Advertisement

Hydrobiologia

, Volume 490, Issue 1–3, pp 63–74 | Cite as

Benthic insects and fish of the Doubs River system: typological traits and the development of a species continuum in a theoretically extrapolated watercourse

  • J. Verneaux
  • A. Schmitt
  • V. Verneaux
  • C. Prouteau
Article

Abstract

Using the distribution patterns of benthic insects (198 species) and fishes ( 29 species) from 11 tributaries and the main channel of the Doubs River drainage basin (French Jura), the authors have tried to establish whether there is an organization of species into discrete, identifiable communities. Principal Component Analysis (PCA) was used to identify whether a continuum existed, and also used to select 50 least-disturbed sites, which were used to define a theoretical watercourse. The density classes of each species were projected on this longitudinal gradient and each species response was characterised by two typological traits: its typological preferendum (tp) and its typological amplitude (ta),thus creating a synthesis of ecological characteristics. In the typological index given in the appendix, the 210 species which form a biological templet are listed in alphabetical order with their tp and ta values. These typological species traits are useful contributions to a database for running waters biomonitoring.

running waters insects fish typology 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Aart Van der, P. J. M., 1973. Distribution analysis of wolfspiders (Aracae Lycosidae) in a dune area by means of principal component analysis. Neth. J. aquat. Zool. 23: 266–329.Google Scholar
  2. AFNOR, 1992. Essais des Eaux. Détermination de l'indice biologique global normalisé (IBGN). NFT 90–350. AFNOR, Paris. 9 p.Google Scholar
  3. Agence de l'Eau Rhône, Méditerranée, Corse, 1996. Carte de la Qualité des cours d'eau. Synthèse des données acquises de 1988 à 1994.Google Scholar
  4. Agence de l'Eau Rhône, Méditerranée, Corse, 1999. Réseau National de Bassin-Qualité des cours d'eau-Résultats 1997, 76 p.Google Scholar
  5. Angelier, E., 2000. Ecologie des eaux courantes. Tec. & Doc., Paris: 199 pp.Google Scholar
  6. Bacchi, M., 1994. Recherches sur la macrofaune benthique de la Haute Loue. Evolution des peuplements depuis 1973. Mém. DESS Eaux Continentales, Univ. Fr. Comté, Besançon. 41 p et annexes.Google Scholar
  7. Bournaud, M., P. Richoux & P. Usseglio-Polatera, 1992. An approach to the synthesis of qualitative ecological information issued from aquatic Coleoptera communities. Regul. Rivers 7: 165–180.Google Scholar
  8. Cayrou, J., A. Compin, N. Giani & R. Céréghino, 2000. Associations spécifiques chez les macroinvertébrés benthiques et leur utilisation pour la typologie des cours d'eau. Cas du réseau hydrographique Adour-Garonne (France). Ann. Limnol. 36 (3): 189–202Google Scholar
  9. Charvet, S., A. Kosmala & B. Statzner, 1998. Biomonitoring through biological traits of benthic macroinvertebrates: perspectives for a general tool in stream management. Arch. Hydrobiol. 142 (4): 415–432.Google Scholar
  10. Chessel, D, J. D. Lebreton & N. Yoccoz, 1987. Propriétés de l'analyse canonique des correspondances; une illustration en hydrobiologie. Rev. Stat. Appl. 35: 55–72.Google Scholar
  11. Chevenet, F., S. Doledec & D. Chessel, 1994. A fuzzy coding approach for the analysis of long-term ecological data. Freshwat. Biol. 31: 295–309.Google Scholar
  12. Doledec, S., J. M. Olivier & B. Statzner, 2000. Accurate description of the abundance of taxa and their biological traits in stream invertebrate communities: effects of taxonomic and spatial resolution. Arch. Hydrobiol. 148 (1): 25–43.Google Scholar
  13. Fittkau, E. J. & F. Reiss, 1983. Versuch einer Rekonstruktion der Fauna europäischer Ströme und ihrer Auen. Arch. Hydrobiol. 97: 1–6.Google Scholar
  14. Gendron, J. M. & H. Laville, 1997. Les Chironomidés (Diptera) de l'Aude, rivière méditerranéenne des Pyrénées orientales: étude biocénotique et typologique. Ann. Limnol. 33: 93–106.Google Scholar
  15. Hawkes, H. A., 1975. River zonation and classification. In Whitton, B. A. (ed.), River Ecology. Studies in Ecology, Blackwell Scientific Publication, Oxford: 312–374.Google Scholar
  16. Hynes, H. B. N., 1970. The Ecology of Running Waters. Liverpool University Press: 555 pp.Google Scholar
  17. Illies, J. & L. Botosaneanu, 1963. Problèmes et méthodes de la classification et de la zonation écologique des eaux courantes, considérées surtout du point de vue faunistique. Mitt. int. Ver. Limnol. 12: 1–57.Google Scholar
