Advertisement

Tropical Animal Health and Production

, Volume 35, Issue 2, pp 131–145 | Cite as

Replacement Value of Undecorticated Sunflower Meal as a Supplement for Milk Production by Crossbred Cows and Buffaloes in the Northern Plains of India

  • K. Sharma
  • N. Dutta
  • A.K. Pattanaik
  • Q.Z. Hasan
Article

Abstract

The replacement value of undecorticated sunflower meal (SFM) in the diets of dairy animals was assessed on-station and on-farm. Eighteen primiparous crossbred (Bos taurus×Bos indicus) cows (350.4±8.84 kg), randomly allocated to three groups, were used in the on-station study. The animals were fed on either a conventional concentrate supplement (control) or on an experimental concentrate, in which SFM replaced 25% (SFM-25) or 50% (SFM-50) of the CP in the control supplement. Green oats (Avena sativa) were supplied ad libitum. A metabolism trial conducted following 60 days of experimental feeding revealed that the intakes of DM, DCP and TDN were similar among the groups. The digestibilities of OM, CP, EE, NDF and ADF were also without significant differences. All the groups were in positive nitrogen balance. Inclusion of SFM at either level had no effect on the intake, excretion or retention of nitrogen. The daily milk yield and its composition did not differ among the dietary treatments. Moreover, the efficiency of utilization of DOM and TDN for FCM production tended to reflect, although non-significantly, increasing levels of SFM inclusion. In the on-farm study, seven multiparous milking buffaloes belonging to six farmers were used to assess the effect of replacing 20% of the CP of the conventional supplement with SFM, in a predominantly crop residue-based diet. The study continued for 4 months and revealed that the average daily feed intake and milk production was similar in the control and SFM-fed groups. It was concluded that SFM can be effectively utilized as a cheaper replacement for costly oil cakes and wheat bran for economic milk production by smallholder farmers.

buffalo cattle digestibility management milk production nitrogen retention nutrition palatability sunflower meal 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

