Clinical & Experimental Metastasis

, Volume 20, Issue 1, pp 19–24

Tumor metastasis-associated human MTA1 gene and its MTA1 protein product: Role in epithelial cancer cell invasion, proliferation and nuclear regulation

  • Garth L. Nicolson
  • Akihiro Nawa
  • Yasushi Toh
  • Shigeki Taniguchi
  • Katsuhiko Nishimori
  • Amr Moustafa
Article

Abstract

Using differential cDNA library screening techniques based on metastatic and nonmetastatic rat mammary adenocarcinoma cell lines, we previously cloned and sequenced the metastasis-associated gene mta1. Using homology to the rat mta1 gene, we cloned the human MTA1 gene and found it to be over-expressed in a variety of human cell lines (breast, ovarian, lung, gastric and colorectal cancer but not melanoma or sarcoma) and cancerous tissues (breast, esophageal, colorectal, gastric and pancreatic cancer). We found a close similarity between the human MTA1 and rat mta1 genes (88% and 96% identities of the nucleotide and predicted amino acid sequences, respectively). Both genes encode novel proteins that contain a proline rich region (SH3-binding motif), a putative zinc finger motif, a leucine zipper motif and 5 copies of the SPXX motif found in gene regulatory proteins. Using Southern blot analysis the MTA1 gene was highly conserved, and using Northern blot analysis MTA1 transcripts were found in virtually all human cell lines (melanoma, breast, cervix and ovarian carcinoma cells and normal breast epithelial cells). However, the expression level of the MTA1 gene in normal breast epithelial cells was ∼ 50% of that found in rapidly growing adenocarcinoma and atypical epithelial cell lines. Experimental inhibition of MTA1 protein expression using antisense phosphorothioate oligonucleotides resulted in inhibition of growth and invasion of human MDA-MB-231 breast cancer cells with relatively high MTA1 expression. Furthermore, the MTA1 protein was localized in the nuclei of cells transfected with a mammalian expression vector containing a full-length MTA1 gene. Although some MTA1 protein was found in the cytoplasm, the vast majority of MTA1 protein was localized in the nucleus. Examination of recombinate MTA1 and related MTA2 proteins suggests that MTA1 protein is a histone deacetylase. It also appears to behave like a GATA-element transcription factor, since transfection of a GATA-element reporter into MTA1-expressing cells resulted in 10–20-fold increase in reporter expression over poorly MTA1-expressing cells. Since it was reported that nucleosome remodeling histone deacetylase complex (NuRD complex) involved in chromatin remodeling contains MTA1 protein and a MTA1-related protein (MTA2), we examined NuRD complexes for the presence of MTA1 protein and found an association of this protein with histone deacetylase. The results suggest that the MTA1 protein may serve multiple functions in cellular signaling, chromosome remodeling and transcription processes that are important in the progression, invasion and growth of metastatic epithelial cells.

