Educational Psychology Review

, Volume 15, Issue 2, pp 115–145 | Cite as

The Relationship Between Homework and Achievement—Still Much of a Mystery

Article

Abstract

Despite the long history of homework and homework research, the role that homework plays in enhancing student achievement is, at best, only partly understood. In this review, we give an overview of twentieth-century homework research and discuss the reasons why the relationship between homework and achievement remains unclear. We identify the operationalization of homework and achievement and the problematic handling of hierarchically ordered data as two important factors affecting the validity of many of the studies performed over the last century. We then describe a new generation of homework studies using multilevel modeling to deal with hierarchically nested data. Finally, we argue that homework research should be more closely connected to well-founded psychological theories of learning and instruction, and we offer three potential links (theories of instruction time, self-regulation theory and expectancy-value theory, and teaching behavior).

homework achievement school grades multilevel modeling self-regulation expectancy-value 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Beaton, A. E., Mullis, I. V. S., Martin, M. O., Gonzalez, E. J., Kelly, D. L., and Smith, T. A. (1996). Mathematics Achievement in the Middle School Years: IEA's Third International Mathematics and Science Study, Boston College, Chestnut Hill, MA.Google Scholar
  2. Betts, J. (1998). The two-legged stool: The neglected role of educational standards in improving America's public schools. Econ. Policy Rev. 4: 97-116.Google Scholar
  3. Boekaerts, M. (1999). Self-regulated learning: Where we are today. Int. J. Educ. Res. 31: 445-457.Google Scholar
  4. British Educational Research Association (1999). Homework, common sense, politics and the defence of research. Res. Intell. 70: 24-25.Google Scholar
  5. Brophy, J., and Good, T. (1986). Teacher behavior and student achievement. In: Wittrock, M. C. (ed.), Handbook of Research on Teaching (3rd Ed.), Macmillan, New York, pp. 328-375.Google Scholar
  6. Brunstein, J. C., and Spörer, N. (2001). Selbstgesteuertes Lernen [Self-regulated learning]. In: Rost, J. (ed.), Handwörterbuch Pädagogische Psychologie, Beltz, Weinheim, Germany, pp. 622-629.Google Scholar
  7. Bryk, A. S., and Raudenbush, S. W. (1992). Hierarchical Linear Models: Applications and Data Analysis Methods, Sage, Newbury Park, CA.Google Scholar
  8. Byrne, B. (1998). Structural Equation Modeling with LISREL, PRELIS, and SIMPLIS: Basic Concepts, Applications, and Programming, Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ.Google Scholar
  9. Carroll, J. B. (1963). A model of school learning. Teach. Coll. Rec. 64: 723-733.Google Scholar
  10. Carroll, J. B. (1984). The model of school learning: Progress of an idea. In: Anderson, L. W. (ed.), Time and School Learning, Croom Helm, London, pp. 15-45.Google Scholar
  11. Chou, H.-W. (1991). The investigation of a LISREL achievement model. Chin. J. Psychol. 33: 59-75.Google Scholar
  12. Cool, V., and Keith, T. Z. (1991). Testing a model of school learning: Direct and indirect effects on academic achievement. Contemp. Educ. Psychol. 16: 28-44.Google Scholar
  13. Cooper, H. (1989). Homework, Longman, White Plains, NY.Google Scholar
  14. Cooper, H., and Valentine, J. C. (2001). Using research to answer practical questions about homework. Educ. Psychol. 36: 143-153.Google Scholar
  15. Cooper, H., Lindsay, J. J., Nye, B., and Greathouse, S. (1998). Relationships among attitudes about homework, amount of homework assigned and completed, and student achievement. J. Educ. Psychol. 90: 70-83.Google Scholar
  16. Cooper, H., Valentine, J. C., Nye, B., and Lindsay, J. J. (1999). Relationships between five after-school activities and academic achievement. J. Educ. Psychol. 91: 369-378.Google Scholar
  17. Corno, L. (1980). Individual and class level effects of parent-assisted instruction in classroom memory support strategies. J. Educ. Psychol. 72: 278-292.Google Scholar
  18. Corno, L. (1994). Student volition and education: Outcomes, influences, and practices. In: Schunk, D. H., and Zimmerman, B. J. (eds.), Self-Regulation of Learning and Performance, Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ, pp. 229-251.Google Scholar
