Journal of Religion and Health

, Volume 37, Issue 3, pp 195–214

Death with Dignity: Fifty Years of Soul-Searching

  • R.J. Connelly
Article

Abstract

The thesis of this paper is that there has been a gradual liberalization of thinking in the U.S. since the 1950's about what is morally allowable in how individuals control their own dying. The degree of liberalization will be plotted based on changes in public and professional opinion, landmark court cases, publication of books about dying, key players in the public eye, and the emergence of more organizations promoting death with dignity. More recent developments show a growing interest in finding better ways to respond to the needs of the dying. A final section speculates on the future of death with dignity.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    In re Quinlan, 70 N.J. 10, 355 A.2d 647, cert denied sub nom. Garger v. New Jersey, 429 U.S. 922 (1976).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Capron, A., “Death and Dying: Professional and Public Policies,” in W. Reich, ed., Encyclopedia of Bioethics. V.1. New York: Simon & Schuster Macmillan, 1995, pp. 583-588.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Perel, A., and Stock, M., Handbook of Mechanical Ventilatory Support. Baltimore: Williams and Wilkins, 1991; Bunker, J., “Artificial Organ and Life-Support Systems,” in W. Reich, op. cit., pp. 198–206.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Williams, R., “Our Role in the Generation, Modification and Termination of Life,” Archives of Internal Medicine 124(2) (1969), pp. 215-237.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Paris, J., “When Burdens of Feeding Outweigh Benefits,” Hastings Center Report 16(1) (1986), pp. 30-32.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Pope Pius XII, “The Prolongation of Life,” The Pope Speaks 4 (1957), pp. 393-398.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kelly, G., Medico-Moral Problems. St. Louis: Catholic Hospital Association, 1957, p. 129.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Congregation for the Doctrine of Faith. “Declaration on Euthanasia,” Rome: Vatican, 1980, sec. IV.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Carson, R., “The Symbolic Significance of Giving to Eat,” in J. Lynn, ed., By No Extraordinary Means: The Choice to Forgo Life-Sustaining Food and Drink. Bloomington: Indiana UP, 1986; Callahan, D., “On Feeding the Dying,” Hastings Center Report 13(5) (1983), p. 22.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Flynn, E., Hard-Decisions: Forgoing and Withdrawing Artificial Nutrition and Hydration. Kansas City, MO: Sheed and Ward, 1990, pp. 11-17.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    President's Commission for the Study of Ethical Problems in Medicine and Biomedical and Behavioral Research, Deciding to Forego Life Sustaining Treatment. Washington, DC: U.S. GPO, 1983; Hastings Center, Guidelines on the Termination of Life-Sustaining Treatment and the Care of the Dying. Briarcliff Manor, NY: The Hastings Center, 1987.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    American Medical Association (AMA), Code of Medical Ethics: Current Opinions with Annotations. Chicago: AMA, 1996, pp. 39-41.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Cruzan v. Director, MO Dept. of Health, 110 USSCT 2841 (1990).Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Paris, J., and McCormick, R., “The Catholic Tradition on the Use of Nutrition and Fluids,” America 156(17) (1987), pp. 356-361.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Kelly, G., “The Duty of Using Artificial Means of Preserving Life,” Theological Studies 11 (1950), pp. 203-220.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Flynn, E., op. cit., pp. 68-91.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Heaney, S., “You Can't be any Poorer than Dead: Difficulties in Recognizing Artificial Nutrition and Hydration as Medical Treatments,” Linacre Quarterly 61(2) (1994), pp. 77-87; McCarthy, J., “Caring for the Critically Ill Patient in a Persistent Vegetative State,” Linacre Quarterly 61(2) (1994), pp. 63–76.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Committee for Pro-Life Activities, Nutrition and Hydration: Moral and Pastoral Reflections. Washington, DC: National Conference of Catholic Bishops, April 1992.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    McCarthy, J., ibid., p. 68.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Sehgal, A., et al., “Advance Directives and Withdrawal of Dialysis in the U.S., Germany, and Japan,” Journal of the American Medical Association 276(20) (1996), pp. 1652-1656. Wood, L., and Del Papa, L., “Nurses' Attitudes, Ethical Reasons, and Knowledge of the Law Concerning Advance Directives,” Image: Journal of Nursing Scholarship 28(4) (1996), p. 371.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Marshall, P., “The SUPPORT Study: Who's Talking,” Hastings Center Report 25(6) (1995), pp. S9-S11.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Roberts, C., and Gorman, M., Euthanasia: A Reference Handbook. Santa Barbara: ABCCLIO, 1996, pp. 252-253.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Quill, T., “Death and Dignity: A Case of Individualized Decision Making,” New England Journal of Medicine 324(10) (1991), pp. 691-694.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    AMA, 1994, op. cit., p. 51; American Nurses Association, Position Statement on Assisted Suicide. Kansas City, MO: ANA, 1994.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    AMA, 1996, op cit., p. 56.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Humphry, D., and Wickett, A., The Right to Die: An Historical and Legal Perspective of Euthanasia. Eugene, OR: Hemlock Society, 1990, pp. 63-90.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Williams, R., op. cit. Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Williams, R., “The End of Life in the Elderly,” PostGraduate Medicine 54(6) (1973), pp. 55-59.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Emanuel, E., “Euthanasia and Physician-Assisted Suicide: Attitudes and Experiences of Oncology Patients, Oncologists, and the Public,” The Lancet 347(9018) (1996), pp. 1805-1810.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Larson, K., “Poll Shows Doctors Support Death with Dignity,” Time Lines 65 (11/95–2/96), p. 1.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Bachman, J., et al., “Attitudes of Michigan Physicians and the Public Toward Legalization of Physician-Assisted Suicide and Voluntary Euthanasia,” New England Journal of Medicine 334(5) (1996), pp. 303-309; Back, A., Wallace, J., Starks, H., and Pearlman, R., “Physician-Assisted Suicide and Euthanasia in Washington State: Patient Requests and Physician Responses,” Journal of the American Medical Association 275(12) (1996), pp. 919–925.Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Asch, D., “The Role of Critical Care Nurses in Euthanasia and Assisted Suicide,” New England Journal of Medicine 334(21) (1996), pp. 1374-1379.Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Humphry, D., Final Exit: Self Deliverance and Assisted Suicide. New York: Hemlock Society, 1991.Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Roberts, C., and Gorman, M., op. cit., p. 258.Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Marzuk, P., et al., “The Effect of Access to Lethal Methods of Injury on Suicide Rates,” Archives of General Psychiatry 49(6) (1992), pp. 451-458; “Increase in Suicide by Asphyxiation in New York City After the Publication of Final Exit,” New England Journal of Medicine 329(20) (1993), pp. 1508–1510.Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Website. www.compassionindying.org (11/97).Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Vacco v. Quill, 95 USSCT 1858 (1997); Washington v. Glucksberg, 96 USSCT 110 (1997).Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    AMA, 1996, op cit., p. 40.Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Brief of the AMA, et al., #96-110, November 12, 1996.Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    May, W., “Double Effect.” in W. Retch, ed., Encyclopedia of Bioethics V.1. New York: Free Press, 1978, pp. 316-320.Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Cruzan, op cit.; Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pennsylvania v. Casey, 505 U.S. 833 (1992).Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Gianelli, D., “Oregon Assisted-Suicide Vote Still Raises Questions, Obstacles,” American Medical News 40(44) (1997), pp. 21-22.Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Website. www.cp-tel.net/pamnorth/history.htm (11/97).Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Emanuel, E., et al., “Cost Savings at the End of Life: What Do the Data Show?” Journal of the American Medical Association 275(24) (1996), pp. 1907-1914.Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    Schute, N., “Death with More Dignity,” US News and World Report 122(7) (1997), pp. 61-62.Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    SUPPORT Principal Investigators, “A Controlled Trial to Improve Care for Seriously Ill Hospitalized Patients: The Study to Understand Prognosis and Preferences for Outcomes and Risks of Treatment,” Journal of the American Medical Association 274(20) (1995), pp. 1591-1598.Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    Lee, M., and Tolle, S., “Oregon's Assisted Suicide Vote: The Silver Lining,” Annals of Internal Medicine 124 (1996), pp. 267-269.Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    AP News, “Oregon Leads Nation in Medical Use of Morphine,” American Medical News 40(39) (1997), p. 20.Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    Ashburn, M., “Interdisciplinary Chronic Pain Management Programs,” Journal of Pharmaceutical Care in Pain and Symptom Control 2(3) (1994), pp. 7-24.Google Scholar
  50. 50.
    Practice and Policy Guidelines Panel—NIH Office of Alternative Medicine, “Clinical Guidelines in Complementary and Alternative Medicine,” Archives of Family Medicine 6(2) (1997), pp. 149-154.Google Scholar
  51. 51.
    Ferrel, B., et al., “Pain Management at Home—Struggle, Comfort, and Mission,” Cancer Nurse 16(3) (1993), pp. 169-178.Google Scholar
  52. 52.
    Osgood, N., “Suicide: Aged Adults,” in R. & B. Kastenbaum, eds., Encyclopedia of Death. Phoenix, AZ: Oryx Press, 1989, pp. 231-233.Google Scholar
  53. 53.
    Landes, A., Blair, C., and Quiram, J., eds., Death and Dying: Who Decides. Wylie, TX: Information Plus, 1996, p. 158.Google Scholar
  54. 54.
    Osgood, N., Brant, B., and Lipman, A., “Patterns of Suicidal Behavior in Long-Term Care Facilities: A Preliminary Report,” Omega, Journal of Death and Dying 1(1) (1988–9), pp. 69-78.Google Scholar
  55. 55.
    Hoyert, D., “Mortality Trends for Alzheimer's Disease, 1979–91,” Vital and Health Statistics, series 20, no. 28, January 1996.Google Scholar
  56. 56.
    Valente, S., “Suicide and Elderly People: Assessment and Intervention,” Omega, Journal of Death and Dying, 28(4) (1994), pp. 317-332; Richman, J., Preventing Elderly Suicide: Overcoming Personal Despair, Professional Neglect, and Social Bias. New York: Springer, 1993.Google Scholar
  57. 57.
    Osgood, N., Suicide in the Elderly: A Practitioner's Guide to Diagnosis and Mental Health Intervention. Rockville, MD: Aspen, 1985.Google Scholar
  58. 58.
    Washington, DC. “Many Suicides Can be Prevented.” American Medical News 40(40) (1997): p. 35.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Blanton-Peale Institute 1998

Authors and Affiliations

  • R.J. Connelly
    • 1
  1. 1.University of the Incarnate Word inSan Antonio

Personalised recommendations