antisense growth histone deacetylase complex invasion metastasis-associated gene nuclear complexes signal transduction transcription 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Moustafa A, Nicolson GL. Breast cancer metastasis-associated genes: Prognostic significance and therapeutic implications. Oncol Res 1998; 9:505–25.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Debies MT, Welch D. Genetic basis of human breast cancer metastasis. J Mammary Gland Biol Neoplasia 2001; 6(4): 441–51.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Steeg PS, Bevilacqua G, Kopper L et al. Evidence for a novel gene associated with low tumor metastatic potential. J Natl Cancer Inst1998; 80: 200–4.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Ebralidze A, Tulchinsky E, Grigorian M et al. Isolation and characterization of a gene specially expressed in different metastatic cells and whose deduced gene product has a high degree of homology to Ca2+ binding protein. Genes Dev 1989; 3: 1086–93.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Dear TN, Ramshaw IA, Kefford RF. Differential expression of a novel gene, WDNM1, in nonmetastatic rat mammary adenocarcinoma cells. Cancer Res 1988; 48: 5203–9Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Dear TN, McDonald DA, Kefford RF. Transcriptional downregulation of a rat gene, WDNM2, in metastatic DMBA-8 cells. Cancer Res 1989; 49: 5323–8.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Phillips SM, Bendall AJ, Ramshaw IA. Isolation of gene associated with high metastatic potential in rat mammary adenocarcinoma. J Natl Cancer Inst 1990; 82:199–203.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Bisset P, Bellocq JP, Wolf C et al. A novel metalloproteinase gene specifically expressed in stromal cells of breast carcinomas. Nature 1990; 348: 699–704.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Dong JT, Lamb PW, Rinker-Schaeffer CW et al. KAI1, a metastasis suppressor gene for prostate cancer of human chromosome 11p11.2. Science 1995; 268: 884–6.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Samant RS, Seraj MJ, Saunders MM et al. Analysis of mechanisms underlying BRMS1 suppression of metastasis. Clin Exp Metastasis 2000; 18: 683–93.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Toh Y, Pencil SD, Nicolson GL. A novel candidate metastasisassociated gene, mta1, differentially expressed in highly metastatic mammary adenocarcinoma cell lines. J Biol Chem 1994; 269: 22958–63.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Toh Y, Pencil SD, Nicolson GL. Analysis of the complete sequence of the novel gene mta1 differentially expressed in highly metastatic mammary adenocarcinoma and breast cancer cell lines and clones. Gene 1995; 159: 99–104.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Pencil SD, Toh Y, Nicolson GL. Candidate metastasis-associated genes of the rat 13762NF mammary adenocarcinoma. Breast Cancer Res Treat 1993; 25: 165–74.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Nawa A, Nishimori K, Lin P et al.Tumor metastasis-associated human MTA1 gene: Its deduced protein sequence, localization and association with breast cancer cell proliferation using antisense phosphorothioate oligonucleotides. J Cell Biochem 2000; 79: 202–12.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Nawa A, Sawada H, Toh Y et al. Tumor metastasis-associated human MTA1 gene: Effects of antisense oligonucleotides on cell growth. Intern J Med Biol Environ 2000; 28(1): 33–9.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Xue Y, Wong J, Moreno GT et al. NURD, a novel complex with both ATP-dependent chromatin-remodeling and histone deacetylase activities. Mol Cell 1989; 2: 851–61.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Zhang Y, LeRoy G, Seelig HP et al. The dermatomyositis-specific autoantigen Mi2 is a component of a complex containing histone deacetylase and nucleosome remodeling activities. Cell 1998; 95: 279–89.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    . Ren R, Mager BJ, Cicchetti P et al. Identification of a ten-amino acid proline-rich SH3 binding site. Science 1993; 259: 1157–61.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Yu H, Chen JK, Feng S et al. Structual basis for the binding of prolinerich peptides to SH3 domains. Cell 1994; 76: 933–45.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Martin DIK, Orkin SH. Transcriptional activation and DNA binding by the erythroid factor GF-1/NF-E1/Eryf. Genes Dev 1990; 4: 1886–98.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Vinson CR, Sigler PB, McKnight SL. Scissors-Grip model for DNA recognition by a family of leucine zipper proteins. Science 1989; 246: 911–6.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Suzuki M. SPXX, a frequent sequence motif in gene regulatory proteins. J Mol Biol 1989; 207: 61–84.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Aasland R. The SANT domain: putative DNA-binding domain in the SWI-SNF and ADA complexes, the transcriptional co-repressor NCoR and TFIIIB. Trends Biochem Sci 1996; 21: 87–8.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Peterson CL, Tamkun JW. The SWI-SNF complex: A chromatin remodeling machine? Trends Biochem Sci 1995; 20: 143–6.