  18. Jackson, D. A., 1973. Multivariate analysis of benthic invertebrate communities: the implication of choosing particular data standardization, measure of association and ordination methods. Hydrobiologia 268: 9–26.Google Scholar
  19. Legendre, L. & P. Legendre, 1984. Ecologie numérique. 2. La structure des données écologiques. Masson, Paris: 335 pp.Google Scholar
  20. Le Roi, O., 1913. Zur Kenntnis der Plecopteren von Rheinland-Westfalen. Sber. naturh. Ver. preuss. Rheinl. Westf: 25–51.Google Scholar
  21. Macan, T. T., 1963. Freshwater Ecology. Longmans, London: 358 pp.Google Scholar
  22. Maitland, P. S., 1966. Studies on Loch Lomond. II–The Fauna of the River Endrick. Backie & Son, Glasgow: 194 pp.Google Scholar
  23. Moog, O. & coll., 1995 Fauna Aquatica Austriaca. A Comprehensive Species Inventory of Austrian Aquatic Organisms with Ecological Notes. Bundesministerium für Land und Forstwirtschaft-Wasserwirtschaftskataster, Wien: 195 pp.Google Scholar
  24. Moss, D., M. T. Furse, J. F. Wright & P. D. Armitage, 1987. The prediction of the macroinvertebrate fauna of unpolluted runningwater sites in Great Britain using environmental data. Freshwat. Biol. 17: 41–52.Google Scholar
  25. Mouthon, J., 1999. Longitudinal organisation of the mollusc species in a theoretical French river. Hydrobiologia 90: 117–128.Google Scholar
  26. Norris, R. H. & M. C. Thoms, 1999. What is river health? Freshwat. Biol. 41: 197–209.Google Scholar
  27. Observatoire Régional de l'Environnement de Franche-Comté. 1995. Qualité des eaux superficielles. 7 p.Google Scholar
  28. Reynoldson, T. B., R. H. Norris, V. H. Resh, D. E. Day & D. Rosenberg, 1997. The reference condition: a comparison of multimetric and multivariate approaches to assess water quality impairment using benthic macroinvertebrates. J. n. am. Benthol. Soc. 16: 833–852.Google Scholar
  29. Shelford, V. E., 1911. Ecological succession. I. Stream fishes and the method of physiographic analysis. Biol. Bull. mar. biol. Lab. Woods Hole 21: 9–35.Google Scholar
  30. Sipahiler, F., 2000. New Ryacophila (Trichoptera Rhyacophilidae) species from France and Spain. Aquatic Insects 22: 138–147.Google Scholar
  31. Ter braak, C. F. J. & P. F. M. Verdonschot, 1995. Canonical correspondence analysis and related multivariate methods in aquatic ecology. Aquat. Sci. 7: 255–289.Google Scholar
  32. Thioulouse, J., D. Chessel, S. Doledec & J. M. Olivier, 1997. ADE4: a multivariate analysis and graphical display software. Stat. Computing 7: 75–83.Google Scholar
  33. Ulfstrand, S., 1968. Benthic animal communities in Lapland streams. Oikos, suppl. 10: 1–120.Google Scholar
  34. Vannote, R. L., G. W. Minshall, K. W. Cummins, S. R. Sedell & C. E. Cushing, 1980. The river continuum concept. Can. J. Fish. aquat. Sci. 37: 130–137.Google Scholar
  35. Verneaux, J., 1973. Cours d'eau de Franche-Comté (massif du Jura). Recherches écologiques sur le réseau Hydrographique du Doubs–essai de biotypologie. Ann. Scient. Univ. Fr. Comté, Biol. Anim. 3 (9): 1–260.Google Scholar
  36. Verneaux, J. & M. Rezzouk, 1974. Les structures d'un grand cours d'eau à Salmonidés: la Loue (Massif du Jura)-Essai typologique et problèmes des relations entre espèces et milieu. Ann. Limnol.10 (2): 131–162.Google Scholar
  37. Verneaux, J., 1976a. Biotypologie de l'écosystème 'eau courante'. La structure biotypologique. C.R. Acad. Sc. Paris 283: 1663–1666.Google Scholar
  38. Verneaux, J., 1976b. Biotypologie de l'écosystème 'eau courante'. Les groupements socio-écologiques. C.R. Acad. Sc. Paris 283: 1791–1793.Google Scholar
  39. Verneaux, J., 1982. Une nouvelle méthode pratique d'évaluation de la qualité des eaux courantes. Un indice biologique de qualité générale (I.B.G.). Ann. Scient. Univ. Fr. Comté, Biol. Anim. 4 (3): 11–21. Verneaux, J., 1984. Méthodes biologiques et problèmes de la détermination des qualités des eaux courantes. Bull. Ecol. 15 (1): 47–55.Google Scholar
  40. Verneaux, J., 1994. Le macrobenthos et 'l'état de santé' des eaux douces. Fondements contraintes et perspectives: 215–227. In Etat de Santé des Écosystèmes Aquatiques. Les Variables Biologiques Comme Indicateurs. Actes du séminaire national Hydrosystèmes. Cemagref, Paris: 298 pp.Google Scholar
  41. Vinçon, G. & C. Ravizza, 2001. Leuctridae (Plecoptera) of the Pyrénées. Ann. Limnol. 37 (4): 293–322.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  • J. Verneaux
    • 1
  • A. Schmitt
    • 1
  • V. Verneaux
    • 1
  • C. Prouteau
    • 1
  1. 1.Laboratoire de Biologie et Ecophysiologie -EA 3184 USC INRA. Pôle HydrobiologieInstitut des Sciences et Techniques de l'Environnement, Université de Franche-ComtéBesançon cedexFrance Tel

Personalised recommendations