Journal of Chemical Ecology

, Volume 29, Issue 3, pp 629–638 | Cite as

Chemical Composition of Precloacal Secretions of Two Liolaemus fabiani Populations: Are They Different?

  • Claudio M. Escobar
  • Carlos A. Escobar
  • Antonieta Labra
  • Hermann M. Niemeyer

Abstract

The chemical composition of secretions of precloacal pores from two populations of the lizard Liolaemusfabiani (Puilar and Punta-Brava) were compared. This is an endemic species from the Atacama Salt Flat (26°46'S 68°14'W; 2400 m) in northern Chile, restricted to the internal lakes of the salt flat. Interpopulational differences in the chemical composition of the secretions were expected considering that populations have genetic differences and are subject to different thermal conditions. By using GC-MS, a total of 44 compounds were found belonging to three categories: n-alkanes, long-chain carboxylic acids, and steroids. Six compounds were found in all the individuals studied: tetradecanoic, pentadecanoic, hexadecanoic, hexadecenoic, octadecanoic, and octadecenoic acids. The secretions of both populations had similar types and proportions of the different compounds, except for cholesterol and hexanoic acid, which were more abundant in the Puilar population. These differences can be ascribed to the different environmental conditions to which populations are subjected. The adaptive meaning of these differences is discussed.

Precloacal secretion lizard Liolaemusfabiani 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Alberts, A. C. 1990. Chemical properties of femoral gland secretions in the desert iguana, Dipsosaurus dorsalis. J. Chem. Ecol. 16:13–25.Google Scholar
  2. Alberts, A. C. 1991. Phylogenetic and adaptive variation in lizards femoral gland secretions. Copeia 1991:69–79.Google Scholar
  3. Alberts, A. C., Sharp, T. R., Werner, D. I., and Weldon, P. J. 1992. Seasonal variation of lipids in femoral gland secretions of male green iguanas (Iguana iguana). J. Chem. Ecol. 18:703–712.Google Scholar
  4. Alberts, A. C., Phillips, J.A., and Werner, D. I. 1993. Sources of intraspecific variability in the protein composition of lizard femoral gland secretions. Copeia 1993:775–781.Google Scholar
  5. Bull, C.M., Griffin, C.L., and Perkins, M.V. 1999. Some properties of a pheromone allowing individual recognition, from the scats of an Australian lizard, Egernia striolata. Acta Ethol. 2:35–42.Google Scholar
  6. Bull, C. M., Griffin, C. L., Lanham, E. J., and Johnston, G. R. 2000. Recognition of pheromones from group members in a gregarious lizard, Egernia stokesii. J. Herpetol. 34:92–99.Google Scholar
  7. Chauhan, N. B. 1986. A preliminary report on the lipid components of pre-anal gland secretion of lizards Hemidactylus flaviviridis and Uromastix hardwickii. J. Anim. Morphol. Physiol. 33:73–76.Google Scholar
  8. Cooper, W. E., Jr. 1998. Evaluation of the swap and related tests as a bioassay for assessing responses by squamata reptiles to chemical stimuli. J. Chem. Ecol. 24:841–866.Google Scholar
  9. Cooper, W. E., Jr. and Garstka, W. R. 1987. Lingual responses to chemical fractions of urodaeal glandular pheromones of the skink Eumeces laticeps. J. Exp. Zool. 24:249–253.Google Scholar
  10. Cooper, W. E., Jr. and Vitt, L. J. 1986. Interspecific odour discrimination among syntopic congeners in scincid lizards (Genus Eumeces). Behavior 97:1–9.Google Scholar
  11. Escobar, C. A., Labra, A., and Niemeyer, H. M. 2001. Chemical composition of precloacal secretions of Liolaemus lizards. J. Chem. Ecol. 27:1–14.Google Scholar
  12. Etheridge, R. 1995. Redescription of Ctenoblepharys adspersa Tschudi, 1845, and the taxonomy of Liolaeminae (Reptilia: Squamata: Tropiduridae). Am. Mus. Novit. 3142:1–34.Google Scholar
  13. Font, E. 1996. Los sentidos químicos de los reptiles. Un enfoque etológico. pp. 197–259, in F. Colmenares (ed.). Etología, Psicología Comparada y Comportamiento Animal. Síntesis Psicológica, Editorial Síntesis S.A., Madrid.Google Scholar
  14. Ford, N. B. 1982. Species specificity of sex pheromone trails of sympatric and allopatric garter snakes (Thamnophis). Copeia 1982:10–13.Google Scholar
  15. Ford, N. B. and Schofield, C. W. 1984. Species specificity of sex pheromones trails in the plains garter snake, Thamnophis radix. Herpetologica 40:51–55.Google Scholar
  16. Johnstone, R. A. 1998. The evolution of animal signals, pp. 155–178, in J. R. Krebs and N. B. Davis (Eds.). Behavioral Ecology. Blackwell Science, London.Google Scholar
  17. Labra, A. and Niemeyer, H. M. 1999. Intraspecific chemical recognition in the lizard Liolaemus tenuis. J. Chem. Ecol. 25:1799–1811.Google Scholar
  18. Labra, A., Beltrán, S., and Niemeyer, H. M. 2001a. Chemical exploratory behavior in the lizard Liolaemus bellii. J. Herpetol. 35:51–55.Google Scholar
  19. Labra, A., Escobar, C. A., and Niemeyer, H. M. 2001b. Chemical discrimination in Liolaemus lizards: comparison of behavioral and chemical data. pp. 437–444, in A. Marchlewska-Koj, F. Lepri, and D. Muller-Schwarze (Eds.). Chemical Sense in Vertebrates, Vol. 9. Kluwer Acedemic/Plenum Publishers, New York.Google Scholar
  20. Labra, A., Soto-Gamboa, M., and Bozinovic, F. 2001c. Behavioral and physiological thermoregulation of Atacama desert-dwelling Liolaemus lizards. écoscience 8:413–420.Google Scholar
  21. Labra, A., Escobar, C.A., Aguilar, P. M., and Niemeyer, H. M. 2002. Sources of pheromones in the lizard Liolaemus tenuis. Rev. Chil. Hist. Nat. 75:141–147.Google Scholar
  22. LeMaster, M. P. and Mason, R. T. 2001. Annual and seasonal variation in the female sexual attractiveness pheromone of the red-sided garter snake, Thamnophis sirtalis parietalis, pp. 369–376, in A. Marchlewska-Koj, F. Lepri, and D. Muller-Schwarze (Eds.). Chemical Sense in Vertebrates, Vol. 9. Kluwer Acedemic/Plenum Publishers, New York.Google Scholar
  23. Lynch, M. 1990. The similarity index and DNA fingerprinting. Mol. Biol. Evol. 7:478–484.Google Scholar
  24. Mason, R. T. 1992. Reptilian pheromones, pp. 114–228, in C. Gans, and D. Crews (Eds.). Hormones, Brain and Behavior. Biology of Reptilia. The University Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar
  25. Mason, R. T. and Gutzke, W. H. N. 1990. Sex recognition in the leopard gecko, Eublepharis macularius (Sauria: Gekkonidae) possible mediation by skin-derived semiochemicals. J. Chem. Ecol. 16:27–36.Google Scholar
  26. Pesyna, G. M., Venkataraghavan, R., Dayringer, H. E. and McLafferty, F. W. 1976. Probability based matching system using a large collection of reference mass spectra. Anal. Chem. 48:1362–1368.Google Scholar
  27. Veloso, A. and Navarro, J. 1988. Lista sistemática y distribución geográfica de anfibios y reptiles de chile. Boll. Mus. Reg. Scie. Nat. Torino 6:481–539.Google Scholar
  28. Zar, J. H. 1984. Biostatistical Analysis. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey, 718pp.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  • Claudio M. Escobar
    • 1
  • Carlos A. Escobar
    • 2
  • Antonieta Labra
    • 1
  • Hermann M. Niemeyer
    • 1
  1. 1.Departamento de Ciencias Ecológicas, Facultad de CienciasUniversidad de ChileSantiagoChile
  2. 2.Facultad de Ecología y Recursos NaturalesUniversidad Nacional Andrés BelloSantiagoChile

Personalised recommendations