Advertisement

Linguistics and Philosophy

, Volume 26, Issue 2, pp 129–184 | Cite as

Plurals, All, and the Nonuniformity of Collective Predication

  • C. Brisson
Article

Keywords

Artificial Intelligence Computational Linguistic Collective Predication 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

REFERENCES

  1. Bach, Emmon: 1981, ‘On Time, Tense, and Aspect: An Essay in English Metaphysics’, in P. Cole (ed.), Radical Pragmatics, Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
  2. Beaver, David: 1996, ‘An Infinite Number of Monkeys’, in Acta Linguistica Hungarica (Special edition devoted to Proceedings of the 5th Hungarian Symposium on Logic and Language).Google Scholar
  3. Beck, Sigrid: 2000, Exceptions in Relational Plurals, Talk presented at SALT 10, Cornell.Google Scholar
  4. Brisson, Christine: 1998, Distributivity, Maximality, and Floating Quantifiers, Doctoral dissertation, Rutgers University, New Brunswick.Google Scholar
  5. Dalrymple, M., M. Kanazawa, Y. Kim, S. Mchombo, and S. Peters: 1998, ‘Reciprocal Expressions and the Concept of Reciprocity’, Linguistics and Philosophy 21, 159–210.Google Scholar
  6. Davidson, Donald: 1967, ‘Causal Relations’, Journal of Philosophy 64. Reprinted in Donald Davidson: Essays on Actions and Events, Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1980, pp. 149–162.Google Scholar
  7. Dowty, David: 1979, Word Meaning and Montague Grammar, Reidel, Dordrecht.Google Scholar
  8. Dowty, David: 1987, ‘Collective Predicates, Distributive Predicates, and All’, in F. Marshall (ed.), Proceedings of the 3rd ESCOL, Ohio State University, Ohio.Google Scholar
  9. Fiengo, Robert and Howard Lasnik: 1973, ‘The Logical Structure of Reciprocal Sentences in English’, Foundations of Language 9, 447–468.Google Scholar
  10. Gillon, Brendan: 1987, ‘The Readings of Plural Noun Phrases in English’, Linguistics and Philosophy 13, 477–485.Google Scholar
  11. Grimshaw, Jane: 1990, Argument Structure, MIT Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  12. Grimshaw, Jane and Sten Vikner: 1993, ‘Obligatory Adjuncts and the Structure of Events’, in E. Reuland and W. Abraham (eds.), Knowledge and Language, Vol. II, Kluwer, Dordrecht.Google Scholar
  13. Hale, Ken and Samuel Jay Keyser: 1987, ‘Explaining and Constraining the English Middle’, in Carol Tenny (ed.), Studies in Generative Approaches to Aspect, Lexicon Project Working Papers 10, Center for Cognitive Science, MIT.Google Scholar
  14. Heim, Irene: 1983, ‘On the Projection Problem for Presuppositions’, in Proceedings of WCCFL 2.Google Scholar
  15. Heim, Irene, Howard Lasnik, and Robert May: 1991, ‘Reciprocity and Plurality’, Linguistic Inquiry 22, 63–101.Google Scholar
  16. Higginbotham, James: 1981, ‘Reciprocal Interpretation’, Journal of Linguistic Research 1, 97–117.Google Scholar
  17. Higginbotham, James: 1985, ‘On Semantics’, Linguistic Inquiry 16, 547–593.Google Scholar
  18. Johnson, Kyle: 1991, ‘Object Positions’, Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 9, 577–636.Google Scholar
  19. Kadmon, Nirit and Fred Landman: 1993, ‘Any’, Linguistics and Philosophy 16, 353–422.Google Scholar
  20. Keenan, Edward and Leonard Faltz. 1985, Boolean Semantics for Natural Language, Kluwer, Dordrecht.Google Scholar
  21. Kratzer, Angelika: 1994, ‘On External Arguments’, in E. Benedicio and J. Runner (eds.), UMOP Occasional Papers 17-Functional Projections, GLSA, Amherst.Google Scholar
  22. Krifka, Manfred: 1992, ‘Thematic Relations as Links between Nominal Reference and Temporal Constitution’, in Ivan Sag and Anna Szabolsci (eds.), Lexical Matters, Stanford University, Palo Alto.Google Scholar
  23. Kroch, Anthony: 1975, The Semantics of Scope of English, Doctoral dissertation, MIT, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  24. Landman, Fred: 1989, ‘Groups, I’, Linguistics and Philosophy 12, 559–605.Google Scholar
  25. Landman, Fred: 1996, ‘Plurality’, in S. Lappin (ed.), The Handbook of Contemporary Semantic Theory, Blackwell, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  26. Langendoen, D. Terence: 1978, ‘The Logic of Reciprocity’, Linguistic Inquiry 9, 177–197.Google Scholar
  27. Larson, Richard: 1988, ‘On the Double Object Construction’, Linguistic Inquiry 19, 335–391.Google Scholar
  28. Lasersohn, Peter: 1995, Plurality, Conjunction, and Events, Kluwer, Dordrecht.Google Scholar
  29. Lasersohn, Peter: 1998, ‘Generalized Distributivity Operators’, Linguistics and Philosophy 21, 83–93.Google Scholar
  30. Lasersohn, Peter: 1999, ‘Pragmatic Halos’ Language 75, 522–551.Google Scholar
  31. Lewis, David: 1975, ‘Adverbs of Quantification’, in E. Keenan (ed.), Formal Semantics of Natural Language, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  32. Link, Godehard: 1983, ‘The Logical Analysis of Plurals and Mass Terms: A Lattice-Theoretical Approach’, in Bauerle et al. (eds.), Meaning, Use, and Interpretation of Language, DeGruyter, Berlin.Google Scholar
  33. McClure, William: 1994, Syntactic Projections of the Semantics of Aspect, Doctoral dissertation, Cornell, Ithaca, NY.Google Scholar
  34. Mittwoch, Anita: 1982, ‘On the Difference between Eating and Eating Something: Activities versus Accomplishments’, Linguistic Inquiry 12, 113–122.Google Scholar
  35. Mittwoch, Anita: 1991, ‘Defence of Vendler's Achievements’, in C. Vetters and W. Vandeweghe (eds.), Perspectives on Aspect and Aktionsart (Belgian Journal of Linguistics 6), Editions de l’Université de Bruxelles, Bruxelles, pp. 71–85.Google Scholar
  36. Moltmann, Friederike: 1997, Parts and Wholes in Semantics, Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
  37. Parsons, Terence: 1990, Events in the Semantics of English, MIT Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  38. Partee, Barbara: 1995, ‘Quantificational Structures and Compositionality’, in Emmon Bach et al. (eds.), Quantification in Natural Language, Kluwer, Dordrecht.Google Scholar
  39. Partee, Barbara and Mats Rooth: 1983, ‘Generalized Conjunction and Type Ambiguity’, in Bauerle et al. (eds.), Meaning, Use, and Interpretation of Language, DeGruyter, Berlin.Google Scholar
  40. Pustejovsky, James: 1991, ‘The Syntax of Event Structure’, Cognition 41, 47–81.Google Scholar
  41. Quine, W. V. O.: 1980, Set Theory and its Logic, Cambridge. Revised edition, Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  42. Ross, J. R.: 1972, ‘Act’, in D. Davidson and G. Harman (eds.), Semantics of Natural Language, Reidel, Dordrecht.Google Scholar
  43. Schwarzschild, Roger: 1992, ‘Together as a Non-Distributivity Marker’, in P. Dekker and M. Stokhof (eds.), Proceedings of the 8th Amsterdam Colloquium, Institute for Logic, Language, and Computation, University of Amsterdam.Google Scholar
  44. Schwarzschild, Roger: 1994, ‘Plurals, Presuppositions, and the Sources of Distributivity’, Natural Language Semantics 2, 201–248.Google Scholar
  45. Schwarzschild, Roger: 1996, Pluralities, Kluwer, Dordrecht.Google Scholar
  46. Scha, Remko: 1981, ‘Distributive, Collective, and Cumulative Quantification’, in J. Groenendijk, T. Janssen, and M. Stokhof (eds.), Truth, Interpretation, and Information (GRASS 2), Foris, Dordrecht.Google Scholar
  47. Speas, Margaret: 1990, Phrase Structure in Natural Language, Kluwer, Dordrecht.Google Scholar
  48. Stalnaker, Robert: 1973, ‘Presuppositions’, Journal of Philosophical Logic 2, 447–457.Google Scholar
  49. Taub, Alison: 1989, ‘Collective Predicates, Aktionsarten and All’, in Emmon Bach, Angelika Kratzer, and Barbara Partee (eds.), Papers on Quantification, University of Massachusetts at Amherst.Google Scholar
  50. von Fintel, Kai: 1994, Restrictions on Quantifier Domains, Doctoral dissertation, University of Massachusetts at Amherst.Google Scholar
  51. Westerståhl, Dag: 1985, ‘Determiners and Context Sets’, in Johan van Bentham and Alice ter Meulen (eds.), Generalized Quantifiers in Natural Language, Foris, Dordrecht.Google Scholar
  52. Williams, Edwin: 1991, ‘Reciprocal Scope’, Linguistic Inquiry 22, 159–173.Google Scholar
  53. Yoon, Y.: 1996, ‘Total and Partial Predicates and the Weak and Strong Interpretations’, Natural Language Semantics 4, 217–236.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  • C. Brisson
    • 1
  1. 1.University of PennsylvaniaPhiladelphiaUSA

Personalised recommendations