Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy

, Volume 6, Issue 1, pp 51–58

Gender in medical ethics: Re-examining the conceptual basis of empirical research

  • Elisabeth Conradi
  • Nikola Biller-Andorno
  • Margarete Boos
  • Christina Sommer
  • Claudia Wiesemann
Article

Abstract

Conducting empirical research on gender in medical ethics is a challenge from a theoretical as well as a practical point of view. It still has to be clarified how gender aspects can be integrated without sustaining gender stereotypes. The developmental psychologist Carol Gilligan was among the first to question ethics from a gendered point of view. The notion of care introduced by her challenged conventional developmental psychology as well as moral philosophy. Gilligan was criticised, however, because her concept of ‘two different voices’ may reinforce gender stereotypes. Moreover, although Gilligan stressed relatedness, this is not reflected in her own empirical approach, which still focuses on individual moral reflection. Concepts from social psychology can help overcome both problems. Social categories like gender shape moral identity and moral decisions. If morality is understood as being lived through actions of persons in social relationships, gender becomes a helpful category of moral analysis. Our findings will provide a conceptual basis for the question how empirical research in medical ethics can successfully embrace a gendered perspective.

empirical research ethic of care gender Gilligan moral philosophy social psychology 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Allmark, Peter: 1995, ‘Can There Be an Ethics of Care?’ Journal of Medical Ethics 21(1), 19-24.Google Scholar
  2. Allmark, Peter: 1996, ‘Reply to Ann Bradshaw’ (‘Yes! There Is an Ethics of Care: An Answer for Peter Allmark’), Journal of Medical Ethics 22, 13-15.Google Scholar
  3. Apel, Karl-Otto: 1988, Diskurs und Verantwortung. Das Problem des Übergangs zur postkonventionellen Moral. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
  4. Arend, Arie van der and Chris Gastmans: 31998, Ethisch zorg verlenen — handboek voor de verpleegkundige beroepen. Baarn: Intro.Google Scholar
  5. Barbour, Allen: 1995, Caring for Patients. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Beauchamp, Tom L. and James F. Childress: 1979, Principles of Biomedical Ethics. New York, Oxford.Google Scholar
  7. Bem, Sandra L.: 1974, ‘The Measurement of Psychological Androgyny’, Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 42(2), 155-162.Google Scholar
  8. Benhabib, Seyla: 1992, Situating the Self. Gender, Community and Postmodernism in Contemporary Ethics. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  9. Benner, Patricia: 1997, ‘A Dialogue Between Virtue Ethics and Care Ethics’, Theoretical Medicine 18 (March–June), 46-61.Google Scholar
  10. Benner, Patricia and Judith Wrubel: 1988, The Primacy of Caring — Stress and Coping in Health and Illness. Boston, MA: Addison Wesley Longman Publishing Co.Google Scholar
  11. Bergmann, Jörg and Thomas Luckmann: 1999, Die kommunikative Konstruktion von Moral. Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag.Google Scholar
  12. Biller-Andorno, Nikola: 2001, Gerechtigkeit und Fürsorge. Zur Möglichkeit einer integrativen Medizinethik. Frankfurt, New York: Campus.Google Scholar
  13. Blumer, Herbert: 1969, Symbolic Interaction: Perspective and Method. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  14. Bochner, Stephen and Robert Perks: 1971, ‘National Role Evocation as a Function of Cross-national Interaction’, Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology 2, 157-164.Google Scholar
  15. Bradshaw, Ann: 1996, ‘Yes! There is an Ethics of Care: An Answer for Peter Allmark’, Journal of Medical Ethics 22(1), 8-12.Google Scholar
  16. Brykczyńska, Gosia: 1997, Caring: the Compassion and Wisdom of Nursing. London, Sydney, Auckland: Arnold.Google Scholar
  17. Burke, Peter J.: 1980, The Self: ‘Measurement Requirements from an Interactionist Perspective’, Social Psychology Quarterly 43, 18-29.Google Scholar
  18. Carse, Alisa L.: 1998, ‘Impartial Principle and Moral Context: Securing a Place for the Particular in Ethical Theory’, Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 23(2), 153-169.Google Scholar
  19. Colby, Anne and Lawrence Kohlberg: 1984, ‘Invariant Sequence and Internal Consistency in Moral Judgment Stages’, in: William M. Kurtines and Jacob L. Gerwirtz (eds.), Morality, Moral Behavior, and Moral Development. New York: Wiley, pp. 41-51.Google Scholar
  20. Conradi, Elisabeth: 2001, Take Care. Grundlagen einer Ethik der Achtsamkeit. Frankfurt am Main: Campus.Google Scholar
