Advertisement

Reading and Writing

, Volume 16, Issue 4, pp 263–287 | Cite as

The effects of morphology and word length on the reading of Hebrew nominals

  • Rachel Schiff
Article

Abstract

This article investigated the effects of twospecific Hebrew nominal word structures andword length, on the latency and accuracy ofgrade school children's reading ofwords. For this study, three-, four- and five-letterwords of the feminine nominalderivative structure and the feminine nominalinflectional structure, at three differentgrade levels, were used. The study alsodifferentiated between an additional vocalizedconsonant and the addition of a vowel letter.The participants, 150 native monolingual Hebrewspeakers in grades two, four and six, wereasked to read vocalized nouns. The paperreports and analyzes the differences in thereading of the two morphological structures andword lengths to draw conclusions about theireffects on reading performance. The resultsindicated that inflections took longer to readand elicited more correct responses thanderivations. For derivations with theprogression of grade level, latency becomesshorter and the number of correct responsesincreases. For inflections with the progressionof grade level, latency becomes longer but thenumber of correct responses increases. With theaddition of a consonant at all grade levels,latency becomes longer. For accuracy, therewere differential results for the differentword lengths in the different grades. With theaddition of a vowel letter, accuracy increasedin all the grade levels. Latency, for the twoword lengths, showed differential results inthe different grades. A hypothesis on readingdevelopment is suggested based on the language-specificcharacteristics of Hebrew morphologyand the double vowel system of Hebrew.