REFERENCES

  1. AOAC, 1990. Official Methods of Analysis, 15th edn, (Association of Official Analytical Chemists, Washington, DC)Google Scholar
  2. Devendra, C., 1997. Crop residues for feeding animals in Asia: technology development and adoption in crop/livestock systems. In: C. Renard (ed.), Crop Residues in Sustainable Mixed Crop/Livestock Farming Systems, (CAB International, Wallingford), 241-267Google Scholar
  3. Dolberg, F., 1992. Progress in the utilization of urea-ammonia treated crop residues: biological and socioeconomic aspects of animal production and application of the technology on small farms. Livestock Research for Rural Development, 4, 20-31Google Scholar
  4. Doyle, P.T., Devendra, C. and Pearce, G.R., 1986. Rice Straw as a Feed for Ruminants, (International Development Programme of Australian Universities and Colleges (IDP), Canberra, Australia)Google Scholar
  5. Economides, S., 1998. The nutritive value of sunflower meal and its effect on replacing cereal straws in the diets of lactating ewe and goats. Livestock Production Science, 55, 89-97Google Scholar
  6. Erickson, G.M., Edgerly, C.G.M., Fisher, G.R., Lindberg, G.L. and Park, C.S., 1984. Feeding a complete mixed diet supplemented with either soybean or sunflower meal according to lactation curve. Journal of Dairy Science, 67, 142-143Google Scholar
  7. Etheridge, M., Lemerle, C., Trigg, T. and Cumming, R.B., 1985. The value of various vegetable protein concentrates for lactating cows grazing pasture. Proceedings of the Symposium on Recent Advances in Animal Nutrition in Australia, University of New England, Australia, paper no. 14Google Scholar
  8. Goering, H.K. and Van Soest, P.J., 1970. Forage Fibre Analysis, (Agricultural Handbook No. 379, US Department of Agriculture, Washington DC)Google Scholar
  9. ILRI, 1995. Global agenda for livestock research. In: P.R. Gardiner and C. Devendra (eds), Proceedings of a Consultation, (International Livestock Research Institute, Nairobi, Kenya)Google Scholar
  10. ISI, 1961. Chemical Analysis of Milk. IS: 1479 (part II), (Indian Standards Institution, New Delhi, India)Google Scholar
  11. Jodha, N.S., 1986. Common property resources and rural poor in dry regions of India. Economic and Political Weekly, 21, 1169-1181Google Scholar
  12. Kaneko, J.J., 1989. Clinical Biochemistry of Domestic Animals, 4th edn, (Academic Press, New York)Google Scholar
  13. Kearl, L.C., 1982. Nutrient Requirements of Ruminants in Developing Countries, (International Feedstuffs Research Institute, Utah Agricultural Experiment Station, Utah State University, Logan, UT 84322, USA)Google Scholar
  14. Khattab, H.M., El-Alamy, H.A., El-Nor, S.A.H.A., Salen, F.A.F. and Abdou, M.M.A., 1998. Effect of protein source on milk yield and composition of lactating buffaloes. Egyptian Journal of Dairy Science, 26, 1-23Google Scholar
  15. Kiran Singh, Habib, G., Siddiqui, M.M. and Ibrahim, M.N.M., 1997. Dynamics of feed resources in mixed farming systems of south Asia. In: C. Renard (ed.), Crop Residues in Sustainable Mixed Crop/Livestock Farming Systems, (CAB International, Wallingford), 113-130Google Scholar
  16. Kuldip, Akbar, M.A., Mandal, A.B. and Gupta, P.C., 1995. Comparative feeding value of sunflower and mustard cake in sheep. Indian Journal of Animal Sciences, 65, 944-946Google Scholar
  17. Mandibaya, W., Mutisi, C., Hamudikuwandu, H. and Tittertor, M., 1999. The nutritive value, intake, digestibility and nitrogen balance of farm-grown and prepared sunflower based dairy calf meals. Tropical Animal Health and Production, 31, 321-331Google Scholar
  18. Nishino, S., Kondo, S. and Hayashi, K., 1980. Feeding value of sunflower meal as a replacement for soybean meal in lactating cows. Journal of the College of Dairying, Natural Science, 8, 275-284Google Scholar
  19. Owen, E. and Jayasuriya, M.C.M., 1989. Use of crop residues as animal feeds in developing countries: a review. Research Development in Agriculture, 6, 124-128Google Scholar
  20. Pattanaik, A.K., Sastry, V.R.B. and Katiyar, R.C., 1999. Effect of different degradable protein and starch sources on the blood metabolites and rumen biochemical profile of early weaned crossbred calves. Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences, 12, 728-734Google Scholar
  21. Pearson, A.M., Wallace, H.D. and Hentges, J.F. Jr., 1954. Sunflower-seed meal as a protein supplement for beef cattle and swine, (University of Florida Agricultural Experiment Station Bulletin), 533-539Google Scholar
  22. Richardson, C.R., Beville, R.N., Ratcliff, R.K. and Albin, R.C., 1981. Sunflower meal as a protein supplement for growing ruminants. Journal of Animal Science, 53, 557-563Google Scholar
  23. Schingoethe, D.J., Rook, J.A. and Ludens, F., 1977. Evaluation of sunflower meal as a protein supplement for lactating cows. Journal of Dairy Science, 60, 591-595Google Scholar
  24. Senel, H.S. and Oznacor, R., 1975. Sunflower oil meal, cottonseed oil meal and urea as protein supplement in beef finishing diets. First Universities Veterina Fakultest, 2, 192-197Google Scholar
  25. Sihag, S., Vidya Sagar and Yadav, K.R., 1997. Effect of feeding deoiled sunflower cake on milk yield and composition in crossbred cows. Indian Journal of Dairy Science, 50, 347-351Google Scholar
  26. Smith, K.L., 1968. A review of nutritional value of sunflower meal. Feedstuffs, 40, 23-27Google Scholar
  27. Snedecor, G.W. and Cochran, W.G., 1989. Statistical Methods, (Iowa State University Press, Ames, IA)Google Scholar
  28. Stake, P.E., Owens, M.J. and Schingoethe, D.J., 1973. Rapeseed, sunflower and soybean meal supplementation of calf rations. Journal of Dairy Science, 59, 1967-1984Google Scholar
  29. Steinbach, J., 1997. Alternatives to crop residues as feed resources in mixed farming systems. In: C. Renard (ed.), Crop Residues in Sustainable Mixed Crop/Livestock Farming Systems, (CAB International, Wallingford), 197-214Google Scholar
  30. Tashev, T.K., Khasan, A.M., Todorov, N.A., Peicheveki, I. and Hasan, A.M., 1990. Amount and source of protein in diets for dairy cows. Zhivotnov'dni Nauki, 27, 3-9Google Scholar
  31. Topps, J.H. and Oliver, J., 1993. Animal Foods of Central Africa, (Zimbabwe Agricultural Technical Handbook No. 2, Zimbabwe Agricultural Journal, Modern Farming Publications, Harare, Zimbabwe)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  • K. Sharma
    • 1
  • N. Dutta
    • 1
  • A.K. Pattanaik
    • 1
  • Q.Z. Hasan
    • 1
  1. 1.Centre of Advanced Studies in Animal Nutrition, Indian Veterinary Research InstituteIzatnagarIndia

Personalised recommendations