Journal of Business Ethics

, Volume 44, Issue 2–3, pp 159–170 | Cite as

Supply Chain Specific? Understanding the Patchy Success of Ethical Sourcing Initiatives

  • Sarah Roberts


As a number of high profile companies have found to their cost, corporate reputations can be significantly affected by firms' management of sustainability issue, including those that are outside their direct control, such as the environmental and social impacts of their supply networks. This paper begins by examining the relationship between corporate social responsibility, reputation, and supply network conditions. It then looks at the effectiveness of one tool for managing supply network sustainability issues, ethical sourcing codes of conduct, by examining how the characteristics of three supply networks branded clothes, DIY wood products and branded confectionary affects the implementation ethical sourcing codes of conduct. It ends by setting out conclusions on why implementation of such codes has been so much more successful in some sectors than others and recommendations on effective approaches to managing sustainability issues in supply networks.


Economic Growth Corporate Social Responsibility Social Responsibility Network Condition Social Impact 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Bass et al.: 2001, Certification's Impacts on Forests, Stakeholders and Supply Chains (IIED, London).Google Scholar
  2. Bowen et al.: 2001, 'The Role of Supply Management Capabilities in Green Supply', Journal of Production and Operations Management (Special Issue, Environmental Management).Google Scholar
  3. Brown and Perry: 1994, 'Removing the Financial Performance Halo from Fortune's Most Admired Companies', Academy of Management Journal 37(5).Google Scholar
  4. Carter and Carter: 1998, 'Interorganisational Determinants of Environmental Purchasing: Initial Evidence from the Consumer Products Industries', Decision Sciences 29(3) (Summer).Google Scholar
  5. CIPS: 2001, 'Ethical Business Practices in Purchasing and Supply', Chartered Institute of Purchasing and Supply, website 3 July 2001.Google Scholar
  6. Deephouse: 2000, 'Media Reputation as a Strategic Resource: An Integration of Mass Communication and Resource Based Theories', Journal of Management 26(6).Google Scholar
  7. Dowling: 2001, Creating Corporate Reputation. Identity, Image, Performance (Oxford University Press, Oxford).Google Scholar
  8. Drumwright: 1994, 'Socially Responsible Organisational Buying: Environmental Concern as a Noneconomic Buying Criterion', Journal of Marketing 58 (July).Google Scholar
  9. Environics: 1999, 'The Millennium Poll on Corporate Social Responsibility', Executive Briefing. Environics.Google Scholar
  10. Financial Times: 2000, Nike Races for Reputation (21 December).Google Scholar
  11. Financial Times: 2001, Hard Labour to Put Code into Practice (Roger Cowe. June 12th 2001).Google Scholar
  12. Fombrun: 1996, Reputation: Realising the Value from Corporate Image (Harvard Business School Press, Harvard, USA).Google Scholar
  13. Fombrun and Shanley: 1990, 'What in a Name? Reputation Building and Corporate Strategy', Academy of Management Review 33(2).Google Scholar
  14. Supply Chain 169 Friedman: 1962, 'The Social Responsibility of Business is to Increase its Profits', New York Times.Google Scholar
  15. Green et al.: 1996, 'Purchasing and Environmental Management: Interactions, Policies and Opportunities', Business Strategy and the Environment 5.Google Scholar
  16. GEMI: 2001, 'New Paths to Business Value. Strategic Sourcing-Environment Health and Safety', Global Environmental Management Initiative (Washington DC).Google Scholar
  17. Gereffi et al.: 2001, 'The NGO-Industrial Complex.Google Scholar
  18. Foreign Policy', Foreign Policy (July/August 2001, Washington DC).Google Scholar
  19. Guardian: 1999, Nike on the Run as Sit-ins Spread across the US (June 25th).Google Scholar
  20. Hines et al.: 2000, Value Stream Management: Strategy and Excellence in the Supply Chain (Pearson, London).Google Scholar
  21. Hines: 1994, Creating World Class Suppliers. Unlocking Mutual Competitive Advantage (Pitman, London).Google Scholar
  22. Kotler: 2000, Marketing Management (Prentice Hall, New Jersey, USA).Google Scholar
  23. Lamming: 2000, Operations Management: Developing Lean Production and Supply, an Aide Memoire (Executive MBA Year 1, Lecture notes 18th March 2000. University of Bath).Google Scholar
  24. Lamming et al.: 1999, 'Environmental Soundness: A Pragmatic Alternative to Expectations of Sustainable Development in Business Strategy', Business Strategy and the Environment 8(3).Google Scholar
  25. Lippmann: 1999, 'Supply Chain Environmental Management: Elements for Success', Environmental Management 6(2) (Elsevier Science).Google Scholar
  26. Frost et al.: forthcoming, Growing Credibility? The Impact of Certification on Forests and People in South Africa (International Institute for Environment and Development, London).Google Scholar
  27. McWilliams and Siegel: 'Corporate Social Responsibility. A Theory of the Firm Perspective', Academy of Management Review 26(1) (Mississippi State, USA).Google Scholar
  28. Murphy and Mathew: 2001, 'Nike and Global Labour Practices', A case study prepared for the New Academy of Business Innovation Network for Socially Responsible Business (New Academy of Business, Bristol, UK).Google Scholar
  29. Nation & World: 2001, Chocolate Giant 'Shocked' over Slave-labor Reports (June 24. Seattle Times).Google Scholar
  30. PWC (1999). 'Corporate Social Responsibility Affects Reputation' (Press release 30th September 1999. 3/8/01).Google Scholar
  31. Russo and Fouts: 1997, 'A Resource Based Perspective on Corporate Environmental Performance and Profitability', Academy of Management Journal 40(3).Google Scholar
  32. Supply Management: 2001a, 'Bad Behaviour Can Damage your Brand' (Supply Management 18 January 2001).Google Scholar
  33. Supply Management: 2001b, 'Be Ethical or be Targeted Warning' (Supply Management 10 May 2001).Google Scholar
  34. Sutcliffe: 2000, Soft Issues, Hard Cash: The Risks and Rewards of Corporate Responsibility (Unpublished report. Shared Vision Social Responsibility Ltd., London).Google Scholar
  35. Teece et al.: 1997, 'Dynamic Capabilities and Strategic Management', Strategic Management Journal 18(7).Google Scholar
  36. Turban and Greening: 1997, 'Corporate Social Performance and Organisational Attractiveness to Prospective Employees', Academy of Management Journal 40(3) (Mississippi State, USA).Google Scholar
  37. Waddock and Graves: 1997, 'The Corporate Social Performance-financial Performance Link', Strategic Management Journal 18(4).Google Scholar
  38. Walton et al.: 1998, 'The Green Supply Chain: Integrating Suppliers into Environmental Management Processes', International Journal of Purchasing and Materials Management (Spring).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sarah Roberts
    • 1
  1. 1.National Centre for Business and SustainabilityGiants Basin, Potato WharfCastlefield, ManchesterU.K.

Personalised recommendations