Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution

, Volume 50, Issue 2, pp 121–132 | Cite as

Characterisation of germplasm accessions of Napier grass (pennisetum purpureum and P. purpureum×P. glaucum Hybrids) and comparison with farm clones using RAPD

  • A.J. Lowe
  • W. Thorpe
  • A. Teale
  • J. Hanson


Fifty six germplasm accessions of the important East African fodder crop Napier grass, Pennisetum purpureum, and its hybrids with P. glaucum, were characterised using 67 random amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD) fragments. No or very low intra-accession variation was found for 49 of the accessions examined, confirming field observations that this species is predominantly clonally propagated. Comparison of intra and inter-accession variation identified several groups of identical/similar accessions that could be targeted if the collection is to be rationalised, and also highlighted two misplantings of germplasm material during transfer to a field trial site. A neighbour joining dendrogram of Jaccard's similarity estimates, clearly separated 50 accessions of P. purpureum from three P. glaucum individuals, and placed six hybrid accessions in an intermediate position. These groupings were well supported by a nested AMOVA (P<0.001; 29.5% of total variance due to taxonomic delineation). The main group of P. purpureum individuals could be further differentiated into five sub-groups (designated East Africa, Southern Africa, USA1, USA2 and Miscellaneous, to reflect the majority membership of sub-groups) and examination of the within P. purpureum component of the nested AMOVA, found them to be significantly different (P<0.001; 18.8% of variance). Genetic diversity across all accessions was found to be fairly high (Shannon's diversity index 0.306) and thus the collection probably represents a wide genetic base for this species. In addition to germplasm accessions, 25 Kenyan farm clones were also analysed. A principal coordinate analysis found that all but one of the clones clustered with the main P. purpureum group of accessions, indicating that the majority are probably not interspecific hybrids. The origin and pedigree of clones is discussed based on genetic similarity amongst clones and to germplasm accessions.

