Philosophical Studies

, Volume 112, Issue 3, pp 251–278 | Cite as

Presupposition and Accommodation: Understanding the Stalnakerian Picture

  • Mandy Simons
Article

Abstract

This paper offers a critical analysis ofStalnaker's work on presupposition (Stalnaker1973, 1974, 1979, 1999, 2002). The paperexamines two definitions of speakerpresupposition offered by Stalnaker – the familiar common ground view, and the earlier,less familiar, dispositional account – and howStalnaker relates this notion to the linguisticphenomenon of presupposition. Special attentionis paid to Stalnaker's view of accommodation. Iargue that given Stalnaker’s views,accommodation is not rightly seen as driven bythe presuppositional requirements ofutterances, but only by the interests ofspeakers in eliminating perceived differencesamong presuppositions. I also consider therevisions which are needed either to thedefinition of speaker presupposition or to thedefinition of sentence presupposition in lightof the possibility of informativepresupposition. In the concluding section, Idiscuss the ways in which some recent accountsof context and speaker presupposition departfrom their Stalnakerian foundations.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

REFERENCES

  1. Atlas, J.D. and Levinson, S.C. (1981): ‘It-clefts, Informativeness and Logical Form: Radical Pragmatics (Revised Standard Version)’, in P. Cole (ed.), Radical Pragmatics, New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  2. Beaver, D. (1995): ‘Presupposition and Assertion in Dynamic Semantics’, Ph.D. dissertation, University of Edinburgh.Google Scholar
  3. Gauker, C. (1998): ‘What is a Context of Utterance?’ Philosophical Studies 91, 149-172.Google Scholar
  4. Grice, H.P. (1989): Studies in the Way of Words, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Groenendijk, J., Stokhof, M. and Veltman, F. (1996): ‘Coreference and Modality’, in S. Lapin (ed.), The Handbook of Contemporary Semantic Theory, Cambridge,MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  6. Heim, I. (1983): ‘On the Projection Problem for Presuppositions’, WCCFL 2.Google Scholar
  7. Heim, I. (1992): ‘Presupposition Projection and the Semantics of Attitude Verbs’, Journal of Semantics 9, 183-221.Google Scholar
  8. Kamp, H. (1981): ‘A Theory of Truth and Semantic Representation’, in J. Groenendijk, T. Janssen and Martin Stokhof (eds.), Truth, Representation and Information (=GRASS Series No. 2), Dordrecht.Google Scholar
  9. Kamp, H. and Reyle, U. (1993): From Discourse to Logic, Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
  10. Kempson, R. (1975): Presupposition and the Delimitation of Semantics, Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Lewis, D. (1979): ‘Scorekeeping in a Language Game’, in R. Bäuerle et al. (eds.), Semantics from Different Points of View (pp. 172-187), Berlin: Springer. Also in Journal of Philosophical Logic 8, 339-359.Google Scholar
  12. Stalnaker, R. (1973): ‘Presuppositions’, Journal of Philosophical Logic 2, 447-457.Google Scholar
  13. Stalnaker, R. (1974): ‘Pragmatic Presuppositions’, in M.K. Munitz and P.K. Unger (eds.), Semantics and Philosophy, New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
  14. Stalnaker, R. (1974): Inquiry, Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  15. Stalnaker, R. (1978): ‘Assertion’, in P. Cole (ed.), Syntax and Semantics Vol. 9: Pragmatics, New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  16. Stalnaker, R. (1999): Context and Content, New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Stalnaker, R. (2002): ‘Common Ground’, Linguistics and Philosophy 25(5-6), 701-721.Google Scholar
  18. Von Fintel, K. (2000): ‘What is Presupposition Accommodation?’ MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  19. Wilson, D. (1975): Presuppositions and Non-Truth Conditional Semantics, New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  20. Zeevat, H. (1992): ‘Presupposition and Accommodation in Update Semantics’, Journal of Semantics 9, 379-412Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mandy Simons
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of PhilosophyCarnegie Mellon UniversityPittsburghUSA, E-mail

Personalised recommendations