Advertisement

Biodiversity & Conservation

, Volume 12, Issue 7, pp 1335–1355 | Cite as

Species richness in agroecosystems: the effect of landscape, habitat and farm management

  • Ann-Christin Weibull
  • Örjan Östman
  • Åsa Granqvist
Article

Abstract

It has been suggested that biodiversity in agroecosystems depends on both landscape heterogeneity and farm management, but at the same time, studies of biodiversity in relation to both landscape variables and farm management are rare. We investigated the species richness of plants, butterflies, carabids, rove beetles and the diversity of spiders in cereal fields, leys (grass and clover crop) and semi-natural pastures at 16 farms in Central East Sweden. The farms were divided into eight pairs of one conventional and one organic farm to enable us to separate the effects of landscape and farm management on biodiversity. The pairing was based on land use, location, and landscape features. Species richness of different taxonomic groups was generally not correlated. There were no differences in species richness between the farming systems, except for carabids that had higher numbers of species on conventional farms. The species richness generally increased with landscape heterogeneity on a farm scale. Habitat type had a major effect on the species richness for most groups, with most species found in pastures and leys. The correlations between species richness and landscape variables on a farm scale, and not on a scale of multiple farms, identify farmers as the important decision-maker in conservation issues for these taxonomic groups. We discuss the role of species richness of pests' natural enemies for biological control and conservation strategies of the more common species in the agricultural landscape.

