Group Decision and Negotiation

, Volume 12, Issue 3, pp 217–241 | Cite as

Cracks in Diversity Research: The Effects of Diversity Faultlines on Conflict and Performance

  • Sherry M.B. Thatcher
  • Karen A. Jehn
  • Elaine Zanutto


In this quasi-field study, we investigate the effects of diversity faultlines on the conflict experience, performance, and morale of 79 groups. This is one of the first studies to operationalize the construct of diversity-related faultlines (Lau and Murnighan 1998). One of the most important contributions of this research is that faultlines incorporate multiple characteristics of group members simultaneously rather than assessing just one demographic characteristic at a time as most past diversity research has done. We develop a measure to capture the complexity of the faultline construct and to examine the effects of various group diversity faultline profiles on group outcomes. Linear results with a limited range of data show that faultlines are negatively related to conflict and positively related to morale and performance. Supplemental analyses that take into account the unique characteristics of our dataset indicate curvilinear relationships between diversity faultlines and relationship conflict, process conflict, group morale, and group performance. Groups with either virtually no faultlines (very diverse members) or strong faultlines (split into 2 fairly homogeneous subgroups) had higher levels of conflict and lower levels of morale and performance than groups with medium faultlines. The results suggest a more complex relationship between diversity and group process and outcome variables than typically described in diversity research. A detailed discussion of the faultline measure we developed and the methodological issues associated with measuring and interpreting faultlines are reported.

