Brain Topography

, Volume 15, Issue 3, pp 165–171 | Cite as

Augmentation of Auditory N1 in Children with Fragile X Syndrome

  • Maija Castrén
  • Ari Pääkkönen
  • Ina M. Tarkka
  • Markku Ryynänen
  • Juhani Partanen
Article

Abstract

We compared the N1 responses of the auditory event-related brain potentials (ERPs) in school-aged children with fragile X syndrome to age-matched controls in order to assess auditory processing. Event-related potentials to non-attended standard and deviant tone stimuli were recorded with EEG electrodes and here the standard tones were analysed. The amplitude of the N1 component to standard tones was significantly larger in children with fragile X syndrome than in control children. In addition, the global field power maximum of ERP corresponding to the N2 component was significantly (p<0.05) larger in fragile X children than in controls. The N2 scalp distribution in children with fragile X syndrome appeared more frontal than that in controls. Furthermore, the fragile X children exhibited no habituation of N1 and an absence of N2 sensitization for repeated tones. Increased responsiveness observed in the N1 evoked potential together with abnormal habituation of auditory responses in childhood may indicate increased sensory sensitivity for auditory stimuli in fragile X syndrome. The data, though very limited, suggest that stimulus processing in the auditory afferent pathways and/or in the corresponding cortical receiving areas is abnormal in children with fragile X syndrome.

Fragile X FMRP Event-related potentials N1 Mental retardation 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Backes, M., Genc, B., Schreck, J., Doerfler, W., Lehmkuhl, G. and von Gontard, A. Cognitive and behavioral profile of fragile X boys: correlations to molecular data. Am. J. Med. Genet., 2000, 95:150–156.Google Scholar
  2. de Vries, B.B., Halley, D.J., Oostra, B.A. and Niermeijer, M.F. The fragile X syndrome. J. Med. Genet. 1998; 35: 578–89.Google Scholar
  3. Chen, L. and Toth, M. Fragile X mice develop sensory hyperreactivity to auditory stimuli. Neurosci., 2001, 103: 1043–1050.Google Scholar
  4. Ferri, R., Musumeci, S.A., Elia, M., Del Gracco, S., Scuderi, S. and Bergonzi, P. Bit-mapped somatosensory evoked potentials in the fragile X syndrome. Neurophysiol. Clin., 1994, 24: 413–426.Google Scholar
  5. Fruhstorfer, H., Soveri, P. and Järvilehto, T. Short-term habituation of the auditory evoked response in man. Electroenceph. Clin. Neurophysiol., 1970, 28: 153–161.Google Scholar
  6. Hagerman, R.J., Hills, J., Scharfenaker, S. and Lewis, H. Fragile X syndrome and selective mutism. Am. J. Med. Genet., 1999, 83: 313–317.Google Scholar
  7. Hari, R., Kaila, K., Katila, T., Tuomisto, T. and Varpula, T. Interstimulus-interval depence of the auditory vertex response and its magnetic counterpart: Implications for their neural generation. Electroenceph. clin. Neurophysiol., 1982, 54: 561–569.Google Scholar
  8. Hjalgrim, H., Jacobsen, T.B., Nø rgaard, K., Lou, H.C., Brø ndum-Nielsen, K. and Jonassen, O. Frontal-subcortical hypofunction in the fragile X syndrome. Am. J. Med. Genet., 1999, 83: 140–141.Google Scholar
  9. Irwin, S.A., Swain, R.A., Christmon, C.A., Chakravarti, A., Weiler, I.J. and Greenough, W.T. Evidence for altered Fragile-X mental retardation protein expression in response to behavioral stimulation. Neurobiol. Learn. Mem., 2000, 74: 87–93.Google Scholar
  10. Javitt, D.C., Steinschneider, M., Schroeder, C.E. and Arezzo, J.C. Role of cortical N-methyl-D-aspartate receptors in auditory sensory memory and mismatch negativity generation: implications for schizophrenia. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 1996, 93: 11962–11967.Google Scholar
  11. Karhu, J., Herrgard, E., Pääkkönen, A., Luoma, L. Airaksinen, E. and Partanen, J. Dual cerebral processing of elementary auditory input in children. Neuroreport, 1997, 8: 1327–1330.Google Scholar
  12. Lachiewicz, A.M., Spiridigliozzi, G.A., Gullion, C.M., Ransford, S.N. and Rao, K. Aberrant behaviors of young boys with fragile X syndrome. Am. J. Ment. Retard., 1994, 98: 567–579.Google Scholar
  13. Lehman, D. and Skrandies, W. Segmentation of EEG potential fields. Electroenceph. Clin. Neurophysiol., 1980, 38: 27–32.Google Scholar
  14. Meador, K.J. Cholinergic, serotonergic, and GABAergic effects on the ERP. Electroenceph. Clin. Neurophysiol. Suppl., 1995, 44: 151–155.Google Scholar
  15. Menon, V., Kwon, H., Eliez, S., Taylor, A.K. and Reiss, A.L. Functional brain activation during cognition is related to FMR1 gene expression. Brain Res., 2000, 877: 367–370.Google Scholar
  16. Merenstein, S.A., Sobesky, W.E., Taylor, A.K., Riddle, J.E., Tran, H.X. and Hagerman, R.J. Molecular-clinical correlations in males with an expanded FMR1 mutation. Am. J. Med. Genet., 1996, 64: 388–394.Google Scholar
  17. Miller, L.J., McIntosh, D.N., McGrath, J., Shyu, V., Lampe, M., Taylor, A.K., Tassone, F., Neitzel, K., Stackhouse, T. and Hagerman, R.J. Electrodermal responses to sensory stimuli in individuals with fragile X syndrome: a preliminary report. Am. J. Med. Genet., 1999, 83: 268–279.Google Scholar
  18. Musumeci, S.A., Elia, M., Ferri, R., Scuderi, S. and Del Gracco, S. Evoked spikes and giant somatosensory evoked potentials in a patient with fragile X syndrome. Ital. J. Neurol. Sci., 1994, 15: 365–368.Google Scholar
  19. Musumeci, S.A., Ferri, R., Colognola, R.M., Neri, G., Sanfilippo, S. and Bergonzi, P. Prevalence of a novel epileptogenic EEG pattern in the Martin-Bell syndrome. Am. J. Med. Genet., 1988, 30: 207–212.Google Scholar
  20. Musumeci, S.A., Hagerman, R.J., Ferri, R., Bosco, P., Dalla Bernardina, B., Tassinari, C.A., De Sarro, G.B. and Elia, M. Epilepsy and EEG findings in males with fragile X syndrome. Epilepsia, 1999, 40: 1092–1099.Google Scholar