Araneae Diversity Farming practices Ground beetles Land use intensity Landscape structure Lepidoptera Phanoregam Staphylinids 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Allen-Wardell G., Bernhardt P., Bitner R., Burquez A., Buchmann S., Cane J. et al. 1998. The potential consequences of pollinator declines on the conservation of biodiversity and stability of food crop yields. Conservation Biology 12: 8–17.Google Scholar
  2. Andersen A. and Eltun R. 2000. Long-term developments in the carabid and staphylinid (Col., Carabidae and Staphyliniidae) fauna during conversion from conventional to biological farming. Journal of Applied Entomology 124: 51–56.Google Scholar
  3. Anonymous 1996. SAS/STAT User's Guide. SAS Institute, Cary, North Carolina.Google Scholar
  4. Armstrong G. 1995. Carabid beetle (Coleoptera, Carabidae) diversity and abundance in organic potatoes and conventionally grown seed potatoes in the north of Scotland. Pedebiologia 39: 231–237.Google Scholar
  5. Bernes C. 1994. Monitor 14: biologisk mångfald i Sverige; En Landstudie. Naturvåardsverket Förlag, Solna, Sweden (in Swedish).Google Scholar
  6. Berry N.A., Wratten S.D., McErlich A. and Frampton C. 1996. Abundance and diversity of beneficial arthropods in conventional and ‘organic’ carrot crops in New Zealand. New Zealand Journal of Crop and Horticultural Science 24: 307–313.Google Scholar
  7. Booij C.J.H. and Noorlander J. 1992. Farming systems and insect predators. Agriculture Ecosystems and Environment 40: 125–135.Google Scholar
  8. Bommarco R. 1998. Reproduction and energy reserves of a predatory carabid beetle relative to agroecosystem complexity. Ecological Applications 8: 846–853.Google Scholar
  9. Chamberlain D.E., Fuller R.J., Bunce R.G.H., Duckworth J.C. and Shrubb M. 2000. Changes in the abundance of farmland birds in relation to the timing of agricultural intensification in England and Wales. Journal of Applied Ecology 37: 771–788.Google Scholar
  10. Clements D.R., Weise S.F. and Swanton C.J. 1994. Integrated weed management and weed species diversity. Phytoprotection 75: 1–18.Google Scholar
  11. Daily G.C. 1997. Nature's Services: Societal Dependence on Natural Ecosystems. Island Press, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  12. Dover J., Sparks T., Clarke S., Gobbett K. and Glossop S. 2000. Linear features and butterflies: the importance of green lanes. Agriculture Ecosystems and Environment 80: 227–242.Google Scholar
  13. Dritschilo W. and Erwin T.L. 1982. Responses in abundance and diversity of cornfield carabid communities to differences in farm practices. Ecology 63: 900–904.Google Scholar
  14. Duelli P. and Obrist M.K. 1998. In search of the best correlates for local organismal biodiversity in cultivated areas. Biodiversity and Conservation 7: 297–309.Google Scholar
  15. Dunning J.B., Danielson B.J. and Pulliam H.R. 1992. Ecological processes that affect populations in complex landscapes. Oikos 65: 169–175.Google Scholar
  16. Fuller R.J., Gregory R.D., Gibbons D.W., Marchant J.H., Wilson J.D., Baillie S.R. et al. 1995. Population declines and range contractions among lowland farmland birds in Britain. Conservation Biology 9: 1425–1441.Google Scholar
  17. Granqvist Å. 1999. Mångfalden av växter i jordbrukslandskapet – effekten av odlingssystem och landskapsheterogenitet. Examensarbeten/Seminarieuppsatser 4 Uppsala (in Swedish).Google Scholar
  18. Hald A.B. and Reddersen J. 1990. Fugleføde i kornmarker – insekter og vilde planter. Miljøprojekt no. 125. Miljøstyrelsen, Copenhagen, Denmark (in Danish).Google Scholar
  19. Harrison S. and Bruna E. 1999. Habitat fragmentation and large-scale conservation: what do we know for sure? Ecography 22: 225–232.Google Scholar
  20. Hector A., Schmid B., Beierkuhnlein C., Caldeira M.C., Diemer M., Dimitrakopoulos P.G. et al. 1999. Plant diversity and productivity experiments in European grasslands. Science 286: 1123–1127.Google Scholar
  21. Holland S.M. 2000. Analytical Rarefaction. 1.3. http://www.uga.edu/strata/software/AnRareReadme. html.Google Scholar
  22. Jennersten O. 1988. Pollination in Dianthus deltoides (Caryophyllaceae): effects of habitat fragmentation on visitation and seed set. Conservation Biology 2: 359–366.Google Scholar
  23. Jonsen I.D. and Fahrig L. 1997. Response of generalist and specialist insect herbivores to landscape spatial structure. Landscape Ecology 12: 185–197.Google Scholar
  24. Kaiser J. 2000. Rift over biodiversity divides ecologists. Science 289: 1282–1283.Google Scholar
  25. Kerr J.T. 2001. Butterfly species richness patterns in Canada: energy, heterogeneity, and the potential consequences of climate change. Conservation Ecology 5 (online) URL: http.//www.consecol.org/vol5/iss1/art10:10.Google Scholar
  26. Kleijn D., Berendse F., Smit R. and Gilissen N. 2001. Agri-environment schemes do not effectively protect biodiversity in Dutch agricultural landscapes. Nature 413: 723–725.Google Scholar
  27. Krebs C.J. 1989. Ecological Methodology. Harper and Row, New York.Google Scholar
  28. Krebs J.R., Wilson J.D., Bradbury R.B. and Siriwardena G.M. 1999. The second silent spring? Nature 400: 611–612.Google Scholar
  29. Kromp B. 1989. Carabid beetle communities (Carabidae, Coleoptera) in biologically and conventionally farmed agroecosystems. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 27: 241–251.Google Scholar
  30. Laurner A.E. and Murphy D.D. 1994. Umbrella species and the conservation of habitat fragments – a case of a threatened and a vanishing grassland ecosystem. Biological Conservation 69: 145–153.Google Scholar
  31. Letourneau D.K. and Goldstein B. 2001. Pest damage and arthropod community structure in organic vs. conventional tomato production in California. Journal of Applied Ecology 38: 557–570.Google Scholar
  32. Loreau M. 2000. Biodiversity and ecosystem functioning: recent theoretical advances. Oikos 91: 3–17.Google Scholar
