Critical Impact Assessment of Organic Agriculture

  • Xie Biao
  • Wang Xiaorong
  • Ding Zhuhong
  • Yang Yaping
Article
  • 374 Downloads

Abstract

Based on its productionguideline, organic agriculture has set foritself the goals of minimizing all forms ofpollution and maintaining sustainability of thefarming system. By striving for these goals,organic farming meets the demands of anincreasing number of consumers who are criticalof conventional production methods. This papergives an overview of the present state of theart in the different issues. Possibilities ofand limitations in performing the self-aimedgoals under the basic standards of organicagriculture are discussed. Concerningenvironmental protection, in general, the riskof adverse environmental effects is lower withorganic than with conventional farming methods,though not necessarily so; with reference tosoil fertility and nutrient management, organicfarming is suited to improve soil fertility andnutrient management markedly on the farm level;regarding biodiversity, comparison studies showthat organic farming has more positive effectson biodiversity conservation; in relation toproduct quality, under the basic standards oforganic farming, there is no sufficientevidence for a system-related effect on productquality due to the production method.

biodiversity environmentally friendly production nutrient management organic agriculture product quality soil fertility 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

REFERENCES

  1. Adam, D., “Nutritionists Question Study of Organic Food,” Nature 412 (2001), 666.Google Scholar
  2. Albrecht, H. and A. Mattheis, “The Effect of Organic and Integrated Farming on Rare Arable Weeds on the Forschungsverbund Agrarokosysteme Munchen (FAM) Research Station in Southern Bavaria,” Biological Conservation 86 (1998), 347–356.Google Scholar
  3. Alrøe, H. F., M. Vaarst, and E. S. Kristensen, “Does Organic Farming Face Distinctive LivestockWelfare Issues? A Conceptual Analysis,” Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 14 (2001), 275–299.Google Scholar
  4. Axelsen, J. A. A. and S. Elmholt, Scenarium om 100% økologisk jordbrug i Danmark, A3.4, Jordbundens biologi, Rapport for Bichel-Udvalget (1998).Google Scholar
  5. Bossio, D. A. and K. M. Scow, “Impact of Carbon and Flooding on PLFA Profiles and Substrate Utilization Patterns of Soil Microbial Communities,” Microbial Ecology 35 (1998), 265–278.Google Scholar
  6. Braae, L., H. Nøhr, and B. S. Petersen, Fuglefaunaen påkonventionelle of økologiske landbrug, Miljøprojekt 102 (Danish Environmental Projection Agency, Copenhagen, 1988).Google Scholar
  7. Brady, N. C. and R. R. Weil, The Nature and Properties of Soils, 12th edn. (Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, New Jersey, 1999), pp. 468–469.Google Scholar
  8. Cederberg, C. and B. Mattsson, “Life Cycle Assessment of Milk Production — a Comparison of Conventional and Organic Farming,” Journal of Cleaner Production 8 (2000), 49–60.Google Scholar
  9. Chamberlain, D. E., J. D. Wilson, and R. J. Fuller, “A Comparison of Bird Populations on Organic and Conventional Farm Systems in Southern Britain,” Biological Conservation 88 (1999), 307–320.Google Scholar
  10. Cobb, D. R., Feber, A. Hopkins, L. Stockdale, T. O'Riordan, B. Clements, L. Firbank, K. Goulding, S. Jarvis, and D. Macdonald, “Integrating the Environmental and Economic Consequences of Converting to Organic Agriculture: Evidence from a Case Study,” Land Use Policy 16 (1999), 207–221.Google Scholar
