International Journal of Historical Archaeology

, Volume 3, Issue 4, pp 225–259 | Cite as

Domesticating Barbie: An Archaeology of Barbie Material Culture and Domestic Ideology

  • Marlys Pearson
  • Paul R. Mullins
Article

Abstract

A systematic examination of Barbie fashions, accessories, and playsets produced since 1959 reveals several distinct phases in the domestic symbolism associated with Barbie. Today, Barbie grocery shops, cleans house, cares for her young siblings, and assumes careers which fill nurturing and protective roles like those championed in traditional domestic ideology. Yet in the late 1950s, Barbie was conceived and marketed as a single career girl who did not do “rough housework.” This paper examines the range of clothing and accessories marketed alongside Barbie as a mechanism to trace the changes in Barbie's domestic image over nearly 40 years.

Barbie domesticity toys gender 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

REFERENCES CITED

  1. Abelson, E. (1989). When Ladies Go A-Thieving: Middle-Class Shoplifters in the Victorian Department Store, Oxford University Press, New York.Google Scholar
  2. Arend, S. (1995). Air Barbie: Barbie doll's life in the skies. Barbie Bazaar 7(4): 26–30.Google Scholar
  3. Arend, S., Holzerand, K., and Kent, T. (1998). Skipper licensed products. Barbie Bazaar 10(3): 90–92.Google Scholar
  4. Augustyniak, J. M. (1995). Packaged food promotions offer Barbie. Barbie Bazaar 7(5): 54–55.Google Scholar
  5. Avasthi, S. (1997). Mattel: Don't toy with Barbie & Ken. New York Post 10(Sept.): 39.Google Scholar
  6. Baker, P. (1984). The domestication of politics: Women and American political society, 1780–1920. American Historical Review 89(3): 620–647.Google Scholar
  7. Barbie Bazaar (1994). Mattel and Christmas catalog reprints of Barbie doll, 1959–1965. Murat Caviale, Kenosha, WI.Google Scholar
  8. Baudrillard, J. (1983). Simulacra and Simulations (Foss, P., Patton, P., and Beichtman, P., trans.), Semiotext(e), New York.Google Scholar
  9. Blitman, J. (1996). Barbie Doll and Her Mod, Mod, Mod, Mod World of Fashion, 1967–1972. Hobby House Press, Grantsville, MD.Google Scholar
  10. Borger, G. (1997). Barbie's newest values. U.S. News and World Report 123(21): 40.Google Scholar
  11. Caviale, K. (1997). Barbie vintage crafts. Barbie Bazaar 9(5): 47–49.Google Scholar
  12. Chamberlain, K. (1995). Idollatry. Tikkun 10(2): 57–60.Google Scholar
  13. Cross, C. M. (1996). Keeping Barbie in stitches. Miller's Barbie Collector 3(2): 75–79.Google Scholar
  14. Dant, T. (1998). Playing with things: Objects and subjects in windsurfing. Journal of Material Culture 3(1): 77–95.Google Scholar
  15. DeWein, S., and Ashabraner, J. (1977). The Collector's Encyclopedia of Barbie Dolls and Accessories, Collector Books, Paducah, KY.Google Scholar
  16. Eames, S. S. (1990). Barbie Fashion Volume I, 1959–1967, Collector Books, Paducah, KY.Google Scholar
  17. Eames, S. S. (1997). Barbie Fashion Volume II, 1968–1974, Collector Books, Paducah, KY.Google Scholar
  18. Faludi, S. (1991). Backlash: The Undeclared War Against American Women, Crown, New York.Google Scholar
  19. Formanek-Brunell, M. (1993). Made to Play House: Dolls and the Commercialization of American Girlhood, 1830–1930, Yale University Press, New Haven, CT.Google Scholar
  20. Foucault, M. (1972). The Archaeology of Knowledge, Pantheon, New York.Google Scholar
  21. Fox-Genovese, E. (1991). Feminism Without Illusions: A Critique of Individualism, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill.Google Scholar
