Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders

, Volume 29, Issue 5, pp 407–418 | Cite as

Recognition of Faux Pas by Normally Developing Children and Children with Asperger Syndrome or High-Functioning Autism

  • Simon Baron-Cohen
  • Michelle O'Riordan
  • Valerie Stone
  • Rosie Jones
  • Kate Plaisted


Most theory of mind (ToM) tests are designed for subjects with a mental age of 4–6 years. There are very few ToM tests for subjects who are older or more able than this. We report a new test of ToM, designed for children 7–11 years old. The task involves recognizing faux pas. Study 1 tested 7–9, and 11-year-old normal children. Results showed that the ability to detect faux pas developed with age and that there was a differential developmental profile between the two sexes (female superiority). Study 2 tested children with Asperger syndrome (AS) or high-functioning autism (HFA), selected for being able to pass traditional 4- to 6-year level (first- and second-order) false belief tests. Results showed that whereas normal 9- to 11-year-old children were skilled at detecting faux pas, children with AS or HFA were impaired on this task. Study 3 reports a refinement in the test, employing control stimuli. This replicated the results from Study 2. Some patients with AS or HFA were able to recognize faux pas but still produced them. Future research should assess faux pas production.

Theory of mind faux pas recognition Asperger syndrome high-functioning autism 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. American Psychiatric Association. (1994). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (4th ed). Washington, DC: Author.Google Scholar
  2. Baron-Cohen, S. (1989a). The autistic child's theory of mind: A case of specific developmental delay. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 30, 285–298.Google Scholar
  3. Baron-Cohen, S. (1989b). Thinking about thinking: how does it develop? Critical Notice. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 30, 931–933.Google Scholar
  4. Baron-Cohen, S. (1995). Mindblindness. Boston: MIT Press/Bradford Books.Google Scholar
  5. Baron-Cohen, S., & Hammer, J, (1997). Is autism an extreme form of the male brain? Advances in Infancy Research, 11, 193–217.Google Scholar
  6. Baron-Cohen, S., Jolliffe, T., Mortimore, C., & Robertson, M. (1997). Another advanced test of theory of mind: Evidence from very high functioning adults with autism or Asperger Syndrome. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 38, 813–822.Google Scholar
  7. Baron-Cohen, S., Leslie, A. M., & Frith, U. (1985). Does the autistic child have a ‘theory of mind’? Cognition, 21, 37–46.Google Scholar
  8. Baron-Cohen, S., Wheelwright, S., & Jolliffe, T. (1997). Is there a “language of the eyes”? Evidence from normal adults and adults with autism or Asperger syndrome. Visual Cognition, 4, 311–331.Google Scholar
  9. Bowler, D. M. (1992). Theory of mind in Asperger syndrome. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 33, 877–895.Google Scholar
  10. Dahlgren, S., & Trillingsgaard, A. (1996). Theory of mind in non-retarded children with autism and AS. A research note. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 37, 759–763.Google Scholar
  11. Dunn, L. M., Dunn, L. M., Whetton, C., & Pintilie, D. (1982). British Picture Vocabulary Test. London: NFER-Nelson.Google Scholar
  12. Eibl-Eibesfeldt, J. (1989). Human ethology. Athene de Gruyter.Google Scholar
  13. Frith, U. (1989). Autism: explaining the enigma. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
  14. Goodenough, E. (1957). Interest in persons as an aspect of sex difference in the early years. Genetic Psychology Monographs. 55, 287–323.Google Scholar
  15. Halpern, D. (1992). Sex differences in cognitive ability. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  16. Happé, F. (1994). An advanced test of theory of mind: Understanding of story characters' thoughts and feelings by able autistic, mentally handicapped, and normal children and adults. Journal of Autism and Development Disorders, 24, 129–154.Google Scholar
  17. Happé, F. (1995). The role of age and verbal ability in the theory of mind task performance of subjects with autism. Child Development, 66, 843–855.Google Scholar
  18. Happé, F. (1996). Autism. London: UCL Press.Google Scholar
  19. Hughes, C., & Russell, J. (1993). Autistic children's difficulty with mental disengagement from an object: Its implications for theories of autism. Developmental Psychology, 29, 498–510.Google Scholar
  20. Hughes, C., Russell, J., & Robbins, T. (1994). Specific planning deficit in autism: Evidence of a central executive dysfunction. Neuropsychologia, 32, 477–492.Google Scholar
  21. Jarrold, C., Boucher, J., & Russell, J. (1997). Language profiles in children with autism: theoretical and methodological implications. International Journal of Research and Practice; Autism. 1, 57–76.Google Scholar
  22. Keasey, C. B. (1977). Children's developing awareness and usage of intentionality and motives. Nebraska Symposium on Motivation (pp. 219–260). Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar
  23. McEvoy, R. E., Rogers, S. J., & Pennington, B. F. (1993). Executive function and social communication deficits in young autistic children. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 34, 563–578.Google Scholar
  24. McGuiness, D., & Pribram, K. H. (1979). The origins of sensory bias in the development of gender differences in perception and cognition. In M. Borner (Ed.), Cognitive growth and development: Essays in memory of Herbert G Birch. New York: Brunner/Mazel.Google Scholar
  25. Ozonoff, S. (1995). Executive functions in autism. In E. Schopler & G. Mesibov (Eds.), Learning and cognition in autism, New York: Plenum Press.Google Scholar
  26. Ozonoff, S., Pennington, B., & Rogers, S. (1991). Executive function deficits in high-functioning autistic children: Relationship to theory of mind. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 32, 1081–1106.Google Scholar
  27. Ozonoff, S., Rogers, S., & Pennington, B. (1991). Asperger's syndrome: Evidence of an empirical distinction from high-functioning autism. Journal of Child Psychiatry and Psychology, 32, 1107–1122.Google Scholar
  28. Pennington, B., & Ozonoff, S. (1996). Executive functions and developmental psychopathology. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 37, 51–87.Google Scholar
  29. Perner, J., & Wimmer, H. (1985). “John thinks that Mary thinks that...” Attribution of second-order beliefs by 5–10 year old children. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 39, 437–471.Google Scholar
  30. Russell, J., Jarrold, C., & Henry, L. (1996). Working memory in children with autism and with moderate learning difficulties. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 37, 673–686.Google Scholar
  31. Stone, V., Baron-Cohen, S., & Knight, R. (1998). Frontal lobe contributions to theory of mind. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 10, 640–656.Google Scholar
  32. Stone, V., Baron-Cohen, S., Young, A., Calder, A., & Green, J. (1999). Patients with amygdalectomy show impairments on theory of mind. Unpublished manuscript. University of Denver.Google Scholar
  33. Sullivan, K., Zaitchik, D., & Tager-Flusberg, H. (1994). Preschoolers can attribute second-order beliefs. Developmental Psychology, 30, 395–402.Google Scholar
  34. Wimmer, H., & Perner, J. (1983). Beliefs about beliefs: Representation and constraining function of wrong beliefs in young children's understanding of deception. Cognition, 13, 103–128.Google Scholar
  35. Wing, L. (1997). The Autistic Spectrum. Oxford: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
  36. World Health Organization. (1994). International classification of disease (10th ed.). Geneva, Switzerland: Author.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1999

Authors and Affiliations

  • Simon Baron-Cohen
    • 1
  • Michelle O'Riordan
    • 1
  • Valerie Stone
    • 1
  • Rosie Jones
    • 1
  • Kate Plaisted
    • 1
  1. 1.Departments of Experimental Psychology and PsychiatryUniversity of CambridgeCambridgeUnited Kingdom

Personalised recommendations