  21. Conradi, Elisabeth: 2003, ‘Agency and Social Change in the Light of an Ethic of Care. Some Thoughts About Collective Moral Judgment and Moral Action’, in: Sasha Roseneil and Linda Hogan (eds.), Feminism, Agency and Ethics (forthcoming).Google Scholar
  22. Deaux, Kay and Marianne Lafrance: 1998, ‘Gender’, in: Daniel T. Gilbert, Susan T. Fiske and Lindzey Gardner (eds.), The Handbook of Social Psychology, 4th ed. New York: Mc Graw Hill, pp. 788-827.Google Scholar
  23. Deaux, Kay and Brenda Major: 1987, ‘Putting Gender into Context. An Interactive Model of Gender-related Behaviour’, Psychological Review 94, 369-389.Google Scholar
  24. Döbert, Rainer and Natalie Juranek: 2000, ‘Zur Rolle von Begrifflichkeiten: Die Auswirkungen eines Gerechtigkeitsrahmens auf die Aufschlüsselung eines moralischen Dilemmas — Eine Forschungsnotiz’, in: Wolfgang Edelstein and Gertrud Nunner-Winkler (eds.), Moral im sozialen Kontext. Frankfurt am Main; Suhrkamp, pp. 234-258.Google Scholar
  25. Friedman, Marilyn: 1995, ‘Beyond Caring: the De-Moralization of Gender’, in: Virginia Held (ed.), Justice and Care. Essential Readings in Feminist Ethics. Boulder, CO: Harper Collins, pp. 61-77.Google Scholar
  26. Fry, Sara T.: 1989, ‘The Role of Caring in a Theory of Nursing Ethics’, Hypatia 4(2), 88-103.Google Scholar
  27. Gilligan, Carol, Janie V. Ward and Jill M. Taylor (eds.): 1988, Mapping the Moral Domain. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  28. Gilligan, Carol: 1982, In a Different Voice: Psychological Theory and Women's Development. Cambridge, MA; London: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  29. Gilligan, Carol: 1987, ‘Moral Orientation and Moral Development’, in: Eva F. Kittay and Diana T. Meyers (eds.), Women and Moral Theory. Totowa, New Jersey: Rowan and Littlefield, pp. 19-33.Google Scholar
  30. Gordon, Suzanne, Patricia Benner and Nel Noddings (eds.): 1996, Caregiving. Readings in Knowledge, Practice, Ethics, and Politics. Philadelphia, PA: Pennsylvania University Press.Google Scholar
  31. Habermas, Jürgen: 1990, Moral Consciousness and Communicative Action. Boston: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  32. Habermas, Jürgen: 1989/90, ‘Justice and Solidarity: On the Discussion Concerning Stage 6’, Philosophical Forum 21(1–2) (Fall/Winter), 40-47.Google Scholar
  33. Hogg, Michael A.: 1996, ‘Social Identity, Self-categorisation, and the Small Group’, in: E.H. Witte and J.H. Davis (eds.), Understanding Group Behaviour: Small Group Process and Interpersonal Relations, Vol. 2. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum, pp. 227-254.Google Scholar
  34. Hogg, Michael A., Deborah J. Terry and Katherine M. White: 1995, ‘A Tale of Two Theories: A Critical Comparison of Identity Theory with Social Identity Theory’, in: Social Psychology Quarterly 58(4), 255-269.Google Scholar
  35. Kant, Immanuel: 1997, Critique of Practical Reason. Cambridge Texts in the History of Philosophy. Cambridge UP (orig. 1788).Google Scholar
  36. Kant, Immanuel: 1998, Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Moral. Cambridge UP (orig. 1785/86).Google Scholar
  37. Kohlberg, Lawrence: 1981, The Philosophy of Moral Development. Essays on Moral Development. Vol. 1. San Francisco: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
  38. Krol, Sandera and Selma Sevenhuijsen: 1992, Ethics and Morality in Feminism. An interdisciplinary Bibliography. Anna Maria van Schuurman Centrum, Department Women’s Studies, Faculty Social Sciences, Utrecht University.Google Scholar
  39. Little, Margaret O.: 1998, ‘Care: From Theory to Orientation and Back’, Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 23(2), 190-209.Google Scholar
  40. Loewy, Erich: 1995, ‘Care Ethics: A Concept in Search of a Framework’, Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 4, 56-63.Google Scholar
  41. Maihofer, Andrea: 2000, ‘Ethic of Care’, in: Alison M. Jagger, and Iris Young (eds.), A Companion to Feminist Philosophy. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers, pp. 383-392.Google Scholar
  42. Manschot, Henk and Marian Verkerk (eds.): 1994, Ethiek van de zorg. Een discussie. Amsterdam and Meppel: Boom.Google Scholar
  43. McCall, George and Jerry Simons: 1978, Identities and Interactions. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  44. Mead, George H.: 1934, Mind, Self, and Society: From the Standpoint of a Social Behaviorist. Ed. and with an introduction by C.W. Morris. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  45. Morse, Janice M. (ed.): 1992, Qualitative Health Research. Newbury Park, London, New Delhi.Google Scholar
  46. Moskowitz, Debbie S., Eun J. Suh and Julie Desaulniers: 1994, ‘Situational Influences on Gender Differences in Agency and Communion’, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 66(4), 753-761.Google Scholar