coalitions conflict diversity performance 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Abrams, D., M. Wetherell, S. Cochrane, M. A. Hogg, and J. C. Turner. (1990). “Knowing What to Think by Knowing Who You Are: Self-Categorization and the Nature of Norm Formation, Conformity and Group Polarization,” British Journal of Social Psychology 29, 97–119.Google Scholar
  2. Allen, N. J., and J. P. Meyer. (1990). “The Measurement and Antecedents of Affective, Continuance, and Normative Commitment to the Organization,” Journal of Occupational Psychology 63, 1–18.Google Scholar
  3. Amason, A. C. (1999). “The Effects of Past Performance on Top Management Team Conflict in Strategic Decision Making,” International Journal of Conflict Management 10 (4), 340–360.Google Scholar
  4. Amason, A. C. (1996). “Distinguishing the Effects of Functional and Dysfunctional Conflict on Strategic Decision Making: Resolving a Paradox for Top Management Teams,” Academy of Management Journal 39, 123–148.Google Scholar
  5. Ancona, D. G., and D. F. Caldwell. (1992). “Demography and Design: Predictors of New Product Team Performance,” Organization Science 3, 321–341.Google Scholar
  6. Bacharach, S. B., P. Bamberger, and B. Mundell. (1993). “Status Inconsistency in Organizations: From Social Hierarchy to Stress,” Journal of Organizational Behavior 14, 21–36.Google Scholar
  7. Bantel, K. A., and S. E. Jackson. (1989). “Top Management and Innovations in Banking: Does the Composition of the Top Team Make a Difference?” Strategic Management Journal 10, 107–124.Google Scholar
  8. Bezrukova, K., S. M. B. Thatcher, and K. A. Jehn. (2001). “Comparing the Effects of Group Heterogeneity and Faultlines on Performance: An Empirical Assessment of Contrasting Models,” Paper Presented at the Annual Meetings of the Academy of Management, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  9. Blau, P. M. (1977). Inequality and Composition: A Primitive Theory of Social Structure. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  10. Byrne, D. E. (1971). The Attraction Paradigm. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  11. Clark, M. A., V. Anand, and L. Roberson. (2000). “Resolving Meaning: Interpretation in Diverse Decision-Making Groups,” Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice 4, 211–221.Google Scholar
  12. Cummings, A., J. Zhou, and G. R. Oldham. (1993). “Demographic Differences and Employee Work Outcomes: Effects on Multiple Comparison Groups,” Paper Presented at the Annual Meetings of the Academy of Management, Atlanta, Georgia.Google Scholar
  13. Eisenhardt, K., J. Kahwajy, and L. Bourgeois. (1997). “Conflict and Strategic Choice: How Top Management Teams Disagree,” California Management Review 39, 42–62.Google Scholar
  14. Ely, R. J. (1995). “The Power in Demography: Women's Social Constructions of Gender Identity at Work,” Academy of Management Journal 38 (3), 589–634.Google Scholar
  15. Frey, L. R. (2000). “Diversifying Our Understanding of Diversity and Communication in Groups: Dialoguing with Clark, Anand, and Roberson,” Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice 4, 222–229.Google Scholar
  16. Hambrick, D., T. Cho, and M. Chen. (1996). “The Influence of Top Management Team Heterogeneity on Firms' Competitive Moves,” Administrative Science Quarterly 41, 659–684.Google Scholar
  17. Hogg, M. A., J. C. Turner, and B. Davidson. (1990). “Polarized Norms and Social Frames of Reference: A Test of the Self-Categorization Theory of Group Polarization,” Basic and Applied Social Psychology 11: 77–100.Google Scholar
  18. Jackson, S. E., J. F. Brett, V. I. Sessa, D. M. Cooper, J. A. Julian, and K. Peyronnin. (1991). “Some Differences Make a Difference: Individual Dissimilarity and Group Heterogeneity as Correlates of Recruitment, Promotion, and Turnover,” Journal of Applied Psychology 76, 675–689.Google Scholar
  19. Jehn, K. (1995). “A Multimethod Examination of the Benefits and Detriments of Intragroup Conflict,” Administrative Science Quarterly 40, 256–282.Google Scholar
  20. Jehn, K. (1997). “A Qualitative Analysis of Conflict Types and Dimensions in Organizational Groups,” Administrative Science Quarterly 42, 530–557.Google Scholar
  21. Jehn, K. A., C. Chadwick, and S. M. B. Thatcher. (1997). “To Agree or Not to Agree: The Effects of Value Congruence, Individual Demographic Dissimilarity, and Conflict on Workgroup Outcomes,” International Journal of Conflict Management 8 (4), 287–306.Google Scholar
  22. Jehn, K. A., G. B. Northcraft, and M. A. Neale. (1999). “Why Differences Make a Difference: A Field Study of Diversity, Conflict and Performance in Workgroups,” Administrative Science Quarterly 44 (4), 741–763.Google Scholar
  23. Jobson, J. D. (1992). Applied Multivariate Data Analysis. Volume II: Categorical and Multivariate Methods. New York: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
  24. Johnston, W. B., and A. H. Packer. (1987). Work Force 2000. Indianapolis, IN: Hudson Institute.Google Scholar
  25. Kabanoff, B. (1991). “Equity, Equality, Power, and Conflict,” Academy of Management Review 16, 416–441.Google Scholar
  26. Kirchmeyer, C. (1995). “Demographic Similarity to the Workgroup: A Longitudinal Study of Managers at the Early Career Stage,” Journal of Organizational Behavior 16, 67–83.Google Scholar
  27. Kunin, T. (1955). “The Construction of a New Type of Attitude Measure,” Personnel Psychology 8, 65–78.Google Scholar
  28. Lau, D. C., and J. K. M urnighan. (1998). “Demographic Diversity and Faultlines: The Compositional Dynamics of Organizational Groups,” Academy of Management Review 23 (2), 325–340.Google Scholar
  29. Lincoln, J. R., and J. Miller. (1979). “Work and Friendship Ties in Organizations: A Comparative Analysis of Relational Networks,” Administrative Science Quarterly 24, 181–199.Google Scholar
  30. Michel, J., and D. Hambrick. (1992). “Diversification Posture and the Characteristics of the Top Management Team,” Academy of Management Journal 35, 9–37.Google Scholar