Accuracy Consonant Latency Morphology Vowel letter Word length 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Anglin, J.M. (1993). Vocabulary development: A morphological analysis, Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 58(10, Serial No. 238), 1‐187.Google Scholar
  2. Baayen, H. (1991). Quantitative aspects of morphological productivity. In G. Booij & J. Van Marle (Eds.), Yearbook of morphology (pp. 109‐149). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic.Google Scholar
  3. Ben-Dror, I., Bentin, S. & Frost, R. (1995). Semantic, phonologic and morphologic skills in reading disabled and normal children, Reading Research Quarterly, 30, 876‐893.Google Scholar
  4. Berman, R.A. (1997). Preliterate knowledge of language: What five year olds know about language structure and language use. In C. Pontecorvo (Ed.), Writing development: An interdisciplinary view (pp. 61‐76). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
  5. Bolozky, S. (1999). Measuring productivity in word formation: The case of Israeli Hebrew. Leiden, The Netherlands: Brill.Google Scholar
  6. Burani, C. & Laudanna, A. (1992). Units of representation of derived words in the lexicon. In R. Frost and L. Katz (Eds.), Orthography, phonology, morphology and meaning (pp. 361‐ 376). Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
  7. Bybee, J. (1995). Diachronic and typological properties of morphology and their implications for representation. In L.B. Feldman (Ed.), Morphological aspects of language processing (pp. 225‐246). Hillsdale, New Jersey: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  8. Cahana-Amitay, D. & Ravid, D. (2000). Optional bound morphology in the development of text production.Proceedings of the 24th Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development, Vol. 1 (pp. 176‐ 184). Somerville, Massachusetts: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar
  9. Caramazza, A., Laudanna, A. & Romani, C. (1988). Lexical access in inflectional morphology. Cognition, 28, 207‐332.Google Scholar
  10. Carlisle, J. (1995). Morphological awareness and early reading achievement. In L.B. Feldman (Ed.), Morphological aspects of language processing (pp. 189‐209). Hillsdale, New Jersey: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  11. Carlisle, J. (2000). Awareness of the structure and meaning of morphologically complex words: Impact on reading, Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 12, 169‐190.Google Scholar
  12. Carlisle, J. & Nomanbhoy, D. (1993). Phonological and morphological development in first graders, Applied Psycholinguistics, 14, 177‐195.Google Scholar
  13. Choueka, Y. (1995). Corpus of Hebrew word frequency. Unpublished computer data base.Google Scholar
  14. Deutsch, A., Frost, R. & Forster, K.I. (1998). Verbs and nouns are organized differently in the mental lexicon: Evidence from Hebrew, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 24, 1238‐1255.Google Scholar
  15. Ehri, I.C. (1987). Learning to read and spell words, Journal of Reading Behaviour, 19, 5‐31.Google Scholar
  16. Ellis, N.C. (1994). Longitudinal studies of spelling development. In G.D.A. Brown & N.C. Ellis (Eds.), Handbook of spelling: Theory, process and intervention (pp. 155‐178). Chichester, UK: J. Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
  17. Eriksen, C.W., Pollack, M.D. & Montague, W.E. (1970). Implicit speech: Mechanism in perceptual coding, Journal of Experimental Psychology, 84, 502‐507.Google Scholar
  18. Foster, K.I. & Chambers, S. (1973). Lexical access and naming time, Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 12, 627‐635.Google Scholar
  19. Fowler, A.E. & Liberman, I.Y. (1995). Morphological awareness and early reading achievement. In L.B. Feldman (Ed.), Morphological aspects of language processing (pp. 189‐ 210). Hilldale, New Jersey: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  20. Frauenfelder, U.H. & Schreuder, R. (1991). Constraining psycholinguistic models of morphological processing and representation: The role of productivity. In G. Booij & J. Van Marle (Eds.), Yearbook of morphology (pp. 109‐149). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic.Google Scholar
  21. Frith, U. (1985). Beneath the surface of developmental dyslexia. In K.E. Peterson, J.C. Marshall & M. Coltheart (Eds.), Surface dyslexia (pp. 301‐330). Hillsdale, New Jersey: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  22. Frost, R. (1995). Phonological computation and missing vowels:Mapping lexical involvement in reading, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory, and Cognition, 21, 398‐408.Google Scholar
  23. Frost, R. (1998). Toward a strong phonological theory of visual word recognition: True issues and false trails, Psychological Bulletin, 123(1), 71‐99.Google Scholar
  24. Frost, R. & Bentin, S. (1992). Reading consonants and guessing vowels: Visual word recognition in Hebrew orthography. In R. Frost and L. Katz (Eds.), Orthography, phonology, morphology and meaning (pp. 27‐44). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Elsevier.Google Scholar
  25. Frost, R., Forster, K.I. & Deutsch, A. (1997). What can we learn from the morphology of Hebrew: A masked priming investigation of morphological representation, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 23, 829‐856.Google Scholar
  26. Gibson, E.J., Osser, H. & Pick, A.D. (1963). A study of the development of graphemephoneme correspondences. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 2, 142‐146.Google Scholar
  27. Gillis, S.& Ravid, D. (2000). Effects of phonology and morphology in children’s orthographic systems: A cross-linguistic study of Hebrew and Dutch. In E. Clark (Ed.), The Proceedings of the 30th Annual Child Research Forum (pp. 203‐210). Stanford: Center for the Study of Language and Information.Google Scholar
  28. Goswami, U. (1999). The relationship between phonological awareness and orthographic representation in different orthographies. In M. Harris & G. Hatano (Eds.), Learning to read and write: A crosslinguistic perspective (pp. 134‐156). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  29. Goswami, U. & Bryant, P. (1990). Phonological skills and learning to read. Hove, UK: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  30. Gough, P.B. & Stewart, W.C. (1970). Word vs. nonword discrimination latency. Unpublished paper presented at Midwestern Psychological Association.Google Scholar
  31. Henderson, L. (1982). Orthography and word recognition in reading. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  32. Henry, M.K. (1993).Morphological structure: Latin and Greek roots and affixes as upper grade code strategies, Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 5, 227‐241.Google Scholar
  33. Holligman, C. & Johnson, R. (1988). The use of phonological information by good and poor readers in memory and reading tasks, Memory and Cognition, 16, 522‐532.Google Scholar
  34. Jones, K.N. (1991). Development of morphophonemic segments in children's mental representations of words, Applied Psycholinguistics, 12, 217‐239.Google Scholar