  47. Nelson, Hilde L: 1992, ‘Against Caring’, Journal of Clinical Ethics 3(1), 8-15.Google Scholar
  48. Nicholson, Linda: 1983, ‘Woman, Morality and History’, Social Research 50(3), 514-536.Google Scholar
  49. Nunner-Winkler, Gertrud: 1984, ‘Two Moralities? A Critical Discussion of an Ethic of Care and Responsibility Versus an Ethic of Rights and Justice’, in: William M. Kurtines and Jacob L. Gewirtz (eds.), Morality, Moral Behaviour, and Moral Development. New York: Wiley, pp. 348-361.Google Scholar
  50. Peabody, F.W.: 1984, ‘The Care of the Patient’, Journal of the American Medical Association 99, 877-882.Google Scholar
  51. Rawls, John: 1971, A Theory of Justice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  52. Reich, Warren T.: 1995, ‘Historical Dimensions of an Ethic of Care in Health Care’, in: Warren T. Reich (ed.), Encyclopedia of Bioethics. New York: Simon & Schuster Macmillan, pp. 331-336.Google Scholar
  53. Schneider-Düker, Marianne and André Kohle: 1988, ‘Die Erfassung von Geschlechtsrollen — Ergebnisse der deutschen Neukonstruktion des Bem Sex-Role-Inventory’, Diagnostica 34(3), 256-279.Google Scholar
  54. Self, D.J., D.E. Schrader, D.C. Baldwin Jr. and F.D. Wolinsky: 1993, ‘The Moral Development of Medical Students: A Pilot Study of the Possible Influence of Medical Education’, Medical Education 27, 26-34.Google Scholar
  55. Sevenhuijsen, Selma: 1998, Citizenship and the Ethics of Care: Feminist Considerations on Justice, Morality and Politics. London, New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  56. Sharpe, Virginia: 1992, ‘Justice and Care: the Implications of the Kohlberg-Gilligan Debate for Medical Ethics’, Theoretical Medicine 13(4), 295-318.Google Scholar
  57. Spiro, Howard, Mary McCrea Curnen, Enid Peschel and Deborah St. James (eds.): 1993, Empathy and the Practice of Medicine. New Haven, London: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  58. Stryker, Sheldon: 1968, ‘Identity Salience and Role Performance: The Importance of Symbolic Interaction Theory for Family Research’, Journal of Marriage and the Family 30, 558-564.Google Scholar
  59. Stryker, Sheldon and Anne Statham: 1985, ‘Symbolic Interaction and Role Theory’, in: G. Lindzey and E. Aronson (eds.), The Handbook of Social Psychology. New York: Random House, pp. 311-378.Google Scholar
  60. Tajfel, Henri (ed.): 1982, Social Identity and Intergroup Relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  61. Tajfel, Henri: 1978, Differentiation Between Groups: Studies in the Social Psychology of Intergroup Relations. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  62. Tronto, Joan C.: 1987, ‘Beyond Gender Difference to a Theory of Care’, Signs 12(4) (Summer), 644-663.Google Scholar
  63. Tronto, Joan C.: 1993, Moral Boundaries: A Political Argument for an Ethic of Care. New York, London.Google Scholar
  64. Turner, John C.: 1982, ‘Towards a Cognitive Redefinition of the Group’, in: Henri Tajfel (ed.), Social Identity and Intergroup Relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 15-40.Google Scholar
  65. Turner, John C. and Penelope J. Oakes: 1989, ‘Self-Categorization Theory and Social Influence’, in: Paul B. Paulus (ed.), The Psychology of Group Influence. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, pp. 233-279.Google Scholar
  66. Turner, John C.: 1999, ‘Some Current Issues in Research on Social Identity and Self-categorization Theories’, in: Naomi Ellemers, Russell Spears and Doosje Bertjan (eds.), Social Identity: Context, Commitment, Content. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.Google Scholar
  67. van Hooft, Stan: 1996, ‘Bioethics and Caring’, Journal of Medical Ethics 22, 83-89.Google Scholar
  68. Veatch, Robert M.: 1998, ‘The Place of Care in Ethical Theory’, Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 23(2), 210-224.Google Scholar
  69. Wren, Thomas E., Wolfgang Edelstein and Gertrud Nunner-Winkler (eds.): 1990, The Moral Domain. Essays in the Ongoing Discussion Between Philosophy and the Social Sciences. Cambridge, MA, London: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  • Elisabeth Conradi
    • 1
  • Nikola Biller-Andorno
    • 3
  • Margarete Boos
    • 4
  • Christina Sommer
    • 4
  • Claudia Wiesemann
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Political SciencesUniversity of GöttingenGermany
  2. 2.Seminar für PolitikwissenschaftGeorg-August-Universität GöttigenGöttingen
  3. 3.Department of Medical Ethics and History of MedicineUniversity of GöttingenGermany
  4. 4.Department of Social Psychology and Communication StudiesUniversity of GöttingenGermany

Personalised recommendations