Journal of Business and Psychology

, Volume 17, Issue 4, pp 537–561 | Cite as

Withholding Effort in Organizations: Toward Development and Validation of a Measure

Article

Abstract

Field research into the topic of withholding effort and its variants (shirking, loafing, free riding, and job neglect) has been limited due to a lack of measures that are applicable to organizational settings. This study used a multi-phase process to ascertain a measure of withholding effort that can be used in organizational settings. Items were generated through literature review and discussions with practitioners; culled by the authors; and tested in a field study in multiple, diverse organizations. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses found the construct of withholding effort to be multidimensional, but not necessarily as previous theoretical work in the area would suggest. Correlations of the various dimensions of withholding effort scales with existing scales tapping a wide range of employee attitudes were consistent with a priori expectations. Implications for the use of these scales in future workplace research and their practical application in organizations are discussed.

withholding effort social loafing shirking neglect free riding 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

REFERENCES

  1. Adams, J. S. (1965). Inequity in social exchanges. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology: Vol. 2 (pp. 267–300). New York: Academic Press. 559 ROLAND E. KIDWELL JR. AND CHET ROBIEGoogle Scholar
  2. Albanese, R., & Van Fleet, D. D. (1985). Rational behavior in groups: The free-riding tendency. Academy of Management Review, 10, 244–255.Google Scholar
  3. Alchian, A. A., & Demsetz, H. (1972). Production, information costs, and economic organization. American Economic Review, 62, 777–795.Google Scholar
  4. Allen, N. J., & Meyer, J. P. (1990). The measurement and antecedents of affective, continuance, and normative commitment to the organization. Journal of Occupational Psychology, 63, 1–18.Google Scholar
  5. Averill, J. R. (1983). Studies on anger and aggression: Implications for theories of emotion. American Psychologist, 38, 1145–1160.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Bentler, P. M. (1990). Comparative fit indexes in structural models. Psychological Bulletin, 107, 238–246.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Borman, W.C., & Motowidlo, S.J. (1993). Expanding the criterion domain to include elements of contextual performance. In N. Schmitt & W.C. Borman (Eds.), Personnel selection in organizations (pp. 71–98). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  8. Browne, M. W., & Cudeck, R. (1989). Single sample cross-validation indices for covariance structures. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 24, 445–455.Google Scholar
  9. Cappelli, P., & Chauvin, K. (1991). An interplant test of the efficiency wage hypothesis. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 106, 769–787.Google Scholar
  10. Carson, K. D., & Bedeian, A.G. (1994). Career commitment: Construction of a measure and examination of its psychometric properties. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 44, 237–262.Google Scholar
  11. Chalykoff, J., & Kochan, T. A. (1989). Computer-aided monitoring: Its influence on employee job satisfaction and turnover. Personnel Psychology, 42, 807–834.Google Scholar
  12. Collins, J., & Porras, J. (1994). Built to last: Successful habits of visionary companies. New York: Harper Collins.Google Scholar
  13. Comer, D. R. (1995). A model of social loafing in real work groups. Human Relations, 48, 647–667.Google Scholar
  14. Comrey, A. L. (1973). A first course in factor analysis. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  15. Condie, S. J., Warner, W. K., & Gillman, D. C. (1976). Getting blood from collective turnips: Volunteer donation in mass blood drives. Journal of Applied Psychology, 61, 290–294.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Cook, J., Hepworth, S. J., Wall, T. D., & Warr, P. B. (1980). The experience of work: A compendium and review of 249 measures and their use. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  17. Dobbins, G. H., & Zaccaro, S. J. (1986). The effects of group cohesion and leader behavior on subordinate satisfaction. Group & Organization Studies, 11, 203–219.Google Scholar
  18. Earley, P. C. (1989). Social loafing and collectivism: A comparison of the United States and the People's Republic of China. Administrative Science Quarterly, 34, 565–581.Google Scholar
  19. Earley, P. C. (1993). East meets West meets Mideast: Further explorations of collectivistic and individualistic work groups. Academy of Management Journal, 36, 319–348.Google Scholar
  20. Everett, J. J., Smith, R. E., & Williams, K. D. (1992). Effects of team cohesion and identifiability on social loafing in relay swimming performance. International Journal of Sport Psychology, 23, 311–324.Google Scholar
  21. George, J. M. (1992). Extrinsic and intrinsic origins of perceived social loafing in organizations. Academy of Management Journal, 35, 191–202.Google Scholar