  11. Dalgaard, T., N. Halberg, and I. S. Kristensen, “Can Organic Farming Help to Reduce N-Losses? Experiences from Denmark,” Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystem 52 (1998), 277–287.Google Scholar
  12. Dalgaard, T., N. Halberg, and J. R. Porter, “A Model for Fossil Energy use in Danish Agriculture Used to Compare Organic and Conventional Farming,” Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 87 (2001), 51–65.Google Scholar
  13. Drinkwater, L. E., P. Wagoner, and M. Sarrantonio, “Legume-Based Cropping Systems have Reduced Carbon and Nitrogen Losses,” Nature 396 (1998), 262–265.Google Scholar
  14. Duden, R., “Image ans Qualitat von Tomaten,” Gordian 6 (1987), 118–119.Google Scholar
  15. Edwards, J. G. and O. Howells, “The Origin and Hazard of Inputs to Crop Protection in Organic Farming Systems: Are They Sustainable?” Agricultural Systems 67 (2001), 31–47.Google Scholar
  16. Eltun, R., “Comparisons of Nitrogen Leaching in Ecological and Conventional Cropping Systems, Nitrogen Leaching in Ecological Agriculture,” A B Academic Publishers (1995), 103–114.Google Scholar
  17. Eltun, R., “The Apelsvoll Cropping System Experiment, III. Yield and Grain Quality of Cereals,” Norwegian J. Agric. Sci. 10 (1996), 7–21.Google Scholar
  18. Evers, A.M., “Effects of Different Fertilization Practices on Growth, Yield and DryMatter Content of Carrot,” J. Agric. Sci. Finland 60 (1989a), 135–152.Google Scholar
  19. Evers, A. M., “Effects of Different Fertilization Practices on the Carotene Content of Carrot,” J. Agric. Sci. Finland 61 (1989b), 7–14.Google Scholar
  20. Evers, A. M., “Effects of Different Fertilization Practices on the Glucose, Fructose, Sucrose, Taste and Texture of Carrot,” J. Agric. Sci. Finland 61 (1989c), 113–122.Google Scholar
  21. Feber, R. E., L. G. Firbank, P. J. Johnson, and D. W. Macdonald, “The Effects of Organic Farming on Pest and Non-Pest Butterfly Abundance,” Agric. Ecosyst. Envir. 64 (1997), 133–139.Google Scholar
  22. Feber, R. E., J. Bell, P. J. Johnson, L. G. Firbank, and D. W. Macdonald, “The Effects of Organic Farming on Surface-Active Spider (Araneae) Assemblages in Wheat in Southern England, UK,” Journal of Arachnology 26 (1998), 190–202.Google Scholar
  23. Freese, L., R. Friedrich, D. Kendall, and S. Tanner, “Variability of Deoxynivalenol Measurements in Barley,” Journal of AOAC International 83 (2000), 1259–1263.Google Scholar
  24. Gunapala, N. and K. M. Scow, “Dynamics of Soil Microbial Biomass and Activity in Conventional and Organic Farming Systems,” Soil Biology and Biochemistry 30 (1998), 805–816.Google Scholar
  25. Haas, G., F. Wetterich, and U. Köpke, “Comparing Intensive, Extensified and Organic Grassland Farming in Southern Germany by Process Life Cycle Assessment,” Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 83 (2001), 43–53.Google Scholar
  26. Hald, A. B. and J. Reddersen, Fugleføde i kornmarker — insekter og vilde planter, Miljøprojekt 125 (Miljøstyrelsen, Kbh, 1990).Google Scholar
  27. Hansen, B., H. F. Alrøe, and E. S. Kristensen, “Approaches to Assess the Environmental Impact of Organic Farming with Particular Regard to Denmark,” Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 83 (2001), 11–26.Google Scholar
  28. Hansen, H., “Comparison of Chemical Composition and Taste of Biodynamically and Conventionally Grown Vegetables,” Qualitas Plantarium. Plant Foods Human Nutrit. 30 (1981), 203–211.Google Scholar
