Chromosome Research

, Volume 11, Issue 2, pp 99–113 | Cite as

Lampbrush chromosomes of the chaffinch Fringilla coelebs L.)

  • Alsu Saifitdinova
  • Svetlana Derjusheva
  • Alla Krasikova
  • Elena Gaginskaya

Abstract

The seven macrochromosomes of the chaffinch (Fringilla coelebs L.) are described in their lampbrush form. The relative lengths of bivalents, the positions and arrangements of chromosomal regions with lateral loops of similar length and appearance, as well as the positions of protein bodies and loops of peculiar morphology have been defined and mapped, so that each of the seven lampbrush macrobivalents may be identified in oocytes from every individual of the species. This morphological analysis has been supplemented by determining the positions of certain loci and objects that are specifically and consistently labelled after immunostaining or fluorescence in-situ hybridization with defined molecular probes.

birds centromere Fringilla coelebs in-situ hybridization lampbrush chromosome 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Callan HG (1986) Lampbrush Chromosomes. Springer Verlag, Berlin.Google Scholar
  2. Callan HG, Lloyd L (1960) Lampbrush chromosomes of crested newts Triturus cristatus (Laurenti). Phil Trans R Soc London Ser B 243: 135-219.Google Scholar
  3. Chelysheva LA, Solovei IV, Rodionov AV, Iakovlev AF, Gaginskaya ER (1990) The lampbrush chromosomes of the chicken. Cytological maps of the macrobivalents. Tsitologiia 32: 303-316.Google Scholar
  4. Eckmann CR, Jantsch MF (1999) The RNA-editing enzyme ADAR1 is localized to the nascent ribonucleoprotein matrix on Xenopus lampbrush chromosomes but specifically associates with an atypical loop. J Cell Biol 144: 603-615.Google Scholar
  5. Gaginskaya ER (1972) Nuclear structures in oocytes of adult birds. II. Protein bodies and the karyosphere. Tsitologiia 14: 568-578.Google Scholar
  6. Gaginskaya ER, Gruzova MN (1969) Characteristics of oogenesis in the finch. Tsitologiia 11: 1241-1251.Google Scholar
  7. Gaginskaya ER, Gruzova MN (1975) Detection of the ampli-fied rDNA in ovarial cells of some insects and birds by hybridization in situ. Tsitologiia 17: 1132-1137.Google Scholar
  8. Gall JG (2000) Cajal bodies: The first 100 years. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol 16: 273-300.Google Scholar
  9. Hutchison N (1987) Lampbrush chromosomes of the chicken, Gallus domesticus. J Cell Biol 105: 1493-1500.Google Scholar
  10. Koecke HU, Muller M (1965) Formwechel und Anzahl der Chromosomen bei Huhn und Ente. Naturwissenshcaften 52: 483.Google Scholar
  11. Kropotova EV, Gaginskaya ER (1984) Lampbrush chromosomes from the Japanese quail oocytes. Tsitologiia 26: 1008-1015.Google Scholar
  12. Liangouzov IA, Derjusheva SE, Saifitdinova AF, Malykh AG, Gaginskaya ER (2002) Monomers of a satellite DNA sequence of chaffinch (Fringilla coelebs L., Aves: Passeriformes) contains short clusters of the TTAGGG repeat. Rus J Genet 38: 1359-1364.Google Scholar
  13. Loyez M (1906) Recherches sur le developpement ovarien des oeufs meroblastiques a vitellus nutritis abdominant. Arch Anat Microsc Morphol Exp 8: 239-345.Google Scholar
  14. Morgan GT (2002) Lampbrush chromosomes and associated bodies: new insights into principles of nuclear structure and function. Chromosome Res 10: 177-200.Google Scholar
  15. MyakoshinaYuA, Rodionov AV (1994) Meiotic lampbrush chromosomes in turkey, Meleagris gallopavo (Galliformes: Meleagrididae). Rus J Genet 30: 577-583.Google Scholar
  16. Piccinni E, Stella M (1970) Some avian karyograme. Caryologia 23: 189-202.Google Scholar
  17. Saifitdinova AF, Timofejeva LP, Zhurov VG, Gaginskaya ER (2000) Highly repeated centromere sequence FCP from chaffinch (Fringilla coelebs: Aves) genome is revealed within interchromosomal connectives. Tsitologiia 42: 588-593.Google Scholar
  18. Saifitdinova AF, Derjusheva SE, Malykh AG, Zhurov VG, Andreeva TF, Gaginskaya ER (2001) Centromeric tandem repeat from the chaffinch genome: isolation and molecular characterization. Genome 44: 96-103.Google Scholar
  19. Snow MHL, Callan HG (1969) Evidence for a polarized movement of lateral loops of newt lampbrush chromosomes during oogenesis. J Cell Sci 5: 1-25.Google Scholar
  20. Solovei I, Gaginskaya E, Hutchison N, Macgregor H (1993) Avian sex chromosomes in the lampbrush form: the ZW lampbrush bivalent from six species of bird. Chromosome Res 1: 153-166.Google Scholar
  21. Solovei I, Gaginskaya ER, Macgregor HC (1994) The arrangement and transcription of telomere DNA sequences at the ends of lampbrush chromosomes of birds. Chromosome Res 2: 460-470.Google Scholar
  22. Solovei IV, Joffe BI, Gaginskaya ER, Macgregor HC (1996) Transcription on lampbrush chromosomes of a centromerically localized highly repeated DNA in pigeon (Columba) relates to sequence arrangement. Chromosome Res 4: 588-603.Google Scholar
  23. Vlad M, Macgregor HC (1975) Chromomere number and its genetic significance in lampbrush chromosomes. Chromosoma 50: 327-347.Google Scholar
  24. Wu Z, Murphy C, Callan HG, Gall JG (1991) Small nuclear ribonucleoproteins and heterogeneous nuclear ribonucleoproteins in the amphibian germinal vesicle: Loops, spheres, and snurposomes. J Cell Biol 113: 465-483.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  • Alsu Saifitdinova
    • 1
  • Svetlana Derjusheva
    • 1
  • Alla Krasikova
    • 1
  • Elena Gaginskaya
    • 1
  1. 1.Biological Research InstituteSaint-Petersburg State UniversitySaint-PetersburgRussia

Personalised recommendations