  22. Hackman, J. R. (1992). Group influences on individuals. In M. D. Dunnette & L. M. Hough (Eds.), Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology: Vol. 3 (pp. 199–267). Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.Google Scholar
  23. Harkins, S.G., Latané, B., & Williams, K. D. (1980). Social loafing: Allocating effort or taking it easy? Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 16, 457–465.Google Scholar
  24. Harrison, D. A., & McLaughlin, M. E. (1991). Exploring the cognitive processes underlying responses to self-report instruments: Effects of item content on work attitude measures. Proceedings of the 1991 Academy of Management Annual Meeting, 310–314.Google Scholar
  25. Hinkin, T. R. (1995). A review of scale development practices in the study of organizations. Journal of Management, 21, 967–988.Google Scholar
  26. Hinkin, T. R. (1998). A brief tutorial on the development of measures for use in survey questionnaires. Organizational Research Methods, 1, 104–121.Google Scholar
  27. Hirschman, A. O. (1970). Exit, voice, and loyalty: Responses to decline in firms, organizations, and states. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  28. Hu, L.T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1–55.Google Scholar
  29. Ingham, A. G., Levinger, G., Graves, J., & Peckham, V. (1974). The Ringelmann effect: Studies of group size and group performance. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 10, 371–384.Google Scholar
  30. Jones, G. R. (1984). Task visibility, free riding, and shirking: Explaining the effect of structure and technology on employee behavior. Academy of Management Review, 9, 684–695.Google Scholar
  31. Jöreskog, K. G. (1977). Structural equation models in the social sciences: Specification, estimation and testing. In P. R. Krishnaiah (Ed.), Applications of statistics (pp. 265–287), Amsterdam: North-Holland.Google Scholar
  32. Jöreskog, K. G., & Sörbom, D. (1989). LISREL 7: User's reference guide. Mooresville, IN: Scientific Software.Google Scholar
  33. Judge, T. A., & Chandler, T. D. (1996). Individual-level determinants of employee shirking. Relations Industrielles / Industrial Relations, 51, 468–486.Google Scholar
  34. Kaiser, H. F. (1958). The varimax criterion for analytic rotation in factor analysis. Psychometrika, 23, 187–200.Google Scholar
  35. Karau, S. J., & Williams, K. D. (1993). Social loafing: A meta-analytic review and theoretical integration. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 681–706.Google Scholar
  36. Katzenbach, J. R., & Smith, D. K. (1994). The wisdom of teams: Creating the high performance organization. New York: Harper Business.Google Scholar
  37. Keller, R.T. (2001). Cross-functional project groups in research and new product development: Diversity, communications, job stress, and outcomes. Academy of Management Journal, 44, 547–555.Google Scholar
  38. Kerr, N. L. (1983). Motivation losses in small groups: A social dilemma analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45, 819–828.Google Scholar
  39. Kidwell Jr., R. E. (1995). Contextual determinants of propensity to withhold effort: Test of a synthesized model in the private sector. Presented at the Academy of Management National Meeting, August, 1995, Vancouver, BC.Google Scholar
  40. Kidwell Jr., R. E., & Bennett, N. (1993). Employee propensity to withhold effort: A conceptual model to intersect three avenues of research. Academy of Management Review, 18, 429–456.Google Scholar
  41. Kidwell, Jr., R.E., & Bennett, N. (2001). Perceived work context and employee job neglect. American Business Review, 19-2 (June 2001), 64–74.Google Scholar
  42. Knoke, D. (1990). Organizing for collective action: The political economies of associations. New York: de Gruyter.Google Scholar
  43. Krueger, A. B. (1991). Ownership, agency, and wages: An examination of franchising in the fast food industry. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 106, 75–101.Google Scholar
  44. Latané, B., Williams, K., & Harkins, S. (1979). Many hands make light the work: The causes and consequences of social loafing. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 822–832.Google Scholar
  45. Lawler, E. E., Mohrman, S., & Ledford, G. (1995). Creating high performance organizations: Practices and results of employee involvement and total quality management in Fortune 1000 companies. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  46. Leck, J. D., & Saunders, D. M. (1992). Hirschman's loyalty: Attitude or behavior? Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal, 5, 219–230.Google Scholar
  47. Lind, E. A., & Tyler, T. R. (1988). The social psychology of procedural justice. New York: Plenum Press.Google Scholar
  48. Locke, E. A., Shaw, K. N., Saari, L. M., & Latham, G. P. (1981). Goal setting and task performance: 1969–1980. Psychological Bulletin, 90, 125–152.Google Scholar
  49. Martin, C. L., & Bennett, N. (1996). The role of justice judgments in explaining the relationship between job satisfaction and organizational commitment. Group & Organization Management, 21, 84–104.Google Scholar
  50. Marwell, G., & Ames, R. E. (1979). Experiments on the provision of public goods, I. Resources, interest, group size, and the free-rider problem. American Journal of Sociology, 84, 1335–1360.Google Scholar