  33. Losey J.E. and Denno R.F. 1998. Positive predator–predator interactions: enhanced predation rates and synergistic suppression of aphid populations. Ecology 79: 2143–2152.Google Scholar
  34. Losey J.E. and Denno R.F. 1999. Factors facilitating synergistic predation: the central role of synchrony. Ecological Applications 9: 378–386.Google Scholar
  35. Marino P.C. and Landis D.A. 1996. Effect of landscape structure on parasitoid diversity and parasitism in agroecosystems. Ecological Applications 6: 276–284.Google Scholar
  36. Moreby S.J., Aebischer N.J., Southway S.E. and Sotherton N.W. 1994. A comparison of the flora and arthropod fauna of organically and conventionally grown winter-wheat in southern England. Annals of Applied Biology 125: 13–27.Google Scholar
  37. Nabhan G.P. and Buchmann S.L. 1997. Services provided by pollinators. In: Daily G.C. (ed.), Nature's Services; Societal Dependence on Natural Ecosystems. Island Press, Washington, DC, pp. 133–150.Google Scholar
  38. Naylor R.L. and Erlich P. 1997. Natural pest control services and agriculture. In: Daily G.C. (ed.), Nature's Services; Societal Dependence on Natural Ecosystems. Island Press, Washington, DC, pp. 151–174.Google Scholar
  39. Östman Ö., Ekbom B. and Bengtsson J. 2001a. Landscape heterogeneity and farming practice influence biological control. Basic and Applied Ecology 2: 365–371.Google Scholar
  40. Östman Ö., Ekbom B., Bengtsson J. and Weibull A.-C. 2001b. Landscape complexity and farming practice influence the condition of polyphagous carabid beetles. Ecological Applications 11: 480–488.Google Scholar
  41. Paoletti M.G. 1995. Biodiversity, traditional landscapes and agroecosystem management. Landscape and Urban Planning 31: 117–128.Google Scholar
  42. Pollard E. 1977. A method for assessing changes in the abundance of butterflies. Biological Conservation 12: 115–134.Google Scholar
  43. Prendergast J.R., Quinn R.M., Lawton J.H., Eversham B.C. and Gibbons D.W. 1993. Rare species, the coincidence of diversity hotspots and conservation strategies. Nature 365: 335–337.Google Scholar
  44. Rands M.R.W. and Sotherton N.W. 1986. Pesticide use on cereal crops and the changes in the abundance of butterflies on arable farmland in England. Biological Conservation 36: 71–82.Google Scholar
  45. Rhode K. 1992. Latitudinal gradients in species diversity: the search for the primary cause. Oikos 65: 514–527.Google Scholar
  46. Robertsson G.M., Eknert B. and Ihse M. 1990. Habitat analysis from infrared aerial photographs and the conservation of birds in Swedish agricultural landscapes. Ambio 19: 195–203.Google Scholar
  47. Rosenzweig M.L. 1995. Species Diversity in Space and Time. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.Google Scholar
  48. Schneider C. and Fry L.A. 2001. The influence of landscape grain on butterfly diversity in grasslands. Journal of Insect Conservation 5: 163–171.Google Scholar
  49. Siemann E. 1998. Experimental tests of effects of plant productivity and diversity on grassland arthropod diversity. Ecology 79: 2057–2070.Google Scholar
  50. Siepel H., Meijer J., Mabelis A.A. and Denboer M.H. 1989. A tool to assess the influence of management practices on grassland surface macrofaunas. Journal of Applied Entomology 108: 271–290.Google Scholar
  51. Söderström B., Svensson B., Vessby K. and Glimskär A. 2001. Plants, insects and birds in semi-natural pastures in relation to local habitat and landscape factors. Biodiversity and Conservation 10: 1839–1863.Google Scholar
  52. Stopes C., Measures M., Smith C. and Foster L. 1995. Hedgerow management in organic farming – impact on diversity. In: Isart J. and Llerena J.J. (eds), Biodiversity and Land Use: The Role of Organic Farming. First ENOF Workshop, Bonn, Germany, pp. 121–125.Google Scholar
  53. Sunderland K. and Samu F. 2000. Effects of agricultural diversification on the abundance, distribution, and pest control potential of spiders: a review. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata 95: 1–13.Google Scholar
  54. Thomas C.F.G., Parkinson L., Griffiths G.J.K., Garcia A.F. and Marshall E.J.P. 2001. Aggregation and temporal stability of carabid beetle distributions in field and hedgerow habitats. Journal of Applied Ecology 38: 100–116.Google Scholar
  55. Tilman D. 1997. Biodiversity and ecosystem functioning. In: Daily G.C. (ed.), Nature's Services; Societal Dependence on Natural Ecosystems. Island Press, Washington, DC, pp. 93–112.Google Scholar
  56. Topping C.J. and Sunderland K.D. 1992. Limitations to the use of pitfall traps in ecological studies exemplified by a study of spiders in a field of winter-wheat. Journal of Applied Ecology 29: 485–491.Google Scholar
  57. Vessby K., Söderström B., Glimskär A. and Svensson B. 2002. Species diversity of six taxa show few correlations in Swedish semi-natural pastures. Conservation Biology 16: 430–439.Google Scholar
  58. Wratten S.D. and Fry G.L.A. 1980. Field and Laboratory Exercises in Ecology. Edward Arnold, London.Google Scholar
  59. Weibull A.-C., Bengtsson J. and Nohlgren E. 2000. Diversity of butterflies in the agricultural landscape: the role of farming system and landscape heterogeneity. Ecography 23: 743–750.Google Scholar
  60. Younie D. and Armstrong G. 1995. Botanical and invertebrate diversity in organic and intensively fertilized grassland. In: Isart J. and Llerena J.J. (eds), Biodiversity and Land Use: The Role of Organic Farming. First ENOF Workshop, Bonn, Germany, pp. 35–44.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ann-Christin Weibull
    • 1
  • Örjan Östman
    • 1
  • Åsa Granqvist
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Ecology and Crop Production ScienceSwedish University of Agricultural SciencesUppsalaSweden
  2. 2.SundbybergSweden

Personalised recommendations