Springer Nature is making SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 research free. View research | View latest news | Sign up for updates

The Relationship Between Homework and Achievement—Still Much of a Mystery

Abstract

Despite the long history of homework and homework research, the role that homework plays in enhancing student achievement is, at best, only partly understood. In this review, we give an overview of twentieth-century homework research and discuss the reasons why the relationship between homework and achievement remains unclear. We identify the operationalization of homework and achievement and the problematic handling of hierarchically ordered data as two important factors affecting the validity of many of the studies performed over the last century. We then describe a new generation of homework studies using multilevel modeling to deal with hierarchically nested data. Finally, we argue that homework research should be more closely connected to well-founded psychological theories of learning and instruction, and we offer three potential links (theories of instruction time, self-regulation theory and expectancy-value theory, and teaching behavior).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Beaton, A. E., Mullis, I. V. S., Martin, M. O., Gonzalez, E. J., Kelly, D. L., and Smith, T. A. (1996). Mathematics Achievement in the Middle School Years: IEA's Third International Mathematics and Science Study, Boston College, Chestnut Hill, MA.

  2. Betts, J. (1998). The two-legged stool: The neglected role of educational standards in improving America's public schools. Econ. Policy Rev. 4: 97-116.

  3. Boekaerts, M. (1999). Self-regulated learning: Where we are today. Int. J. Educ. Res. 31: 445-457.

  4. British Educational Research Association (1999). Homework, common sense, politics and the defence of research. Res. Intell. 70: 24-25.

  5. Brophy, J., and Good, T. (1986). Teacher behavior and student achievement. In: Wittrock, M. C. (ed.), Handbook of Research on Teaching (3rd Ed.), Macmillan, New York, pp. 328-375.

  6. Brunstein, J. C., and Spörer, N. (2001). Selbstgesteuertes Lernen [Self-regulated learning]. In: Rost, J. (ed.), Handwörterbuch Pädagogische Psychologie, Beltz, Weinheim, Germany, pp. 622-629.

  7. Bryk, A. S., and Raudenbush, S. W. (1992). Hierarchical Linear Models: Applications and Data Analysis Methods, Sage, Newbury Park, CA.

  8. Byrne, B. (1998). Structural Equation Modeling with LISREL, PRELIS, and SIMPLIS: Basic Concepts, Applications, and Programming, Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ.

  9. Carroll, J. B. (1963). A model of school learning. Teach. Coll. Rec. 64: 723-733.

  10. Carroll, J. B. (1984). The model of school learning: Progress of an idea. In: Anderson, L. W. (ed.), Time and School Learning, Croom Helm, London, pp. 15-45.

  11. Chou, H.-W. (1991). The investigation of a LISREL achievement model. Chin. J. Psychol. 33: 59-75.

  12. Cool, V., and Keith, T. Z. (1991). Testing a model of school learning: Direct and indirect effects on academic achievement. Contemp. Educ. Psychol. 16: 28-44.

  13. Cooper, H. (1989). Homework, Longman, White Plains, NY.

  14. Cooper, H., and Valentine, J. C. (2001). Using research to answer practical questions about homework. Educ. Psychol. 36: 143-153.

  15. Cooper, H., Lindsay, J. J., Nye, B., and Greathouse, S. (1998). Relationships among attitudes about homework, amount of homework assigned and completed, and student achievement. J. Educ. Psychol. 90: 70-83.

  16. Cooper, H., Valentine, J. C., Nye, B., and Lindsay, J. J. (1999). Relationships between five after-school activities and academic achievement. J. Educ. Psychol. 91: 369-378.

  17. Corno, L. (1980). Individual and class level effects of parent-assisted instruction in classroom memory support strategies. J. Educ. Psychol. 72: 278-292.

  18. Corno, L. (1994). Student volition and education: Outcomes, influences, and practices. In: Schunk, D. H., and Zimmerman, B. J. (eds.), Self-Regulation of Learning and Performance, Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ, pp. 229-251.

  19. Corno, L. (1996). Homework is a complicated thing. Educ. Res. 25(8): 27-30.

  20. Corno, L. (2000). Looking at homework differently. Elem. Sch. J. 100: 529-548.

  21. Coulter, F. (1979). Homework: A neglected research area. Br. Educ. Res. J. 5: 21-33.

  22. De Jong, R., Westerhof, K. J., and Creemers, B. P. M. (2000). Homework and student math achievement in junior high schools. Educ. Res. Eval. 6: 130-157.

