Information Systems Frontiers

, Volume 5, Issue 2, pp 207–218 | Cite as

Powering E-Learning In the New Millennium: An Overview of E-Learning and Enabling Technology

  • Dongsong Zhang
  • Jay F. Nunamaker

Abstract

In today's new economy characterized by industrial change, globalization, increased intensive competition, knowledge sharing and transfer, and information technology revolution, traditional classroom education or training does not always satisfy all the needs of the new world of lifelong learning. Learning is shifting from instructor-centered to learner-centered, and is undertaken anywhere, from classrooms to homes and offices. E-Learning, referring to learning via the Internet, provides people with a flexible and personalized way to learn. It offers learning-on-demand opportunities and reduces learning cost. This paper describes the demands for e-Learning and related research, and presents a variety of enabling technologies that can facilitate the design and implementation of e-Learning systems. Armed with the advanced information and communication technologies, e-Learning is having a far-reaching impact on learning in the new millennium.

e-Learning internet information technology lifelong learning 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. ACM SIGCHI. Curricula for Human-Computer Interaction. ACM Special Interest Group on Computer-Human Interaction Curr-Curriculum Development Group [online]. 1992, Available: http://www1.acm.org:82/sigchi/cdg/index.html.Google Scholar
  2. Adam A, Slonim W, Yesha Y. Globalizing business, education, culture through the Internet. Communications of the ACM 1997;40(2):115-121. Available: ACM digital library.Google Scholar
  3. Agius HW, Angelides MC. Developing knowledge-based intelligent multimedia tutoring systems using semantic content-based modeling.Artificial Intelligence Review 1999;13:55-83.Google Scholar
  4. Aggarwal C, Wolf J, Yu PS. On optimal piggyback merging policies for video-on-demand systems. In: Proceedings of the ACM SIGMETRICS Conference on Measurement & Modeling of Computer Systems,May23-26, 1996, Philadelphia, PAUSA, 1996:200-209.Available: ACM digital library.Google Scholar
  5. Alavi M. Computer-mediated collaborative learning: An empirical evaluation. MIS Quarterly 1994:159-174.Google Scholar
  6. Amir F, Iqbal SM, Yasin M. Effectiveness of cyber-learning. In: 29th ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference, Nov. 10-13, 1999, at San Juan, Puerto Rico.Google Scholar
  7. Arbaugh JB. How classroom environment and student engagement affect learning in internet-based MBA courses. Business Communication Quarterly 2000;63(4):9-26.Google Scholar
  8. Baloian NA, Pino JA, Hoppe HU. A teaching/learning approach to CSCL. In: Proceedings of the 33rd Hawaii International Conference on Systems Sciences, Available: IEEE Computer Society, 2000.Google Scholar
  9. Bargeron D, Gupta A, Grudin J, Sanocki E, Li F. Asynchronous collaboration around multimedia and its application to on-demand training. In: Proceedings of 34th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 2001.Google Scholar
  10. Beam P, Cameron B. “But what did we learn...?”: Evaluating online learning as process. In: Proceedings on the Sixteenth Annual International Conference on Computer Documentation, Sept. 24-26, 1998, Quebec, Canada, 258-264.Google Scholar
  11. Burgstahler S. Teaching on the Net: What's the difference? T.H.E.Journal 1997;24(9):61-64.Google Scholar
  12. Carswell L. Teaching via the Internet: The impact of the Internet as a communication medium on distance learning introductory computing students. In: Proceedings of the Conference on Integrating Technology into Computer Science Education, June 1-5, 1997, Uppsala, Sweden, 1-5.Google Scholar
  13. Carswell L. The 'Virtual University': Toward an Internet paradigm? In: Proceedings of 6th Annual Conference on the Teaching of Computing/3rd Annual Conference on Integrating Technology into Computer Science Education on Changing the Delivery of Computer Science Education, 1998.Google Scholar
  14. Chapman P, Selvarajah S, Webster J. Engagement in multimedia training systems. In: Proceedings of the 32nd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Jan. 5-8, 1999, at Maui, HI, USA.Google Scholar
  15. Chen H-Y, Chia Y-T, Chen G-Y, Hong J-S. An RTP-based synchronized hypermedia live lecture system for distance education.In: Proceedings of the Seventh ACM International Conference on Multimedia, Oct. 30-Nov. 5, 1999, Orlando, FL, US.Google Scholar
  16. Corbett AT, Anderson JR. Knowledge decomposition and subgoal reification in the ACT programming tutor. In: Proceedings of AI-ED 95: 7th World Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Education, 1995.Google Scholar
  17. Dorai C, Kermani P, Stewart A.ELM-N:E-Learning media navigator.In: Proceedings of ACM International Multimedia Conference, 2001, Ottawa, Canada.Google Scholar
  18. Ertmer PA, Newby TJ. Behaviorism, cognivism, constructivism: Comparing critical features from an instructional design perspective.Performance Improvement Quarterly 1993;6(4):50-70.Google Scholar