  29. House of Lords Select Committee on European Communities (HLSCEC), 16th Report: Organic Farming and European Union (HMSO, London, 1999).Google Scholar
  30. Hodtke, M., P. A. Araujo, U. Kopke, and D. L. Almeida, “Nutritional Status, Grain Yield and N-Balance of Organically Grown Maize Intercropped with Green Manure,” in D. Foguelman and W. Lockeretz (eds.), Organic Agriculture — the Credible Solution for the XXIst Century: Proceedings of the 12th International IFOAMScientific Conference, Mar del Plata, Argentinien (1998), pp. 135–141.Google Scholar
  31. International Federation of Organic Agriculture Movements (IFOAM), Basic Standards for Organic Production and Processing (Fa. Werbedruck, Germany, 2000).Google Scholar
  32. Isart, J. and J. J. Llerena (eds.), Biodiversity and Land Use: The Role of Organic Farming. Proceedings of the First ENOF Workshop (Barcelona, 1996).Google Scholar
  33. Jackson, L. E. (ed.), Ecology in Agriculture (Academic, San Diego, 1997).Google Scholar
  34. Kirchmann, H., “Losses, Plant Uptake and Utilisation of Manure Nitrogen During a Production Cycle,” Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica Supplementum 24 (1985), 77.Google Scholar
  35. Kirchmann, H., “Biological Dynamic Farming — an Occult Form of Agriculture?” J. Agricult. Environ. Ethics 7 (1994), 173–187.Google Scholar
  36. Kirchmann, H., M. Esala, J. Morken, M. Ferm, W. Bussing, J. Gustavsson, and C. Jakobsson, “Ammonia Emissions from Agriculture,” Nutrient Cycling Agroecosyst 51 (1998), 1–3.Google Scholar
  37. Kirchmann, H. and G. Thorvaldsson, “Challenging Targets for Future Agriculture,” Eur. J. Agron. 12 (2000), 145–161.Google Scholar
  38. Kleijn, D., F. Berendse, R. Smit, and N. Gilissen, “Agri-Environmental Schemes do not Effectively Protect Biodiversity in Dutch Agricultural Landscapes,” Nature 413 (2001), 723–725.Google Scholar
  39. Koepf, H. H., W. Schaumann, and B. D. Pettersson, Biologische Landwirtschaft (Verlag Eugen Ulmer, Suttgart, Germany, 1976).Google Scholar
  40. Krebs, J. R., J. D. Wilson, R. B. Bradbury, and G. M. Siriwardena, “The Second Silent Spring?” Nature 400 (1999), 611–612.Google Scholar
  41. Kristensen, S. P.,J. Mathiasen, J. Lassen, H. B. Madsen, and A. Reenberg, “A Comparison of the Leachable Inorganic Nitrogen Content in Organic and Conventional Farming Systems,” Acta Agric. Scand. Sect. B: Soil Plant Sci. 44 (1994), 19–27.Google Scholar
  42. Lampkin, N., Organic Farming (Farming Press Books, Ipswitch, 1990).Google Scholar
  43. Lampkin, N., “Opportunities for Profit from Organic Farming,” Paper presented to the RASE Conference: Organic Farming — Science into Practice (Royal Agricultural Society of England, Stoneleigh, 1997).Google Scholar
  44. Lindner, U., “Alterrativer Anbau — Alternative im Erwerbsgemusebau?” Gemuse 21 (1985),412–418.Google Scholar
  45. Lockie, S., K. Lyons, and G. Lawrence, “Constructing ‘Green’ Foods: Corporate Capital, Risk, and Organic Farming in Australia and New Zealand,” Agriculture and Human Values 17 (2000), 315–322.Google Scholar
  46. Lovejoy, S. B., Are Organic Foods Safer? http://www.inetport.com/~texasbot/lovejy.htm (1994).Google Scholar
  47. Lundquist, E. J., K. M. Scow, L. E. Jackson, S. L. Uesugi, and C. R. Johnson, “Rapid Response of Soil Microbial Communities from Conventional, Low Input, and Organic Farming Systems to a Wet/Dry Cycle,” Soil Biology and Biochemistry 31(1999), 1661–1675.Google Scholar
