Population and Environment

, Volume 20, Issue 5, pp 467–488 | Cite as

Do People Move When They Say They Will? Inconsistencies in Individual Migration Behavior

Article

Abstract

Conventional theories of migration decision–making posit that there exists a simple, sequential link between residential satisfaction, mobility intentions and actual moving behavior. Past empirical work, however, has indicated substantial discrepancies between mobility intentions and behavior. This study investigates behavioral inconsistencies in migration using data drawn from the 1985, 1987 and 1989 rounds of the American Housing Survey (AHS). Mobility is inferred by comparing occupants of the same housing units in two consecutive surveys. The results show that a substantial number of people do not realize their intention to move and many move unexpectedly; with or without prior intentions to move, movers and stayers appear to differ significantly in terms of their sociodemographic characteristics. The extent to which individuals act consistently with their intentions also differs along with their attributes (e.g., tenure, age, education and gender). The paper discusses possible reasons for behavioral inconsistencies in migration based on recent developments in social psychological theories of human behavior.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

REFERENCES

  1. Ajzen, I. (1985). From intentions to action: A theory of planned behavior. In J. Kuhl & J. Beckmann (Eds.). Action control (pp. 11-39). Berlin: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
  2. Ajzen, I. (1988). Attitudes, personality, and behavior. Chicago: Dorsey Press.Google Scholar
  3. Ajzen, I. (1991). The intentions to actions: a theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50, 179-211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. (1980). Understanding attitudes and predicting social behavior. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  5. Bach, R. L., & Smith, J. (1977). Community satisfaction, expectations of moving, and migration. Demography, 14, 147-167.Google Scholar
  6. Bentler, P. M. & Speckart, G. (1981). Attitudes ‘cause’ behaviours: A structural equations analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 40, 226-238.Google Scholar
  7. Brown, L. A., & Moore, E. G. (1970). The intra-urban migration process: a perspective. Geografiska Annaler, Series B, 53, 1-13.Google Scholar
  8. Clark, W. A. V. (1982). Recent research on migration and mobility: a review and interpretation. In D. R. Diamond and J. B. McIoughlin (Eds.). Progress in Planning (pp. 1-56). Oxford, Great Britain: Pergamon.Google Scholar
  9. Clark, W. A. V., Huff, J. O., & Burt, J. E. (1979). Calibrating a model of the decision to move. Environment and Planning A, 11, 689-704.Google Scholar
  10. Clark, W. A. V., & Onaka, J. L. (1983). Life cycle and housing adjustment as explanations of residential mobility. Urban Studies, 20, 47-57.Google Scholar
  11. Clark, W. A. V., & Onaka, J. L. (1985). An empirical test of a joint model of residential mobility and housing choice. Environment and Planning A, 17, 915-930.Google Scholar
  12. Crull, S. R., Eichner, M. M., & Morris, E. W. (1991). Two tests of the housing adjustment model of residential mobility. Housing and Society, 18, 53-64.Google Scholar
  13. DaVanzo, J. S. (1982). Repeat migration in the U.S.: who moves back and who moves on. Review of Economics and Statistics, 65, 552-559.Google Scholar
  14. DaVanzo, J. S., & Morrison, P. A. (1981). Return and other sequences of migration in the united states. Demography, 18, 85-101.Google Scholar
  15. Deane, G. D., (1990). Mobility and adjustments: paths to the resolution of residential stress. Demography, 27, 65-79.Google Scholar
  16. De Jong, G. F., (1994). Choice process in migration intentions and behavior (Working Paper No. 95-04). The Pennsylvania State University: Population Research Institute.Google Scholar
  17. De Jong, G. F., & Fawcett, J. T. (1981). Motivations for migration: an assessment and a value-expectancy research model. In G. F. De Jong & R.W. Gardner (Eds.). Migration Decision-Making: Multidiciplinary Approaches to Microlevel Studies in Developed and Developing Countries (pp. 13-58). New York: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
  18. De Jong, G. F., Wilmoth, J. M., Angel, J. L., & Cornwell, G. T. (1992). Geographic mobility of the very old: motives and explanations (Working Paper No. 1992-10). The Pennsylvania State University: Population Research Institute.Google Scholar
  19. Fawcett, J. T. (1985–86). Migration psychology: new behavioral models. Population and Environment, 8, 5-14.Google Scholar
