Biodiversity & Conservation

, Volume 12, Issue 6, pp 1099–1111

The differences of butterfly (Lepidoptera, Papilionoidea) communities in habitats with various degrees of disturbance and altitudes in tropical forests of Vietnam

Article

Abstract

A survey was conducted on the species composition, richness and abundance of Papilionoidea (excluding Lycaenidae) butterfly fauna in habitats with various degrees of disturbance and altitudes in tropical forests at Tam Dao National Park, northern Vietnam in 2001. The transect method was used to collect data in the survey. Six transects representing different habitat types at two sites, one site located at a low elevation of 200–250 m a.s.l., and the other located at a high elevation of 950–1000 m a.s.l., were chosen: three transects for each site, with a length of 500 m for each transect. A total of 3594 individuals of 127 species in 240 sets of data were recorded from various habitats. The differences in butterfly composition, species richness, abundance and diversity in different habitat types and altitudes were analyzed. The results showed significant differences of butterfly diversity among the different habitat types and between the low and high altitude sites. The butterfly diversity, species richness and species abundance in the low elevation habitats were higher than in the high elevation habitats. The highest diversity of butterflies occurred in the mixed habitats of agriculture, scrub and clearing lands of high disturbance. However, butterflies most important for conservation are associated with undisturbed or moderately disturbed forests only.

Butterfly community Habitats Lepidoptera Papilionoidea (excl. Lycaenidae) Species diversity Tropical forests Vietnam 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Barlow H.S. and Woiwod I.P. 1989. Moth diversity of a tropical forest in Peninsular Malaysia. Journal of Tropical Ecology 5: 37–50.Google Scholar
  2. Chou I. 1994. Monographia Rhopalocerum Sinensium Vols 1 and 2. Henan Science and Technology Press, Henan, China (in Chinese).Google Scholar
  3. DeVries P.J., Walla T.R. and Greeney H.F. 1999. Species diversity in spatial and temporal dimensions of fruit-feeding butterflies from two Ecuadorian rainforests. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 68: 333–353.Google Scholar
  4. Lekagul B., Askin K., Nabhitabhata J. and Samruadkit A. 1977. Field Guide to the Butterflies of Thailand. Association for the Conservation of Wildlife, Bangkok, Thailand.Google Scholar
  5. Magurran A.E. 1988. Ecological Diversity and Its Measurement. Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey.Google Scholar
  6. Morris M.G. 1986. A butterfly farming and trading agency in Irian Jaya. Unpublished memo. Report on consultancy project 920 in Indonesia (12 January–30 April 1985). World Wildlife Fund and USAID.Google Scholar
  7. Morse D.R., Stork N.E. and Lawton J.H. 1988. Species number, species abundance and body length relationships of arboreal beetles in Bornean lowland rain forest trees. Ecological Entomology 13: 25–37.Google Scholar
  8. Osada S., Uemura Y. and Uehara J. 1999. An Illustrated Checklist of the Butterflies of Laos P.D.R. Mokuyo-sha, Tokyo, Japan.Google Scholar
  9. Pham H.H. 1999. An Illustrated Flora of Vietnam Vols. 1 and 2. Young Publishing House, Ho Chi Minh, Vietnam (in Vietnamese).Google Scholar
  10. Pollard E. 1977. A method for assessing changes in the abundance of butterflies. Biological Conservation 12: 115–134.Google Scholar
  11. Pollard E., Elias D.O., Skelton M.J. and Thomas J.A. 1975. A method of assessing the abundance of butterflies in Monks Wood National Nature Reserve in 1973. Entomologist's Gazette 26: 79–88.Google Scholar
  12. Poole R.W. 1974. An Introduction to Quantitative Ecology. McGraw Hill, New York.Google Scholar
  13. Pyle R.M. 1981. Butterflies: now you see them. International Wildlife 11: 4–12.Google Scholar
  14. Sparrow R.H., Sisk D.T., Ehrlich P.R. and Murphy D.D. 1994. Techniques and guidelines for monitoring Neotropical butterflies. Conservation Biology 8: 800–809.Google Scholar
  15. Spitzer K., Novotny V., Tonner M. and Leps J. 1993. Habitat preferences, distribution and seasonality of the butterflies (Lepidoptera, Papilionoidae) in a montane tropical rain forest, Vietnam. Journal of Biogeography 20: 109–121.Google Scholar
  16. Spitzer K., Jaros J., Havelka J. and Leps J. 1997. Effect of small-scale disturbance on butterfly communities of an Indochinese montane rainforest. Biological Conservation 80: 9–15.Google Scholar
  17. Spitzer K., Leps J. and Soldan T. 1987. Butterfly communities and habitat of seminatural savanna in southern Vietnam (Papilionoidea, Lepidoptera). Acta Entomologica Bohemoslovaca 84: 200–208.Google Scholar
  18. Vo V.C., Vu V.C., Phan N.H., Le K.K. and Do T.L. 1972–1976. The Common Vegetation of Vietnam Vols. 2–6. Scientific and Technological Publishing House, Hanoi, Vietnam (in Vietnamese).Google Scholar
  19. Vu V.L. and Dang T.D. 2002. Species composition, habitat preferences and abundance of butterflies (Lepidoptera, Rhopalocera) of Cuc Phuong National Park. Proceedings of the 4th Vietnam National Conference on Entomology. Agriculture Publishing House, Hanoi, Vietnam (in Vietnamese), pp. 285–297.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Chinese Academy of SciencesConservation Biology Center, Kunming Institute of ZoologyKunmingChina
  2. 2.Vietnam Russia Tropical CenterCau GiayVietnam
  3. 3.Chinese Academy of SciencesInstitute of ZoologyBeijingChina

Personalised recommendations