Journal of Happiness Studies

, Volume 4, Issue 1, pp 79–106 | Cite as

Affect Measurement in Experience Sampling Research

Article

Abstract

Experience-sampling studies are used to study the emotional component of subjective well-being (hedonic balance). This manuscript examines conceptual and methodological issues in the measurement of hedonic balance, and it relates aspects of affective experiences (frequency, intensity, and duration) to affective dispositions (extraversion, neuroticism) and life-satisfaction. Aggregates of experience-sampling data are influenced by response styles, but the effect is negligible. Pleasant affects and unpleasant affects show high discriminant validity. Extraversion is more highly related to aspects of pleasant affects than unpleasant affects, and neuroticism is more highly related to aspects of unpleasant affects than pleasant affects. Mean levels (i.e., frequency * intensity) of affects are the aspects that best predict life-satisfaction. The specific item happiness is a better predictor of life-satisfaction than the average of all pleasant affects.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

REFERENCES

  1. Andrews, F.M. and S.B. Withey: 1976, Social Indicators of Well-being: America's Perception of Life Quality (Plenum, New York).Google Scholar
  2. Barrett, L.F.: 1997, ‘The relationships among momentary emotion experiences, personality descriptions, and retrospective ratings of emotion’, Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 23(10), pp. 1100–1110.Google Scholar
  3. Beebe-Center, J.G.: 1932, The psychology of pleasantness and unpleasantness (Van Nostrand, New York).Google Scholar
  4. Brandstaetter, H.: 1983, ‘Emotional responses to other persons in everyday life situations’, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 45(4), pp. 871–883.Google Scholar
  5. Cacioppo, J.T. and G.G. Berntson: 1994, ‘Relationship between attitudes and evaluative space: A critical review, with emphasis on the separability of positive and negative substrates’, Psychological Bulletin 115(3), pp. 401–423.Google Scholar
  6. Carstensen, L.L., M. Pasupathi, U. Mayr and J.R. Nesselroade: 2000, ‘Emotional experience in everyday life across the adult life span’, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 79(4), pp. 644–655.Google Scholar
  7. Costa, P.T. and R.R. McCrae: 1980, ‘Influence of extraversion and neuroticism on subjective well-being: Happy and unhappy people’, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 38(4), pp. 668–678.Google Scholar
  8. Cote, S. and D.S. Moskowitz: 1998, ‘On the dynamic covariation between interpersonal behavior and affect: Prediction from neuroticism, extraversion, and agreeableness’, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 75(4), 1032–1046.Google Scholar
  9. Csikszentmihalyi, M. and R. Larson: 1987, ‘Validity and reliability of the experiencesampling method’, Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease 175(9), pp. 526–536.Google Scholar
  10. Diener, E: 1984, ‘Subjective well-being’, Psychological Bulletin 95(3), pp. 542–575.Google Scholar
  11. Diener, E. and C. Diener: 1996, ‘Most people are happy’, Psychological Science 7(3), pp. 181–185.Google Scholar
  12. Diener, E. and R.A. Emmons: 1984, ‘The independence of positive and negative affect’, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 47(5), pp. 1105–1117.Google Scholar
  13. Diener, E., R.A. Emmons, R.J. Larsen and S. Griffin: 1985, ‘The satisfaction with life scale’, Journal of Personality Assessment 49(1), pp. 71–75.Google Scholar
  14. Diener, E. and R.J. Larsen: 1984, ‘Temporal stability and cross-situational consistency of affective, behavioral, and cognitive responses’, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 47(4), pp. 871–883.Google Scholar
  15. Diener, E., E. Sandvik and W. Pavot: 1991, ‘Happiness is the frequency, not the intensity, of positive versus negative affect’, in F. Strack and M. Argyle (eds), Subjective Well-being: An Interdisciplinary Perspective. International series in experimental social psychology, Vol. 21 (Pergamon Press, Inc, Elmsford, NY, US), pp. 119–139.Google Scholar
  16. Diener, E., E. Sandvik, W. Pavot and D. Gallagher: 1991, ‘Response artifacts in the measurement of subjective well-being’, Social Indicators Research 24(1), pp. 35–56.Google Scholar
  17. Diener, E., H. Smith and F. Fujita: 1995, ‘The personality structure of affect’, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 69(1), pp. 130–141.Google Scholar
  18. Diener, E., E.M. Suh, R.E. Lucas and H.L. Smith: 1999, ‘Subjective well-being: Three decades of progress’, Psychological Bulletin 125(2), pp. 276–302.Google Scholar
  19. Egloff, B: 1998, ‘The independence of positive and negative affect depends on the affect measure’, Personality and Individual Differences 25(6), pp. 1101–1109.Google Scholar
  20. Egloff, B., A. Tausch, C. Kohlmann and H.W. Krohne: 1995, ‘Relationships between time of day, day of the week, and positive mood: Exploring the role of the mood measure’, Motivation and Emotion 19(2), pp. 99–110.Google Scholar
