Journal of Psycholinguistic Research

, Volume 27, Issue 6, pp 619–637 | Cite as

The Consistency of Multiple-Pronunciation Effects in Reading: The Case of Japanese Logographs

  • Yuriko Kayamoto
  • Jun Yamada
  • Hiro-omi Takashima
Article

Abstract

Naming latencies were measured for single- and multiple-reading (pronunciation) kanji words with two frequency levels in Experiment 1. Results showed that multiple-reading kanji are named much slower than are single-reading controls, the effect of multiple reading being greater than that of frequency. There was found to be measurable competition between two readings of a multiple-reading kanji. In Experiment 2, it was demonstrated that there are multiple-reading kanji which are named as fast as single-reading kanji, thereby showing that no significant competition is induced in them. In light of the theoretical perspective in this study, the conflicting results reported by previous studies are discussed.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

REFERENCES

  1. Balota, D. A., & Chumbley, J. I. (1984). Are lexical decisions a good measure of lexical access? The role of word frequency in the neglected decision stage. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 10, 340–357.Google Scholar
  2. Carroll, J. B., & White, M. N. (1973). Age-of-acquisition norms for 220 picturable nouns. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 12, 563–576.Google Scholar
  3. Colombo, L. (1992). Lexical stress effect and its interaction with frequency in word pronunciation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 18, 987–1003.Google Scholar
  4. Fang, S., Horng, R., & Tzeng, O. (1986). Consistency effects in the Chinese character and pseudo-character naming tasks. In H. S. R. Kao & R. Hoosain (Eds.), Linguistics, psychology, and the Chinese language (pp. 11–21). Hong Kong: University of Hong Kong.Google Scholar
  5. Feldman, L. B., & Turvey, M. T. (1980). Words written in kana are named faster than the same words written in kanji. Language and Speech, 23, 141–147.Google Scholar
  6. Fushimi, T., Ijuin, M., & Tatsumi, I. (1996). Kanji jukugo no ondoku ni okeru consistency koka (1). Proceedings of the Japan Psychological Association, p. 608.Google Scholar
  7. Glushko, R. J. (1979). The organization and activation of orthographic knowledge in reading aloud. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 5, 574–691.Google Scholar
  8. Goryo, K. (1987). Yomu to iu koto [On reading]. Tokyo, Japan: Tokyo University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Hayashi, O. (1982). Zusetsu nihongo [The Japanese language described in graphs]. Tokyo, Japan: Kadokawa Shuppan.Google Scholar
  10. Hue, C. W. (1992). Recognition process in character naming. In H. C. Chen & O. J. L. Tzeng (Eds.), Language processing in Chinese (pp. 93–107). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: North-Holland.Google Scholar
  11. Jared, D., McRae, K., & Seidenberg, M. S. (1990). The basis of consistency effects in word naming. Journal of Memory and Language, 29, 687–715.Google Scholar
  12. Kawamoto, A. H., & Zemblidge, J. H. (1992). Pronunciation of homographs. Journal of Memory and Language, 31, 349–374.Google Scholar
  13. Kess, J. F., & Miyamoto, T. (1994). Japanese psycholinguistics: A classified and annotated research bibliography. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
  14. Leong, C. K., Cheng, P., & Mulcahy, R. (1987). Automatic processing of morphemic orthography by mature readers. Language and Speech, 30, 181–196.Google Scholar
  15. Monsell, S., Doyle, M. C., & Haggard, P. N. (1989). Effects of frequency on visual recognition tasks: Where are they? Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 118, 43–71.Google Scholar
  16. Morrison, C. M., & Ellis, A. W. (1995). The roles of word frequency and age of acquisition in word naming and lexical decision. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 21, 116–133.Google Scholar
  17. National Language Institute. (1976). Gendai shimbun no kanji [Kanji in modern newspapers]. Tokyo, Japan: Shuei Shuppan.Google Scholar
  18. Nomura, M. (1988). Kanji no mirai [The future of kanji]. Tokyo, Japan: Chikuma Shobo.Google Scholar
  19. Nomura, Y. (1978). Kanji no johoo shori: Ondoku-kundoku to imi no fuyo [The information processing of Chinese characters (kanji): Chinese reading, Japanese reading and the attachment of meaning]. Japanese Journal of Psychology, 49, 190–197.Google Scholar
  20. Nomura, Y. (1981). Kanji to kana no johoo shori: data suishin gata to gainen suishin gata no koka [The information processing of kanji and kana scripts: The effects of data-driven and conceptually-driven processing on reading]. Japanese Journal of Psychology, 51, 327–334.Google Scholar
  21. Paradis, M., Hagiwara, H., & Hildebrandt, N. (1985). Neurolinguistic aspects of the Japanese writing system. Tokyo, Japan: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  22. Peereman, R. (1995). Naming regular and irregular words: Further examination of the effect of phonological dissension among lexical neighbors. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 7, 307–330.Google Scholar
  23. Sampson, G. (1985). Writing systems. London, England: Hutchinson.Google Scholar
  24. Seidenberg, M. S. (1985). The time course of phonological code activation in two writing systems. Cognition, 19, 1–30.Google Scholar
  25. Seidenberg, M. S., Waters, G. S., Barnes, M. A., & Tanenhaus, M. A. (1984). When does irregular spelling or pronunciation influence word recognition? Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 23, 383–404.Google Scholar
  26. Tan, L. H., Hoosain, R., & Siok, W. W. T. (1996). Activation of phonological codes before access to character meaning in written Chinese. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 22, 865–882.Google Scholar
  27. Taylor, I., & Taylor, M. M. (1983). The psychology of reading. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  28. Umesao, T. (1987). Asu no nihongo no tameni [For tomorrow's Japanese]. Tokyo, Japan: Kumon Shuppan.Google Scholar
  29. Umesao, T. (1988). Nihongo to nihon bunmei [The Japanese language and the Japanese civilization]. Tokyo, Japan: Kumon Shuppan.Google Scholar
  30. Unger, J. M. (1987). The fifth generation fallacy. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  31. Whaley, C. P. (1978). Word-nonword classification time. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 17, 143–154.Google Scholar
  32. Wydell, T. N., Butterworth, B., & Patterson, K. (1995). The inconsistency of consistency effects in reading: The case of Japanese kanji. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 21, 1155–1168.Google Scholar
  33. Yamada, J. (1992). Why are kana words named faster than kanji words? Brain and Language, 43, 682–693.Google Scholar
  34. Yamazaki, M., Ellis, A. W., Morrison, C. M., & Ralph, M. A. L. (1997). Two age of acquisition effects in the reading of Japanese kanji. British Journal of Psychology, 88, 407–421.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1998

Authors and Affiliations

  • Yuriko Kayamoto
  • Jun Yamada
  • Hiro-omi Takashima

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations