Journal of Materials Science

, Volume 38, Issue 6, pp 1231–1238 | Cite as

Effect of a machining-induced defect on the tensile strength of a 3D composite material

  • Catherine Davy
  • Didier Marquis
Article

Abstract

This paper investigates the effect of finite specimen size upon the tensile failure of a tridirectional carbon-carbon composite along each reinforcement axis. Asymmetry in the position of load-bearing axial yarns across the cross-section is generated randomly by machining. This yields parasitic bending of the specimen, and thereby premature failure of the yarns subjected to the maximum bending stress. However, bending effects become negligible at final failure. Additionally, the composite failure strength σ F is determined from the cross-sectional area of the actually load-bearing axial yarns, using both symmetrical and asymmetrical specimens. Results are in good agreement with previous work, and we show that the variability of σ F is small.

Keywords

Polymer Tensile Strength Composite Material Specimen Size Tensile Failure 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    A. Legendre, Lematériau Carbone: des céramiques noires aux fibres de carbone (Eyrolles, 1992).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    G. Savage, Carbon-carbon Composites (Chapman and Hall, 1993).Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    D. F. Adams, Mat. Sci. and Eng. 23 (1976) 55.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    J. S. Baste and B. Hosten, Rev. de Phys. Appl. 25(2) (1990) 161.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    J. Jortner, Carbon 24(5) (1986) 603.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    P. Laramee, G. Lamere, B. Prescott, R. Mitchell, P. Sottosanti and D. Dahle, in “Proc. 12th Biennal Conf. on Carbon,” Am. Chem. Soc. (Washington, DC, 1975) p. 74.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    L. E. Mcallister and W. Lachmann, edited by A. Kelly and S. T. Millieko (North Holland, 1983) p. 109.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    J. L. Perry and D. F. Adams, Carbon 14 (1976) 61.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    J. L. White and P. M. Sheaffer, Carbon 27(5) (1989) 697.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    O. Allix, M. Dommanget, M. Gratton and P. L. Hereil, Comp. Sci. and Tech. 61(3) (2001) 409.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    O. Allix and P. Ladeveze, in Advanced Composites Materials II, Leading Part for the XXIst Century, “Proceedings of the second Japan-France Joint Seminar on Composite Materials,” Tsukuba, Japan, edited by C. Bathias and M. Uemara (SIRPE, Paris, 1991).Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    J. S. Baste, C. Charcosset and F. Sidoroff, in “Compte-Rendus des 6èmes Journées Nationales sur les Composites” (AMAC, Paris, 1988) p. 765.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    J. P. Dumont, P. Ladeveze, M. Poss and Y. Remond, Int. J. of Comp. Struct. 8 (1987) 119.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    S. Ivanov, A. A. Tashkinov and V. P. Skachkov, in “Proc. of the 5th International Conference on Biaxial/Multiaxial Fatigue and Fracture” (Cracow, 1997) p. 267.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    C. T. Robinson and P. H. Francis, Fatigue of Fibrous Composite Materials, ASTM-STP 723 (American Society for Testing and Materials, 1981) p. 85.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    F. Hild and D. Marquis, Eur. J. of Mech. A/Solids 11(6) (1992) 753.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Y. Tanabe, E. Yasuda and M. Inagaki, J. of Mat. Sci. Lett. 10 (1991) 756.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    F. Hild, A. Burr and F. A. Leckie, Eur. J. of Mech.-A/Solids 13(6) (1994) 731.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    J. P. Boehler and L. elAoufi, in “Compte-rendus des Journées Nationales AMAC-GAMAC” (AMAC, Paris, 1989) p. 3.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    F. Hild, French patent no. 90 06848 (Régie Nationale des Usines Renault-ENS de Cachan, 1992).Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    C. Crestia-Davy, S. Calloch, A. Cosculluela, F. Hild and D. Marquis, in “Proc. of the 12th International Conference on Composite Materials” (Paris, July 1999).Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    P. Ladeveze, Y. Remond and E. Vittecoq, Rev.Franc¸. de Méc. 2 (1989) 219.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    R. J. Whitehead, Technical Note NT. 205 (Vishay Micromesures MM, 1984).Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    R. J. Zaldivar, G. S. Rellick and J.-M. Yang, J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 78(3) (1995) 623.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    M. F. Ashby and D. R. H. Jones, Engineering Materials 1: An Introduction to Their Properties and Applications, 2nd ed. (Oxford, 1996).Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    M. L. Berenson, D. M. Levine and D. Rindskopf, Applied Statistics: A First Course (Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1988).Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    N. Lissart and J. Lamon, J. of Mat. Sci. 32(22) (1997) 6107.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    M. R'Mili and M. Murat, C. R. Acad. Sci. Paris-End. Fat. Rupt. 324(II b) (1997) 355.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    W. Weibull, Proc. Roy. Swed. Inst. Eng. Res. 151/153 (1939).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  • Catherine Davy
    • 1
  • Didier Marquis
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of EngineeringUniversity of CambridgeCambridgeUK
  2. 2.LMT CachanCachanFrance

Personalised recommendations