Advertisement

Geotechnical & Geological Engineering

, Volume 21, Issue 1, pp 1–28 | Cite as

Triaxial behaviour of a cemented gravely sand, Tehran alluvium

  • E. Asghari
  • D. G. Toll
  • S. M. Haeri
Article

Abstract

Cemented coarse-grained alluvium is present in a vast area of Tehran city, Iran including its suburbs. This deposit consists of gravely sand to sandy gravel with some cobbles and is dominantly cemented by carbonaceous materials. In order to understand the mechanical behaviour of this soil, a series of triaxial compression tests were performed on uncemented, artificially cemented and destructured samples. Hydrated lime was used as the cementation agent for sample preparation to model the Tehran deposit. The tests were performed on cemented samples after an appropriate time for curing. The tests on cemented samples show that a shear zone appears as the shear stress approaches the peak shear strength. During shearing these samples undergo dilation at confining stress lower than 1000 kPa. However, the uncemented and destructured samples show contraction during shearing. Peak shear strength is followed by strain softening for all cemented samples. The shear strength increases with increasing cement content but the influence of the cementation decreases as the confining stress increases. With increasing cementation the stress-strain behaviour of samples tend towards the behaviour expected of high-density soils. Test results indicate that the failure envelope for cemented samples is curved and not linear.

cemented soil gravely sand lime shear strength Tehran alluvium 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Acar, Y. B. and El-Tahir, A. E. (1986) Low strain dynamic properties of artificially cemented sand, Journal of Geotech. Engrg. Div., ASCE, 112(11), 1001–1015.Google Scholar
  2. Airey, D. W. (1993) Triaxial testing of naturally cemented carbonate soil, Journal of Geotech. Engerg. Div., ASCE, 119(11), 1379–1398.Google Scholar
  3. Boardman, D. I., Glendinning, S. and Rogers, C. D. F. (2001) Development of stabilisation and solidification in lime-clay mixes, Geotechnique, London, 50(6), 533–643.Google Scholar
  4. Boynton, R. S. (1966) Chemistry and technology of lime and limestone, John Wiley and Sons.Google Scholar
  5. Clough, G. W., Kuck, W. M. and Kasali, G. (1979) Silicate-stabilized sands, Journal of Geotech. Engrg. Div., ASCE, 105(1), 65–82.Google Scholar
  6. Clough, G. W., Sitar, N., Bachus, R. C. and Rad, N. S. (1981) Cemented sands under static loading, Journal of Geotech. Engrg. Div., ASCE, 107(6), 799–817.Google Scholar
  7. Coop, M. R. and Atkinson, J. H. (1993) The mechanics of cemented carbonate sands, Geotechnique, London, 43(1), 53–67.Google Scholar
  8. Cuccovilo, T. and Coop, M. R. (1997) Yielding and pre-failure deformation of structured sands, Geotechnique, London, 47(3), 481–508.Google Scholar
  9. Dupas, J. and Pecker, A. (1979) Static and dynamic properties of sand cement, Journal of Geotech. Engerg. Div., ASCE, 105(3), 419–436.Google Scholar
  10. Gens, A. and Nova, R. (1993) Conceptual bases for a constitutive model for bonded soils and weak rocks, Proc., Int. Symp. on Geotech. Engerg. of Hard Soils-Soft Rocks, Vol. 1, Balkema, Rotterdam, The Netherlands, 485–494.Google Scholar
  11. Haeri, S. M., Yasrebi, S. and Asghari, E. (2002) Effects of cementation on the shear strength parameters of Tehran alluvium using large direct shear test, Accepted for 9th IAEG Congress, Durban, South Africa.Google Scholar
  12. Huang, J. T. and Airey, D. W. (1993) Effects of cement and density on an artificially cemented sand, Proc. Geotechnical Engineering of Hard Soils-Soft Rocks, Balkema, Roterdam, 1, 553–560.Google Scholar
  13. Lade, P. V. and Overton, D. D. (1989) Cementation effects in frictional materials, Journal of Geotech. Engerg. Div., ASCE, 115(10), 1373–1387.Google Scholar
  14. Leroueil, S. and Vaughan, P. R. (1990) The general and congruent effects of structure in natural soils and weak rocks, Geotechnique, London, 40(3), 467–488.Google Scholar
  15. Malandraki, V. (1994) The engineering behaviour of a weakly bonded artificial soil, PhD thesis, University of Durham, Durham, U.K.Google Scholar
  16. Malandraki, V. and Toll, D. G. (2000) Drained probing triaxial tests on a weakly bonded artificial soil, Geotechnique, London, 50(2), 141–151.Google Scholar
  17. Malandraki, V. and Toll, D. G. (2001) Triaxial tests on weakly bonded soil with changes in stress path, Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, ASCE, 127(3), 282–291.Google Scholar
  18. Saxena, S. K. and Lastrico, R. M. (1978) Static properties of lightly cemented sand, Journal of Geotech. Engerg. Div., ASCE, 104(12), 1449–1465.Google Scholar
  19. Schnaid, F., Prietto, P. D.M. and Consoli, M. H. T. (2001) Characterization of cemented sand in triaxial compression, Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, ASCE, 127(10), 857–867.Google Scholar
  20. Skempton, A. W. (1954) The pore pressure coefficients A and B, Geotechnique, London, 4, 143–147.Google Scholar
  21. Toll, D. G. (1999) A data acquisition and control system for geotechnical testing, in computing developments in civil and structural engineering, (eds. B. Kumar and B.H.V. Topping), Edinburgh: Civil–Comp Press, 237–242.Google Scholar
  22. Toll, D. G. and Malandraki, V. (1993) Triaxial testing of a weakly bonded soil, Proc., Int. Symp. on Geotech. Engerg. of Hard Soils-Soft Rocks, Balkema, Rotterdam, The Netherlands, 817–823.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  • E. Asghari
    • 1
  • D. G. Toll
    • 2
  • S. M. Haeri
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Engineering GeologyUniversity of Tarbiat ModarresTehranIran
  2. 2.School of EngineeringUniversity of DurhamDurham
  3. 3.Civil Engineering DepartmentSharif University of TechnologyTehranIran

Personalised recommendations