Journal of Quantitative Criminology

, Volume 14, Issue 1, pp 61–81 | Cite as

The Relationship Between Crime Reporting and Police: Implications for the Use of Uniform Crime Reports

  • Steven D. Levitt
Article

Abstract

Empirical studies that use reported crime data to evaluate policies for reducing crime will understate the true effectiveness of these policies if crime reporting/recording behavior is also affected by the policies. For instance, when the size of the police force increases, changes in the perceived likelihood that a crime will be solved may lead a higher fraction of victimizations to be reported to the police. In this paper, three data sets are employed to measure the magnitude of this reporting bias. While each of these analyses is subject to individual criticisms, all of the approaches yield similar estimates. Reporting bias appears to be present but relatively small in magnitude: each additional officer is associated with an increase of roughly five Index crimes that previously would have gone unreported. Taking reporting bias into account makes the hiring of additional police substantially more attractive from a cost–benefit perspective but cannot explain the frequent inability of past studies to uncover a systematic negative relationship between the size of the police force and crime rates.

crime reporting police reporting bias uniform crime reports 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

REFERENCES

  1. Biderman, A., and Lynch, J. (1991). Understanding Crime Incidence Statistics: Why the UCR Diverges from the NCS, Springer-Verlag, New York.Google Scholar
  2. Blumstein, A., Nagin, D., and Cohen, J. (1978). Deterrence and Incapacitation: Estimating the Effects of Criminal Sanctions on Crime Rates, National Academy of Sciences, Washington DC.Google Scholar
  3. Bottomley, K. and Coleman, C. (1981). Understanding Crime Rates, Gower, Westmead, England.Google Scholar
  4. Cameron, S. (1988). The economics of crime deterrence: A survey of theory and evidence. Kyklos 41: 301–323.Google Scholar
  5. Carr-Hill, R. A., and Stern, N. (1979). Crime, The Police and Criminal Statistics, Wiley, New York.Google Scholar
  6. Cohen, M. (1988). Pain, suffering, and jury awards: A study of the cost of crime to victims. Law Soc. Rev. 22: 537–555.Google Scholar
  7. Conaway, M. R., and Lohr, S. L. (1994). A longitudinal analysis of factors associated with reporting violent crimes to the police. J. Quant. Criminol. 10: 23–29.Google Scholar
  8. Craig, S. (1987). The deterrent impact of police: An examination of a locally provided public service. J. Urban Econ. 21: 298–311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Devine, J., Sheley, J., and Smith, M. W. (1988). Macroeconomic and social-control policy influences on crime rate changes, 1948–1985. Am. Sociol. Rev. 53: 407–420.Google Scholar
  10. DiIulio, J. (1996). Help wanted: Economics, crime, and public policy. J. Econ. Perspect. 10: 3–24.Google Scholar
  11. Donohue, J., and Siegelman, P. (1994). Is the United States at the optimal rate of crime. Mimeo, American Bar Foundation.Google Scholar
  12. Eck, J., and Spelman, W. (1987). Problem Solving: Problem-Oriented Policing in Newport News, Police Executive Research Forum, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  13. Federal Bureau of Investigation (multiple editions). Uniform Crime Reports, Federal Bureau of Investigation, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  14. Glaeser, E., Sacerdote, B., and Scheinkman, J. (1996). Crime and social interactions. Q. J. Econ. 111: 507–548.Google Scholar
  15. Gove, W., Hughes, M., and Geerken, M. (1985). Are Uniform Crime Reports a valid indicator of the Index crimes? An affirmative answer with only minor qualifications. Criminology 23: 451–501.Google Scholar
  16. Greenwood, M. J., and Wadycki, W. J. (1973). Crime rates and public expenditures for police protection: Their interaction. Rev. Soc. Econ. 31: 138–151.Google Scholar
  17. Jensen, G. F., and Karpos, M. A. (1993). Managing rape: Exploratory research on the behavior of rape statistics. Criminology 31: 363–385.Google Scholar