  22. Friedan, B. (1983). The Feminine Mystique, reprint of the 1963 ed., Norton, New York.Google Scholar
  23. Handler, R. (1994). Dream Doll: The Ruth Handler Story, Longmeadow Press, Stamford, CT.Google Scholar
  24. Hansen, B. R. (1994). Barbie's post World War II “new look.” Barbie Bazaar 6(4): 53–55.Google Scholar
  25. Lord, M. G. (1994). Forever Barbie: The Unauthorized Biography of a Real Doll, Avon, New York.Google Scholar
  26. Mandeville, A. G. (1990a). And then... I met Ken, Part One. Barbie Bazaar 2(2): 23–26.Google Scholar
  27. Mandeville, A. G. (1990b). And then... I met Ken, Part Three. Barbie Bazaar 2(4): 27–29.Google Scholar
  28. Matthews, G. (1987). “Just a Housewife”: The Rise and Fall of Domesticity in America, Oxford University Press, New York.Google Scholar
  29. Miller, S. (1994). What really came with Barbie's 1964 Dream Kitchen and Dinette? Barbie Bazaar 6(5): 27.Google Scholar
  30. Morgenson, G. (1997). Saturation Barbie? Forbes 160(9): 46.Google Scholar
  31. Muggleton, D. (1997). The Post-subculturalist. In Redhead, S., Wynne, D., and O'Connor, J. (eds.), The Clubcultures Reader: Readings in Popular Cultural Studies, Blackwell, New York, pp. 185–203.Google Scholar
  32. Norton, K. I., Olds, T. S., Olive, S., and Dank, S. (1996). Ken and Barbie at life size. Sex Roles: A Journal of Research 34(3–4): 287–295.Google Scholar
  33. Ogden, A. S. (1986). The Great American Housewife: From Helpmate to Wage Earner, 1776–1986, Greenwood, Westport, CT.Google Scholar
  34. Rana, M. (1996). Barbie Exclusives Book II, Collector Books, Paducah, KY.Google Scholar
  35. Rand, E. (1995). Barbie's Queer Accessories, Duke University Press, Durham, NC.Google Scholar
  36. Rathje, W., and Murphy, C. (1992). Rubbish! The Archaeology of Garbage, HarperPerennial, New York.Google Scholar
  37. Scherzer, L. (1997). Scherzer's Barbie mail auction 13. Scherzer's Auction Service, Matawan, NJ. (Manuscript in possession of the authors.)Google Scholar
  38. Schwartz, H. S. (1997). When Barbie dated G.I. Joe: Analyzing the toys of the early Cold War era. Material History Review 45: 38–50.Google Scholar
  39. Shanks, M., and Tilley, C. (1987). Re-Constructing Archaeology: Theory and Practice, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  40. Shapiro, E. (1992). “Totally hot, totally cool”: long-haired Barbie is a hit. New York Times 22(June): D9.Google Scholar
  41. Summers, B. (1997). A Decade of Barbie Dolls and Collectibles, 1981–1991, Collector Books, Paducah, KY.Google Scholar
  42. Tilley, C. (1990). Michel Foucault: Towards an archaeology of archaeology. In Tilley, C. (ed.), Reading Material Culture, Basil Blackwell, Oxford, pp. 281–347.Google Scholar
  43. Urla, J., and Swedlund, A. C. (1995). The anthropometry of Barbie: Unsettling ideals of the feminine body in popular culture. In Terry, J., and Urla, J. (eds.), Deviant Bodies: Critical Perspectives on Difference in Science and Popular Culture, Indiana University Press, Bloomington, pp. 277–313.Google Scholar
  44. Westenhouser, K. B. (1994). The Story of Barbie, Collector Books, Paducah, KY.Google Scholar
  45. Willis, S. (1991). A Primer for Daily Life, Routledge, New York.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1999

Authors and Affiliations

  • Marlys Pearson
    • 1
  • Paul R. Mullins
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of AnthropologyUniversity of MassachusettsAmherst
  2. 2.Department of AnthropologyIndiana University–Purdue University IndianapolisIndianapolis

Personalised recommendations