  21. Epstein, S: 1982, ‘A research paradigm for the study of personality and emotions’, Nebraska Symposium on Motivation 1982, pp. 91–154.Google Scholar
  22. Fisher, G.A., D.R. Heise, G.W. Bohrnstedt and J.F. Lucke: 1985, ‘Evidence for extending the circumplex model of personality trait language to self-reported moods’, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 49(1), pp. 233–242.Google Scholar
  23. Flügel, J.C: 1925, ‘A quantitative study of feeling and emotion in everyday life’, British Journal of Psychology 15, pp. 318–355.Google Scholar
  24. Frijda, N.H., A. Ortony, J. Sonnemans and G.L. Clore: 1992, ‘The complexity of intensity: Issues concerning the structure of emotion intensity’, in M.S. Clark (ed.), Emotion. Review of Personality and Social Psychology, No. 13 (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA, US), pp. 60–89.Google Scholar
  25. Goldberg, L: 1997, A broad-bandwith, public domain, personality inventory measuring the lower-level facets of several five-factor models. [Online] available: http://www.ipio.ori.org/ipip/.Google Scholar
  26. Green, D.P., S.L. Goldman and P. Salovey: 1993, ‘Measurement error masks bipolarity in affect ratings’, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 64(6), pp. 1029–1041.Google Scholar
  27. Gross, J.J., S.K. Sutton and T. Ketelaar: 1998, ‘Relations between affect and personality: Support for the affect-level and affective reactivity views’, Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 24(3), pp. 279–288.Google Scholar
  28. Hedges, S.M., L. Jandorf and A.A. Stone: 1985, ‘Meaning of daily mood assessments’, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 48(2), pp. 428–434.Google Scholar
  29. Hormuth, S.E: 1986, ‘The sampling of experiences in situ’, Journal of Personality 54(1), pp. 262–293.Google Scholar
  30. Izard, C.E., D.Z. Libero, P. Putnam and O.M. Haynes: 1993, ‘Stability of emotion experiences and their relations to traits of personality’, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 64(5), pp. 847–860.Google Scholar
  31. Kahneman, D., E. Diener and N. Schwarz: (eds) 1999, Well-being: The Foundations of Hedonic Psychology (Russell Sage Foundation, New York, NY, US).Google Scholar
  32. Kennedy-Moore, E., M.A. Greenberg, M.G. Newman and A.A. Stone: 1992, ‘The relationship between daily events and mood: The mood measure may matter’, Motivation and Emotion 16(2), pp. 143–155.Google Scholar
  33. Larsen, J.T., A.P. McGraw and J.T. Cacioppo: 2001, ‘Can people feel happy and sad at the same time?’ Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 81(4), pp. 684–696.Google Scholar
  34. Larsen, R.J. and E. Diener: 1987, ‘Affect intensity as an individual difference characteristic: A review’, Journal of Research in Personality 21(1), pp. 1–39.Google Scholar
  35. Larsen, R.J. and T. Ketelaar: 1991, ‘Personality and susceptibility to positive and negative emotional states’, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 61(1), pp. 132–140.Google Scholar
  36. Larson, R. and M. Csikszentmihalyi: 1983, ‘The experience sampling method’, New Directions for Methodology of Social and Behavioral Science 15(Mar.).Google Scholar
  37. McAdams, D.P. and C.A. Constantian: 1983, ‘Intimacy and affiliation motives in daily living: An experience sampling analysis’, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 45(4), pp. 851–861.Google Scholar
  38. Meddis, R: 1972, ‘Bipolar factors in mood adjective checklists’, British Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology 11(2), pp. 178–184.Google Scholar
  39. Moscowitz, D.S. and S. Cote: 1995, ‘Do interpersonal traits predict affect? A comparison of three models’, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 69(5), pp. 915–924.Google Scholar
  40. Nowlis, V: 1965, ‘Research with the mood adjective check list’, in Affect, Cognition, and Personality: Empirical Studies (Springer, New York), pp. 352–389.Google Scholar
  41. Oatley, K. and E. Duncan: 1994, ‘The experience of emotions in everyday life’, Cognition and Emotion 8(4), pp. 369–381.Google Scholar
  42. Oishi, S., U. Schimmack and E. Diener: 2001, ‘Pleasures and subjective well-being’, European Journal of Personality 15, pp. 153–167.Google Scholar
  43. Parkinson, B., R.B. Briner, S. Reynolds and P. Totterdell: 1995, ‘Time frames for mood: Relations between monetary and generalized ratings of affect’, Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 21(4), pp. 331–339.Google Scholar
  44. Rorer, L.G: 1965, ‘The great response-style myth’, Psychological Bulletin 63(3), pp. 129–156.Google Scholar
  45. Schimmack, U: 2001, ‘Pleasure, displeasure, and mixed feelings: Are semantic opposites mutually exclusive?’ Cognition and Emotion 15(1), pp. 81–97.Google Scholar
  46. Schimmack, U: (in press). ‘Frequency judgments of emotions: The cognitive basis of personality assessment’, in P. Sedelmeier and T. Betsch (eds), Frequency Processing and Cognition (Oxford University Press, Oxford).Google Scholar
