Journal of Family Violence

, Volume 12, Issue 3, pp 333–348 | Cite as

Risk Factors for Family Abduction: Demographic and Family Interaction Characteristics

  • Peggy S. Plass
  • David Finkelhor
  • Gerald T. Hotaling


Previous research in the study of family abduction has been plagued by three problems in efforts to establish risk factors for the experience of these events: (1) failure to use appropriate comparison groups; (2) focus on only the most severe cases of abduction, without consideration of the full spectrum of these events; and (3) use of data drawn only from some “reported” source (i.e., police, court, or missing children agency reports). This paper addresses these three methodological difficulties, using data drawn from a national sample of families, and including both abducted and nonabducted children. We find that race, age of children, family size, and incidence of violence in the family all appear to bear on the risk of experiencing a family abduction event. Further, recency of divorce or separation appears to be associated with the risk for more serious or alarming cases of family abduction.

risk factors family abduction family interaction characteristics 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Agopian, M. W. (1981). Parental Child-Stealing, Lexington Books, Lexington, MA.Google Scholar
  2. Agopian, M. W. (1984). The impact on children of abduction by parents. Child Welfare 63(6): 511–519.Google Scholar
  3. Asbury, J. (1987). African-American women in violent relationships: An exploration of cultural differences. In Hampton, R. (ed.), Violence in the Black Family, Lexington Books, Lexington, MA.Google Scholar
  4. Cole, W. A. and Bradford, J. M. (1992). Abduction during custody and access disputes. Canad. J. Psychiatry 37 (May): 264–266.Google Scholar
  5. Finkelhor, D., Hotaling, G. T., and Sedlak, A. (1990). Missing, abducted, runaway and thrownaway children in America. First report: Numbers and characteristics, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  6. Finkelhor, D., Hotaling, G. T., and Sedlak, A. (1991). Children abducted by family members: A national household survey of incidence and episode characteristics. J. Marr. Fam. 53: 805–817.Google Scholar
  7. Greif, G. L. and Hegar, R. L. (1991). Parents whose children are abducted by the other parent: Implications for treatment. Am. J. Fam. Therapy, 19(3): 215–225.Google Scholar
  8. Greif, G. L., and Hegar, R. L. (1993). When Parents Kidnap: The Families Behind the Headlines. Free Press, New York.Google Scholar
  9. Hegar, R. L., and Greif, G. L. (1991). Abduction of children by their parents: A survey of the problem. Social Work 36(5): 421–426.Google Scholar
  10. Janvier, R. F. (1990). Parental kidnapping: A survey of left-behind parents. Juven. Fam. Court J. 41: 1–8.Google Scholar
  11. National Center for Health Statistics. (1995). Vital Statistics of the United States, 1991, vol. 1, Natality, Public Health Service, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  12. Plass, P. S., Finkelhor, D., and Hotaling, G. T. (1995). Police Response to Family Abduction Episodes. Crime Delinq. 41: 205–218.Google Scholar
  13. Plass, P. S., Finkelhor, D., and Hotaling, G. T. (1996). Family abduction outcomes: Factors associated with duration and emotional trauma to children.” Youth Soc. 28: 109–130.Google Scholar
  14. Sedlak, A., Mohadjer, L., McFarland, J., and Hudock, V. (1990). National Incidence Studies of Missing, Abducted, Runaway and Thrownaway Children: Household Methodology Report. Westat, Inc., Rockville, MD.Google Scholar
  15. U.S. Dept. of Justice. (1994). Criminal Victimization in the United States, 1992. Bureau of Justice Statistics (NCJ-145125), Washington, DC.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1997

Authors and Affiliations

  • Peggy S. Plass
    • 1
  • David Finkelhor
    • 2
  • Gerald T. Hotaling
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Sociology and AnthropologyJames Madison UniversityHarrisonburg
  2. 2.Family Research LaboratoryUniversity of New HampshireDurham
  3. 3.University of MassachusettsLowell

Personalised recommendations