Journal of Gambling Studies

, Volume 14, Issue 2, pp 111–134 | Cite as

The Cognitive Psychology of Lottery Gambling: A Theoretical Review

  • Paul Rogers


Despite the current popularity of the UK National, psychologists have tended to neglect lottery play. This review provides a summary of current research findings and outlines the main cognitive theories of gambling as related to non-pathological lottery play. A discussion of various biases and irrational thinking patterns typically found in lottery gambling will be given. These will include the misunderstanding of lottery odds, a susceptibility to the gambler's fallacy and cognitive entrapment, a belief in hot and cold numbers, unrealistic optimism, a belief in personal luck, superstitious thinking, the illusion of control, the erroneous perception of near misses, a susceptibility to prize size and rollover effects, the framing of gambling outcomes and finally, the influence of social factors on lottery play. It is concluded that the psychology of lottery play needs a more unified theory which whilst largely cognitive in emphasis, should also incorporate social motivations such as those inherent in syndicate based lottery play.


Cognitive Psychology Research Finding Social Factor Cognitive Theory Unify Theory 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Abbott, D. A. & Cramer, S.L. (1993). Gambling attitudes and participation: a midwestern survey. Journal of Gambling Studies, 9(3), 247–263.Google Scholar
  2. Bandura, A. (1977). Social learning theories. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice HallGoogle Scholar
  3. Bar-Hillel, M. & Neter, E. (1996) Why are people reluctant to exchange lottery tickets? Journal of Personality& Social Psychology, 70(1), 17–27.Google Scholar
  4. Brenner, G. A. (1986). Why do people gamble? Further Canadian evidence. Journal of Gambling Studies, 2(2), 121–129.Google Scholar
  5. Brenner, R. & Brenner, G.A. (1990). Gambling and speculation: A theory, history and future of some human decisions. NY: CUP.Google Scholar
  6. Brickman, P., Coates, D. & Janoff-Bulman, R. (1978). Lottery winners and accident: Is happiness relative? Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 36(8), 917–927.Google Scholar
  7. Brockner, J. & Rubin, J.Z. (1985). Entrapment in escalating conflicts: A social psychological analysis. NY: Springer-Verlag. cited in M.B. Walker (1992), op cit.Google Scholar
  8. Brown, D.J. Kaldenberg, D.O, & Browne, B.A. (1992). Socioeconomic status and playing the lotteries. Sociology and Social Research, 76(3), 161–167.Google Scholar
  9. Browne, B. A. & Brown, D. J. (1994). Predictors of lottery gambling amoung American college students. Journal of Social Psychology, 134(3), 339–347.Google Scholar
  10. Burger, J.M. (1991). The effects of desire for control in situations with chance determined outcomes: Gambling behaviour in lotto and bingo players. Journal of Research in Personality, 25, 196–204.Google Scholar
  11. Burger, J.M. & Cooper, H.M. (1979). The Desirability of Control. Motivation and Emotion, 3, 381–393.Google Scholar
  12. Burns, G. (1995). Saturday night fever The Sunday Times Magazine. 12 November 1995Google Scholar
  13. Camelot (1995a). A lottery for the nation: Annual report and accounts 1995. Camelot GroupGoogle Scholar
  14. Camelot (1995b). 1st Anniversary: The National Lottery one year on. Unofficial Report: Camelot Group.Google Scholar
  15. Camelot (1995c). The National Lottery fact file. Camelot Group.Google Scholar
  16. Camelot (1996). Camelot: Annual Report and Accounts 1996. Camelot Group.Google Scholar
  17. Camelot (1997). Delivering on our promises: Camelot: Annual Report and Accounts Camelot Group.Google Scholar
  18. Chapman, L.J. & Chapman, J.P. (1969). Illusory correlation as an obstacle to the use of valid psychodiagnostic signs. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 74, 271–280.Google Scholar
  19. Clotfelter, C.T. & Cook, P.J. (1993). The gamblers fallacy in lottery play. Management Science. 39(12), 1521–1525.Google Scholar
  20. Cornish, D.B. (1978). Gambling: A review of the Literature. London: HMSO. cited in Hill & Williamson (1997), op cit.Google Scholar