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Horiuchi J, Silverman N, Marcus GA et al. ADA3, a putative transcriptional adaptor, consists of two separable domains and interacts with ADA2 and GCN5 in a trimeric complex. Mol Cell Biol 1995; 15: 1203–9.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Horlein AJ, Naar AM, Heinzel T et al. Ligand-independent repression by the thyroid hormone receptor mediated by a nuclear receptor corepressor. Nature 1995; 377: 397–404.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Kassavetis GA, Nguyen ST, Kobayashi R et al. Cloning, expression, and function of TFC5, the gene encoding the B″ component of the Saccharomyces cervisiae RNA polymerase III transcription factor TFIIIB.Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1995; 92: 9786–90.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Ptashne M. How eukaryotic transcriptional activators work. Nature 1988; 335: 683–9.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Price JE, Polyzos A, Zhang RD et al. Tumorigenicity and metastasis of human breast carcinoma cell lines in nude mice. Cancer Res 1990; 50: 717–21.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Toh Y, Oki E, Oda S et al. Overexpression of MTA1 gene in colorectal and gastrointestinal carcinomas: Correlation with invasion and metastasis. Intern J Cancer 1997; 74: 459–63.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Toh Y, Kuwano H, Mori M et al. Overexpression of metastasisassociated MTA1 mRNA in invasive oesophageal carcinomas. Br J Cancer 1999; 79: 1723–26.Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Stein CA. Does antisense exist? Nat Med 1995; 1: 1119–21.Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Bennett CF, Chiang MY, Chan H et al. Cationic lipids enhance cellular uptake and activity of phosphorothioate antisense oligonucleotides. Mol Pharmacol 1992; 41: 1023–33.Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Yaswen P, Stampfer MR, Ghosh K et al. Effect of sequence of thioated oligonucleotides on cultured human mammary epithelial cells. Antisense Res Dev 1993; 3: 67–77.Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Cavanaugh PG, Nicolson GL. Purification and some properties of a lung-derived growth factor that differentially stimulates the growth of tumor cells metastatic to the lung. Cancer Res 1989; 49: 3928–33.Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Wakabayashi H, Nicolson GL. Transfilter cell invasion assays. In Celis JE (ed): Cell Biology: A Laboratory Handbook. New York: Academic Press 1997; 1: 296–301.Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Mahoney MG, Simpson A, JostM et al. Metastasis-associated protein (MTA)1 enhances migration, invasion and anchorage-independent survival of immortalized human keratinocytes. Oncogene 2002; 21: 2161–70.Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Toh Y, Kuninaka S, Endo H et al. Molecular analysis of a candidate metastasis associated gene MTA1: Interaction with histone deacetylase 1. J Exp Clin Cancer Res 2000; 19: 105–11.Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Kumar R, Wang RA, Mazumdar A et al. A naturally occurring MTA1 variant sequesters oestrogen receptor-alpha in the cytoplasm. Nature 2002; 418: 654–7.Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Yoshida M, Beppu T. Reversible arrest of proliferation of rat 3Y1 fibroblasts in both the G1 and G2 phases by trichostatin A. Exp Cell Res 1998; 177: 122–31.Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Brehm A, Miska EA, MaCane DJ et al. Retinoblastoma protein recruits histone deacetylase to repress transcription. Nature 1998; 391: 597–601.Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    . Luo RX, Postigo AA, Dean DC. Rb interacts with histone deacetylase to repress transcription. Cell 1998; 92: 463–73.Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Magnaghi-Jaulin L, Groisman R, Naguibneva I et al. Retinoblastoma protein represses transcription by recruiting a histone deacetylase. Nature 1998; 391: 601–5.Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Gu W, Roeder RG. Activation of p53 sequence-specific DNA binding by acetylation of the p53 C-terminal domain. Cell 1997; 90: 595–606.Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    Fu YH, Marzluf GA. nit-2, the major positive-acting nitrogen regulatory gene of Neurospora crassa, encodes a sequence-specific DNA-binding protein. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1990; 87: 5331–5.Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    Minehart PL, Magasanik B. Sequence and expression of GLN3, a positive nitrogen regulatory gene of Saccharomyces cerevisiae encoding a protein with a putative zinc finger DNA-binding domain. Mol Cell Biol 1991; 11: 6216–28.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  • Garth L. Nicolson
    • 1
  • Akihiro Nawa
    • 2
  • Yasushi Toh
    • 3
  • Shigeki Taniguchi
    • 4
  • Katsuhiko Nishimori
    • 2
  • Amr Moustafa
    • 5
  1. 1.The Institute for Molecular MedicineHuntington BeachUSA
  2. 2.Department of Obstetrics and GynecologyNagoya University School of MedicineNagoyaJapan
  3. 3.Department of Gastroenterorogic SurgeryNational Kyushu Cancer CenterJapan
  4. 4.Laboratory of Molecular Biology, Graduate School of Agricultural ScienceTohoku UniversitySendaiJapan
  5. 5.Ein Shams University School of MedicineCairoEgypt

Personalised recommendations