  35. Klapp, S.T., Anderson, W.G. & Berrian, R.W. (1973). Implicit speech in reading reconsidered, Journal of Experimental Psychology, 100, 368‐374.Google Scholar
  36. Koriat, A. (1984). Reading without vowels: Lexical access in Hebrew. In H. Bouma & D.G. Bouwhuis (Eds.), Attention and performance, Vol. X (pp. 1‐15). Hillsdale, New Jersey: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  37. Laudanna, A., Badecker, W. & Caramazza, A. (1992). Processing inflectional and derivational morphology, Journal of Memory and Language, 31, 333‐348.Google Scholar
  38. Lefton, L.A. & Spragins, A.B. (1974). Orthographic structure and reading experience effect the transfer from iconic to short term memory, Journal of Experimental Psychology, 103, 775‐781.Google Scholar
  39. Levin I., Ravid, D.& Rappaport, S. (2001).Morphology and spelling among Hebrew-speaking children: From kindergarten to first grade, Journal of Child Language, 28, 741‐772.Google Scholar
  40. Lewis, D. & Windsor, J. (1996). Children's analysis of derivational suffix meanings, Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 39, 209‐216.Google Scholar
  41. Marslen-Wilson, W.D., Tyler, L.K., Waksler, R. & Older, L. (1994). Morphology and meaning in the English mental lexicon, Psychological Review, 101, 3‐33.Google Scholar
  42. Mason, M. (1978). From print to sound in mature readers as a function of reader ability and two forms of orthographic regularity, Memory and Cognition, 6, 568‐581.Google Scholar
  43. Nagy, W.E. & Anderson, R.C. (1984). How many words are there in printed school English? Reading Research Quarterly, 14, 304‐330.Google Scholar
  44. Nagy, W.E. & Herman, P.A. (1987). Breadth and depth of vocabulary knowledge: Implications for acquisition and instruction. In M. McKeown & M. Curtis (Eds.), The nature of vocabulary acquisition (pp. 19‐35). Hillsdale, New Jersey: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  45. Nagy, W., Anderson, R.C., Shimmer, M., Scott, A.J. & Stallman, A.C. (1989). Morphological families and word recognition, Reading Research Quarterly, 24, 262‐274.Google Scholar
  46. Nippold, M.A. (1998). Later language development: The school-age and adolescent years, 2nd Ed. Austin, Texas: PRO-ED.Google Scholar
  47. Norris, P.& Cutler, A. (1988). The relative accessibility of phonemes and syllables, Perception and Psychophysics, 43, 541‐550.Google Scholar
  48. Petberg, J., Dewitz, P. & Samuels, S.J. (1981). The effect of context on the perceptual unit used in word recognition, Journal of Experimental Psychology, 13, 33‐48.Google Scholar
  49. Ravid, D. (1995). Language change in child and adult Hebrew: A psycholinguistic perspective. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  50. Ravid, D. (2001). Learning to spell in Hebrew: Phonological and morphological factors, Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 14, 459‐485.Google Scholar
  51. Ravid, D. & Malenky, A. (2001). Awareness of linear and nonlinear morphology in Hebrew, First Language, 21, 25‐56.Google Scholar
  52. Ravid, D.& Gillis, S. (2002). Teachers' perceptions of spelling patterns and children's spelling errors: A crosslinguistic perspective. In M. Neff, A. Neijt & R. Sproat (Eds.), Consistency in writing systems (pp. 71‐95). Tübingen, Germany: Niemeyer Verlag.Google Scholar
  53. Ravid, D. & Tolchinsky, L. (2002). Developing linguistic literacy: A comprehensive model, Journal of Child Language, 29, 417‐447.Google Scholar
  54. Richardson, J.T.E. (1976). The effect of stimulus attributes upon latency of word recognition, British Journal of Psychology, 67, 315‐325.Google Scholar
  55. Samuels, S.J., LaBerge, D. & Bremer, C.D. (1978). Units of word recognition: Evidence for developmental changes, Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 17, 715‐720.Google Scholar
  56. Santa, C.M. (1976‐1977). Spelling patterns and the development of flexible word recognition strategies, Reading Research Quarterly, 7, 125‐144.Google Scholar
  57. Schreuder, R. & Baayen, R.H. (1995). Modeling morphological processing. In L.B. Feldman (Ed.), Morphological aspects of language processing (pp. 131‐154). Hillsdale, New Jersey: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  58. Schiff, R. (in press). They may look similar, but they are different: Reading two morphological structures of Hebrew nouns. First Language.Google Scholar
  59. Schiff, R. & Ravid, D. (submitted). Vowel representation in written Hebrew: Two competing systems.Google Scholar
  60. Seymour, P.H.K. & Elder, L. (1986). Beginning reading without phonology, Cognitive Neurophychology, 3, 1‐36.Google Scholar
  61. Shimron, J. (1993). The role of vowels in reading: A review of studies of English and Hebrew, Psychological Bulletin, 114, 52‐67.Google Scholar
  62. Shimron, J. (1999). The role of vowels in reading: Beyond word recognition, Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 11, 310‐319.Google Scholar
  63. Snowling, M.J. (1981). Phonemic deficits in developmental dyslexia, Psychological Research, 43, 219‐234.Google Scholar
  64. Stewart, M.L., James, C.T. & Gough, P.B. (1969). Word recognition latency as a function of word length, Paper presented at Midwestern Psychological Association.Google Scholar
  65. Taft, M. (1985). The decoding of words in lexical access: A review of the morphological approach. In D. Bersnan, T.G. Waller & G.E. MacKinnon (Eds.), Reading Research: Advances in Theory and Practice (pp. 83‐125). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  66. Taft, M. (1994). Interactive activation as a framework for understanding morphological processing, Language and Cognitive Processes, 9, 271‐294.Google Scholar
  67. Taft, M. & Foster, K.I. (1975). Lexical storage and retrieval of prefixed words, Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 14, 638‐647.Google Scholar
  68. Treiman, R. (1985). Onsets and rhymes as units of spoken syllables: Evidence from children, Experimental Child Psychology, 39, 161‐181.Google Scholar
  69. Treiman, R. (1993). Beginning to spell. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  70. Treiman, R. & Zukowski, A. (1990). Towards an understanding of English syllabification, Journal of Memory and Language, 29, 66‐85.Google Scholar
  71. Treiman, R., Zukowski, A. & Richmond-Welty, E.D. (1995). What happened to the “n” in sink? Children's spelling of final consonant clusters, Cognition, 55, 1‐38.Google Scholar
  72. Tyler, A. & Nagy, W. (1986). The acquisition of English derivational morphology: Implications for models of the lexicon. Unpublished paper presented at the Milwaukee Morphology Meeting, Fifteenth Annual UWM Linguistics Symposium. Milwaukee, Wisconsin.Google Scholar
  73. Tyler, A. & Nagy, W. (1990). Use of derivational morphology during reading, Cognition, 36, 17‐34.Google Scholar
  74. Wysocki, K. & Jenkins, J.R. (1987). Deriving word meanings through morphological generalization, Reading Research Quarterly, 22, 66‐81.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  • Rachel Schiff
    • 1
  1. 1.Haddad Center for Research in Dyslexia and Reading DisordersBar-Ilan UniversityRamat-GanIsrael

Personalised recommendations