Biodiversity & Conservation

, Volume 12, Issue 6, pp 1205–1217 | Cite as

Use of woody plants by locals in Mare aux Hippopotames Biosphere Reserve in western Burkina Faso

  • Paulette Taïta

Abstract

The central area of the Mare aux Hippopotames Biosphere Reserve is located in the western part of Burkina Faso. Local populations have a close relationship with the reserve, from which they get much of their needs in food products, medicine, energy, arts and crafts. The use of resources has consequences for the biodiversity, ecosystem and environment of the reserve. The discussions held during ethnobotanical inquiries have permitted us to establish the main uses of woody plants and to pick out the repercussions of this usage. From this it emerges that the reserve has an important floristic richness and a biodiversity unknown to both locals and authorities.

Central area Consequences Ethnobotanical inquiries Reserve Resources Uses Woody plants 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bolza E. and Keating W.G. 1972. African Timbers – The Properties, Uses and Characteristics of 700 Species. Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organization, Melbourne, Australia.Google Scholar
  2. Burkill H.M. 1985–1995. The Useful Plants of West Tropical Africa. Vols. 1, 2 and 3, 2nd edn. Royaume-Uni, Kew Royal Botanical Garden, Richmond, 960 pp, 636 pp, 858 pp.Google Scholar
  3. Dalziel J.M. 1937. The Useful Plants of West Tropical Africa. The Crown Agents for the Colonies. Royaume-Uni, London, 612 pp.Google Scholar
  4. Elleman L. 1996. The Maasai and their use of plants, Ph.D. Thesis, University of Aarhus, Aarhus, Denmark.Google Scholar
  5. Falconer J. 1990. The Maja Significance of Minor Forest Products. The Local Use and Value of Forests in the West African Humid Forest Zone. FAO, Rome.Google Scholar
  6. Guinko S. 1989. Contribution à l'étude de la végétation et de la flore du Burkina Faso (ex Haute-Volta). I. Les territoires phytogéographiques. Bulletin de l'Institut Fondamental d'Afrique Noire 46: 129–139.Google Scholar
  7. Guinko S. and Pasgo L.J. 1992. Récolte et commercialisation des produits non ligneux des essences forestières locales dans le département de Zitenga, province d'Oubritenga, Burkina Faso. In: Etudes sur la flore et la végétation du Burkina Faso et des pays avoisinants Vol. 1. Verlag Natur et Wissenschaft, Solingen, Germany, pp. 17–25.Google Scholar
  8. Haxaire C. 1994. Dégradation de la forêt, disparition de plantes utiles et nouvelles stratégies chez les Gouros de Côte d'Ivoire. Journal d'Agriculture Traditionnelle et de Botanique Appliquée, nouvelle série 36: 57–73.Google Scholar
  9. Hamann O. 1991. The Joint IUCN–WWF Plants Conservation Programme and its Interest in Medicinal Plants. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.Google Scholar
  10. Infield M. 1988. Attitudes of a rural community towards conservation and a local conservation area in Natal, South Africa. Biological Conservation 45: 21–46.Google Scholar
  11. IUCN 1993. Note by the Director General on guidelines for the ecological sustainability of nonconsumptive and consumptive uses of wild species. Addendum 1 to General Assembly Paper GA/19/94/3. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland.Google Scholar
  12. Kerharo J. and Bouquet A. 1950. Plantes médicinales et toxiques de la Côte d'Ivoire, Haute-Volta. Ed. Vigot-Fréres, Paris.Google Scholar
  13. Lebbie A.R. and Guries R.P. 1995. Ethnobotanical value and conservation of sacred groves of the Kpaa Mende in Sierra Leone. Economic Botany 49: 297–308.Google Scholar
  14. Millogo-Rasolodimby J.F.C. 1993. Les plantes sacrées chez les Bobo Communication présentée au Symposium international du projet de recherche-SFB268–, Frankfurt, 16–19 December 1992, pp. 93–100.Google Scholar
  15. Mkanda F.X. and Munthali S.M. 1994. Public attitudes and needs around Kasungu National Park, Malawi. Biodiversity and Conservation 3: 29–44.Google Scholar
  16. Monod T. 1963. Après Yangambi (1965): note de phytogéographie africaine. Bulletin de l'Institut Français d'Afrique Noire. Dakar xxv: 594–655.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  • Paulette Taïta
    • 1
  1. 1.Centre Régional de Recherches Environnementales et Agricoles de l'Ouest (CRREA – ouest)Institut de l'Environnement et de Recherches Agricoles (INERA)Bobo-Dioulasso, 01Burkina Faso

Personalised recommendations