Advertisement

Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics

, Volume 24, Issue 1, pp 79–94 | Cite as

On Medicine as a Human Science

  • Marco Buzzoni
Article

Abstract

All the powerful influences exertedby the subjective-interpersonal dimension onthe organic or technical-functional dimensionof sickness and health do not make anintersubjective test concerning medicaltherapeutic results impossible. Theseinfluences are not arbitrary; on the contrary,they obey “laws” that are de facto sufficientlystable to allow predictions and explanationssimilar to those of experimental sciences.While, in this respect, the rules concerninghuman action are analogous to the scientificlaws of nature, they can at any time be revokedby becoming aware of them. Law-like andreproducible regularities in the sciences ofman are by no means separated from a patient'spersonal-hermeneutic mediation. This makes itpossible for human beings to modify, improve orsometimes even entirely (or better almostentirely) suspend these psychological,sociological, ethnological, medical,regularities. For this reason the sciences ofman including medicine are under the obligationof constantly inspecting the continuingvalidity of the rules on which theirpredictions and explanations are based, namelyby indirect, statistical methods. Thisrequires a synergistic collaboration ofextra-clinical and clinical tests through whichmedicine can obtain a good level ofintersubjective testability.

epistemology health human sciences medicine philosophy of medicine 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Engelhardt Jr HT. Clinical problems and the concept of a disease. In Nordenfelt L, Lindahl B, Ingemar B, eds. Health, Disease, and Causal Explanation in Medicine. Dordrecht: Reidel, 1984, pp. 27–41.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Fulford KWM. Praxis makes perfect. Illness as a bridge between biological concepts of disease and social conceptions of health. Theoretical Medicine 1993; 14: 305–320.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Anschütz F. Geisteswissenschaftliche Grundlagen der modernen Medizin. In Beckmann JP, ed. Fragen und Probleme einer medizinischen Ethik. Berlin: de Gruyter, 1996, pp. 45–67.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Fedoryka K. Health as a normative concept: Towards a new conceptual framework. The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 1997; 22: 143–160.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Lanzerath D. Krankheit und ärztliches Handeln. Zur Funktion des Krankheitsbegriffs in der medizinischen Ethik. München: Alber, 2000.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Wyss D. Erkranktes Leben - Kranker Leib. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck Ruprecht, 1986.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Doerr W, Schipperges H, eds. Was ist theoretische Pathologie? Berlin/Heidelberg/New York: Springer, 1979.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Christian P. Anthropologische Medizin. Berlin/Heidelberg/New York: Springer, 1989.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Bauer AW. Axiome des systematischen Erkenntnisgewinns in der Medizin. Internist 1997; 38: 299–306.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Bauer AW. Axiome der Medizin. In Pieringer W, Ebner F, eds. Zur Philosophie der Medizin. Wien/New York: Springer, 2000, pp. 15–34.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Uexküll T, Wesiak W. Theorie der Humanmedizin, 3. Aufl. München/Wien: Urban & Schwarzenberg, 1998.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Hahn P. Wissenschaft und Wissenschaftlichkeit in der Medizin. In Pieringer W, Ebner F, eds. Zur Philosophie der Medizin. Wien/New York: Springer, 2000, pp. 35–53.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Pieringer W. Theorien und Methoden der Humanmedizin. In Pieringer W, Ebner F, eds. Zur Philosophie der Medizin. Wien/New York: Springer, 2000, pp. 55–88.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Pieringer W, Fazekas Ch. Grundzüge einer theoretischen Pathologie. In Pieringer W, Ebner F, eds. Zur Philosophie der Medizin. Wien/New York: Springer, 2000, pp. 89–111.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Gethmann CF, Heilen Können, Wissen. Zu den philosophischen Grundlagen der wissenschaftlichen Medizin. In Beckmann JP, ed. Fragen und Probleme einer medizinischen Ethik. Berlin: de Gruyter, 1996, pp. 68–93.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Wesiak W. Die Medizin im Spannungsfeld von Pragmatismus Ideologie und Wissenschaft. In Pieringer W, Ebner F, eds. Zur Philosophie der Medizin. Wien/New York: Springer, 2000, pp. 205–215.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Engelhardt Jr HT. Typologies of disease: Nosologies revisited. In Schaffner KF, ed. Logic of Discovery and Diagnosis in Medicine. Berkeley/Los Angeles/London: Univ. of California Press, 1985, pp. 56–71.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Nordenfelt L. On the Nature of Health. An Action-theoretic Approach. Dordrecht: Reidel, 1987.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Feyerabend PK. Ñber die Methode. In Radnitzky G, Andersson G, eds. Voraussetzungen und Grenzen der Wissenschaft. Tübingen: Mohr, 1981, pp. 175–253.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Bateson G. Style, grace and information in primitive art. In Forge A, ed. The Study of Primitive Art. London: Oxford Univ. Press, 1971.