  48. Mander, U., M. Mikk, and M. Kulvik, “Ecological and Low Intensity Agriculture as Contributors to Landscape and Biological Diversity,” Landscape and Urban Planning 46 (1999), 169–177.Google Scholar
  49. Martinson, K., “Eight years of Ecological and Conventional Farming at Ojebyn,” in Mixed Farming Systems in Europe, Vol. 2 (Dronten, The Netherlands, APMinderhoudhoevereeks, 1998), pp. 109–113.Google Scholar
  50. Matson, P. A.,W. J. Patron, A. G. Power, and M. J. Swift, “Agricultural Intensification and Ecosystem Properties,” Science 277 (1997), 504–509.Google Scholar
  51. Myers, R. J. K., M. van Noordwijk, and P. Vityakon, “Synchrony of Nutrient Release and Plant Demand: Plant Litter Quality, Soil Environment and Farmer Management Options,” in G. Cadisch and K. E. Giller (eds.), Driven by Nature. Plant Litter Quality and Decomposition (CAB International, Wallingford, UK, 1997), pp. 215–230.Google Scholar
  52. O'Riordan T. and D. Cobb, “Assessing the Consequences of Converting to Organic Agriculture,” Journal of Agricultural Economics52 (2001), 22–35.Google Scholar
  53. Ploeger, A. M. and H. Vogtmann, “Product and Environment: Quality and Public Health,” in T. V. Ostergaard (ed.), Fundamentals of Organic Agriculture: Proceedings Vol. 1 of the 11th International IFOAM Scientific Conference (Copenhagen, 1996), pp. 176–189.Google Scholar
  54. Rauhe, K., G. Leithold, and D. Michel, “Untersuchungen zur Ertragsund Humusreproduktionsleistung der Luzerne auf sandigem Lehmboden in Trochenlagen,” Archiv fur Acker-und Pflanzenbau und Bodenkunde 31 (1987), 695–702.Google Scholar
  55. Reddersen, J., “Naturindhold i økologisk jordbrug, Natur, miljø og ressourcer i økologisk jordbrug,” FØJO Rapport 3 (Forskningscenter for Økologisk Jordbrug, 1999), pp. 69–84.Google Scholar
  56. Redman, M. (ed.), Organic Farming and the Countryside, a Special Report from British Organic Farmers in Conjunction with the Soil Association (Organic Food and Farm Centre, Bristol, 1992).Google Scholar
  57. Reed, N., In J. J. Hull (ed.), 125th Annual Report of the Secretary of the State Horticultural Society of Michigan (Mich. State Hort. Co., East Lansing, 1995), pp. 68–78.Google Scholar
  58. Reganold, J. P., J. D. Glover, P. K. Andrews, and H. R. Hinman, “Sustainability of Three Apple Production Systems,” Nature 410 (2001), 926–929.Google Scholar
  59. Schupbach, M., “Spritzmittelruckstande in Obst und Gemuse,” Deutsche Lebensmittel Rundschau 82(3) (1986), 76–80.Google Scholar
  60. Schuphan, W., “YieldMaximization versus Biological Value,” Qual. Plant 24 (1975), 281–310.Google Scholar
  61. Siegrist, D. S., L. Pfiffner, and P. Mäder, “Does Organic Agriculture Reduce Soil Erodibility? The Results of a Long-Term Field Study on Loess in Switzerland,” Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 69 (1998), 253–264.Google Scholar
  62. Stolton, S., B. Geier, and A. Jeffrey, “Biodiversity and Organic Agriculture,” Ecology and Farming, No. 23, January—April, IFOAM (2000), 22–25.Google Scholar
  63. Stolze, M., A. Piorr, A. Häring, and S. Dabbert, “The Environmental Impact of Organic Farming in Europe,” Organic Farming in Europe: Economics and Policy, Vol. 6. (University of Hohenheim, Germany, 2000), pp. 1437–6512.Google Scholar
  64. Sundrum, A., “Organic Livestock Farming: A Critical Review,” Livestock Production Science 67 (2001), 207–215.Google Scholar
  65. Temperli, A. T., U. Künsch, and H. Schärer, “Einfluss zweier Anbauweisen auf den Nitratgehalt von Kopfsalat,” Schweizerische landwirtschaftliche Forschung 21 (1982), 167–196.Google Scholar