  21. Coups, E. Haddock, G. & Webley, P. (1996). Correlates and predictors of lottery play in the United Kingdom. Unpublished manuscript, University of Exeter. Submitted for publication.Google Scholar
  22. Denes-Raj, V. & Epstein, S. (1994). Conflict between intuitive and rational processing: when people behave against their better judgment. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 66(5), 819–829.Google Scholar
  23. Dickerson, M. G. (1984). Compulsive gamblers. New York: Longman Group.Google Scholar
  24. Downes, D.M., Davies, B.P., David, M.E. & Stone, P. (1976). Gambling, work and leisure: A study across three areas. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul. cited in Walker (1992), op cit.Google Scholar
  25. Fiske, S.T. & Taylor, S. E. (1991); Social Cognition (2nd edition). Singapore; McGraw-HillGoogle Scholar
  26. Fitzgerald, S. (1997). Lotteries: Considering consideration. Society for the Study of Gambling Newsletter, No. 29, Spring 1997, 5–10.Google Scholar
  27. Gilovich, T., Vallone, R. & Tversky (1985). The hot hand in basketball: On the misperception of random sequences. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 17, 295–314.Google Scholar
  28. Griffiths, M. (1990). The cognitive psychology of gambling. Journal of Gambling Studies, 6(1), 31–42.Google Scholar
  29. Griffiths, M. (1991). The psychobiology of the near miss in fruit machine gambling. Journal of Psychology, 125(3), 347–357.Google Scholar
  30. Griffiths, M. (1995a). Winners and losers in the lottery boom. Letter to the Editor, The Times, 11 July 1995.Google Scholar
  31. Griffiths, M. (1995b). Adolescent Cambling. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  32. Griffiths, M. (1995c). The National Lottery: Is everyone a winner? Newsletter of the UK Forum on Young People and Gambling Google Scholar
  33. Griffiths, M. (1995d). Scratch-card gambling: A potential addiction? Education & Health, 13(2), 1–4.Google Scholar
  34. Haigh, J. (1997) The statistics of the National Lottery. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A-Statistics in Society, 160(2), 187–206.Google Scholar
  35. Harris, P. (1994). Sufficient grounds for optimism? The relationship between perceived controllability and optimistic bias. Journal of Social & Clinical Psychology, 15(1), 9–52.Google Scholar
  36. Herring, M. & Bledsoe, T. (1994). A model of lottery participation—Demographics, context and attitudes. Policy Studies Journal, 22(2), 245–257.Google Scholar
  37. Hill, C. (1997). Editorial: The National Lottery. Society for the Study of Gambling Newsletter, 29, Spring 1997, 1–3.Google Scholar
  38. Hill, E. & Williamson, J. (1998). Choose six numbers, any numbers. The Psychologist: Bulletin of the British psychological Society, 11(1), Jan 1998, 17–21Google Scholar
  39. Holtgraves, T. & Skeel, J. (1992). Cognitive biases in playing the lottery: Estimating the odds and choosing the numbers. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 22(12), 934–952.Google Scholar
  40. Hoorens, V. (1994). Unrealistic optimism in social comparisons of health and safety risks in D. Rutter (ed). The social psychology of health and safety. Aldershot: Avebury.Google Scholar
  41. Hraba, J. Mok, W. & Huff, D. (1990). Lottery play and problem gambling. Journal of Gambling Studies, 6(4), 355–381.Google Scholar
  42. Hunter, R. (1995). Lottery stress disorder. British Medical Journal, 310(6983), 875.Google Scholar
  43. Kahneman, D. & Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica, 47, 263–291.Google Scholar
  44. Kahneman, D., Slovic, P. & Tversky, A. (1982). Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. NY: CUP.Google Scholar
  45. Kaplan, H. R; (1987). Lottery winners: The myth and the reality. Journal of Gambling Behaviour, 3(3), 168–178.Google Scholar
  46. Keren, G. & Wagenaar, W. A. (1985). On the psychology of playing blackjack: Normative and descriptive considerations with implications for decision theory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 114, 133–158.Google Scholar
  47. King, K.M. (1990). Neutralising marginally deviant behaviour: Bingo players and superstition. Journal of Gambling Studies 6(1), 43–61.Google Scholar