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Buzzoni M. Scienza e tecnica. teoria ed esperienza nelle scienze della natura. Studium: Roma, 1995.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Buzzoni, M. Erkenntnistheoretische und ontologische Probleme der theoretischen Begriffe. Journal for General Philosophy of Science 1997; 28: 19–53.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Bunge M. Treatise on Basic Philosophy,Vol. 7Epistemology and Methodology III Philosophy of Science and Technology. Part II: Life Science, Social Science and Technology. Dordrecht: Reidel, 1985.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Radnitzky G. Psychoanalysis as research therapy and theory. Annals of Theoretical Psychology 1985; 3: 201–211.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Rothschuh KE. Prinzipien der Medizin. Ein Wegweiser durch die Medizin. München: Urban & Schwarzenberg, 1965.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Toulmin S. On the nature of physician's understanding. The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 1976; 1: 32–50.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Feinstein A. Clinical Judgment. Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins, 1967.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    McWhinney R. Medical knowledge and the rise of technology. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 1978; 3: 293–304.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Leder D. Clinical interpretation: The hermeneutics of medicine. Theoretical Medicine 1990; 11: 9–24.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Polanyi M. Personal Knowledge. Towards a Post-Critical Philosophy. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1958.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Gooding D. 'In Nature's School' Faraday as an experimentalist. In Gooding D, Frank AJL, eds. Faraday Rediscovered. Essays on the Life and Work of Michael Faraday 1791-1867. London: Macmillan, 1985, pp. 105–135.Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Thomä H, Kächele H, Kübler JC. Zum Verhältnis von Theorie und Praxis der Psychoanalyse. Analyse und Kritik 1985; 7: 3–25.Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Bunge M. Scientific Research. II: The Search for Truth. New York: Springer, 1967.Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Wiesing U. Kunst oder Wissenschaft? Konzeptionen der Medizin in der deutschen Romantik. Stuttgart-Bad Cannstatt: Frommann-Holzboog, 1995.Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Kant I. Kritik der reinen Vernunft, inKant's Werke, Bd 3. Berlin: Rainer, 1911.Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Boorse C. Health as a theoretical concept. Philosophy of Science 1977; 44: 542–573.Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Boorse C. A rebuttal on health. In Humber JM, Almeder RF, eds. What Is Disease? Totowa (NJ): Humana Press, 1997, pp. 1–134.Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Wright GH von. The Varieties of Goodness. New York: Humanities Press, 1963.Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Kass L. Regarding the end of medicine and the pursuit of health. The Public Interest 1975; 40: 11–24.Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Canguilhem G. Le Normale et le pathologique. Paris: PUF, 1972 (Engl. transl. On the Normal and the Pathological. Reidel: Dordrecht, 1978).Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Searle JR. The Construction of Social Reality. London: Penguin, 1995.Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Veatch RM. The medical model: Its nature and problems. In Caplan AL, Engelhardt Jr HT, McCartney JJ, eds. Concepts of Health and Disease. Massachusetts: Addison-Wesley, 1973, pp. 523–544.Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Schaefer H. Der Krankheitsbegriff. In Blohmke M, Ferber C von, Kisker KP, Schaefer H, eds. Sozialmedizin in der Praxis. Stuttgart: Enke, 1976, pp. 15–31.Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Nordenfelt L. Comments on Pörn's 'An Equilibrium Model of Health'. In Nordenfelt L et al., eds. Disease and Causal Explanation in Medicine. Dordrecht: Reidel, 1984, pp. 11–13.Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    Wieland W. Philosophische aspekte des krankheitsbegriffs. In Becker V, Schipperges H, eds. Krankheitsbegriff, Krankheitsforschung, Krankheitswesen. Berlin: Springer, 1995, pp. 59–76.Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    Legrand M. Hypothèses pour une histoire de la psychanalyse. Dialectica 1975; 29: 189–207.Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    Merton RK. Social Theory and Social Structure. New York: Free Press, 1957.Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    Buzzoni M. Operazionismo ed ermeneutica. Saggio sullo statuto epistemologico della psicoanalisi. Milano: Angeli, 1989.Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    Buzzoni M. The operationalistic and hermeneutic status of psychoanalysis. The Journal for General Philosophy of Science 2001; 32: 131–165.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  • Marco Buzzoni
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Philosophy and Human SciencesUniversity of MacerataMacerataItaly

Personalised recommendations