Springer Nature is making SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 research free. View research | View latest news | Sign up for updates

A Note on Two Classical Enhancement Filters and Their Associated PDE's

  • 188 Accesses

  • 26 Citations

Abstract

We establish in 2D, the P.D.E. associated with a classical image enhancement filter, the Kramer operator and compare it with another classical shock filter, the Osher-Rudin filter. We show that each one corresponds to a non-flat mathematical morphology operator conditioned by a the sign of an edge detector. In the case of the Kramer operator, the equation is conditioned by the Canny edge detector while in the case of the original Rudin-Osher filter, the equation is conditioned by the sign of the Laplacian.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Alvarez, L. and Esclarmn, J. 1997. Image quantization using reaction-diffusion equations. SIAM Journal on Applied Mathematics, 57:153–175.

  2. Alvarez, L., Guichard, F., Lions, P.L., and Morel, J.M. 1993. Axioms and fundamental equations of image processing. Archive for Rational Mechanics and Analysis, 16(9):200–257.

  3. Alvarez, L. and Mazorra, L. 1994. Signal and image restoration using shock filters and anisotropic diffusion. SIAM J. Numerical Analysis, 31(2):590–605.

  4. Cao, F. 1998. Partial differential equation and mathemetical morphology. Journal de Mathematiques Pures et Appliquees, 77(9):909– 941.

  5. Dorst, L. and van den Boomgaard, R. 1994. Morphological signal processing and the slope transform. Signal Processing, 38:79–98.

  6. Engquist, B., Lotstedt, P., and Sjogreen, B. 1989. Nonlinear filters for effcient shock computation. MathComp, 52(186):509–537.

  7. Goldmark. 1951. A new technique for improving the sharpness of television pictures. In Proc. IRE, pp. 1314–1322.

  8. Guichard, F. and Morel, J.-M. 2000. Image Iterative Smoothing and PDE's. Available through email to fguichard@poseidon.fr.

  9. Heijmans, H.J.A.M. 1991. Theoretical aspects of gray-level morphology. PAMI, 13(6):568–582.

  10. Heijmans, H.J.A.M. 1994. Morphological Image Operators. Academic Press: Boston.

  11. Heijmans, H.J.A.M. 2001. Scale-spaces, pde's, and scale-invariance. 'Third International Conference on Scale-Space and Morphology,' submitted.

  12. Heijmans, H.J.A.M. and Maragos, P. 1997. Lattice calculus of the morphological slope transform. Signal Processing, 59(1):17–42.

  13. Hummel, R.A., Kimia, B., and Zucker, S.W. 1983. Gaussian blur and the heat equation: Forward and inverse solutions. In CVPR83, pp. 416–421.

  14. Hummel, R.A., Kimia, B., and Zucker, S.W. 1987. Deblurring gaussian blur. CVGIP, 38(1):66–80.

  15. Jackway, P.T. 1995. On dimensionality in multiscale morphological scale-space with elliptic poweroid structuring functions. JVCIR, 6:189–195.

  16. Kramer, H.P. and Bruckner, J.B. 1975. Iterations of a non-linear transformation for enhancement of digital images. Pattern Recognition, 7.

  17. Lindenbaum, M., Fischer, M., and Bruckstein, A.M. 1994. On gabor contribution to image-enhancement. PR, 27(1):1–8.

  18. Maragos, P. 1989. A representation theory for morphological image and signal processing. PAMI, 11(6):586–599.

  19. Maragos, P. 1995. Slope transfroms: Theory and application to nonlinear signal processing. IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, 43:864–877.

  20. Maragos, P. and Schafer, R.W. 1987. Morphological filters. Part II: Their relations to median, order-statistic, and stack filters. ASSP, 35:1170–1184.

  21. Matheron, G. 1975. Random Sets and Integral Geometry. JohnWiley: New York.

  22. Meyer, F. and Serra, J. 1989. Contrasts and activity lattice. Signal Processing, 16:303–317.

  23. Price, C.B., Wambacq, P., and Oosterlinck, A. 1990. Image enhancement and analysis with reaction-diffusion paradigm. IEE-P, I:137(3):136–145.

  24. Rudin, L.I., Osher, S., and Fatemi, E. 1992. Nonlinear total variation based noise removal algorithms. Physica D, 60(1–4):259– 268.

  25. Rudin, L.I. 1987. Images, Numerical Analysis of Singularities and Shock Filters. Ph.D. Thesis, California Institute of Technology.

  26. Stanley, O. and Rudin, L.I. 1990. Feature-oriented image enhancement using shock filters. SIAM J. Numer. Anal., 27(4):919– 940.

  27. Schavemaker, J.G.M., Reinders, M.J.T., Gerbrands, J.J., and Backer, E. 1999. Image sharpening by morphological filtering. Pattern Recognition, submitted.

  28. Schreiber, W.F. 1970.Wirephoto quality improved by unsharp masking. Pattern Recognition.

  29. Scollar, I., Weidner, B., and Huang, T.S. 1970. Image enhancement using the median and the interquartile distance. Computer Vision, Graphics, and Image Processing, 2:117–121.

  30. Serra, J. 1982. Image Analysis and Mathematical Morphology. Academic Press: San Diego, CA.

  31. Serra, J. 1986. Introduction to mathematical morphology. CVGIP, 35(3):283–305.

  32. Sternberg, S.R. 1986. Grayscale morphology. CVGIP, 35(3):333– 355.

  33. van den Boomgaard, R. and Smeulders, A. 1994. The morphological structure of images: The differential equations of morphological scale space. IEEE Tr. PAMI, 16:1101–1113.

  34. You, Y.L. and Kaveh, M. 1997. Formation of step images during anisotropic diffusion. In ICIP97, vol. III, pp. 388–391. Shock filter.

Download references

Author information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Guichard, F., Morel, J. A Note on Two Classical Enhancement Filters and Their Associated PDE's. International Journal of Computer Vision 52, 153–160 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022904124348

Download citation

  • shock filters
  • PDE
  • enhancement filters
  • deblurring filters