  47. Schimmack, U: 1997, ‘The Berlin everyday language mood inventory (BELMI): Toward the content valid assessment of moods’, Diagnostica 43(2), pp. 150–173.Google Scholar
  48. Schimmack, U. and E. Diener: 1997, ‘Affect intensity: Separating intensity and frequency in repeatedly measured affect’, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 73(6), pp. 1313–1329.Google Scholar
  49. Schimmack, U. and A. Grob: 2000, ‘Dimensional models of core affect: A quantitative comparison by means of structural equation modeling’, European Journal of Personality 14(4), pp. 325–345.Google Scholar
  50. Schimmack, U., S. Oishi, E. Diener and E. Suh: 2000, ‘Facets of affective experiences: A framework for investigations of trait affect’, Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 26(6), pp. 655–668.Google Scholar
  51. Schimmack, U., U. Bockenholt and R. Reisenzein: 2002, ‘Response styles in affect ratings: Making a mountain out of a molehill’, Journal of Personality Assessment 78, pp. 461–483.Google Scholar
  52. Schimmack, U., E. Diener and S. Oishi: 2002, ‘Life-satisfaction is a momentary judgment and a stable personality characteristic: The use of chronically accessible and stable sources’, Journal of Personality 70, pp. 345–385.Google Scholar
  53. Schimmack, U., P. Radhakrishnan, S. Oishi, V. Dzokoto and S. Ahadi: 2002, ‘Culture, personality, and subjective well-being: Integrating process models of life-satisfaction’, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 82, pp. 1313–1329.Google Scholar
  54. Schwarz, N., B. Knäuper, H. Hippler, E. Noelle-Neumann and F. Clark: 1991, ‘Rating scales: Numeric values may change the meaning of scale labels’, Public Opinion Quarterly 55(4), pp. 570–582.Google Scholar
  55. Shapiro, D., L.D. Jamner, I.B. Goldstein and R.J. Delfino: 2001, ‘Striking a chord: Moods, blood pressure, and heart rate in everyday life’, Psychophysiology 38(2), pp. 197–204.Google Scholar
  56. Shaver, P., J. Schwartz, D. Kirson and C. O'Connor: 1987, ‘Emotion knowledge: Further exploration of a prototype approach’, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 52(6), pp. 1061–1086.Google Scholar
  57. Stone, A.A. and J.M. Neale: 1984, ‘New measure of daily coping: Development and preliminary results’, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 46(4), pp. 892–906.Google Scholar
  58. Suh, E., E. Diener, S. Oishi and H.C. Triandis: 1998, ‘The shifting basis of life satisfaction judgments across cultures: Emotions versus norms’, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 74(2), pp. 482–493.Google Scholar
  59. Svensson, E: 1977, ‘Response format and factor structure in mood adjective check lists’, Scandinavian Journal of Psychology 18(1), pp. 71–78.Google Scholar
  60. Thomas, D.L. and E. Diener: 1990, ‘Memory accuracy in the recall of emotions’, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 59(2), 291–297.Google Scholar
  61. Watson, D: 1988, ‘The vicissitudes of mood measurement: Effects of varying descriptors, time frames, and response formats on measures of positive and negative affect’, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 55(1), pp. 128–141.Google Scholar
  62. Watson, D. and L.A. Clark: 1992, ‘On traits and temperament: General and specific factors of emotional experience and their relation to the five-factor model’, Journal of Personality 60(2), pp. 441–476.Google Scholar
  63. Watson, D. and L.A. Clark: 1991, ‘Self-versus peer ratings of specific emotional traits: Evidence of convergent and discriminant validity’, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 60(6), pp. 927–940.Google Scholar
  64. Watson, D., L.A. Clark and A. Tellegen: 1988, ‘Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales’, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 54(6), pp. 1063–1070.Google Scholar
  65. Watson, D., L.A. Clark and A. Tellegen: 1984, ‘Cross-cultural convergence in the structure of mood: A Japanese replication and a comparison with U.S. findings’, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 47(1), pp. 127–144.Google Scholar
  66. Watson, D. and L.A. Clark: 1997, ‘Measurement and mismeasurement of mood: Recurrent and emergent issues’, Journal of Personality Assessment 68(2), pp. 267–296.Google Scholar
  67. Winkielman, P., B. Knäuper and N. Schwarz: 1998, ‘Looking back at anger: Reference periods change the interpretation of (emotion) frequency questions’, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 75, pp. 719–728.Google Scholar
  68. Zelenski, J.M. and R.J. Larsen: 2000, ‘The distribution of basic emotions in everyday life: A state and trait perspective from experience sampling data’, Journal of Research in Personality 34(2), pp. 178–197.Google Scholar
  69. Zevon, M.A. and A. Tellegen: 1982, ‘The structure of mood change: An idiographic/ nomothetic analysis’, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 43(1), pp. 111–122.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PsychologyUniversity of Toronto, MississaugaMississaugaCanada

Personalised recommendations