  23. Eccles, J. S., and Wigfield, A. (2002). Motivational beliefs, values, and goal. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 53: 109-132.

  24. Eccles, J. S., Adler, T. F., and Meece, J. L. (1984). Sex differences in achievement: A test of alternate theories. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 46: 26-43.

  25. Elawar, M. C., and Corno, L. (1985). A factorial experiment in teachers' written feedback on student homework: Changing teacher behavior a little rather than a lot. J. Educ. Psychol. 77: 162-173.

  26. Epstein, J. L., and van Voorhis, F. L. (2001). More than minutes: Teachers' roles in designing homework. Educ. Psychol. 36: 181-193.

  27. Farrow, S., Tymms, P., and Henderson, B. (1999). Homework and attainment in primary schools. Br. Educ. Res. J. 25: 323-341.

  28. Fend, H. (1998). Eltern und Freunde [Parents and peers], Hans Huber, Bern, Switzerland.

  29. Gill, B., and Schlossman, S. (1996). A sin against childhood: Progressive education and the crusade to abolish homework, 1897–1941. Am. J. Educ. 105: 27-66.

  30. Goldstein, H. (1995). Multilevel Statistical Models, Edward Arnold, London.

  31. Haag, L., and Mischo, C. (2002). Saisonarbeiter in der Schule–einem Phänomen auf der Spur [On the trail of a phenomenon: Casual learners]. Z. Pädagog. Psychol. 16: 109-116.

  32. Harding, R. C. (1979). The Relationship of Teacher Attitudes Toward Homework and the Academic Achievement of Primary Grade Students. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Lehigh University, Bethlehem, PA.

  33. Hoover-Dempsey, K. V., Battiato, A. C., Walker, J. M. T., Reed, R. P., DeJong, J. M., and Jones, K. P. (2001). Parental involvement in homework. Educ. Psychol. 36: 195-209.

  34. Hox, J. J., and Kreft, I. G. G. (1994). Multilevel analysis methods. Sociol. Methods Res. 22: 283-299.

  35. Keith, T. Z. (1982). Time spent on homework and high school grades: A large-sample path analysis. J. Educ. Psychol. 74: 248-253.

  36. Keith, T. Z. (1988). Using path analysis to test the importance of manipulable influences on school learning. Sch. Psychol. Rev. 17: 637-643.

  37. Keith, T. Z., and Cool, V. A. (1992). Testing models of school learning: Effects of quality of instruction, motivation, academic coursework, and homework on academic achievement. Sch. Psychol. Q. 3: 207-226.

  38. Keith, T. Z., and Page, E. B. (1985). Homework works at school: National evidence for policy changes. Sch. Psychol. Rev. 3: 351-359.

  39. Keith, T. Z., Reimers, T. M., Fehrmann, P. G., Pottebaum, S. M., and Aubey, L. W. (1986). Parental involvement, homework, and TV time: Direct and indirect effects on high school achievement. J. Educ. Psychol. 78: 373-380.

  40. Keith, T. Z., Keith, P. B., Troutman, G. C., Bickley, P. G., Trivette, P. S., and Singh, K. (1993). Does parental involvement affect eighth-grade student achievement? Structural analysis of national data. Sch. Psychol. Rev. 22: 474-496.

  41. Köller, O., and Schümer, G. (1998). Why did Japanese students do so well in TIMSS? Results from the TIMSS Videotape Study and information about the educational system in Japan. Newsl. Int. Soc. Study Behav. Dev. 33: 7-8.

  42. Levin, J. R., and Peterson, P. L. (1984). Classroom aptitude-by-treatment interactions: An alternative analysis strategy. Educ. Psychol. 19: 43-47.

  43. Muhlenbruck, L., Cooper, H., Nye, B., and Lindsay, J. J. (2000). Homework and achievement: Explaining the different strengths of relation at the elementary and secondary school levels. Soc. Psychol. Educ. 3: 295-317.

  44. Mullis, I. V. S., Martin, M. O., Beaton, A. E., Gonzalez, E. J., Kelly, D. L., and Smith, T. A. (1998). Mathematics and Science Achievement in the Final Year of Secondary School: IEA's Third International Mathematics and Science Study, Boston College, Chestnut Hill, MA.

