Journal of Business and Psychology

, Volume 14, Issue 1, pp 5–24 | Cite as

Exploring the Relationships Between Object Relations/Reality Testing Functioning, Coping Styles, and Somatic Tension

  • Bruce Mills
  • Ramon J. Aldag


In view of the importance of coping and of the apparent impact of individual differences on coping styles, it seems appropriate to examine relationships of coping with deeper and more complex psychological constructs such as those described in object relations psychology. Discovery of psychological predispositions to coping should have significant implications for both organizational and interpersonal intervention mechanisms. This study examined the relationships among six object relations/reality testing constructs and the coping styles of positive thinking coping, interpersonal coping, avoidance coping, direct action coping, and symptom-management coping, as well as somatic tension. Several significant relationships were evidenced. Implications and suggestions for future research are presented.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Allcorn, S. (1995). Understanding organizational culture as the quality of workplace subjectivity. Human Relations, 48, 73–96.Google Scholar
  2. Bacal, H. A., & Newman, K. M. (1990). Theories of object relations: Bridges to self psychology. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Baghat, R. S., Allie, S. M., & Ford, D. L., Jr. (1991). Organizational stress, personal life stress and symptoms of life strains: An inquiry into the moderating roles of styles of coping. In P. L. Perrewe (ed.), Handbook of job stress. Special issue of Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 6, 163–184.Google Scholar
  4. Bassman, L. E. (1991). Object relations and self-reported AIDS self-care behavior. Psychological Reports, 68, 915–923.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Becker, B., Bell, M., & Billington, R. (1987). Object relations deficits in bulimic college women. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 43, 92–95.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Bell, M. (1991). An introduction to the Bell Object Relations Reality Testing Inventory.Google Scholar
  7. Bell, M., Billington, R., & Becker, B. (1985). A scale for the assessment of reality testing: Reliability, validity and factorial invariance. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 53, 506–511.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Bell, M., Billington, R., & Becker, B. (1986). A scale for the assessment of object relations: Reliability, validity, and factorial invariance. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 42, 733–741.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Bell, M., Billington, R., Cicchetti, D., & Gibbons, J. (1988). Do object relations deficits distinguish BPD from other diagnostic groups? Journal of Clinical Psychology, 44, 511–516.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Berger, S. (1993). Chronic fatigue syndrome: a self psychological perspective. Clinical Social Work Journal, 21, 57–70.Google Scholar
  11. Blough, S. G. (1981). Perceived stress as a function of setting and personality. Dissertation Abstracts International, 41, 4285A.Google Scholar
  12. Brown, G. I., & Merry, U. (1985). Neurotic mechanisms applied to organizations. The Gestalt Journal, 8(2), 49–85.Google Scholar
  13. Chen, P. Y., & Spector, P. E. (1991). Negative affectivity as the underlying cause of correlations between stressors and strains. Journal of Applied Psychology, 76, 398–407.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Christie, R., & Geis, F. L. (1970). Studies in Machiavellianism. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  15. Clark, L. A., & Watson, D. (1988). General affective dispositions in physical and psychological health. In C. R. Snyder & D. R. Forsyth (Eds.), Handbook of Social and Clinical Psychology; 221–245. New York: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
  16. Crowne, D., & Marlowe, D. (1964). The approval motive. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  17. Engelman, E. (1985). Level of object representation in depression: A longitudinal study. Unpublished doctoral dissertation: Adelphi University.Google Scholar
  18. Evans, G. W., Palsane, M. N., & Carrere, S. (1987). Type A behavior and occupational stress: A cross-sectional study of blue-collar workers. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 1002–1007.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Fleishman, J. A. (1984). Personality characteristics and coping patterns. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 25, 229–244.Google Scholar
  20. Friedman, M., & Rosenman, R. H. (1974). Type A behavior and your heart. New York: Knopf.Google Scholar
  21. Giacalone, R. A., & Rosenfeld, P. (Eds.) (1990). Impression management in the organization. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  22. Gibbons, J. (1984). Prediction of object representations from projective test data: Borderline Personality Disorder (DSM III). Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Fordham University.Google Scholar
  23. Glickauf-Hughes, C., & Wells, M. (1991). Current conceptualizations on masochism: Genesis and object relations. American Journal of Psychotherapy, 45, 53–68.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Greenglass, E. R. (1988). Type A behavior and coping strategies in female and male supervisors. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 37, 271–288.Google Scholar
  25. Haviland, M. G., Sonne, J. L., & Woods, L. R. (1995). Beyond posttraumatic stress disorder: Object relations and reality testing disturbances in physically and sexually abused adolescents. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 34, 1054–1059.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Heesacker, R. S., & Neimeyer, G. J. (1990). Assessing object relations and social cognitive correlates of eating disorder. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 37, 419–426.Google Scholar
