Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology

, Volume 26, Issue 4, pp 257–268

The Revised Conners' Parent Rating Scale (CPRS-R): Factor Structure, Reliability, and Criterion Validity

  • C. Keith Conners
  • Gill Sitarenios
  • James D. A. Parker
  • Jeffery N. Epstein
Article

Abstract

The Conners' Parent Rating Scale (CPRS) is a popular research and clinical tool for obtaining parental reports of childhood behavior problems. The present study introduces a revised CPRS (CPRS-R) which has norms derived from a large, representative sample of North American children, uses confirmatory factor analysis to develop a definitive factor structure, and has an updated item content to reflect recent knowledge and developments concerning childhood behavior problems. Exploratory and confirmatory factor-analytic results revealed a seven-factor model including the following factors: Cognitive Problems, Oppositional, Hyperactivity-Impulsivity, Anxious-Shy, Perfectionism, Social Problems, and Psychosomatic. The psychometric properties of the revised scale appear adequate as demonstrated by good internal reliability coefficients, high test-retest reliability, and effective discriminatory power. Advantages of the CPRS-R include a corresponding factor structure with the Conners' Teacher Rating Scale—Revised and comprehensive symptom coverage for attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) and related disorders. Factor congruence with the original CPRS as well as similarities with other parent rating scales are discussed.

ADHD CPRS-R rating scale parents childhood 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