  21. Musumeci, S.A., Bosco, P., Calabrese, G., Bakker, C., De Sarro, G.B., Elia, M., Ferri, R. and Oostra, B.A. Audiogenic seizures susceptibility in transgenic mice with fragile X syndrome. Epilepsia, 2000, 41: 19–23.Google Scholar
  22. Näätänen, R. and Picton, T. The N1 wave of the human electric and magnetic response to sound:Areview and an analysis of the component structure. Psychophysiology, 1987, 24: 375–425.Google Scholar
  23. O'´Donnell, W.T. and Warren, S.T. A decade of molecular studies of fragile X syndrome. Annu. Rev. Neurosci., 2002, 25: 315–338.Google Scholar
  24. Picton, T.W., Hillyard, S.A., Krausz, H.I. and Galambos, R. Human auditory evoked potentials. I. Evaluation of components. Electroenceph. Clin. Neurophysiol., 1974, 36: 179–190.Google Scholar
  25. Pieretti, M., Zhang, F.P., Fu, Y.H., Warren, S.T., Oostra, B.A., Caskey, C.T. and Nelson, D.L. Absence of expression of the FMR-1gene in fragileXsyndrome. Cell, 1991, 66: 817–822.Google Scholar
  26. Ragazzoni, A., Ferri, R., Di Russo, F., Del Gracco, S., Barcaro, U. and Navona, C. Giant somatosensory evoked potentials in different clinical conditions: scalp topography and dipole source analysis. Electroenceph. Clin. Neurophysiol. Suppl., 1999, 49: 81–89.Google Scholar
  27. Reiss, A.L., Lee, J. and Feund, L. Neuroanatomy of fragile X syndrome: The temporal lobe. Neurology, 1994, 44: 1317–1324.Google Scholar
  28. Reiss, A.L., Abrams, M.T., Greenlaw, R., Feund, L. and Denckla, M.B. Neurodevelopmental effects of the FMR-1 full mutation in humans. Nat. Med., 1995, 1: 159–167.Google Scholar
  29. Rojas, D.C., Benkers, T.L., Rogers, S.J., Teale, P.D., Reite, M.L. and Hagerman, R.J. Auditory evoked magnetic fields in adults with fragile X syndrome. Neuroreport, 2001, 12: 2573–2576.Google Scholar
  30. Sabaratnam, M., Vroegop, P.G. and Gangadharan, S.K. Epilepsy and EEG findings in 18 males with fragile X syndrome. Seizure, 2001, 10: 60–63.Google Scholar
  31. Sokolov, E.N. Higher nervous functions: The orienting reflex. Ann. Rev. Physiol., 1963, 26: 545–580.Google Scholar
  32. St. Clair, D.M., Blackwood, D.H., Oliver, C.J. and Dickens, P. P3 abnormality in fragile X syndrome. Biol. Psychiatr., 1987, 22: 303–312.Google Scholar
  33. Swick, D., Pineda, J.A. and Foote, S.L. Effects of systemic clonidine on auditory event-related potentials in squirrel monkeys. Brain Res. Bull., 1994, 33: 79–86.Google Scholar
  34. Tarkka, I.M., Karhu, J., Kuikka, J., Pääkkönen, A., Bergström, K., Partanen, J. and Tiihonen, J. Altered frontal lobe function suggested by source analysis of event-related potentials in impulsive violent alcoholics. Alcohol Alcoholism, 2001, 36(4): 323–328.Google Scholar
  35. Todd, P.K. and Mack, K.J. Sensory stimulation increases cortical expression of the fragileXmental retardation protein in vivo. Brain Res. Mol. Brain Res., 2000, 80: 17–25.Google Scholar
  36. Turner, G., Webb, T., Wake, S. and Robinson, H. Prevalence of fragileXsyndrome. Am.J. Med. Genet., 1996, 64: 196–197.Google Scholar
  37. Verheij, C., Bakker, C.E., de Graaff, E., Keulemans, J., Willemsen, R., Verkerk, A.J, Galjaard, H., Reuser, A.J., Hoogeveen, A.T. and Oostra, B.A. Characterization and localization of the FMR-1 gene product associated with fragile X syndrome. Nature, 1993, 363: 722–724.Google Scholar
  38. Verkerk, A.J., Pieretti, M., Sutcliffe, S., Fu, Y.H., Kuhl, D.P., Pizzuti, A., Reiner, O., Richards, S., Victoria, M.F. and Zhang, F.P. Identification of a gene (FMR-1) containing a CGG repeat coincident with a breakpoint cluster region exhibiting length variation in fragile X syndrome. Cell, 1991, 65: 905–914.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Human Sciences Press, Inc. 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  • Maija Castrén
    • 1
  • Ari Pääkkönen
    • 2
  • Ina M. Tarkka
    • 3
  • Markku Ryynänen
    • 4
  • Juhani Partanen
    • 2
  1. 1.A.I.Virtanen Institute,University of Kuopio,Finland
  2. 2.Department of Clinical Neurophysiology,Kuopio University Hospital and University of Kuopio,Finland
  3. 3.Brain Research and Rehabilitation Center Neuron,Kuopio,Finland
  4. 4.Department of Gynaecology,University Hospital of Oulu,Finland

Personalised recommendations