Journal of Science Teacher Education

, Volume 14, Issue 2, pp 97–126

Preparing More Confident Preservice Elementary Science Teachers: One Elementary Science Methods Teacher's Self-Study

  • Diana C. Rice
  • Anita Roychoudhury


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Abell, S.K., & Bryan, L.A. (1997). Reconceptualizing the elementary science methods course using a reflection orientation. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 8, 153–166.Google Scholar
  2. Appleton, K. (1995). Student teachers' confidence to teach science: Is more science knowledge necessary to improve self-confidence? International Journal of Science Education, l7, 357–369.Google Scholar
  3. Ashton, P. (1984). Teacher efficacy: A motivational paradigm for effective teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education, 35, 28–32.Google Scholar
  4. Ballou, M. (1969, September). Science methods courses for elementary teachers. Science and Children,7, 7–9.Google Scholar
  5. Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84, 191–215.Google Scholar
  6. Barman, C., & Shedd, J.D. (1992). An inservice program designed to introduce K-6 teachers to the learning cycle teaching approach. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 3, 58–64.Google Scholar
  7. Barrow, L. H. (1985). Professional preparation and responsibilities of New England preservice elementary science methods faculty. Science Education, 71, 557–564.Google Scholar
  8. Beane, D.B. (1988). Mathematics and science: Critical filters for the future of minority students. Washington, DC: The Mid-Atlantic Equity Center, The American University.Google Scholar
  9. Blosser, P.E., & Howe, R.W. (1969, January/February). An analysis of research on elementary teacher education related to the teaching of science. Science and Children, 50–60.Google Scholar
  10. Bohning, G., & Hale, L. (1998). Images of self-confidence and the change of career prospective elementary science teacher. Journal of Elementary Science Education, 10, 39–59.Google Scholar
  11. Boone, W.J. (1993). Preservice elementary teachers' views toward a science methods curriculum. Journal of Elementary Science Education, 5(2), 37–51.Google Scholar
  12. Butts, D.P., Koballa, T.R., Jr., & Elliott, T.D. (1997). Does participating in an undcrgraduate elementary science methods course make a difference? Journal of Elementary Science Education, 9(2), 1–17.Google Scholar
  13. Carr, W., & Kemmis, S. (1986). Becoming critical: Education, knowledge and action research. Philadelphia, PA: The Falmer Press, Taylor & Francis, Inc.Google Scholar
  14. Cronin-Jones, L., & Shaw, E. (1992). Influence of methods instruction on the beliefs of' preservice elementary and secondary science teachers: Preliminary comparative analyses. School Science and Mathematics, 92, 14–22.Google Scholar
  15. Czerniak, C., & Shriver, M. (1994). An examination of preservice science teachers' beliefs and behaviors as related to self-efficacy. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 5(3), 77–86.Google Scholar
  16. Dana, T.M., Campbell, L.M., & Lunetta, V.N. (1997). Theoretical bases for reform of science teacher education. The Elementary School Journal, 9, 419–432.Google Scholar
  17. Duschl, R. (1983). The elementary level science methods course: Breeding ground of an apprehension toward science? a case study. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 20, 745–754.Google Scholar
  18. Enochs, L.G., & Riggs, LM. (1990). Further development of an elementary science teaching efficacy belief instrument: A preservice elementary scale. School Science and Mathematics, 90, 694–706.Google Scholar
  19. Enochs, L., Scharmann, L., & Riggs, I. (1995). Relationship of pupil control to preservice elementary science teacher self-efficacy and outcome expectancy. Science Education, 79, 63–75.Google Scholar
  20. French, M.J. (1995). Exploring empowering strategies for teaching elementary science methods. Teacher Education and Practice, 11(1), 82–98.Google Scholar
  21. Ginns, I., Watters, J., Tulip, D., & Lucas, K. (1995). Changes inpreservice elementary teachers' sense of efficacy in teaching science. School Science and Mathematics, 95, 394–400.Google Scholar
  22. Glasgow, D.R. (1983, May). What research says: Identifying the "real" elementary science curriculum. Science and Children, 56–59.Google Scholar
  23. Harlen, W. (1997). Primary teachers' understanding in science and its impact in the classroom. Research in Science Education, 27, 323–337.Google Scholar
  24. Hone, E., & Carswell, E.M. (1969, January/February). Elements of successful inservice education. Science and Children, 24–26.Google Scholar
  25. Huinker, D., & Madison, S. (1997). Preparing efficacious elementary teachers in science and mathematics: The influence of methods courses. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 8, 107–126.Google Scholar
  26. Jarrett, O. (1999, Spring). Science interest and confidence among preservice elementary teachers. Journal of Elementary Science Education, 11(1), 47–57.Google Scholar
  27. Koballa, T. R., Jr., & Crawley, F.E. (1985). The influence of attitude on science teaching and learning, School Science and Mathematics, 85, 222–232.Google Scholar
  28. Koballa, T. R., Jr. & French, J. (1995, Spring). Dilemmas, decisions, and recommendations: Personal empowerment in an elementary science methods course. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 6, 61–70.Google Scholar
  29. Lincoln, Y. & Guba, E. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  30. Lawrenz, E. & Cohen, H. (1985). The effect of methods classes and practice teaching on student attitudes toward science and knowledge of science processes. Science Education, 69, 105–113.Google Scholar
  31. Marek, E.A., & Cavallo, A.M.L. (1997). The learning cycle: Elementary science and beyond. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.Google Scholar
  32. Martin, R.E., Jr. (1985). Is the credibility principle a model for changing science attitudes? Science Education, 69, 229–239.Google Scholar
  33. McKernan, J. (1991). Curriculum action research. London: Kogan Page Limited.Google Scholar
  34. Miles, M., & Huberman, A.M. (1994). An expanded sourcebook: Qualitative data analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  35. Morrisey, J.T. (1981). An analysis of studies on changing the attitude of elementary student teachers toward science and science teaching. Science Education, 65, 157–177.Google Scholar
  36. Mulholland, J., & Wallace, J. (1996). Breaking the cycle: Preparing elementary teachers to teach science. Journal of Elementary Science Education, 8(1), 17–38.Google Scholar
  37. Newman, W.J., Jr., Hubbard, P.D., & Abell, S.K. (2001). A comparison of science content and pedagogy discourse in elementary science methods. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, St. Louis, MO, March 25–28.Google Scholar
  38. O'Sullivan, C.Y., Weiss, A. R., &Askew, J.M. (1998). Students learning science: A report on policies and practices in U.S.schools. Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics.Google Scholar
  39. Parker, J., & Spink, E. (1997). Becoming science teachers: An evaluation of the initial stages of primary teacher training. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 22, 17–31.Google Scholar
  40. Paulsen, M.B., & Feldman, K.A. (1995). Taking teaching seriously: Meeting the challenge of instructional improvement. Washington, DC: The George Washington University.Google Scholar
  41. Pratt, H. (1981). Science education in the elementary school. In N.C. Harms & R.E. Yager (Eds.). What research says to the science teacher (Volume 3), 73–93. Washington, DC: National Science Teachers Association.Google Scholar
  42. Raizen, S.A., & Michelsohn, A.M. (Eds.) (1994). Thefuture of science in elementary schools: Educating prospective teachers. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass Publishers.Google Scholar
  43. Ramey-Gassert, L., & Shroyer, G. (1992). Enhancing science teaching self efficacy in presemice elementary teachers. Journal of Elementary Science Education, 4(1), 26–34.Google Scholar
  44. Rarney-Gassert, L., Shroyer, G., & Staver, J. (1996). A qualitative study of factors influencing science teaching self-efficacy of elementary level teachers. Science Education 80, 283–315.Google Scholar
  45. Rice, D. (2001). Life to space science: Do elementary science teachers know the basics?” Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, St. Louis, MO, March 25–28.Google Scholar
  46. Riggs, I.M., & Enochs, L.G. (1990). Toward development of an elementary teachcr's science teaching efficacy belief instrument. Science Education, 74, 625–637.Google Scholar
  47. Rowe, M.B. (1980, September). What research says: Elementary science: A vanishing species. Science and Children, 19–21.Google Scholar
  48. Scharmann, L.C., & Orth Hampton, C.M. (1995). Cooperative learning andpreservice elementary teacher science self-efficacy. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 6, 125–133.Google Scholar
  49. Schoon, K.J., & Boone, W.J. (1998). Self-efficacy and alternative conceptions of science of preservice elemcnhry teachers. Science Education, 82, 553–568.Google Scholar
  50. Shrigley, R. (1974). The attitude of preservice elementary teachers toward science. School Science and Mathematics, 74, 243–250.Google Scholar
  51. Shrigley, R. (1976). Credibility of the elementary science methods course instructor as perceived by students: A model for attitude modification. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 13, 449–453.Google Scholar
  52. Shrigley, R. (1990). Attitude and behavior are correlates. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 27, 97–113.Google Scholar
  53. Stefanich, G.P. (1992). Reflections on elementary school science. Journal of Elementary Science Education, 4(2), 13–22.Google Scholar
  54. Tilgner, P.J. (1990). Avoiding science in the elementary school. Science Education, 74, 421–431.Google Scholar
  55. U.S. Department of Education. (2000). Before it's too late: A report to the nation from the national commission on mathematics and science teaching for the 21st century. Washington, DC: author.Google Scholar
  56. Vannan, D.A. (1969). Food for thought. Science and Children, September, 10–11.Google Scholar
  57. Watters, J., & Ginns, I. (1995). Origins of, and changes in preservice teachers' science teaching efficacy. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 383570).Google Scholar
  58. Watters, J., & Ginns, I. (1997). Impact of course and program design features on the preparation of preservice elementary science teachers. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 408267).Google Scholar
  59. Watters, J., Ginns, I., Newrnann, P., & Schweitzer, R. (1994). Enhancing preservice teacher education students sense of science teaching self efficacy. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Australian Teacher Education Association, Brisbane, July 4, 1994. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 375141).Google Scholar
  60. Weiss, I.R. (1978). Report of the 1977 national survey of science, mathematics and social studies education. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
  61. Weiss, I. R. (1994). A profile of science and mathematics education in the United States: 1993. Chapel Hill, NC: Horizon Research, Inc.Google Scholar
  62. Weiss, I.R. (1997). The status of science and mathematics teaching in the United States: Comparing teacher views and classroom practice to national standards. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 411158).Google Scholar
  63. Wenner, G. (1993). Relationship between science knowledge levels and beliefs toward science instruction held by preservice elementary reachers. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 2, 461–468.Google Scholar
  64. Wenner, G. (1995). Science knowledge and efficacy beliefs among preservice elementary teachers: A follow-up study. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 4, 307–315.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  • Diana C. Rice
    • 1
  • Anita Roychoudhury
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Elementary and Early Childhood EducationThe Florida State UniversityTallahasseeU.S.A
  2. 2.Department of Mathematics, Science, and TechnologyThe Ohio State UniversityColumbusU.S.A

Personalised recommendations