Biology and Philosophy

, Volume 18, Issue 1, pp 131–168 | Cite as

Neural Plasticity and Consciousness

  • Susan Hurley
  • Alva Noë
Article

Abstract

We introduce a distinction between cortical dominance andcortical deference, and apply it to various examples ofneural plasticity in which input is rerouted intermodally orintramodally to nonstandard cortical targets. In some cases butnot others, cortical activity `defers' to the nonstandard sourcesof input. We ask why, consider some possible explanations, andpropose a dynamic sensorimotor hypothesis. We believe that thisdistinction is important and worthy of further study, bothphilosophical and empirical, whether or not our hypothesis turnsout to be correct. In particular, the question of how the distinction should be explained is linked to explanatory gapissues for consciousness. Comparative and absolute explanatorygaps should be distinguished: why does neural activity in aparticular area of cortex have this qualitative expressionrather than that, and why does it have any qualitativeexpression at all? We use the dominance/deference distinction toaddress the comparative gaps, both intermodal and intramodal (notthe absolute gap). We do so not by inward scrutiny but rather by expanding our gaze to include relations between brain, body andenvironment.

consciousness cortical deference cortical dominance dynamic sensorimotor contingencies explanatory gaps neural plasticity perceptual adaptation phantom limbs synaesthesia 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Arho, P., Capelle, C., Wanet-Defalque, M.C., Catalan-Ahumada, M. and Veraart, C.: 1999, ‘Auditory Coding of Visual Patterns for the Blind’, Perception 28(8), 1013-1029.Google Scholar
  2. Bach-y-Rita, P.: 1972, BrainMechanisms in Sensory Substitution, Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
  3. Bach-y-Rita, P.: 1995, Nonsynaptic Diffusion of Neurotransmission and Late Brain Reorganization, Demos-Vermande, New York.Google Scholar
  4. Bach-y-Rita, P.: 1984, ‘The Relationship between Motor Processes and Cognition in Tactile Visual Substitution’, in W. Prinz and A.F. Sanders (eds), Cognition and Motor Processes, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, pp. 149-160.Google Scholar
  5. Bach-y-Rita, P.: 1996, ‘Sustitucion sensorielle et qualia’, in J. Proust (ed.), Perception et Intermodalité, Presses Universitaires de France, Paris). Reprinted in English translation in Noë, A. and Thompson, E.: 2002, Vision and Mind: Selected Readings in the Philosophy of Perception, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  6. Bach-y-Rita, P., Collins, C.C., Saunders, F., White, B., and Scadden, L. 1969, Nature 221, 963-964.Google Scholar
  7. Borsook, D., Becerra, L., Fishman, S., Edwards, A., Jennings, C.L., Stonjanovic, M., Papinicolas, L., Ramachandran, V.S., Gonzalez, R.G. and Breiter, H.: 1998, ‘Acute Plasticity in the Human Somatosensory Cortex Following Amputation’, Neuroreport 9(6), 1013-1017.Google Scholar
  8. Botvinik, M., and Cohen, J.: 1998, ‘Rubber Hands ‘Feel’ Touch that Eyes See’, Nature 391(6669), 756.Google Scholar
  9. Buchel, C.: 1998, ‘Functional Neuroimaging Studies of Braille Reading: Cross-modal Reorganization and Its Implications’, Brain 121, 1193-1194.Google Scholar
  10. Buchel, C., Price, C., Frackowiak, R.S.J. and Friston, K.: 1998, ‘Different Activation Patterns in the Visual Cortex of Late and Congenitally Blind Subjects’, Brain 121, 409-419.Google Scholar
  11. Carman, L.S., Pallas, S.L. and Sur, M.: 1992, ‘Visual Inputs Routed to Auditory Pathway in Ferrets’, Society for Neuroscience Abstracts 18, 593.Google Scholar
  12. Chalmers, D.: 1996, The Conscious Mind, Oxford University Press, New York.Google Scholar
  13. Cohen, L.G., Celnik, P., Pascual-Leone, A., Corwell, B., Faiz, L., Dambrosia, J., Honda, M., Sadato, N., Gerloff, C., Catala, M.D. and Hallett, M.: 1997a, ‘Functional Relevance of Cross-modal Plasticity in Blind Humans’, Nature 389, 180-183.Google Scholar
  14. Cohen L.G., Weeks, R., Celnik, P. and Hallett, M.: 1997b, ‘Role of the Occipital Cortex During Braille Reading (Cross-Modal Plasticity) in Subjects with Blindness Acquired Late in Life’, Society for Neuroscience Abstracts (92.1).Google Scholar
  15. Cohen, L.G., Weeks, R.A., Sadato, N., Celnik, P., Ishii, K. and Hallett, M.: 1999, ‘Period of Susceptibility of Cross-Modal Plasticity in the Blind’, Annals of Neurology 45(4), 451-460.Google Scholar
  16. Cole, D.: 1990, ‘Functionalism and Inverted Spectra’, Synthese 82, 207-222.Google Scholar
  17. Elman, J., Bates, E., Johnson, M., Karmiloff-Smith, A., Parisi, D. and Plunkett, K.: 1996, Rethinking Innateness, MIT Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  18. Hadjikhani, M., Liu, A.K., Dale, A., Cavanagh, P. and Tootell, R.B.H.: 1998, ‘Retinotopy and Color Sensitivity in Human Visual Cortical Area V8’, Nature Neuroscience, 235-241.Google Scholar
  19. Halligan, P.W., Marshall, J.C. and Wade, D.T.: 1994, ‘Sensory Disorganization and Perceptual Plasticity after Limb Amputation: A Follow-up Study’, Neuroreport 5(11), 1341-1345.Google Scholar
  20. Hardin, C.L.: 1997, ‘Reinverting the Spectrum’, in A. Byrne and D.R. Hilbert (eds), Readings on Color: Volume 1, The Philosophy of Color, MIT Press, Cambridge, pp. 289-301.Google Scholar
  21. Harris, C.: 1965, ‘Perceptual Adaptation to Inverted, Reversed, and Displaced Vision’, Psychological Review 72(6), 419-444.Google Scholar
  22. Harris, C.: 1980, ‘Insight or Out of Sight?: Two Examples of Perceptual Plasticity in the Human Adult’, in Charles S. Harris (ed.), Visual Coding and Adaptability, Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ, pp. 95-149.Google Scholar
  23. Hurley, S.L.: 1998a, Consciousness in Action, Harvard University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  24. Hurley, S.L.: 1998b, ‘Vehicles, Contents, Conceptual Structure, and Externalism’, Analysis 58(1), 1-6.Google Scholar
  25. Knecht, S., Henningsen, H., Hohling, C., Elbert, T., Flor, H., Pantev, C. and Taub, E.: 1998, ‘Plasticity of Plasticity? Changes in the Pattern of Perceptual Correlates of Reorganization after Amputation’, Brain 121(4), 717-724.Google Scholar
  26. Kohler, I.: 1951, ‘Ñber Aufbau und Wandlungen der Wahrnehmungswelt’, Österreichische Akademie der Wissenschaften. Sitzungsberichte, philosophish-historische Klasse 227, 1-118.Google Scholar
  27. Kohler, I.: 1964, The Formation and Transformation of the Perceptual World. Published as a monograph in Psychological Issues vol. 3 (monograph 12), New York International University Press. [This is a translation of Kohler 1951.]Google Scholar
  28. Kujala, T., Alho, K. and Naatenen, R.: 2000, ‘Cross-modal Reorganization of Human Cortical Functions’, Trends in Neuroscience 23(3), 115-120.Google Scholar
  29. Levine, J.: 1993, ‘On Leaving out What It's Like’, in Martin Davies and Glyn Humphreys (eds), Consciousness, Blackwell, Cambridge, pp. 121-136.Google Scholar