  48. Langer, E.J. (1975). The illusion of control. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 31, 311–328.Google Scholar
  49. Lea, S. E. G., Tarpy, R. M & Webley, P. (1987). The individual in the economy: A textbook of economic psychology. NY: CUP.Google Scholar
  50. Lorenz, V. C. (1990). State lotteries and compulsive gambling. Journal of Gambling Studies, 6(4), 383–396.Google Scholar
  51. Miller, D. T. & McFarland, C. (1986): Counterfactual thinking and victim compensation: A test of norm theory. Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin, 12, 513–519.Google Scholar
  52. Nisbett, R.E. & Ross, L. (1980). Human inference: Strategies and shortcoming of social judgment. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-HallGoogle Scholar
  53. Plous, S. (1993). The psychology of judgment and decision making. NY: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  54. Rachlin, H. (1990). Why do people gamble and keep gambling despite heavy losses? American Psychological Society, 1(5), 294–297.Google Scholar
  55. Rachlin, H., Siegel, E. & Cross, D. (1994). Lotteries and the time horizon. American Psychological Society, 5(6), 390–393.Google Scholar
  56. Reber, A. S. (1985). Penguin Dictionary of Psychology. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
  57. Reid, R. L. (1986). The psychology of the near miss. Journal of Gambling Behaviour, 2(1), 32–39.Google Scholar
  58. Rogers, P. & Webley, P. (1998). It could be us! a cognitive & social psychological analysis of individual & syndicate based national lottery play in the UK. unpublished manuscript. Submitted for Publication.Google Scholar
  59. Rosecrance, J. (1986). Why regular gamblers don't quit: A sociological perspective. Sociological Perspectives, 29, 357–378.Google Scholar
  60. Runciman, D. (1996). A Load of Balls. The Sunday Telegraph Review. 25 February 1996.Google Scholar
  61. Smith, M. D. & Wiseman, R. (1997). Perceived Luckiness and the UK National Lottery. Paper presented at the 40th Annual Convention of the Parapsychological Association/SPR, Brighton, UK, August 1997.Google Scholar
  62. Smith, M.D., Wiseman, R., Harris, P. & Joiner, R. (1996). On being lucky: The psychology and parapsychology of luck. European Journal of Parapsychology, 12, 35–44.Google Scholar
  63. Stoner, J.A.F. (1968). Risky and cautious shift in group decisions: The influence of widely held values. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 4, 442–459.Google Scholar
  64. Sutherland, N. S. (1992). Irrationality: the enemy within. London: PenguinGoogle Scholar
  65. Tversky, A. & Kahneman, D. (1982a). Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Ch 1 in Tversky, Slovic & Kahneman (eds.). Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. NY: CUP.Google Scholar
  66. Tversky, A. & Kahneman, D. (1982b). Belief in the law of small numbers. Ch 2 in Tversky, Slovic & Kahneman (eds.). Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. NY: CUP.Google Scholar
  67. Tversky, A. & Kahneman, D. (1982c). Availability: A heuristic for judging frequency and probability. Ch 11 in Tversky, Slovic & Kahneman (eds.). Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. NY: CUP.Google Scholar
  68. Walker, M. B. (1992). The psychology of gambling. Oxford: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
  69. Wagenaar, W. A. (1988). Paradoxes of gambling behaviour. Hove: LEA.Google Scholar
  70. Webley, P., Rogers, P., Coups, E. & Haddock, G. (1997). It could be us! Predictors and correlated of National Lottery play in Britain. Paper presented at the XXII International Conference in Economic Psychology, Valencia, Spain, September 1997.Google Scholar
  71. Weinstein, N. D. (1980). Unrealistic optimism about future life events. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 39, 806–820.Google Scholar
  72. Wood, G. (1992). Predicting outcomes: sports and stocks. Journal of Gambling Studies, 8(2), 201–222.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Human Sciences Press, Inc. 1998

Authors and Affiliations

  • Paul Rogers
    • 1
  1. 1.University of ExeterUK

Personalised recommendations