  66. Tillman, D., “Global Environmental Impacts of Agricultural Expansion: Then Need for Sustainable and Efficient Practices,” Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA96 (1999), 5995–6000.Google Scholar
  67. Trewavas, A., “Urban Myths of Organic Farming,” Nature 410 (2001), 409–410.Google Scholar
  68. Uzogara, S. G., “The Impact of Genetic Modification of Human Foods in the 21st Century: A Review,” Biotechnology Advances 18 (2000), 179–206.Google Scholar
  69. van Elsen, T., “Species Diversity as a Task for Organic Agriculture in Europe,” Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 77 (2000), 101–109.Google Scholar
  70. van Mansvelt, J. D. and J. Mulder, “European Features for Sustainable Development: A Contribution to the Dialogue,” Landscape and Urban Planning 27 (1993), 67–90.Google Scholar
  71. Vogtmann, H., A. T. Temperli, U. Kunsch, M. Eichenberger, and P. Ott, “Accumulation of Nitrates in Leafy Vegetables Grown under Contrasting Agricultural Systems,” Biological Agriculture and Horticulture 2 (1984), 51–68.Google Scholar
  72. Weibel, F. P., R. Bickel, S. Leuthold, T. Alfoldi, and U. Niggli, “Are Organically Grown Apples Tastier and Healthier? A Comparative Field Study Using Conventional and Alternative Methods to Measure Fruit Quality,” in D. Foguelman and W. Lockeretz (eds.), Organic Agriculture — the Credible Solution for the XXIst Century: Proceedings of the 12th International IFOAM Scientific Conference (Mar del Plata, Argentinean, 1998), pp. 147–153.Google Scholar
  73. Whalen, J. K., R. W. Parmelee, and C. A. Edwards, “Population Dynamics of Earthworm Communities in Corn Agroecosystems Receiving Organic or Inorganic Fertilizer Amendments,” Biology and Fertility of Soils 27 (1998), 400–407.Google Scholar
  74. Witter, E. and H. Kirchmann, “Peat, Zeolit and Basalt as Adsorbents of Ammoniacal Manure Nitrogen,” Plant Soil 115 (1989a), 43–52.Google Scholar
  75. Witter, E. and H. Kirchmann, “Effect of Ca and Mg Additions to Manure on Ammonia Volatilization during Manure Decomposition,” Plant Soil 115 (1989b), 53–58.Google Scholar
  76. Woese, K., D. Lange, C. Boess, and K. W. Bögl, “A Comparison of Organically and Conventionally Grown Foods — Results of a Review of the Relevant Literature,” J. Sci. Food Agric. 74 (1997), 281–293.Google Scholar
  77. Youngberg, E. G., J. G. Parr, and R. L. Papendick, “Potential Benefits of Organic Farming Practices for Wildlife and Natural Resources,” Transactions of the North American Wildlife and Natural Resources Conference 49 (1984), 141–153.Google Scholar
  78. Younie, D. and C. A. Watson, “Soil Nitrate-N Levels in Organically and Intensively Managed Grassland Systems,” Aspects Appl. Biol. 30 (1992), 235–238.Google Scholar
  79. Zhu, Y., H. Chen, J. Fan, Y. Wang, Y. Li, J. Chen, J. Fan, S. Yang, L. Hu, H. Leung, T. W. Mew, P. S. Teng, Z. Wang, and C. C. Mundt, “Genetic Diversity and Disease Control in Rice,” Nature 406 (2000), 718–722.Google Scholar
  80. Zwankhuizen, M. J., F. Govers, and J. C. Zadoks, “Development of Potato Late Blight Epidemics: Disease Foci, Disease Gradients, and Infection Sources,” Phytopathology 88 (1998), 754–763.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  • Xie Biao
    • 1
  • Wang Xiaorong
    • 1
  • Ding Zhuhong
    • 1
  • Yang Yaping
    • 1
  1. 1.School of the EnvironmentNanjing UniversityNanjinP.R. China

Personalised recommendations