  30. Marks, L.E.: 1987, ‘On Cross-modal Similarity: Auditory-visual Interactions in Speeded Discriminations’, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 13(3), 384-394.Google Scholar
  31. Mattingley, J.B., Rich, A.N., Yelland, G. and Bradshaw, J.L.: 2001, ‘Unconscious Priming Eliminates Automatic Binding of Colour and Alphanumeric form in Synaesthesia’, Nature 410, 580-582.Google Scholar
  32. Maudlin, T.: 1989, ‘Computation and Consciousness’, Journal of Philosophy, 407-432.Google Scholar
  33. Meijer, P.B.L.: 1992, ‘An Experimental System for Auditory Image Representations’, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering 39(2), 112-121. Reprinted in the 1993 IMIA Yearbook of Medical Informatics, pp. 291–300.Google Scholar
  34. Merzenich, M.: 2000, ‘Seeing in the Sound Zone’, Nature 404, 820-821.Google Scholar
  35. Mueller, J.: 1838, Handbuch der Physiologie des Menschen (Vol. V), Hölscher, Coblenz.Google Scholar
  36. Myin, E.: 2001, ‘Color and the Duplication Assumption’, Synthese 129, 61-77.Google Scholar
  37. Noë, A.: 2002, ‘On What We See’, Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 83(1), 57-80.Google Scholar
  38. Noë, A.: forthcoming, Action in Perception, The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  39. Noë, A. and O'Regan, K.: 2000, ‘Perception, Attention, and the Grand Illusion’, Psyche 6(15). URL:http://psyche.cs.monash.edu.au/v6/psyche-6-15-noe.html.Google Scholar
  40. Noë, A. and O'Regan, K.: 2002, ‘On the Brain-basis of Visual Consciousness: A Sensorimotor Account’, in A. Noë and E. Thompson (eds), Vision and Mind: Selected Readings in the Philosophy of Perception, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  41. Noë, A. and Thompson, E.: forthcoming, ‘Are there Neural Correlates of Consciousness?’ Journal of Consciousness Studies.Google Scholar
  42. Nunn, J.A., Gregory, L.J., Brammer, M., Williams, S.C.R., Parslow, D.M., Morgan, M.J., Morris, R., Bullmore, E., Baron-Cohen, S. and Gray, J.A.: 2002, ‘Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Synesthesia: Activation of Color Vision Area V4/V8 by Spoken Words’, Nature Neuroscience 5(4), 371-374.Google Scholar
  43. O'Regan, K. and Noë, A.: 2001a, ‘A Sensorimotor Account of Vision and Visual Consciousness’, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24(5), 883-917.Google Scholar
  44. O'Regan, K. and Noë, A.: 2001b, ‘Acting out Our Sensory Experience’, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24(5), 955-975.Google Scholar
  45. O'Regan, K. and Noë, A.: 2001c, ‘What It Is Like to See: A Sensorimotor Theory of Perceptual Experience’, Synthese 129(1): 79-103.Google Scholar
  46. O'Regan, J.K., Myin, E. and Noë, A.: submitted, ‘What It's Like to Feel: An Explanation in Terms of Bodiliness and Grabbiness’, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.Google Scholar
  47. Pallas, S.L.: 2001, ‘Intrinsic and Extrinsic Factors that Shape Neocorticial Specification’, Trends in Neuroscience 24(7), 411-423.Google Scholar
  48. Pallas, S.L. and Sur, M.: 1993, ‘Visual Projections Induced into the Auditory Pathway of Ferrets: II. Coriticocoritical Connections of Primary Auditory Cortex’, Journal of Comparative Neurology 337(2), 317-333.Google Scholar
  49. Pettit, P.: in press, ‘Looks Red’, Philosophical Issues 13.Google Scholar
  50. Ramachandran, V.S., Rogers-Ramachandran, D. and Cobb, S.: 1995, ‘Touching the Phantom Limb’, Nature 377, 490-491.Google Scholar