  31. Morrison, D. G. (1967). “Measurement Problems in Cluster Analysis,” Management Science, 13 775–780.Google Scholar
  32. Murnighan, J. K. (1978). “Models of Coalition Behavior: Game Theoretic, Social Psychological, and Political Perspectives,” Psychological Bulletin 85, 1130–1153.Google Scholar
  33. Murnighan, J. K., and D. J. Brass. (1991). “Intraorganizational Coalitions,” Research on Negotiation in Organizations 3, 283–306.Google Scholar
  34. O'Reilly, C. A., K. Williams, and S. Barsade. (1997). “Group Demography and Innovation: Does Diversity Help?” Paper Presented at the Annual Meetings of the Academy of Management, Boston, MA.Google Scholar
  35. O'Reilly, C. A., R. Snyder, and J. Boothe. (1993). “Effects of Executive Team Demography on Organizational Change,” in G. Huber, and W. Glick (eds.), Organizational Change and Redesign. New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 147–175.Google Scholar
  36. O'Reilly, C. A., D. F. Caldwell, and W. P. Barnett. (1989). “Work Group Demography, Social Integration, and Turnover,” Administrative Science Quarterly 34, 21–37.Google Scholar
  37. O'Reilly, C. A., and J. Chatman. (1986). “Organizational Commitment and Psychological Attachment: The Effects of Compliance, Identification, and Internalization of Prosocial Behavior,” Journal of Applied Psychology 71, 492–499.Google Scholar
  38. Pelled, L. H. (1996a). “Relational Demography and Perceptions of Group Conflict and Performance: A Field Investigation,” International Journal of Conflict Resolution 7 (3), 230–247.Google Scholar
  39. Pelled, L. H. (1996b). “Demographic Diversity, Conflict, and Work Group Outcomes: An Intervening Process Theory,” Organization Science 7 (6), 615–631.Google Scholar
  40. Pfeffer, J., and C. A. O'Reilly. (1987). “Hospital Demography and Turnover Among Nurses,” Industrial Relations 26, 158–173.Google Scholar
  41. Polzer, J. T., E. A. Mannix, and M. A. Neale. (1998). “Interest Alignment and Coalitions in Multiparty Negotiation,” Academy of Management Journal 41, 42–54.Google Scholar
  42. Pool, J. (1976). “Coalition Formation in Small Groups With Incomplete Communication Networks,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 34 (1): 82–91.Google Scholar
  43. Riordan, C. M., and L. M. Shore. (1997). “Demographic Diversity and Employee Attitudes: An Empirical Examination of Relational Demography Within Work Units,” Journal of Applied Psychology 82 (3), 342–358.Google Scholar
  44. Shah, P. P., and K. A. Jehn. (1993). “Do Friends Perform Better than Acquaintances: The Interaction of Friendship, Conflict, and Task,” Group Decision and Negotiation 2: 149–166.Google Scholar
  45. Sharma, S. (1996). Applied Multivariate Techniques. New York: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
  46. Stevenson, W. B., J. L. Pearce, and L. W. Porter. (1985). “The Concept of 'Coalition' in Organization Theory and Research,” Academy of Management Review 10 (2): 256–268Google Scholar
  47. Tajfel, H. (1978). “The Achievement of Group Differentiation,” in H. Tajfel (ed.), Differentiation Between Social Groups. London: Academic Press, pp. 483–507.Google Scholar
  48. Taylor, S., and R. Bogdan. (1984). Introduction to Qualitative Research Methods: The Search for Meanings. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
  49. Thatcher, S. M. B. (1999). “The Contextual Importance of Diversity: The Impact of Relational Demography and Group Diversity on Individual Performance and Satisfaction,” Performance Improvement Quarterly 12 (1), 97–112.Google Scholar
  50. Tsui, A. S., T. Egan, and C. A. O'Reilly. (1992). “Being Different: Relational Demography and Organizational Attachment,” Administrative Science Quarterly 37, 549–579.Google Scholar
  51. Turner, J. C. (1987). Rediscovering the Social Group: A Self-Categorization Theory. Oxford, England: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
  52. Turner, J. C. (1982). “Towards a Cognitive Redefinition of the Social Group,” in H. Tajfel (ed.), Social Identity and Intergroup Relations. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press, pp. 15–40.Google Scholar
  53. Wagner, G. W., J. Pfeffer, and C. A. O'Reilly. (1984). “Organizational Demography and Turnover in Top Management Groups,” Administrative Science Quarterly 29, 74–92.Google Scholar
  54. Weingart, L. R. (1992). “Impact of Group Goals, Task Component Complexity, Effort and Planning On Group Performance,” Journal of Applied Psychology 77, 682–693.Google Scholar
  55. Wharton, A., and J. Baron. (1987). “So Happy Together? The Impact of Gender Segregation on Men at Work,” American Sociological Review 52, 574–587.Google Scholar
  56. Wiersema, M., and A. Bird. (1993). “Organizational Demography in Japanese Firms: Group Heterogeneity, Individual Dissimilarity and Top Management Team Turnover,” Academy of Management Journal 36, 996–1025.Google Scholar
  57. Wiersema, M., and K. Bantel. (1992). “Top Management Team Demography and Corporate Strategic Change,” Academy of Management Journal 35, 91–121.Google Scholar
  58. Williams, K. Y., and C. A. O'Reilly. (1998). “Demography and Diversity in Organizations: A Review of 40 Years of Research,” Research in Organizational Behavior 20, 77–140.Google Scholar
  59. Zajac, E., B. Golden, and S. Shortell. (1991). “New Organizational Forms for Enhancing Innovation: The Case of Internal Corporate Joint Ventures,” Management Science 37: 170–84.Google Scholar
  60. Zenger, T., and B. Lawrence. (1989). “Organizational Demography: The Differential Effects of Age and Tenure Distributions on Technical Communications,” Academy of Management Journal 32, 353–376.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sherry M.B. Thatcher
    • 1
  • Karen A. Jehn
    • 2
  • Elaine Zanutto
    • 3
  1. 1.MIS Department, Eller College of BusinessUniversity of ArizonaTucsonUSA
  2. 2.Management Department, Wharton College of BusinessUniversity of PennsylvaniaPhiladelphiaUSA
  3. 3.Statistics Department, Wharton College of BusinessUniversity of PennsylvaniaPhiladelphiaUSA

Personalised recommendations