Genetic diversity Germplasm characterisation Napier grass Pennisetum RAPD 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Adams R.P. 1995. PCO3D, Principal Coordinate Analysis Program in 3D. Baylor University, Gruver, USA.Google Scholar
  2. Adams R.P., Zhong M., Turuspekov Y., Dafforns M.R. and Veldkamp J.F. 1998. DNA fingerprinting reveals clonal nature. Vetiveria zizanioides (L.) Nash, Gramineae and sources of potential new germplasm. Molecular Ecology 7: 813–818.Google Scholar
  3. Armstrong J., Gibbs A., Peakall R. and Weiller G. 1995. RAPDistance Programs; Version 1.03 for the Analysis of Patterns of RAPD Fragments. Australian National University, Canberra, Australia.Google Scholar
  4. Boonman J.G. 1993. East Africa' Grasses and Fodders: Their Ecology and Husbandary. Kluwer Academic Publishers, London.Google Scholar
  5. Chalmers K.J., Waugh R., Sprent J.L., Simons A.J. and Powell W. 1992. Detection of genetic variation between and within popula tions of Gliricidia sepium and G. maculata using RAPD markers. Heredity 69: 465–472.Google Scholar
  6. Dawson I.K., Simons A.J., Waugh R. and Powell W. 1995. Diversity and gentic differentiation among subpopulations of Gliricidia sepium revealed by PCR-based assays. Heredity 74: 10–18.Google Scholar
  7. Excoffier L., Smouse P.E. and Quattro J.M. 1992. Analysis of molecular variation inferred from metric distances among DNA haplotypes: application to human mitochondrial DNA restriction data. Genetics 131: 479–491.Google Scholar
  8. Felsenstein J. 1993. PHYLIP (phylogeny inference package) Version 3.5c. University of Washington, Seattle, USA.Google Scholar
  9. Hamrick J.L. 1990. Isozymes and the analysis of genetic structure in plant populations. In: Soltis E.D. and Soltis P.S. (eds), Isozymes and Plant Biology. Chapman and Hall, London, pp. 87–105.Google Scholar
  10. Howell E.C., Newbury H.J., Swennen R.L., Withers L.A. and Ford-Lloyd B.V. 1994. The use of RAPD for identifying and classifying Musa germplasm. Genome 37: 328–332.Google Scholar
  11. Huff D.R., Peakall R. and Smouse P.E. 1993. RAPD variation within and among natural populations of outcrossing buffalog-rass [Buchloe dactyloides (Nutt.) Engelm.]. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 86: 927–934.Google Scholar
  12. Jaccard P. 1901. Etude comparative de la distribution florale dans une portion des Alpes et des Jura. Bulletin du Society Vaudoise Scientific Natural 37: 547–579.Google Scholar
  13. Karanja G.M. 1981. Bana Napier grass (Pennisetum purpureum cv. Bana) Kenya Farmer. Agricultural Society of Kenya, Nairobi.Google Scholar
  14. King L.M. and Schaal B.A. 1989. Genotypic variation within asexual lineages of Taraxacum officinale. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 87: 998–1002.Google Scholar
  15. Lynch M. and Millingan B.G. 1994. Analysis of population structure with RAPD markers. Molecular Ecology 3: 91–99.Google Scholar
  16. Ndikumana J. 1996. Multilocational evaluation of Napier and Pennisetum hybrids: Highlights of research results from the Addis Ababa, 5–7 December 1995 workshop. AFRNET News-letter 6: 2–8.Google Scholar
  17. Newbury H.J. and Ford-Lloyd B.V. 1993. The use of RAPD for patassessing variation in plants. Plant Growth Regulation 12: 43–51.Google Scholar
  18. Orodho A.B., Wanambacha J.W. and Otieno K. 1995. Pennisetum multi-locational evaluation and trial. Report for AFRNET multilocational Pennisetum trial. Workshop, International Livestock Research Institute, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.Google Scholar
  19. Powell W., Morgante M., Andre C., Hanafey M., Vogel J., Tingey S. et al. 1996. The comparison of RFLP, AFLP and SSR (microsatellite) markers for germplasm analysis. Molecular Breeder 2: 225–238.Google Scholar
  20. Rieseberg L.H. 1996. Homology among RAPD fragments in interspecific comparisons. Molecular Ecology 5: 99–105.Google Scholar
  21. Russell J.R., Hosein F., Johnson E., Waugh R. and Powell W. 1993. Genetic differentiation of cocoa (Theobroma cacao L.) populations revealed by RAPD analysis. Molecular Ecology 2: 89–97.Google Scholar
  22. Russell J.R., Fuller J.D., Macaulay M., Hatz B.G., Jahoor A., Powell W. et al. 1997. Direct comparison of levels of genetic variation among barley accessions detected by RFLPs, AFLPs, SSRs and RAPDs. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 95: 714–722.Google Scholar
  23. Saitou N. and Nei M. 1987. The neighbour-joining method: a new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. Molecular Biology and Evolution 4: 406–425.Google Scholar
  24. Valk Y.S. 1990. Review report of the DEAF surveys during 1989 NDDP/M41/ 200. Ministry of Livestock Development, Nairobi, Kenya.Google Scholar
  25. Virk P.S., Ford-Lloyd B.V., Jackson M.T. and Newbury H.J. 1995. Use of RAPD for the study of diversity within plant germplasm collections. Heredity 74: 170–179.Google Scholar
  26. Virk P.S., Newbury H.J., Jackson M.T. and Ford-Lloyd B.V. 1995. The identification of duplicate accessions within a rice germplasm collection using RAPD analysis. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 90: 1049–1055.Google Scholar
  27. Virk P.S., Ford-Lloyd B.V., Jackson M.T., Pooni H.S., Clemeno T.P. and Newbury H.J. 1996. Predicting quantitative variation within rice germplasm using molecular markers. Heredity 76: 296–304.Google Scholar
  28. Wachira F.N., Waugh R., Hackett C.A. and Powell W. 1995. Detection of genetic diversity in tea (Camellia sinensis) using RAPD markers. Genome 38: 201–210.Google Scholar
  29. Weising K., Nybom H., Wolff K. and Meyer W. 1995. DNA Fingerprinting in Plants and Fungi. CRC Press, London.Google Scholar
  30. Wilde J., Waugh R. and Powell W. 1992. Genetic fingerprinting of Theobroma clones using randomly amplified polymorphic DNA markers. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 83: 871–877.Google Scholar
  31. Williams J.G.K., Kubelik A.R., Livak K.J., Rafalski J.A. and Tingey S.V. 1990. DNA polymorphisms amplified by arbitary primers are useful as genetic markers. Nucleic Acids Research 18: 6231–6235.Google Scholar
  32. Wolff K., El Akkad S. and Abbott R.J. 1997. Population substructure in Alkanna orientalis (Boraginaceae) in the Sinai desert, in relation to its pollinator behaviour. Molecular Ecology 6: 365–372.Google Scholar
  33. Wolff K., Zietkiewicz E. and Hofstra H. 1995. Identification of chrysanthemum cultivars and stability of DNA fingerprint patassessing terns. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 91: 439–447.Google Scholar
  34. van de Wouw M., Hanson J. and Luethi S. 1995. Morphological and agronomic characterization of nine accessions of Napier grass. Report for AFRNET multi-locational Pennisetum trial. Workshop, International Livestock Research Institute, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.Google Scholar
  35. van de Wouw M., Hanson J. and Luethi S. 1999. Morphological and agronomic characterization of a collection of Napier grass (Pennisetum purpureum) and P.purpureum × P.glaucum. Tropical Grasslands 33: 150–158.Google Scholar
  36. Yang X. and Quiros C. 1993. Identification and classification of celery cultivars with RAPD markers. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 86: 205–212.Google Scholar
  37. Zhang D., Ghislain M., Huaman Z., Golmirzaie A. and Hijmans R. 1998. RAPD variation in sweetpotato (Ipomoea batatas (L.) Lam.) cultivars from South America and Papua New Guinea. Genet. Resour. Crop Evol. 45: 271–277.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  • A.J. Lowe
    • 1
    • 2
  • W. Thorpe
    • 1
    • 2
  • A. Teale
    • 1
    • 2
  • J. Hanson
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.International Livestock Research InstituteNairobiKenya
  2. 2.International Livestock Research InstituteAddis AbabaEthiopia

Personalised recommendations