  18. Kitsuse, J. I., and Cicourel, A. V. (1963). A note on the uses of official statistics. Soc. Problems 1: 131–139.Google Scholar
  19. Land, K., McCall, P., and Cohen, L. (1990). Structural covariates of homicide rates: Are there any invariances across time and space. Am. J. Sociol. 95: 922–967.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Levitt, S. D. (1997). Using electoral cycles in police hiring to estimate the effect of police on crime. Am. Econ. Rev. (in press).Google Scholar
  21. Marvell, T., and Moody, C. (1996). Police levels, crime rates, and specification problems. Criminology 34: 609–646.Google Scholar
  22. Myers, S. (1980). Why are crimes underreported? What is the crime rate? Does it really matter? Soc. Sci. Q. 61: 23–43.Google Scholar
  23. Myers, S. (1982). Crime in urban areas: New evidence and results. J. Urban Econ. 11: 148–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. O'Brien, R. (1985). Crime and Victimization Data, Sage, Beverly Hills, CA.Google Scholar
  25. O'Brien, R. (1996). Police productivity and crime rates: 1973–1992. Criminology 34: 183–207.Google Scholar
  26. Pelinsky, H., and Jesilow, P. (1982). Myths that Cause Crime, Seven Locks Press, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  27. Rabindra, S., and Pease, K. (1992). Crime, race, and reporting to the police. Howard J. Crim. Just. 31: 192–199.Google Scholar
  28. Sampson, R. (1986). Crime in cities: The effects of formal and informal social control. Crime Just. Rev. Res. 8: 271–311.Google Scholar
  29. Sampson, R., and Cohen, J. (1988). Deterrent effects of police on crime: A replication and theoretical extension. Law Soc. Rev. 22: 163–189.Google Scholar
  30. Sellin, J., and Wolfgang, M. (1964). The Measurement of Delinquency, Wiley, New York.Google Scholar
  31. Sherman, L. (1992). Police and crime control. In Tonry, M., and Morris, N. (eds.), Modern Policing, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar
  32. Singer, S. (1988). The fear of reprisal and the failure of victims to report a personal crime. J. Quant. Criminol. 4: 289–302.Google Scholar
  33. Skogan, W. (1976). Citizen reporting of crime: Some national panel data. Criminology 13: 535–549.Google Scholar
  34. Skogan, W. (1984). Reporting crime to the police: The status of world research. J. Res. Crime Delinq. 21: 113–137.Google Scholar
  35. Sparrow, M. K., Moore, M. H., and Kennedy, D. (1990). Beyond 911: A New Era of Policing, Basic Books, New York.Google Scholar
  36. Swimmer, G. (1974). Measurement of the effectiveness of urban law enforcement: A simultaneous approach. South. Econ. J. 40: 618–630.Google Scholar
  37. Thaler, R. (1977). An econometric analysis of property crime. J. Public Econ. 8: 37–51.Google Scholar
  38. Thaler, R. (1978). A note on the value of crime control: Evidence from the property market. J. Urban Econ. 5: 137–145.Google Scholar
  39. United States Department of Justice (1975a). Criminal Victimization Surveys in American Cities, Government Printing Office, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  40. United States Department of Justice (1975b). Criminal Victimization Surveys in the Nation's Five Largest Cities, Government Printing Office, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  41. United States Department of Justice (1976). Criminal Victimization Surveys in Eight American Cities, Government Printing Office, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  42. United States Department of Justice (1983). Report to the Nation on Crime and Justice, Government Printing Office, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  43. Wilson, J. Q., and Boland, B. (1978). The effect of police on crime. Law Soc. Rev. 12: 367–390.Google Scholar
  44. Zedlewski, E. (1983). Deterrence findings and data sources: A comparison of the Uniform Crime Reports and the National Crime Survey. J. Res. Crime Delinq. 20: 262–276.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1998

Authors and Affiliations

  • Steven D. Levitt
    • 1
  1. 1.University of Chicago Department of Economics and the American Bar FoundationChicago

Personalised recommendations