REFERENCES

  1. Achenbach, T. M., & Edelbrock, C. (1981). Behavioral problems and competencies reported by parents of normal and disturbed children aged four to sixteen. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 46 (1, Serial No. 188).Google Scholar
  2. Achenbach, T. M., & Edelbrock, C. (1983). Manual for the Child Behavior Checklist and Revised Child Behavior Profile. Burlington: University of Vermont, Department of Psychiatry.Google Scholar
  3. Achenbach, T. M., Hensley, V. R., Phraes, V., & Grayson, D. (1990). Problems and competencies reported by parents of Australian and American children. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 31, 265-286.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Achenbach, T. M., Howell, C. T., Quay, H. C., & Conners, C. K. (1991). National survey of problems and competencies among four-to sixteen-year-olds: Parents' reports for normative and clinical samples. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 56(3), (Serial No. 37-976X) 1-131.Google Scholar
  5. American Psychiatric Association. (1994). Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (4th ed.), Washington, DC: Author.Google Scholar
  6. American Psychological Association. Standards for educational and psychological testing (1985). Washington, DC: Author.Google Scholar
  7. Anderson, J. C., & Gerbing, D. W. (1984). The effect of sampling error on convergence, improper solutions, and goodness-of-fit indices for maximum likelihood confirmatory factor analysis. Psychometrika, 49, 155-173.Google Scholar
  8. Anderson, J. C., Williams, S., McGee, R., & Silva, P. A. (1987). DSM-III disorders in preadolescent children: Prevalence in a large sample from the general population. Archives of General Psychiatry, 44, 69-76.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Arnold, L. E., Barnebey, N. S., & Smeltzer, D. J. (1981). First grade norms, factor analysis and cross correlation for Conners, Davids, and Quay-Peterson behavior rating scales. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 14, 269-275.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Barkley, R. A. (1990). Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder: A handbook for diagnosis and treatment. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  11. Bentler, P. M. (1990). Comparative fit indexes in structural models. Psychological Bulletin, 107, 238-246.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Bentler, P. M. (1995). EQS structural equations program manual. Encino, CA: Multivariate Software.Google Scholar
  13. Bentler, P. M., & Bonett, D. G. (1980). Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures. Psychological Bulletin, 88, 588-606.Google Scholar
  14. Blouin, A. G., Conners, C. K., Seidel, W. T., & Blouin, J. (1989). The independence of hyperactivity from conduct disorder: Methodological considerations. Canadian Journal of Psychiatry, 34, 279-282.Google Scholar
  15. Campbell, S. B., & Steinert, Y. (1978). Comparisons of rating scales of child psychopathology in clinic and nonclinic samples. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 46, 358-359.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Cattell, R. B. (1978). The scientific use of factor analysis in behavioral and life sciences. New York: Plenum Press.Google Scholar
  17. Cohen, M., DuRant, R. H., & Cook, C. (1988). The Conners Teacher Rating Scale: Effects of age, sex, and race with special education children. Psychology in the Schools, 25, 195-202.Google Scholar
  18. Cohen, M., & Hynd, G. W. (1986). The Conners Teacher Rating Scale: A different factor structure with special education children. Psychology in the Schools, 23, 13-23.Google Scholar
  19. Cole, D. A. (1987). Utility of confirmatory factor analysis in test validation research. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 55, 584-594.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Conners, C. (1970). Symptom patterns in hyperkinetic, neurotic, and normal children. Child Development, 41, 667-682.Google Scholar
  21. Conners, C. K. (1973). Rating scales for use in drug studies with children. Psychopharmacology Bulletin [Special issue on children]. 24-42.Google Scholar
  22. Conners, C. K. (1989). Manual for Conners' Rating Scales. N. Tonawanda, NY: Multi-Health Systems.Google Scholar
  23. Conners, C. K. (1994). The Conners Rating Scales: Use in clinical assessment, treatment planning and research. In M. Maruish (Ed.), Use of psychological testing for treatment planning and outcome assessment. Hillsdale, NJ: L. Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  24. Conners, C. K., Sitarenios, G., Parker, J. D. A., & Epstein, J. N. (1998). Revision and restandardization of the Conners Teacher Rating Scale: Factor structure, reliability, and criterion validity. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 26 (this issue).Google Scholar
  25. Costello, E. J., Costello, A. J., Edelbrock, C., Burns, B. J., Dulcan, M. K., Brent, D., & Janiszewski, S. (1985). DSM-III disorders in pediatric primary care: Prevalence and risk factors. Archives of General Psychiatry, 45, 1107-1116.Google Scholar
  26. Everett, J. E. (1983). Factor comparability as a means of determining the number of factors and their rotation. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 18, 197-218.Google Scholar
  27. Fisher, M., & Newby, R. F. (1991). Assessment of stimulant response in ADHD children using a refined multimethod clinical protocol [Special issue on child psychopharmacology]. Journal of Clinical Child Psychology, 20, 232-244.Google Scholar
  28. Glow, R. A., Glow, P. H., & Rump, E. E. (1982). The stability of child behavior disorders: A one year test-retest study of Adelaide versions of the Conners Teacher and Parent Rating Scales. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 10, 33-59.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Goyette, C. H., Conners, C. K., & Ulrich, R. F. (1978). Normative data on revised Conners Parent and Teacher Rating Scales. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 6, 221-236.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Hinshaw, S. P. (1991). Externalizing behavior problems and academic underachievement in childhood and adolescence: Causal relationships and underlying mechanisms. Psychological Bulletin, 110, 1-29.Google Scholar
  31. Horn, W. F., Ialongo, N., Popovich, S., & Peradotto, D. (1987). Behavioral parent training and cognitive-behavioral self-control therapy with ADD-H children: Comparative and combined effects. Journal of Clinical Child Psychology, 16, 57-68.Google Scholar
  32. Joreskog, K. G., & Sorbom, D. (1986). LISREL VI: Analysis of linear structural relationships by maximum likelihood, instrumental variables, and least squares methods. Mooresville, IN: Scientific Software.Google Scholar
  33. Kessel, J. B., & Zimmerman, M. (1993). Reporting errors in studies of the diagnostic performance of self-administered questionnaires: Extent of the problem, recommendations for standardized presentation of results, and implications for the peer review process. Psychological Assessment, 5, 395-399.Google Scholar
  34. Kuehne, C., Kehle, T. J., & McMahon, W. (1987). Differences between children with attention deficit disorder, children with specific learning disabilities, and normal children. Journal of School Psychology, 25, 161-166.Google Scholar
  35. Landau, S., & Moore, L. A. (1991). Social skill deficits in children with attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder. School Psychology Review, 20, 235-251.Google Scholar
  36. Leon, G. R., Kendall, P. C., & Garber, J. (1980). Depression in children: Parent, teacher, and child perspectives. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 8, 221-235.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. March, J. S., Leonard, H. L., & Swedo, S. (1995). Obsessive-compulsive disorder. In J. S. March (Ed.), Anxiety disorders in children and adolescents. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  38. Marsh, H. W., Balla, J. R., & McDonald, R. P. (1988). Goodness-of-fit indexes in confirmatory factor analysis: The effect of sample size. Psychological Bulletin, 103, 391-410.Google Scholar
  39. Mash, E. J., & Johnston, C. (1983). Parental perceptions of child behavior problems, parenting self-esteem, and mothers' reported stress in younger and older hyperactive and normal children. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 51, 68-99.Google Scholar
  40. O'Connor, M., Foch, T., Sherry, T., & Plomin, R. (1980). A twin study of specific behavioral problems of socialization as viewed by parents. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 8, 189-199.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Offord, D. R., Boyle, M. H., Szatmari, P., Rae-Grant, N. I., Links, P. S., Cadman, D. T., Byles, J. A., Crawford, J. W., Blum, H. M., & Byrne, C. (1987). Ontario Child Health Study. II. Six-month prevalence of disorder and rates of service utilization. Archives of General Psychiatry, 44, 832-836.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Prior, M. L., & Wood, G. (1983). A comparison study of preschool children diagnosed as hyperactive. Journal of Pediatric Psychology, 8, 191-207.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Quay, H. C. (1983). A dimensional approach to behavior disorder: The Revised Behavior Problem Checklist. School Psychology Review, 12, 244-249.Google Scholar
  44. Ross, D. M., & Ross, S. A. (1976). Hyperactivity: Research, theory, and action. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  45. Ross, D. M., & Ross, S. A. (1982). Hyperactivity: Current issues, research, and theory (2nd ed.). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  46. Tanaka, J. S., & Huba, G. J. (1984). Confirmatory hierarchical factor analysis of psychological distress measures. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46, 621-635.Google Scholar
  47. Velez, C. N., Johnson, J., & Cohen, P. (1989). A longitudinal analysis of selected risk factors for childhood psychopathology. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 28, 861-864.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. Werry, J. S., Sprague, R. L., & Cohen, N. M. (1975). Conners' Teacher Rating Scale for use in drug studies with children—An empirical study. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 3, 217-229.PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1998

Authors and Affiliations

  • C. Keith Conners
    • 1
  • Gill Sitarenios
    • 2
  • James D. A. Parker
    • 3
  • Jeffery N. Epstein
    • 1
  1. 1.Duke University Medical CenterDurham
  2. 2.York UniversityTorontoCanada
  3. 3.Trent UniversityPeterboroughCanada

Personalised recommendations