  19. Corno, L. (1996). Homework is a complicated thing. Educ. Res. 25(8): 27-30.Google Scholar
  20. Corno, L. (2000). Looking at homework differently. Elem. Sch. J. 100: 529-548.Google Scholar
  21. Coulter, F. (1979). Homework: A neglected research area. Br. Educ. Res. J. 5: 21-33.Google Scholar
  22. De Jong, R., Westerhof, K. J., and Creemers, B. P. M. (2000). Homework and student math achievement in junior high schools. Educ. Res. Eval. 6: 130-157.Google Scholar
  23. Eccles, J. S., and Wigfield, A. (2002). Motivational beliefs, values, and goal. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 53: 109-132.Google Scholar
  24. Eccles, J. S., Adler, T. F., and Meece, J. L. (1984). Sex differences in achievement: A test of alternate theories. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 46: 26-43.Google Scholar
  25. Elawar, M. C., and Corno, L. (1985). A factorial experiment in teachers' written feedback on student homework: Changing teacher behavior a little rather than a lot. J. Educ. Psychol. 77: 162-173.Google Scholar
  26. Epstein, J. L., and van Voorhis, F. L. (2001). More than minutes: Teachers' roles in designing homework. Educ. Psychol. 36: 181-193.Google Scholar
  27. Farrow, S., Tymms, P., and Henderson, B. (1999). Homework and attainment in primary schools. Br. Educ. Res. J. 25: 323-341.Google Scholar
  28. Fend, H. (1998). Eltern und Freunde [Parents and peers], Hans Huber, Bern, Switzerland.Google Scholar
  29. Gill, B., and Schlossman, S. (1996). A sin against childhood: Progressive education and the crusade to abolish homework, 1897–1941. Am. J. Educ. 105: 27-66.Google Scholar
  30. Goldstein, H. (1995). Multilevel Statistical Models, Edward Arnold, London.Google Scholar
  31. Haag, L., and Mischo, C. (2002). Saisonarbeiter in der Schule–einem Phänomen auf der Spur [On the trail of a phenomenon: Casual learners]. Z. Pädagog. Psychol. 16: 109-116.Google Scholar
  32. Harding, R. C. (1979). The Relationship of Teacher Attitudes Toward Homework and the Academic Achievement of Primary Grade Students. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Lehigh University, Bethlehem, PA.Google Scholar
  33. Hoover-Dempsey, K. V., Battiato, A. C., Walker, J. M. T., Reed, R. P., DeJong, J. M., and Jones, K. P. (2001). Parental involvement in homework. Educ. Psychol. 36: 195-209.Google Scholar
  34. Hox, J. J., and Kreft, I. G. G. (1994). Multilevel analysis methods. Sociol. Methods Res. 22: 283-299.Google Scholar
  35. Keith, T. Z. (1982). Time spent on homework and high school grades: A large-sample path analysis. J. Educ. Psychol. 74: 248-253.Google Scholar
  36. Keith, T. Z. (1988). Using path analysis to test the importance of manipulable influences on school learning. Sch. Psychol. Rev. 17: 637-643.Google Scholar
  37. Keith, T. Z., and Cool, V. A. (1992). Testing models of school learning: Effects of quality of instruction, motivation, academic coursework, and homework on academic achievement. Sch. Psychol. Q. 3: 207-226.Google Scholar
  38. Keith, T. Z., and Page, E. B. (1985). Homework works at school: National evidence for policy changes. Sch. Psychol. Rev. 3: 351-359.Google Scholar
  39. Keith, T. Z., Reimers, T. M., Fehrmann, P. G., Pottebaum, S. M., and Aubey, L. W. (1986). Parental involvement, homework, and TV time: Direct and indirect effects on high school achievement. J. Educ. Psychol. 78: 373-380.Google Scholar
  40. Keith, T. Z., Keith, P. B., Troutman, G. C., Bickley, P. G., Trivette, P. S., and Singh, K. (1993). Does parental involvement affect eighth-grade student achievement? Structural analysis of national data. Sch. Psychol. Rev. 22: 474-496.Google Scholar
  41. Köller, O., and Schümer, G. (1998). Why did Japanese students do so well in TIMSS? Results from the TIMSS Videotape Study and information about the educational system in Japan. Newsl. Int. Soc. Study Behav. Dev. 33: 7-8.Google Scholar
  42. Levin, J. R., and Peterson, P. L. (1984). Classroom aptitude-by-treatment interactions: An alternative analysis strategy. Educ. Psychol. 19: 43-47.Google Scholar
  43. Muhlenbruck, L., Cooper, H., Nye, B., and Lindsay, J. J. (2000). Homework and achievement: Explaining the different strengths of relation at the elementary and secondary school levels. Soc. Psychol. Educ. 3: 295-317.Google Scholar