  19. Fallah MH, How WJ, Ubell R. Blind scores in a graduate test: Conventional compared with web-based outcomes. ALN Magazine 2000;4(2).Google Scholar
  20. Freedman Craig S, DeWitt DJ. The SPIFFI scalable video-ondemand system. In: Proceedings of the 1995 ACM SIGMOD International Conference on Management of Data, 1995:352-363.Available: ACM digital library.Google Scholar
  21. Glaser R, Bassok M. Learning theory and the study of instruction.Annual Review of Psychology 1989;40:631-666.Google Scholar
  22. Hadidi R, Sung C. Pedagogy of online instruction-Can it be as good as face-to-face? In: Proceedings of American Conference on Information Systems (AMCIS 2000), Aug. 2000, at Long Beach, California.Google Scholar
  23. Hämäläinen M, Whinston AB, Vishik S. Electronic markets for learning: Education brokerages on the Internet. Communications of the ACM 1996;39(6):51-58.Google Scholar
  24. Hammond N, McKendree J, Reader W, Trapp A, Scott P. The Psy-CLE project: Educational multimedia for conceptual understanding.In: Proceedings of ACM Multimedia 95, Nov. 5-9, 1995, at San Francisco, California, USA.Google Scholar
  25. Hampapur A, Jain R. Chapter 9: Video data management systems: Metadata and architecture. In: Multimedia Data Management, 1998, McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  26. Hiltz SR. Teaching in a virtual classroom. In: Proceedings of International Conference on Computer Assisted Instruction (ICCAI'95), March 7-10, 1995, at Hsinchu, Taiwan.Google Scholar
  27. Hiltz SR, Benbunan-Fich R. Supporting collaborative learning in asynchronous learning networks: Software engineering or symbolic interactionism [online]. Invited Keynote Address for the UNESCO/ Open University Symposium on Virtual Learning Environments and the Role of the Teacher, Milton Keynes, England, April 28, 1997. Available: http://eies.njit.edu/~hiltz.Google Scholar
  28. Hiltz SR, Wellman B. Asynchronous learning networks as a virtual classroom. Communications of the ACM 1997;40(9):44-49.Available: ACM digital library.Google Scholar
  29. Hodgins HW. Into the future-A vision paper. For National Governors' Association (NGA) and the American Society for Training & Development (ASTD)'s Joint Commission on Technology & Adult Learning [Online]. Available: http://www.selsius.com/ warp/public/10/wwtraining/elearning/learn/whitepaper docs/intothe-future.pdf, 2000.Google Scholar
  30. Hofstetter F. Multimedia Literacy. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1995.Google Scholar
  31. Kerrey B, Isakson J. The power of the Internet for learning: Moving from promise to practice. Report of the Web-Based Education Commission to the President and the Congress of the United States. Available: http://www.ed.gov/offices/ AC/WBEC/FinalReport/WBECReport.pdf, 2000.Google Scholar
  32. Khirallah DR. A new way to learn. Informationweek 22-23. Available: http://www.informationweek.com, 2000.Google Scholar
  33. Kohsaka Y, Hashimoto K, Shibata Y, Katsumoto M. Flexible multimedia lecture supporting system based on extended virtual reality space. In: Proceedings of 1999 International Workshops on Parallel Processing, Sept. 21-24, 1999. Aizu-Wakamatsu, Japan.Google Scholar
  34. Kumar A, Kumar P, Basu SC.Student perceptions of virtual education: An exploratory study. In: Proceedings of 2001 Information Resources Management Association International Conference, May 20-23, 2001, at Toronto, Ontario, Canada.Google Scholar
  35. Lang KR, Zhao JL. The role of electronic commerce in the transformation of distance education. Journal of Organizational Computing and Electronic Commerce 2000;10(2):103-128.Google Scholar
  36. Makkonen P. Who benefits from WWW-presentations in the basics of informatics? In: Proceedings of 2001 Information Resources Management Association International Conference, May 20-23, 2001, at Toronto, Ontario, Canada.Google Scholar
  37. Marchionini G, Nolet V, Williams H, Ding W, Beale JR, Rose A, Gordon A, Enomoto E, Harbinson L. Content + connectivity = community: Digital resources for a learning community. In: Proceedings of the 2nd ACM International Conference on Digital Libraries 1997:212-220. Available: ACM digital library.Google Scholar
  38. Marinelli D, Stevens S. Synthetic interviews: The art of creating a “Dyad” between humans and machine-based characters. In: Proceedings of Interactive Voice Technology for Telecommunications Applications'98 (IVTTA '98) 1998:43-48. Available: IEEE digital library.Google Scholar
  39. Marold KA, Larsen G, Moreno A. Web-based learning: Is it working? A comparison of student performance and achievement in Web-based courses and their in-classroom counterparts. Challenges of Information Technology Management in the 21st Century 2000:350-353. Available: Idea group publishing.Google Scholar
  40. McAllister NC, McAllister DF. Providing education electronically to non-traditional sites: New delivery to a new audience. In: Proceedings of the 14th Annual Int'l Conference on Marshaling New Technological Forces: Building a Corporate, Academic, and User-Oriented Triangle, 1996:187-193.Google Scholar
