Journal of Medical Humanities

, Volume 20, Issue 1, pp 49–60

Complicity in Thought and Language: Toleration of Wrong

  • Judith Lee Kissell
Article

Abstract

Complicity as “toleration of wrong” is deeply rooted in Western language and narratives. It is based on assumptions about the self, our relationship to the world and personal accountability that differ from the Common Law's and moral theology's standard doctrines. How we blame others for “tolerating wrong” depends upon the moral force of public discourse and upon the meaning of censure as exhortation. Censure as blame is usually retrospective, while censure as exhortation is forward-looking and stresses moral maturity and flourishing.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

REFERENCES

  1. Angell, Marcia. (1990). The Nazi hypothermia experiments and unethical research today. The New England Journal of Medicine, 322 1462–64.Google Scholar
  2. Aristotle. (1984). Nicomachean Ethics. In Jonathan Barnes (Ed.), The complete works of Aristotle (pp. 1729–1867). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Caplan, Arthur L. (1992). When medicine went mad. Totowa, NJ: Humana Press.Google Scholar
  4. Glidden, David K. (1991). The elusiveness of moral recognition and the imaginary place of fiction. In Peter A. French, Theodore E. Uehling, Jr. & Howard K. Wettstein (Eds.), Midwest studies in philosophy (XVI). Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar
  5. Gottlieb, Martin, & Eichenwald, Kurt. (1997, May 11). A hospital chain's brass knuckles, and the backlash. The New York Times p. 1.Google Scholar
  6. Gottlieb, Martin, & Eichenwald, Kurt. (1997, April 6). For biggest hospital operator, a debate over ties that bind. The New York Times, p. 1.Google Scholar
  7. Hart, H.L.A., & Honoré, Tony. (1985). Causation in the law (2nd ed.). Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  8. Hochhuth, Rolf. (1964). The deputy. New York: Grove Press.Google Scholar
  9. Jonsen, Albert R., & Toulmin, Stephen J. (1988). The abuse of casuistry. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  10. Kadish, Sanford. (1985). Complicity, cause and blame: A study in the interpretation of doctrine. California Law Review, 323 323–410.Google Scholar
  11. Kissell, Judith. (1997.) A comprehensive view of complicity as positive collaboration and toleration-of-evil. Doctoral Dissertation, Georgetown University.Google Scholar
  12. Levitt, Saul. (1960). The Andersonville trial. New York: Dramatists Play Service, Inc.Google Scholar
  13. Noonan, John T. (1976). Persons and masks of the law. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.Google Scholar
  14. Nussbaum, Martha. (1986). The fragility of goodness. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Nussbaum, Martha. (1990). Love's knowledge. New York: Oxford Press.Google Scholar
  16. Pope John Paul II. (1997). The roots of anti-Judaism. Origins, 22, 365–67.Google Scholar
  17. Ricoeur, Paul. (1989). Time and narrative (Vol. 3). Kathleen Blamey & David Pellauer (Trans.). Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  18. Smiley, Marion. (1992). Moral responsibility and the boundaries of community. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  19. Trilling, Lionel. (1979). The liberal imagination. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.Google Scholar
  20. Wertz, Dorothy C., & Fletcher, John C. (1993). Prenatal diagnosis and sex selection in 19 nations. Social Science and Medicine, 11, 1359–1366.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Human Sciences Press, Inc. 1999

Authors and Affiliations

  • Judith Lee Kissell
    • 1
  1. 1.Center for Health Policy and EthicsCreighton UniversityOmaha

Personalised recommendations