  45. Natriello, G., and McDill, E. L. (1986). Performance standards, student effort on homework, and academic achievement. Sociol. Educ. 59: 18-31.

  46. Nilshon, I. (2001). Hausaufgaben [Homework]. In: Rost, D. H. (ed.), Handwörterbuch Pädagogische Psychologie, Beltz, Weinheim, Germany, pp. 231-238.

  47. OECD (2001). Knowledge and Skills for Life: First Results from the OECD Programme for International Student Assessment, OECD, Paris.

  48. Palardy, J. M. (1995). Another look at homework: Homework is one of the most haphazard teaching practices in American schools today. Principal 74: 32-33.

  49. Paschal, R. A., Weinstein, T., and Walberg, H. J. (1984). The effects of homework on learning: A quantitative synthesis. J. Educ. Res. 78: 97-104.

  50. Pintrich, P. R. (1999). The role of motivation in promoting and sustaining self-regulated learning. Int. J. Educ. Res. 31: 459-470.

  51. Raudenbush, S. W., Bryk, A. S., Cheong, Y. F., and Congdon, R. T. (2000). HLM 5 [computer program], Scientific Software International, Lincolnwood, IL.

  52. Rickards, J. P. (1982). Homework. In: Encyclopedia of Educational Research (5th Ed., Vol. 2), Free Press, New York, pp. 831-834.

  53. Schmitz, B., and Skinner, E. (1993). Perceived control, effort, and academic performance: Interindividual, intraindividual, and multivariate time-series analyses. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 64: 1010-1028.

  54. Stright, A. D., Neitzel, C., Sears, K. G., and Hoke-Sinex, L. (2001). Instruction begins in the home: Relations between parental instruction and children's self-regulation in the classroom. J. Educ. Psychol. 93: 456-466.

  55. Trautwein, U., and Köller, O. (2002). Homework in Mathematics and English as a Foreign Language: Evidence for Effects on the Development of Achievement and Interest, Unpublished manuscript.

  56. Trautwein, U., Köller, O., Schmitz, B., and Baumert, J. (2002). Do homework assignments enhance achievement? A multilevel analysis in 7th-grade mathematics. Contemp. Educ. Psychol. 27: 26-50.

  57. Tymms, P. B., and Fitz-Gibbon, C. T. (1992). The relationship of homework to A-level results. Educ. Res. 34: 3-10.

  58. Wagner, P., and Spiel, C. (1999). Arbeitszeit für die Schule–zu Variabilität und Determinanten [Variability and determinants of school-related working time at home]. Empir. Pädagog. 13: 123-150.

  59. Walberg, H. J. (1991). Does homework help? Sch. Community J. 1: 13-15.

  60. Walberg, H. J., and Paschal, R. A. (1995). Homework. In: Anderson, L. W. (ed.), International Encyclopaedia of Teaching and Teacher Education, Elsevier, Oxford, pp. 268-271.

  61. Walberg, H. J., Paschal, R. A., and Weinstein, T. (1985). Homework's powerful effects on learning. Educ. Leadersh. 42: 76-79.

  62. Warton, P. M. (1997). Learning about responsibility: Lessons from homework. Br. J. Educ. Psychol. 67: 213-221.

  63. Weinert, F. E., and Helmke, A. (1995a). Interclassroom differences in instructional quality and interindividual differences in cognitive development. Educ. Psychol. 30: 15-20.

  64. Weinert, F. E., and Helmke, A. (1995b). Learning from wise mother nature or big brother instructor: The wrong choice as seen from an educational perspective. Educ. Psychol. 30: 135-142.

  65. Xu, J., and Corno, L. (1998). Case studies of families doing third-grade homework. Teach. Coll. Rec. 100: 402-436.

  66. Zimmerman, B. J., Bonner, S., and Kovach, R. (1996). Developing Self-Regulated Learners: Beyond Achievement to Self-Efficacy, American Psychological Association, Washington, DC.

Download references

Author information

Correspondence to Ulrich Trautwein.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Trautwein, U., Köller, O. The Relationship Between Homework and Achievement—Still Much of a Mystery. Educational Psychology Review 15, 115–145 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1023460414243

Download citation

  • homework
  • achievement
  • school grades
  • multilevel modeling
  • self-regulation
  • expectancy-value