Facing Facts in U.S. Science and Mathematics Education: Where We Stand, Where We Want to Go

  • Curtis C. McKnight
  • William H. Schmidt

Abstract

The Third International Mathematics and Science Study (TIMSS) provides data that seems clearly important to science and mathematics education in the U.S. TIMSS gathered extensive data on curriculum, textbooks, teachers, and instructional practices in science and mathematics education and some of these data are presented and discussed. Eighth grade achievement data show the U.S. to be somewhat above average in science achievement but consistently average or below in mathematics. U.S. official curricula cover comparatively many topics and are relatively unfocused. U.S. science and mathematics textbooks typically take a cautious, inclusive approach keeping traditional content while adding new reform topics. They thus lack. Teachers, without guidance to help them focus, typically divide their attention among many topics. Empirically, there is little agreement in the U.S. on what is truly “basic” judging by common topics among curricula and textbooks. U.S. teaching, at least in mathematics, is teacher and moves among many different activities, failing to tell a coherent story. We must face these as we seek to find ways to become what we want to be in providing science and mathematics education.

Science education mathematics education international comparisons 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

REFERENCES

  1. National Center for Education Statistics (NCES) (1996). Pursuing excellence: A study of U.S. eighth-grade mathematics and science teaching, learning, curriculum, and achievement in international context. U.S. Department of Education, Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
  2. National Council for Teachers of Mathematics (NCTM) (1989). Curriculum and evaluation standards for school mathematics. Reston, Virginia: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.Google Scholar
  3. Schmidt, W. H., and McKnight, C. C. (1995). Surveying educational opportunity in mathematics and science: An international perspective. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 17(3), 337–353.Google Scholar
  4. Schmidt, W. H., McKnight, C. C., & Raizen, S. (1997). A splintered vision: An investigation of US science and mathematics education. Dordrecht, Boston, London: Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
  5. Schmidt, W. H., McKnight, C. C., Valverde, G. A., Houang, R. T., & Wiley, D. E. (1997). Many visions, many aims: A cross-national investigation of curricular intentions in school mathematics. Dordrecht, Boston, London: Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
  6. Schmidt, W. H., Raizen, S., Britton, E. D., Bianchi, L., & Wolfe, R. (1997) Many visions, many aims: A cross-national investigation of curricular intentions in school science. Dordrecht, Boston, London: Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
  7. Schmidt, W. H., et al. (1996). Characterizing pedagogical flow: An investigation of mathematics and science teaching in six countries. Dordrecht, Boston, London: Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1998

Authors and Affiliations

  • Curtis C. McKnight
  • William H. Schmidt

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations