Plant Ecology

, Volume 166, Issue 1, pp 25–35

Regeneration processes of a boreal forest in Kamchatka with special reference to the contribution of sprouting to population maintenance

  • Kosuke Homma
  • Koichi Takahashi
  • Toshihiko Hara
  • Valentina P. Vetrova
  • Marina P. Vyatkina
  • Sergey Florenzev


We studied regeneration patterns of three tree species Picea ajanensis, Betula platyphylla and Populus tremula from 1998 to 2000 in the Central Depression of the Kamchatka Peninsula. We paid special attention to the contribution of sprouting to their regeneration. P. ajanensis was the only species that regenerated by seedling. In a 40 × 40 m study plot, the density of P. ajanensis saplings < 2.0 cm in diameter at basal area (DBH) was 1132, and this was the highest among the three species studied. The number of saplings ≥ 2 cm in DBH declined sharply with size class. The spatial distribution of P. ajanensis saplings (< 2 cm in DBH) showed a significant positive correlation with that of adult trees and a negative correlation with that of gaps. These trends were not changed after re-measurement in 2000, although nearly half of the juveniles had died or been injured during the two years. These results suggest that small Picea saplings prefer habitats under the canopy of adult trees rather than in gaps for establishment. Most small individuals of B. platyphylla were produced from sprouts. The number of saplings in the smallest size class (< 2 cm in DBH) was much less than that of P. ajanensis, although the number of larger individuals did not decrease remarkably. The spatial distribution of B. platyphylla saplings showed a positive correlation with that of adult trunks and a negative correlation with that of canopy trees of P. ajanensis. These results suggest an effective contribution of sprouts to the regeneration of B. platyphylla. P. tremula was the only species that could invade big gaps and produce many root suckers efficiently. There were 181 suckers of P. tremula in the smallest size class (< 2 cm in DBH) in the study plot, although the number of saplings ≥ 2 cm in DBH declined abruptly. The spatial distribution of saplings of this species showed a slight positive correlation with that of gaps, and negative correlation with that of adult trees of B. platyphylla, P. ajanensis, and P. tremula. The root suckering strategy of P. tremula might be adaptive under severe conditions in high-latitude regions. Our data suggest, however, that it does not necessarily contribute to regeneration in mature forests. The three component species in this forest did not seem to utilize canopy gaps for regeneration; we suggest that gap dynamics do not work in this forest. The sparse canopy, which is a typical character of forests in high-latitude regions, might be a consequence of high mortalities of seedlings and root suckers inside gaps.