  51. Marwell, G., & Ames, R. E. (1980). Experiments on the provision of public goods, II. Provision points, stakes, experience, and the free-rider problem. American Journal of Sociology, 85, 926–937. 561 ROLAND E. KIDWELL JR. AND CHET ROBIEGoogle Scholar
  52. Marwell, G., & Ames, R. E. (1981). Economists free ride, does anyone else? Experiments on the provision of public goods, IV. Journal of Economics, 15, 295–310.Google Scholar
  53. Meyer, J. P., Paunonen, S. V., Gellatly, I. R., Goffin, R. D., & Jackson, D. N. (1989). Organizational commitment and job performance: It's the nature of the commitment that counts. Journal of Applied Psychology, 74, 152–156.Google Scholar
  54. Miles, J. A., & Greenberg, J. (1993). Using punishment threats to attenuate social loafing effects among swimmers. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 56, 246–265.Google Scholar
  55. Mitchell, T. R. (1985). An evaluation of the validity of correlational research conducted in organizations. Academy of Management Review, 10, 192–205.Google Scholar
  56. Mulvey, P. W., & Klein, H. J. (1998a). The impact of perceived loafing and collective efficacy on group goal processes and group performance. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 74, 62–87.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  57. Mulvey, P. W., & Klein, H. J. (1998b). The effects of perceived loafing and defensive impression management on group effectiveness. Small Group Research, 29, 394–415.Google Scholar
  58. Nunnally, J. C. (1967). Psychometric theory. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  59. Orbell, J., & Dawes, R. (1981). Social dilemmas. In G. M. Stephenson and J. M. Davis (Eds.), Progress in applied social psychology: Vol. 1 (pp. 37–63). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  60. Price, K. H., & Harrison, D. A. (1993). Variables related to social loafing in organizational work groups. Presented at the Academy of Management National Meeting, August 1993, Atlanta, GA.Google Scholar
  61. Rizzo, J., House, R. J., & Lirtzman, S. I. (1970). Role conflict and ambiguity in complex organizations. Administrative Science Quarterly, 15, 150–163.Google Scholar
  62. Roth, P. L., & DeVier, A. (1998). Response rates in HRM/OB survey research: Norms and correlates, 1990–1994. Journal of Management, 24, 97–117.Google Scholar
  63. Rusbult, C.E., Farrell, D., Rogers, G. & Mainous, A.G. (1988). Impact of exchange variables on exit, voice, loyalty and neglect. Academy of Management Journal, 31, 599–627.Google Scholar
  64. Shepperd, J. A. (1993). Productivity loss in performance groups: A motivation analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 113, 67–81.Google Scholar
  65. Sims, H. P., Szilagyi, A. D., & McKemey, D. R. (1976). Antecedents of work-related expectancies. Academy of Management Journal, 19, 547–559.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  66. Smith, C. A., Organ, D. W., & Near, J. P. (1983). Organizational citizenship behavior: Its nature and antecedents. Journal of Applied Psychology, 68, 653–663.Google Scholar
  67. Stigler, G. J. (1974). Free riders and collective action: An appendix to theories of economic regulation. Bell Journal of Economics and Management Science, 5, 359–365.Google Scholar
  68. Stroebe, W., & Frey, B. S. (1982). Self-interest and collective action: The economics and sociology of public goods. British Journal of Social Psychology, 21, 121–137.Google Scholar
  69. Tanaka, J. S., & Huba, G. J. (1985). A fit index for covariance structure models under arbitrary GLS estimation. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 38, 197–201.Google Scholar
  70. Taylor, J. C., & Bowers, D. G. (1972). Survey of organizations: A machine scored standardized questionnaire instrument. Ann Arbor, MI: Institute for Social Research, University of Michigan.Google Scholar
  71. Tubbs, M. E. (1986). Goal setting: A meta-analytic examination of the empirical evidence. Journal of Applied Psychology, 71, 474–483.Google Scholar
  72. Veiga, J. F. (1991). The frequency of self-limiting behavior in groups: A measure and an explanation. Human Relations, 44, 877–895.Google Scholar
  73. Vroom, V. H. (1964). Work and motivation. New York: John Wiley.Google Scholar
  74. Weldon, E. (2000). The development of product and process improvements in work groups. Group & Organization Management, 25, 244–268.Google Scholar
  75. Weldon, E., & Gargano, G. M. (1985). Cognitive effort in additive task groups: The effects of shared responsibility on the quality of multi-attribute judgments. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 36, 348–361.Google Scholar
  76. Weldon, E., & Mustari, E. L. (1988). Felt dispensability in groups of co-actors: The effects of shared responsibility and explicit anonymity on cognitive effort. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 41, 330–351.Google Scholar
  77. Withey, M. J., & Cooper, W. H. (1989). Predicting exit, voice, loyalty, and neglect. Administrative Science Quarterly, 34, 521–539.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Human Sciences Press, Inc. 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Commerce, College of BusinessNiagara UniversityNiagara University
  2. 2.Niagara UniversityUSA

Personalised recommendations