  27. Hirschorn, L. (1988). The workplace within: Psychodynamics of organizational life. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  28. Hobson, R. P. (1990). On psychoanalytic approaches to autism. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 60, 324–336.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Juni, S., & Grimm D. W. (1994). Sex roles as factors in defense mechanisms and object relations. The Journal of Genetic Psychology, 155, 99–106.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Kets de Vries, M. F. R. (1989). Prisoners of leadership. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  31. Kirmeyer, S., & Diamond, A. (1985). Coping by police officers: A study of role stress and Type A and Type B behavior patterns. Journal of Occupational Behavior, 6, 183–195.Google Scholar
  32. Kobasa, S. C. (1979). Stressful life events, personality, and health: An inquiry into hardiness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 1–11.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Kobasa, S. C. (1982a). Commitment and coping in stress resistance among lawyers. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 42, 707–717.Google Scholar
  34. Kobasa, S. C. (1982b). The hardy personality: Toward a social psychology of stress and health. In G. S. Sanders & J. Suls (Eds.), Social psychology of health and illness. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  35. Kuhlmann, T. M. (1990). Coping with occupational stress among urban bus and tram drivers. Journal of Occupational Psychology, 63, 89–96.Google Scholar
  36. Latack, J. C. (1981). Career role transitions within organizations: A study of role stress and coping strategies. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Michigan State University.Google Scholar
  37. Latack, J. C. (1986). Coping with job stress: Measures and future directions for scale development. Journal of Applied Psychology, 71, 377–385.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Latack, J. C., & Aldag, R. J. (1986). The dynamic constellation of coping: An examination of measures across samples and job situations. Paper presented at the 46th Annual Meeting of the Academy of Management, Chicago, August.Google Scholar
  39. Lazarus, R. S. (1981). The stress and coping paradigm. In C. Eisdorfer, D. Cohen, A. Kleeman, & P. Maxim (Eds.), Models for clinical psychopathology: 177–214. New York: Spectrum.Google Scholar
  40. Lazarus, R. S., & Folkman, S. (1984). Stress: Appraisal and coping. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  41. Levinson, H. (1981). Executive. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  42. Little, T., Watson, P. J., & Biderman, M. D. (1992). Narcissism and object relations. Psychological Reports, 71, 799–808.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Long, B. C., & Gessaroli, M. E. (1989). The relationship between teacher stress and perceived coping effectiveness: Gender and marital differences. The Alberta Journal of Educational Research, 35, 308–324.Google Scholar
  44. Matteson, M. T., & Ivancevich, J. M. (1983). Note on tension discharge rate as an employee health status predictor. Academy of Management Journal, 26, 540–545.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Miripol, P. (1982). Clinical and statistical validation of current object relations measures. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Illinois Institute of Technology.Google Scholar
  46. Nelson, D. L., & Sutton, C. (1990). Chronic work stress and coping: A longitudinal study and suggested new directions. Academy of Management Journal, 33, 859–869.Google Scholar
  47. Parkes, K. R. (1990). Coping, negative affectivity, and the work environment: Additive and interactive predictors of mental health. Journal of Applied Psychology, 75, 399–409.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. Pierce, C. M. B., & Molloy, G. N. (1990). Psychological and biographical differences between secondary school teachers experiencing high and low levels of burnout. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 60, 37–51.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. Pittner, M. S., Houston, B. K., & Spiridigliozzi, G. (1983). Control over stress: Type A behavior pattern, and response to stress. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44, 627–637.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. Randolf, B. (1984). Sexual decision making: A correlational study of levels of decision making with body image, sex role identity, self esteem, and object relations. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Virginia Consortium of Professional Psychology, Old Dominion University.Google Scholar
  51. Scheier, M. F., & Carver, C. S. (1985). Optimism, coping, and health: Assessment and implications of generalized outcome expectancies. Health Psychology, 4, 219–247.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. Scheier, M. F., Weintraub, J. K., & Carver, C. S. (1986). Coping with stress: Divergent strategies of optimists and pessimists. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1257–1264.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. Schlacter, P. (1981). Concepts of self and perceived stress: A study of correctional officers. Dissertation Abstracts International, 41, 4294A.Google Scholar
  54. Staw, B. M., Bell, N. E., & Clausen, J. A. (1986). The dispositional approach to job attitudes: A lifetime longitudinal test. Administrative Science Quarterly, 31, 56–77.Google Scholar
  55. Tellegen, A. (1985). Structure of mood and personality and their relevance to assessing anxiety, with an emphasis on self-report. In A. H. Tuma and J. D. Maser (Eds.), Anxiety and the anxiety disorders: 681–706. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  56. Watson, D. & Clark, L. A. (1984). Negative affectivity: The disposition to experience aversive emotional states. Psychological Bulletin, 96, 465–490.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  57. Weidner, G., & Mattews, K. A. (1978). Reported physical symptoms elicited by unpredictable events and the Type A coronary-prone behavior pattern. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 36, 1213–1220.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  58. Westen, D. (1991). Social cognitions and object relations. Psychological Bulletin, 109, 429–455.Google Scholar
  59. Zaleznik, A. (1989). The managerial mystique: Restoring leadership in business. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Human Sciences Press, Inc. 1999

Authors and Affiliations

  • Bruce Mills
    • 1
  • Ramon J. Aldag
    • 1
  1. 1.University of WisconsinUSA

Personalised recommendations