Gap regeneration Root sucker Seedling Sprouting Trunk sucker 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Barns B.V. 1966. The clonal growth habit of American aspens. Ecology 47: 439–447.Google Scholar
  2. Brown J.K. and DeByle N.V. 1987. Fire damage mortality and suckering in aspen. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 17: 1100–1109.Google Scholar
  3. Cao K. and Peters R. 1998. Structure and stem growth of multistemmed trees of Fagus engleriana in China. Plant Ecology 139: 211–220.Google Scholar
  4. Hara M. 1987. Analysis of seedling banks of a climax beech forest: ecological importance of seedling sprouts. Vegetatio 71: 67–74.Google Scholar
  5. Homma K. 1997. Effects of snow pressure on growth form and life history of tree species in Japanese beech forest. Journal of Vegetation Science 8: 781–788.Google Scholar
  6. Hubbell S.P. and Foster R.B. 1986. Canopy gaps and the dynamics of a neotropical forest. In: Crawley M.J. (ed.), Plant Ecology. Blackwell, London, pp. 77–96.Google Scholar
  7. Jeník J. 1994. Clonal growth in woody plants: a review. In: Soukupová L., Marshall C., Hara T. and Herben T. (eds), Plant Clonality: Biology and Diversity. Opulus Press, Uppsala, pp. 291–306.Google Scholar
  8. Kemperman J.A. and Barns B.V. 1976. Clone size in American aspens. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 54: 2603–2607.Google Scholar
  9. Kitamura K., Takasu H., Hayashi K., Ohara M., Ohkawa T., Uteck F.H. et al. 2000. Demographic genetic analysis of the American beech (Fagus grandifolia Ehrh.). I. Genetic substructurings of northern populations in Quebec and Pennsylvania with root suckers. Plant Species Biology 15: 43–58.Google Scholar
  10. Kojima S. 1994. Vegetation and environment of Betula ermanii forest on the Kamchatka Peninsula. Japanese Journal of Ecology 44: 49–59.Google Scholar
  11. Koop H. 1987. Vegetative reproduction of trees in some European natural forests. Vegetatio 72: 103–110.Google Scholar
  12. Krasny M.E. and Johnson M.E. 1992. Stand development in aspen clones. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 22: 1424–1429.Google Scholar
  13. Kurahashi Y., Shibuya M., Yajima T. and Matsuda K. 1999. Regeneration pattern of tree species and light regime on scarified sites with sparse canopy trees in Northern Japan. Research Bulletin of Hokkaido University Forest 56: 41–54.Google Scholar
  14. Manly B.K.F. 1990. Randomization and Monte Carlo Methods in Biology. Chapman & Hall, London.Google Scholar
  15. Ogawa M., Aiba Y. and Watanabe N. 1999. Morphological and anatomical characteristics of sprouting root of Prunus ssiori. Journal of Japan Forestry Society 81: 36–41.Google Scholar
  16. Ohkubo T., Kaji M. and Hayama T. 1988. Structure of primary Japanese Beech (Fagus japonica Maxim.) forest in the Chichibu Mountains, Central Japan, with special reference to regeneration process. Ecological Research 3: 101–116.Google Scholar
  17. Palmer M.W. and van der Maarel E. 1995. Variance in species richness species association and niche limitation. Oikos 73: 203–213.Google Scholar
  18. Pecháxčová S., During H.J., Rydlová V. and Herben T. 1999. Species-specific spatial pattern of below ground plant parts in a montane glassland community. Journal of Ecology 87: 569– 582.Google Scholar
  19. Peterson C.J. and Pickett S.T.A. 1991. Treefall and resprouting following catastrophic window in an old growth hemlock-hardwoods forest. Forest Ecology and Management 42: 205–217.Google Scholar
  20. Peterson C.J. and Squiers E.R. 1995a. Competition and succession in an aspen white-pine forest. Journal of Ecology 83: 449–457.Google Scholar
  21. Peterson C.J. and Squiers E.R. 1995b. An unexpected change in spatial pattern across 10 years in an aspen white-pine forest. Journal of Ecology 83: 847–855.Google Scholar
  22. Peterson C.J. and Jones R.H. 1997. Clonality in Woody plants: a review and comparison with clonal herbs. In: de Kroon H. and van Groenendael J. (eds), The Ecology and Evolution of Clonal Plants. Backhuys Publ., Leiden, pp. 263–289.Google Scholar
  23. Putz F.E., Coley P.D., Montalvo A., and Aiello A. 1983. Snapping and uprooting of trees: structural determinants and ecological consequences. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 13: 1011– 1020.Google Scholar
  24. Putz F.E. and Brokaw N.V. 1989. Sprouting of broken trees on Barro Colorado Island, Panama. Ecology 70: 326–333.Google Scholar
  25. Sakai A., Ohsawa T. and Ohsawa M. 1995. Adaptive significance of sprouting of Euptelea polyandra a deciduous tree growing on steep slopes with shallow soil. Journal of Plant Research 108: 377–386.Google Scholar
  26. Seiwa K. and Kikuzawa K. 1996. Importance of seed size for the establishment of seedlings of five deciduous broad-leaved tree species. Vegetatio 123: 51–64.Google Scholar
  27. Sonoyama N., Watanabe N., Watanabe O., Niwa S. and Kubota Y. 1997. Ecological significance of sprouting traits of cool-temperature tree species in a northern mixed forest: population dynamics of sprout species. Japanese Journal of Ecology 47: 21–29.Google Scholar
  28. Shepperd W.D. and Smith F.W. 1993. The role of near-surface lateral roots in the life cycle of aspen in the central Rocky Mountains. Forest Ecology and Management 61: 157–170.Google Scholar
  29. Takahashi K., Homma K., Hara T., Vetrova V. and Florensev S. 2001a. Regeneration process of confer – hardwood mixed forest in the Central Depression, Kamchatka Peninsula (I)-Vegetation and stand structure-. In: Proceedings on international symposium on atmosphere – ocean – cryosphere interaction in the Sea of Okhotsuk and surrounding environment. Institute of Low Temperature Science, Hokkaido Univ., Sapporo, pp. 182– 183.Google Scholar
  30. Takahashi K., Homma K., Hara T., Vetrova V.P. and Florenzev S. 2001b. Stand structure and regeneration of in a Kamchatka mixed boreal forest. Journal of Vegetation Science 12: 627– 634.Google Scholar
  31. Tuskan G.A. and Rensema T.R. 1992. Clonal differences in biomass characteristics, coppice ability, and biomass prediction equasions among four Populus clones grown in eastern North Dakota. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 22: 348–354.Google Scholar
  32. Watt A.S. 1947. Pattern and process in the plant community. Journal of Ecology 35: 1–22.Google Scholar
  33. Yakubov V.V. 1997. Vascular Plants of the Kronotsky Biosphare Reserve (Kamchatka). Vladivostok, Russia, 100 pp.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kosuke Homma
    • 1
  • Koichi Takahashi
    • 1
  • Toshihiko Hara
    • 1
  • Valentina P. Vetrova
    • 2
  • Marina P. Vyatkina
    • 2
  • Sergey Florenzev
    • 2
  1. 1.Institute of Low Temperature ScienceHokkaido UniversityKita-kuJapan
  2. 2.Far East Branch of Russian Academy of SciencesKamchatka Institute of Ecology and Nature ManagementPetropavlovsk–KamchatskyRussia
  3. 3.Field Center for Sustainable Agriculture and ForestryNiigata UniversityAikawa-choJapan
  4. 4.Faculty of ScienceShinshu UniversityMatsumotoJapan

Personalised recommendations