Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology

, Volume 26, Issue 6, pp 467–473 | Cite as

Specificity of Dating Aggression and Its Justification Among High-Risk Adolescents

  • Kenneth A. Chase
  • Dominique Treboux
  • K. Daniel O'Leary
  • Zvi Strassberg
Article

Abstract

Ninety-five high-risk adolescents were studied to determine whether their dating aggression and its justification as a response to interpersonal problems were specific to the current partner, general to dating relationships, or part of a global age-mate (same-sex peers and opposite-sex dating partners) aggression problem. Approximately one-third of males and two-thirds of females reported physical aggression against their current dating partner. Males' aggression (and its justification) toward their current dating partner was part of a generalized pattern of dating aggression, whereas for females, physical aggression against a current dating partner (and its justification) was partner-specific and unrelated to aggression in other relationships. Findings are discussed with regard to intervention and future research on adolescent dating aggression.

Aggression specificity generality high risk adolescents dating friendships peers 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

REFERENCES

  1. Achenback, T. M. (1991). Manual for the Child Behavior Checklist and 1991 Profile. Burlington: University of Vermont, Department of Psychiatry.Google Scholar
  2. Bandura, A. (1973). Aggression: A social learning analysis. Englewood Cliffs, NJ' Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  3. Bem, D. (1967). Self-perception: An alternative interpretation of cognitive dissonance phenomena. Psychological Review, 74, 188–200.Bethke, T. M., & DeJoy, D. M. (1993). An experimental study of factors influencing the acceptability of dating violence. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 38, 36–51.Google Scholar
  4. Bookwala, J., Frieze, I. H., Smith, C., & Ryan, K. (1992). Predictors of dating violence: A multivariate analysis. Violence and Victims, 7 297–311.Google Scholar
  5. Caspi, A., & Moffitt, T. e. (1991). Individual differences are accentuated during periods of social change: The sample case of girls at puberty. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61, 157–168.Google Scholar
  6. Cate, C. A. Henton, J. M. Koval, J., Christopher, F. S., & Lloyd, S. (1982). Premarital abuse: A social psychological perspective. Journal of Family Issues, 3, 79–90.Google Scholar
  7. Caulfield, M. B., & Riggs, D. S. (1992). The assessment of dating aggression: Empirical evaluation of the conflict Tactics Scale. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 7, 549–558.Google Scholar
  8. Compass, B. E. Hinden, B. R., & Gerhardt, C. A. (1995). Adolescent development: Pathways and processes of risk and resilience. Annual Review of Psychology, 46, 265–293.Google Scholar
  9. Connolly, J. (in press). Romantic relationships in adolescence: The role of friends and peers in their emergence and development. In W. Furman, C. Feiring, & B. Brown (Eds.), Contemporary perspectives on adolescent romantic relationships. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Connoly, J., & Johnson, A. (1996). Adolescents' romantic relationships and the structure and quality of their close interpersonal ties. Personal Relationships, 3, 185–195.Google Scholar
  11. Dodge, K. A. (1986). A social information processing model of social competence in children. In M. Perlmutter (Ed.), The Minnesota symposia on child psychology: Vol. 18. Cognitive perspectives on children's social and behavioral development (pp. 77–125). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  12. Foo, L., & Margolin, G. (1995). A multivariate investigation of dating aggression. Journal of Family Aggression, t10, 351–377.Google Scholar
  13. Hartup, W. W. (1992). Conflict and friendship relations. In C. U. Shantz & W. W. Hartup (Eds.), Conflict in child and adolescent development. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  14. Henton, J., Cate, R., Koval, J., Lloyd, s., & Christopher, F. S. (1983). Romance and violence in dating relationships. Journal of Family Issues, 4, 467–482.Google Scholar
  15. Holtzworth-Monroe, A., & Stuart, G. L. (1994). Typologies of male batterers: Three subtypes and the differences among them. Psychological Bulletin, 116, 476–497.Google Scholar
  16. Lloyd, S. A., Koval, J. E., & Cate, R. M. (1989). Conflict and violence in dating relationships. In M. A. Pirog-Good & J. E. Stets (Eds.), Violence in dating relationships: Emerging social issues (pp. 126–142). New York: Praeger.Google Scholar
  17. Makepeace, J. M. (1986). Gender differences in courtship violence victimization. Family Relations, 35, 383–388.Google Scholar
  18. Mason, A., & Blankenship, v. (1987). Power and affiliation motivation, stress, and abuse in intimate relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 203–210.Google Scholar
  19. Mihalic, S. W., Elliot, D. S., & Menard, S. (1994). Continuities in marital violence. Journal of Family Violence, 9, 195–225.Google Scholar
  20. O'Leary, K. D., & Cascardi, M. (1998). Physical aggression in marriage: A developmental analysis, In T. N. Bradbury (Ed.), The development course of marital dysfunction New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  21. O'Leary, K. D., Malone, J., & Tyree, A. (1994). Physical aggression in early marriage: Pre-relationship and relationship effects. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 62, 594–602.Google Scholar
  22. Pan, H. S., Neidig, P. H., & O'Leary, K. D. (1994). Male-female and aggressor-victim differences in the factor structure of the modified conflict tactics scale. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 9, 366–382.Google Scholar
  23. Riggs, D. S., & O'Leary, K. D. (1989). A theoretical model of courtship aggression. In M. A. Pirog-Good & J. E. Stets (Eds.), Violence in dating relationships: emerging social issues (pp. 53–71). New York: Praeger.Google Scholar
  24. Roscoe, B., & Benaske, N. (1985). Courtship violence experienced by abused wives: Similarities in patterns of abuse. Family Relations, 34, 419–424.Google Scholar
  25. Roscoe, B., & Kelsey, T. (1986). Dating violence among high school students. Psychology, 23, 53–59.Google Scholar
  26. Schwartz, M., O'Leary, S. G., & Kendziora, K. T. (1997). Dating aggression among high school students. Violence and Victims, 12, 295–305.Google Scholar
  27. Slaby, R. G., & Guerra, N. G. (1988). Cognitive mediators of aggression in adolescent offenders: 1. Assessment. Developmental Psychology, 24, 580–588.Google Scholar
  28. Stets, J. E., & Pirog-Good, M. A. (1987). Violence in dating relationships. Social Psychology Quarterly, 50, 237–246.Google Scholar
  29. Straus, M. A. (1979). Measuring intrafamily conflict and violence: The Conflict Tactics (CT) Scales. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 48, 465–479.Google Scholar
  30. Straus, M. A., & Gelles, R. J. (1992). Physical violence in American families: Risk factors and adaptations to violence in 8, 145 families. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.Google Scholar
  31. Sugarman, D. B., & Hotaling, G. t. (1989). Dating violence: Incidence, context and risk markers. In M. A. Pirog-Good & J. E. Stets (Eds.), Violence in dating relationships: Emerging social issues (pp. 3–32). New York: Praeger.Google Scholar
  32. Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (1989). Using multivariate statistics (2nd ed.). New York: HarperCollins.Google Scholar
  33. Tontodonato, P., & Crew, B. K. (1992). Dating violence, social learning theory, and gender: A multivariate analysis. Violence and Victims, 7 3–14.Google Scholar
  34. Treboux, D., & O'Leary, K. D. (1996, March) (Chairs). Physical aggression in dating relationships: Is it relationship specific or a generalized aggression problem? Symposium conducted at the sixth biennial meeting of the Society for Research on Adolescence, Boston, MA.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1998

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kenneth A. Chase
    • 1
  • Dominique Treboux
    • 2
  • K. Daniel O'Leary
    • 2
  • Zvi Strassberg
  1. 1.Department of PsychologyThe University of Stony BrookStony Brook
  2. 2.The University of Stony BrookStony Brook

Personalised recommendations