Mental Health Services Research

, Volume 1, Issue 3, pp 159–170

A Comparison of Public and Privatized Approaches to Managed Behavioral Health Care for Persons with Serious Mental Illness

  • Dow A. Wieman
  • Robert A. Dorwart

DOI: 10.1023/A:1022585429190

Cite this article as:
Wieman, D.A. & Dorwart, R.A. Ment Health Serv Res (1999) 1: 159. doi:10.1023/A:1022585429190


This article compares public and privatized approaches to managed behavioral health care for persons with serious mental illness in Massachusetts. Data from the Department of Mental Health (DMH) for 247 patients receiving care managed by DMH and 312 in a Medicaid carve-out were compared. Repeated measures multivariate analysis of variance models were used to examine adjusted changes in number of admissions, bed days, and facilities used from a baseline year before program implementation in 1992 through two follow-up years. Results were comparable for the two programs with similar reductions in the number of people receiving inpatient care but increases in admissions and bed days. Possible problems with continuity of care, indicated by individuals using multiple facilities, were identified for both. Given the evidence of comparable results, the choice between the two approaches is likely to be dictated by various pragmatic and subjective factors other than their demonstrated effectiveness.

Medicaid managed care managed behavioral health care privatization 

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1999

Authors and Affiliations

  • Dow A. Wieman
    • 1
  • Robert A. Dorwart
    • 2
  1. 1.John F. Kennedy School of GovernmentHarvard UniversityCambridge
  2. 2.John F. Kennedy School of Government and theHarvard Medical School Department of PsychiatryCambridge

Personalised recommendations