Advertisement

Wireless Networks

, Volume 9, Issue 4, pp 341–352 | Cite as

Quality of Service and Mobility for the Wireless Internet

  • J. Antonio Garcıa-Macıas
  • Franck Rousseau
  • Gilles Berger-Sabbatel
  • Leyla Toumi
  • Andrzej Duda
Article

Abstract

Our paper explores the issue of how to provide appropriate quality of service mechanisms closely integrated with flexible mobility management in wireless local area networks. We consider them as access networks of choice for the high performance Wireless Mobile Internet. We present a hierarchical QoS architecture that extends Differentiated Services (DiffServ) to mobile hosts in a wireless environment. Our approach is based on controlling several parameters of a wireless LAN cell: the limited geographical span to ensure the same high bit rate for all hosts, the constrained rate of traffic sources to limit the use of the channel in function of the required QoS and the limited number of active hosts to keep the load sufficiently low. The QoS management is coupled with mobility management at the IP level. We use a micro-mobility scheme implemented in the IPv6 layer with fast hand-offs between adjacent cells. Micro-mobility avoids address translation, traffic tunneling, and enables fast hand-offs. We give some details of experiments to show the quality of service differentiation over the 802.11b network.

QoS support in wireless access networks micro-mobility management mechanisms differentiated services DiffServ 802.11 WLAN IPv6 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. [1]
    I. Aad and C. Castellucia, Differentiation mechanisms for IEEE 802.11, in: INFOCOM (2001).Google Scholar
  2. [2]
    ANSI/IEEE, 802.11: Wireless LAN Medium Access Control (MAC) and Physical Layer (PHY) specifications (2000).Google Scholar
  3. [3]
    M. Barry et al., Distributed control algorithms for service differentiation in wireless packet networks, in: INFOCOM (2001).Google Scholar
  4. [4]
    G. Bianchi, Performance analysis of the IEEE 802.11 Distributed Coordination Function, JSAC Wireless Series 18(3) (2000).Google Scholar
  5. [5]
    S. Blake et al., An architecture for Differentiated Services, Internet RFC 2475 (1998).Google Scholar
  6. [6]
    T. Bonald et al., Analytic evaluation of RED performance, in: INFOCOM' 2000 (March 2000) pp. 1415-1424.Google Scholar
  7. [7]
    R. Braden et al., Integrated Services in the Internet architecture: an overview, Internet RFC 1633 (1994).Google Scholar
  8. [8]
    F. Cali, M. Conti and E. Gregori, IEEE 802.11 wireless LAN: Capacity analysis and Protocol enhancement, in: INFOCOM (1998).Google Scholar
  9. [9]
    A.T. Campbell et al., An overview of cellular IP, in: IEEE Wireless Communications and Networks Conference, WCNC (1999) pp. 606-611.Google Scholar
  10. [10]
    D. Chalmers et al., A survey of Quality of Service in mobile computing environments, IEEE Online Communication Surveys 2(2) (1999).Google Scholar
  11. [11]
    J. Chan et al., The challenges of provisioning real-time services in wireless Internet, Telecommunications Journal of Australia 50(3) (2000).Google Scholar
  12. [12]
    A. Helal et al., Towards integrating wireless LANs with wirelessWANs using mobile IP, in: IEEE Wireless Communications and Networks Conference, WCNC (2000).Google Scholar
  13. [13]
    @IRS, Integrated architecture for networks and services, RNRT Project (2001), http://www/rp.lip6.fr/airs/Google Scholar
  14. [14]
    S. Lee and A.T. Campbell, INSIGNIA: in-band signaling support for QOS in mobile ad hoc networks, in: Mobile Multimedia Communications, MoMuC (1998).Google Scholar
  15. [15]
    A. Lindgren et al., Evaluation of Quality of Service schemes for IEEE 802.11 wireless LANs, in: Proceedings of the 26th Annual IEEE Conference on Local Computer Networks (LCN 2001) (November 2001).Google Scholar
  16. [16]
    A. Lindgren et al., Quality of Service schemes for IEEE 802.11 - a simulation study, in: Proceedings of the Ninth International Workshop on Quality of Service (IWQoS 2001) (June 2001).Google Scholar
  17. [17]
    D. Mitzel, Overview of 2000 IABWireless Internetworking Workshop, Internet RFC 3002 (2000).Google Scholar
  18. [18]
    S. Mukkamalla and B. Raman, Latency and scaling issues in mobile IP, ICEBERG Technical Report (2001).Google Scholar
  19. [19]
    C.E. Perkins, Mobile IP specification, Internet RFC 2002 (1996).Google Scholar
  20. [20]
    C.E. Perkins and D.B. Johnson, Mobility support in IPv6, in: Mobile Computing and Networking (1996) pp. 27-37.Google Scholar
  21. [21]
    R. Ramjee et al., HAWAII: a domain-based approach for supporting mobility in wide-area wireless networks, in: IEEE Internat. Conf. Network Protocols (1999).Google Scholar
  22. [22]
    A. Valko, Cellular IP - a new approach to Internet host mobility, ACM Computer Communication Review (1999).Google Scholar
  23. [23]
    J. Weinmiller et al., Performance study of access control in wireless LANs - IEEE 802.11 DFWMAC and ETSI RES 10 HIPERLAN, Mobile Networks and Applications 2(1) (1997) 55-67.Google Scholar
  24. [24]
    B. Zhang et al., WF2Q: Worst-case fair weighted fair queueing, in: INFOCOM 96 (1996).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  • J. Antonio Garcıa-Macıas
    • 1
  • Franck Rousseau
    • 1
  • Gilles Berger-Sabbatel
    • 1
  • Leyla Toumi
    • 1
  • Andrzej Duda
    • 1
  1. 1.LSR-IMAG Laboratory, CNRS andInstitut National Polytechnique de GrenobleGrenobleFrance

Personalised recommendations