Neurochemical Research

, Volume 28, Issue 3–4, pp 507–514

Temperature Effect on Proximal to Distal Gradient of Quantal Release of Acetylcholine at Frog Endplate

  • D. Samigullin
  • E. Bukharaeva
  • E. Nikolsky
  • F. Vyskočil


The conduction velocity of the nerve terminal, mean quantal content, and release latencies of uniquantal endplate currents (EPCs) were recorded in proximal, central, and distal parts of the terminal by extracellular pipettes located 5, 50, and 100 mm from the end of myelinated nerve trunk. The spike conduction velocity, minimal latency, modal value of the latency histograms, and time interval during which 90% of EPCs released (P90) at distal, central, and proximal part of the frog nerve terminal have different temperature dependency between 10° and 28°C. As shown by the size and time-course of reconstructed multiquantal EPCs, the secretion synchronization, which is greatest in distal parts, compensates at least partly for the progressive slowing of spike conduction velocity in the proximodistal direction, in particular at lower temperatures.

Neuromuscular junction acetylcholine release temperature reconstructed endplate currents 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Fatt, P. and Katz, B. 1952. Spontaneous subthreshold activity at motor nerve endings. J. Physiol. 117:109–128.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Boyd, I. and Martin, A. 1956. Spontaneous subthreshold activity at mammalian neuromuscular junction. J. Physiol. 132:61–73.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Katz, B. and Miledi, R. 1965. The effect of temperature on the synaptic delay at the neuromuscular junction. J. Physiol. 181: 656–670.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Hubbard, J., Jones, S., and Landau, E. 1971. The effect of temperature change upon transmitter release, facilitation and post-tetanic potentiation. J. Physiol. 216:591–609.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Barrett, E., Barrett, J., Botz, D., Chang, D., and Manaffey, D. 1978. Temperature sensitivity aspects of evoked and spontaneous transmitter release at the frog neuromuscular junction. J. Physiol. 279:253–273.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Strunsky, E., Borisover, M., Nikolsky, E., and Vyskočil, F. 2001. Temperature effect on cabachol-induced depression of spontaneous quantal transmitter release in frog neuromuscular junction. Neurochem. Res. 26:891–897.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Nikolsky, E., Bukharaeva, E., Samigullin, D., and Gainulov, R. 2000. The time course of evoked secretion of the transmitter quanta in different parts of the frog motor nerve endings. Russ. J. Physiol. 86:1195–1209.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Bukharaeva, E., Samigullin, D., Nikolsky, E., and Vyskočil, F. 2002. Protein kinase A cascade regulates quantal release dispersion at frog muscle endplate. J. Physiol. 538:837–848.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Katz, B. and Miledi, R. 1965. Propagation of electric activity in motor nerve terminals. Proc. R. Soc. B. 161:453–483.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Barret, E. and Stevens, C. 1972. The kinetics of transmitter release at the frog neuromuscular junction. J. Physiol. 227:691–708.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Thska, A. and Lagerspetz, Y. 1994. Thermal acclimation, neuromuscular synaptic delay and miniature endplate current decay in the frog Rana temporaria. J. Exp. Biol. 187:131–142.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Braun, M. and Schmidt, R. 1961. Potential changes recorded from motor nerve terminal during its activation. Pflugers Arch. 287:56–80.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Katz, B. and Miledi, R. 1979. Estimating of quantal content during "chemical potentiation" of transmitter release. Proc. Royal. Soc. B. 212:131–137.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Mallart, A. 1984. Presynaptic currents in frog motor endings. Pflugers Arch. 400:8–20.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Shakiryanova, D. M., Zefirov, A. L., Nikolsky, E. E., and F. 1994. The effect of acetylcholine and related drugs on currents at the frog motor nerve terminal. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 263:107–114.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Del Castillo, J. and Katz, B. 1954. Statistical factors involved in neuromuscular facilitation and depression. J. Physiol. 124: 574–585.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Bukcharaeva, E., Kim, K., Moravec, J., Nikolsky, E., and Vyskočil, F. 1999. Noradrenaline synchronizes evoked quantal release at frog neuromuscular junctions. J. Physiol. 517:879–888.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Van der Kloot, W. 1991. The regulation of quantal size. Progr. Neurobiol. 36:93–130.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Bronstein, I. N. and Semendjaev, K. A. 1986. Handbook of Mathematics. Science Publishing House, Moscow.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Frankenheuser, B. and Moore, L. E. 1963. The effect of temperature on the sodium and potassium permeability changes in myelinated nerve fibres of Xenopus laevis. J. Physiol. 169: 431–437.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Adams, B. 1989. Temperature and synaptic efficacy in frog skeletal muscle. J. Physiol. 408:443–455.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Souček, B. 1971. Influence of latency fluctuations and the quantal process of transmitter release on the end plate potential's amplitude distribution. Biophys. J. 11:127–139.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Giniatullin, R., Kheeroug, L., and Vyskočil, F. 1995. Modelling endplate current: Dependence on quantum secretion probability and postsynaptic miniature current parameters. Eur. Biophys. J. 23:443–446.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Van der Kloot, W. 1988. Estimating the timing of quantal releases during endplate currents at the frog neuromuscular junction. J. Physiol. 402:595–603.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Magazanik, L. G. and Vyskočil, F. 1975. The effect of temperature on desensitization kinetics at the post-synaptic membrane of the frog muscle fibre. J. Physiol. 249:285–300.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Steinbach, J. and Stevens, C. 1979. Neuromuscular transmission. Pages 32–92, in Llinas, R. (ed.), Frog Neurobiology, Precht W. Berlin, Springer.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Bukcharaeva, E., Samigullin, D., Nikolsky, E. E., and Vyskočil, F. 2000. Cyclic AMP synchronizes evoked quantal release at frog neuromuscular junctions. Physiol. Res. 49: 475–479.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Mukhtarov, M. R., Vyskočil, F., Urazaev, A. K., and Nikolsky, E. E. 1999. Non-quantal acetylcholine release is increased after nitric oxide synthase inhibition. Physiol. Res. 48:315–317.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Wood, S. J. and Slater, C. R. 2001. Safety factor at the neuromuscular junction. Prog. Neurobiol. 64:393–429.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Adámek, S. Schutzner, J., Seidl, Z., Smat, V., Pit'ha, J. 1996. Correlation of computer tomography findings with Surgical findings in patients with Myasthenia gravis. Rozhl: Chir. 75: 237–239.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Schutzner, J., Smat, V., Pafko, P., Adámek, S., Sláma, J. 1999. Surgical therapy of thymomas. Sb. Lek. 100:27–31.PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  • D. Samigullin
    • 1
  • E. Bukharaeva
    • 1
    • 2
  • E. Nikolsky
    • 1
    • 2
  • F. Vyskočil
    • 3
    • 4
  1. 1.Institute of Biochemistry and BiophysicsRussian Academy of SciencesKazanRussian Federation
  2. 2.State Medical UniversityKazanRussian Federation
  3. 3.Department of Animal Physiology and Developmental Biology, Faculty of SciencesCharles UniversityPragueCzech Republic
  4. 4.Institute of PhysiologyAcademy of Sciences of the Czech RepublicPragueCzech Republic

Personalised recommendations