  41. McCloskey DW, Antonucci YL, Schug J. Web-based vs. traditional course development: Identifying differences in user characteristics and performance outcomes. In: Proceedings of the International Business Schools Computing Association Annual Conference.Denver, Colorado, 1998.Google Scholar
  42. Merrill MD. Constructivism and instructional design. Educational Technology 1991:45-53.Google Scholar
  43. Moe MT, Blodget H. E-Learning: The knowledge Web. Part 1: People power-Fuel for the new economy; Part 4: Corporate e-Learning-Feeding hungry minds. A Report to United States Education & Training Services. Merrill Lynch. 2000:73.Google Scholar
  44. Morales C, Cory C, Bozell D. A comparative efficiency study between a live lecture and a Web-based live-switched multi-camera streaming video distance learning instructional unit. In: Proceedings of 2001 Information Resources Management Association International Conference, May 20-23, 2001, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.Google Scholar
  45. Nunamaker JF, Briggs RO, Mittleman DD, Vogel DR, Balthazard PA. Lessons from a decade of group support systems research.In: Proceedings of the 29th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. Wailea, HI, USA: IEEE Comput. Soc. Press. 1996:418-427Google Scholar
  46. Rivera JC, McAlister MK. A comparison of student outcomes & satisfaction between traditional & Web based course offerings. In: Proceedings of 2001 Information Resources Management Association International Conference, May 20-23, 2001, Ontario, Canada.Google Scholar
  47. Schreiber DA, Berge ZL. Distance Training. San Francisco, Jossey-Bass Publishers, 1998.Google Scholar
  48. Senn JA. Capitalising on interactive multimedia technologies in dynamic environments [online]. 1997. Available: http://crm.hct.ac.ae/021senn.html.Google Scholar
  49. Stallings W. Business Data Communications. Upper Saddle River, N.J.: Prentice Hall, 1998.Google Scholar
  50. Syed MR. Diminishing the distance in distance education. IEEE Multimedia July-Sept., 2001:18-21.Google Scholar
  51. Thompson M. Distance delivery of graduate-level teacher education: Beyond parity claims. Journal of Continuing Higher Education 1996;44(3):29-34.Google Scholar
  52. Ubell R. Engineers turn to e-Learning. IEEE Spectrum 2000;59-63.Google Scholar
  53. USDLA (The United States Distance Learning Association).Research information and statistics [online]. Available: http://www.usdla.org/.Google Scholar
  54. Wactlar HD. Informedia-Search and summarization in the video medium [online]. In: Proceedings of Imagina 2000 Conference, Monaco, Jan. 31-Feb. 2, 2000;1-10. Available: http://www.informedia.cs.cmu.edu/documents/imagina2000.pdf.Google Scholar
  55. Wade VP, Power C. Evaluating the design and delivery of WWW based educational environments and courseware. ACM ITICME 1998;243-248.Google Scholar
  56. Weston TJ, Barker L. Designing, implementing, and evaluatingWebbased learning modules for university students. Educational Technology 2001;41(4):15-22.Google Scholar
  57. Whitehurst RA, Powell CL, Izatt JS. Utilizing the student model in distance learning. In: Proceedings of the 6th Annual Conference on the Teaching of Computing/3rd Annual Conference on Integrating Technology into Computer Science Education on Changing the Delivery of Computer Science Education, 1998:254-256. Available: ACM digital library.Google Scholar
  58. William F, Bareiss R, Birnbaum L, Osgood R. ASK systems: An approach to the realization of story-based teachers. Technical Report, No. 22, Institute for the Learning Sciences, 1992.Google Scholar
  59. Wilson JM, Mosher DN. Interactive multimedia distance learning (IMDL): The prototype of the virtual classroom. In: Proceedings of ED-MEDIA 94-World Conference on Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, June 25-30, 1994, at Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.Google Scholar
  60. Wulf K. Training via the Internet: Where are we? Training and Development 1996:50-55.Google Scholar
  61. WWWebster Dictionary [online]. (1997). Available: http:// www.mw.com/dictionary.htm.Google Scholar
  62. Zhang D. Media structuration-Towards an integrated approach to interactive multimedia-based E-Learning. Ph.D. dissertation. The University of Arizona, 2002.Google Scholar
  63. Zhang D, Nunamaker JF. A multimedia-enabled system for interactive self-paced learning. In: Proceedings of IASTED International Conference on Internet and Multimedia Systems and Applications, Nov. 19-23, 2000, at Las Vegas, Nevada, USA.Google Scholar
  64. Zhang D, Zhao JL, Nunamaker JF. Media structuration theory: Towards a framework for effective multimedia-based e-Learning, 2002. Submitted to MIS Quarterly.Google Scholar
  65. Zhang W. Chapter 8: Multimedia, technology, education and learning. Technological Innovations in Literacy and Social Studies Education [online], 1995. Available: http://tiger.coe.missouri.edu/~sslit95/.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  • Dongsong Zhang
    • 1
  • Jay F. Nunamaker
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Information SystemsUniversity of Maryland, Baltimore CountyBaltimoreUSA
  2. 2.MIS DepartmentCenter for the Management of Information, University of ArizonaIUSA

Personalised recommendations