Advertisement

Journal of Radiosurgery

, Volume 2, Issue 3, pp 181–188 | Cite as

Geometrical Accuracy Test Obtained on the OUR Rotating γ-System

  • György T. Szeifert
Article

Abstract

In 1996, a new γ-ray brain surgical apparatus, the OUR rotating γ-system (RGS), was developed for stereotactic radiosurgery. The device contains 30 cobalt-60 sources distributed in 5 groups along 6 helical lines in a hemispherical primary collimator body, which rotates during treatment together with the built-in secondary collimator body. By rotating the primary and secondary collimator body together, 30 nonoverlapping, full 360° arcs are formed. The 30 cobalt-60 γ-radiation sources have approximately 6000 Ci total initial activity with ≥3 Gy/min initial dose rate at the isocenter. The purpose of this study was to test the geometrical accuracy of this new radiosurgical equipment. The investigations were carried out on Gafchromic Dosimetry Media, Type MD-55 films. Following a pin-prick directed toward the center point of the radiation unit, the films were exposed, and the optical density profiles were analyzed with an automatic densitometer (Molecular Dynamics Personal Densitometer, Model PD SN 50238, Innovative Optical Systems for Biological Research). By measuring the asymmetry of the position of the pin-prick in relation to the density distribution, the geometrical accuracy of the OUR RGS was determined. The calculated difference between the mechanical unit center point and the radiological center point verify the unit of ±0.1054 mm against the generally accepted ±0.5 mm.

Radiosurgery γ-knife rotating γ-system 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

REFERENCES

  1. 1.
    Leksell L: The stereotactic method and radiosurgery of the brain. Acta Chir Scand 102:316–319, 1951Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Leksell L: Cerebral radiosurgery. Acta Chir Scand 134:585–595, 1968Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Leksell L: Stereotaxis and Radiosurgery: An Operative System. Springfield, IL: Charles C Thomas, 1971Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Arndt J: Focused gamma radiation. The gamma knife. Quality assurance. In MH Philips (ed), Physical Aspects of Stereotactic Radiosurgery. New York: Plenum Medical, 1993, pp. 121–124Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Verhey LJ, Smith V, Serago, CF: Comparison of radiosurgery treatment modalities based on physical dose distributions. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 40:497–505, 1998Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Steiner L, Prasad D, Lindquist C, Steiner M: Clinical aspects of gamma knife stereotactic radiosurgery. In PL Gildenberg, RR Tasker (eds), Textbook of Stereotactic and Functional Neurosurgery. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1998, pp. 763–805Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Smith V, Verhey L, Serago CF: Comparison of radiosurgery treatment modalities based on complication and control probabilities. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 40:507–513, 1998Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Goetsch SJ, Murphy BD, Schmidt R, Micka J. De Werd L, Chen Y, Shockley S: Physics of rotating gamma systems for stereotactic radiosurgery. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 43:689–696, 1999Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1999

Authors and Affiliations

  • György T. Szeifert
    • 1
  1. 1.National Institute of NeurosurgeryBudapestHungary

Personalised recommendations