  20. Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief, attitude, intention and behavior: an introduction to theory and research. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
  21. Fredericks, A. J. & Dossett, D. L. (1983). Attitude-behaviour relations: a comparison of the Fishbein-Ajzen and the Bentler-Speckart models. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45, 501-512.Google Scholar
  22. Fuller, T. D., Lightfoot, P., & Kamnuansilpa, P. (1985–86). Mobility plans and mobility behavior: convergence and divergences in Thailand. Population and Environment, 8, 15-40.Google Scholar
  23. Greene, W. H. (1990). Econometric analysis. Macmillan.Google Scholar
  24. Huff, J. O., & Clark, W. A. V. (1978). Cumulative stress and cumulative inertia: a behavioral model of the decision to move. Environment and Planning A, 10, 1101-19.Google Scholar
  25. Kashima, Y., Gallois, C., & McCamish, M. (1993). The theory of reasoned action and cooperative behavior: It takes two to use a condom. British Journal of Social Psychology, 32, 227-239.Google Scholar
  26. King, G. W. (1975). An analysis of attitudinal and normative variables as predictors of intentions and behavior. Speech Monographs, 42, 237-244.Google Scholar
  27. Landale, N. S., & Guest, A. M. (1985). Constraints, satisfaction and residential mobility: Speare's model reconsidered. Demography, 22(2), 199-222.Google Scholar
  28. Lee, B. A. (1978). Residential mobility on skid row: disaffiliation, powerlessness, and decision-making. Demography, 15, 285-300.Google Scholar
  29. Lee, B. A., Oropesa, R. S., & Kanan, J. W. (1994). Neighborhood context and residential mobility. Demography, 31, 249-270.Google Scholar
  30. Lu, M. (forthcoming). Analyzing migration decision making: relationships between residential satisfaction, mobility intentions and moving behavior. Environment and Planning A.Google Scholar
  31. Massey, D. S. (1990). Social structure, household strategies, and the cumulative causation of migration. Population Index, 56(1), 3-26.Google Scholar
  32. McHugh, K. E. (1984). Explaining migration intentions and destination selection. Professional Geographer, 36, 315-325.Google Scholar
  33. McHugh, K. E., Gober, P., & Reid, N. (1990). Determinants of short-and long-term mobility expectations for home owners and renters. Demography, 27, 81-95.Google Scholar
  34. Michelson, W. (1977). Environmental choice, human behavior and residential satisfaction. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  35. Moore, E. G. (1986). Mobility intention and subsequent relocation. Urban Geography, 7, 497-514.Google Scholar
  36. Morris, E. W., & Winter, M. (1975). A theory of family housing adjustment. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 37, 79-88.Google Scholar
  37. Morris, E. W., & Winter, M. (1978). Housing, family, and society. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  38. Newman, S. J., & Duncan, G. J. (1979). Residential problems, dissatisfaction, and mobility. Journal of American Planning Association, 45, 154-166.Google Scholar
  39. Rossi, P. H. (1955). Why families move: a study of the social psychology of urban residential mobility. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
  40. Rossi, P.H. (1980). Introduction to the Second Edition. Why families move (second edition, pp. 15-50). Beverly Hills: Sage.Google Scholar
  41. Sell, R. R., & De Jong, G. F. (1983). Deciding whether to move: mobility, wishful thinking and adjustment. Sociology and Social Research, 67(2), 146-165.Google Scholar
  42. Simmons, A. B. (1985–86). Recent studies on place-utility and intention to migrate: an international comparison. Population and Environment, 8(1–2), 120-140.Google Scholar
  43. Speare, A. Jr. (1974). Residential satisfaction as an intervening variable in residential mobility. Demography, 11, 173-188.Google Scholar
  44. Speare, A. Jr., Goldstein, S., & Frey, W. H. (Eds.). (1975). Residential mobility, migration, and metropolitan change. Cambridge: Ballinger Publishing Company.Google Scholar
  45. Speare, A. Jr., Kobrin, F., & Kingkade, W. (1982). The influence of socioeconomic bonds and satisfaction on interstate migration. Social Forces, 61(2), 551-574.Google Scholar
  46. U.S. Department of Commerce, Bureau of Census, (1991). American Housing Survey [CD-ROM].Google Scholar
  47. Wolpert, J. (1965). Behavioral aspects of the decision to migrate. Papers of the Regional Science Association, 15, 159-169.Google Scholar
  48. Wolpert, J. (1966). Migration as an adjustment to environmental stress. Journal of Social Issues, 22, 91-102.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Human Sciences Press, Inc. 1999

Authors and Affiliations

  • Max Lu
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of GeographyKansas State UniversityManhattan

Personalised recommendations