  44. Mullis, I. V. S., Martin, M. O., Beaton, A. E., Gonzalez, E. J., Kelly, D. L., and Smith, T. A. (1998). Mathematics and Science Achievement in the Final Year of Secondary School: IEA's Third International Mathematics and Science Study, Boston College, Chestnut Hill, MA.Google Scholar
  45. Natriello, G., and McDill, E. L. (1986). Performance standards, student effort on homework, and academic achievement. Sociol. Educ. 59: 18-31.Google Scholar
  46. Nilshon, I. (2001). Hausaufgaben [Homework]. In: Rost, D. H. (ed.), Handwörterbuch Pädagogische Psychologie, Beltz, Weinheim, Germany, pp. 231-238.Google Scholar
  47. OECD (2001). Knowledge and Skills for Life: First Results from the OECD Programme for International Student Assessment, OECD, Paris.Google Scholar
  48. Palardy, J. M. (1995). Another look at homework: Homework is one of the most haphazard teaching practices in American schools today. Principal 74: 32-33.Google Scholar
  49. Paschal, R. A., Weinstein, T., and Walberg, H. J. (1984). The effects of homework on learning: A quantitative synthesis. J. Educ. Res. 78: 97-104.Google Scholar
  50. Pintrich, P. R. (1999). The role of motivation in promoting and sustaining self-regulated learning. Int. J. Educ. Res. 31: 459-470.Google Scholar
  51. Raudenbush, S. W., Bryk, A. S., Cheong, Y. F., and Congdon, R. T. (2000). HLM 5 [computer program], Scientific Software International, Lincolnwood, IL.Google Scholar
  52. Rickards, J. P. (1982). Homework. In: Encyclopedia of Educational Research (5th Ed., Vol. 2), Free Press, New York, pp. 831-834.Google Scholar
  53. Schmitz, B., and Skinner, E. (1993). Perceived control, effort, and academic performance: Interindividual, intraindividual, and multivariate time-series analyses. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 64: 1010-1028.Google Scholar
  54. Stright, A. D., Neitzel, C., Sears, K. G., and Hoke-Sinex, L. (2001). Instruction begins in the home: Relations between parental instruction and children's self-regulation in the classroom. J. Educ. Psychol. 93: 456-466.Google Scholar
  55. Trautwein, U., and Köller, O. (2002). Homework in Mathematics and English as a Foreign Language: Evidence for Effects on the Development of Achievement and Interest, Unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar
  56. Trautwein, U., Köller, O., Schmitz, B., and Baumert, J. (2002). Do homework assignments enhance achievement? A multilevel analysis in 7th-grade mathematics. Contemp. Educ. Psychol. 27: 26-50.Google Scholar
  57. Tymms, P. B., and Fitz-Gibbon, C. T. (1992). The relationship of homework to A-level results. Educ. Res. 34: 3-10.Google Scholar
  58. Wagner, P., and Spiel, C. (1999). Arbeitszeit für die Schule–zu Variabilität und Determinanten [Variability and determinants of school-related working time at home]. Empir. Pädagog. 13: 123-150.Google Scholar
  59. Walberg, H. J. (1991). Does homework help? Sch. Community J. 1: 13-15.Google Scholar
  60. Walberg, H. J., and Paschal, R. A. (1995). Homework. In: Anderson, L. W. (ed.), International Encyclopaedia of Teaching and Teacher Education, Elsevier, Oxford, pp. 268-271.Google Scholar
  61. Walberg, H. J., Paschal, R. A., and Weinstein, T. (1985). Homework's powerful effects on learning. Educ. Leadersh. 42: 76-79.Google Scholar
  62. Warton, P. M. (1997). Learning about responsibility: Lessons from homework. Br. J. Educ. Psychol. 67: 213-221.Google Scholar
  63. Weinert, F. E., and Helmke, A. (1995a). Interclassroom differences in instructional quality and interindividual differences in cognitive development. Educ. Psychol. 30: 15-20.Google Scholar
  64. Weinert, F. E., and Helmke, A. (1995b). Learning from wise mother nature or big brother instructor: The wrong choice as seen from an educational perspective. Educ. Psychol. 30: 135-142.Google Scholar
  65. Xu, J., and Corno, L. (1998). Case studies of families doing third-grade homework. Teach. Coll. Rec. 100: 402-436.Google Scholar
  66. Zimmerman, B. J., Bonner, S., and Kovach, R. (1996). Developing Self-Regulated Learners: Beyond Achievement to Self-Efficacy, American Psychological Association, Washington, DC.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Max Planck Institute for Human DevelopmentBerlinGermany
  2. 2.Friedrich Alexander UniversityErlangen-NurembergGermany

Personalised recommendations