  51. Ramachandran, V.S. and Rogers-Ramachandran, D.: 1996, ‘Synaesthesia in Phantom Limbs Induced with Mirrors’, Proceedings of the Royal Society 263, 377-386.Google Scholar
  52. Ramachandran, V.S. and Blakeslee, S.: 1998, Phantoms in the Brain, Fourth Estate, London.Google Scholar
  53. Ramachandran, V.S. and Hirstein, W.: 1998, ‘The Perception of Phantom Limbs’, Brain 121(9), 1603-1630.Google Scholar
  54. Ramachandran, V.S. and Hubbard, E.M.: 2001, ‘Synaesthesia – A Window into Perception, Thought and Language’, Journal of Consciousness Studies 8(12), 3-34.Google Scholar
  55. Rauschecker, J.P.: 1996, ‘Substitution of Visual by Auditory Inputs in the Cat's Anterior Ectosylvian Cortex’, Prog. Brain Research 112, 313-323.Google Scholar
  56. Rich, A. N. and Mattingley, J.: 2002, ‘Anomalous Perception in Synaesthesia’, Nature Reviews: Neuroscience 3, 43-52.Google Scholar
  57. Roe, A.W., Pallas, S.L., Hahm, J. and Sur, M.: 1990, ‘A Map of Visual Space Induced in Primary Auditory Cortex’, Science 250 (4982), 818-820.Google Scholar
  58. Roe, A.W., Pallas, S.L., Kwon, Y.H. and Sur, M.: 1992, ‘Visual Projections Routed to the Auditory Pathway in Ferrets’, Journal of Neuroscience 12(9), 3651-3664.Google Scholar
  59. Sadato, N., Pascual-Leone, A., Grafman, J., Ibanez, V., Deiber, M.P., Dold, G. and Hallett, M.: 1996, ‘Activation of the Primary Visual Cortex by Braille Reading in Blind Subjects’, Nature 380(6574), 526-528.Google Scholar
  60. Sadato, N., Pascual-Leone, A., Grafman, J., Deiber, M.P., Ibanez, V. and Hallett, M.: 1998, ‘Neural Networks for Braille Reading by the Blind’, Brain 121(7), 1213-1229.Google Scholar
  61. Sampaio, E., Maris, S. and Bach-y-Rita, P.: 2001, ‘Brain Plasticity: ‘Visual’ Acuity of Blind Persons via the Tongue’, Brain Res 908(2), 204-207.Google Scholar
  62. Sharma, J., Angelucci, A. and Sur, M.: 2000, ‘Induction of Visual Orientation Modules in Auditory Cortex’, Nature 404(6780), 841-847.Google Scholar
  63. Stratton, G.M.: 1897, ‘Vision Without Inversion of the Retinal Image’, Psychological Review 4, 341–360, 463–481.Google Scholar
  64. Sur, M., Angelucci, A. and Sharma, J.: 1999, ‘Rewiring Cortex: The Role of Patterned Activity in Development and Plasticity of Neocortical Circuits’, Journal of Neurobiology 41(1), 33-43.Google Scholar
  65. Taylor, J.: 1962, The Behavioral Basis of Perception, Yale University Press, New Haven and London.Google Scholar
  66. Teller, D.Y. and Pugh, E.N. Jr.: 1983, ‘Linking Propositions in Color Vision’, in J.D. Mollon and L.T. Sharpe (eds), Colour Vision, Academic Press, London, pp. 577-589.Google Scholar
  67. Tootell, R.B.H. and Hadjikhani, N.: 1998, ‘Has a New Color Area Been Discovered? Reply to Zeki’, Nature Neuroscience 1(5), 335-336.Google Scholar
  68. Thompson, E.: 1995, Color Vision, Routledge, London.Google Scholar
  69. van Gulick, R.: 1993, ‘Understanding the Phenomenal Mind’, in M. Davies and G. Humphreys (eds), Consciousness, Blackwell, Oxford, pp. 137-154.Google Scholar
  70. von Melcher, L., Pallas, S.L. and Sur, M.: 2000, ‘Visual Behaviour Mediated by Retinal Projections Directed to the Auditory Pathway’, Nature 404(6780), 871-876.Google Scholar
  71. Zeki, S., McKeefry, D.J., Bartels, A. and Frackowiak, R.S.J.: 1998, ‘Has a New Color Area Been Discovered?’ Nature Neuroscience 1(5), 335-336.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  • Susan Hurley
    • 1
  • Alva Noë
    • 2
  1. 1.PAISUniversity of WarwickCoventryU.K.
  2. 2.Department of PhilosophyUniversity of CaliforniaSanta CruzU.S.A.

Personalised recommendations