Advertisement

Systemic Practice and Action Research

, Volume 12, Issue 3, pp 237–246 | Cite as

A Note on the Correspondence Between Complexity and Systems Theory

  • Steven E. Phelan
Article

Abstract

Complexity theory shares a common vocabulary with systems theory. Terms such as emergence, complexity, and adaptation appear in both traditions. Despite the similarities, complexity theory is not a misnomer for systems theory. Several points of departure exist in complexity's research agenda and methods. Moreover, while systems theory appears to have embraced interpretivist and critical philosophies, complexity theory remains firmly in the positivist camp, despite claims that it is a postmodern science.

chaos complexity systems theory positivism realism 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

REFERENCES

  1. Brocklesby, J., and Cummings, S. (1996). Foucault plays Habermas: An alternative philosophical underpinning for critical systems thinking. J. Operat. Res. Soc. 47 741–754Google Scholar
  2. Checkland, P. (1995). Model validation in soft systems practice. Syst. Res. 12 47–54.Google Scholar
  3. Checkland, P. B. (1972). Towards a systems-based methodology for real-world problem-solving. J. Syst. Eng. 3 87–116.Google Scholar
  4. Checkland, P. B. (1981). Systems Thinking, Systems Practice Wiley, Chichester.Google Scholar
  5. Cohen, K. J., and Cyert, R. M. (1961). Computer models in dynamic economics. Q. J. Econ. 75 112–127.Google Scholar
  6. Drogoul, A., and Ferber, J. (1994). Multi-agent simulation as a tool for studying emergent processes in societies. In Gilbert N., and Doran, J. (eds.), Simulating Societies: The Computer Simulation of Social Phenomena UCL Press, London, pp. 127–142.Google Scholar
  7. Flood, R. L. (1990). Liberating systems theory: Toward critical systems thinking. Hum. Relat. 43 49–75.Google Scholar
  8. Flood, R. L., and Carson, E. R. (1988). Dealing with Complexity: An Introduction to the Theory and Application of Systems Science Plenum Press, New York.Google Scholar
  9. Garfinkel, A., Spano, M. L., Ditto, W. L., and Weiss, J. (1992). Issues in controlling cardiac chaos. Science 257 1230.Google Scholar
  10. Goldberg, D. E. (1989). Genetic Algorithms in Search, Optimization and Machine Learning Addison-Wesley, New York.Google Scholar
  11. Gross, P. R., and Levitt, N. (1994). Higher Superstition: The Academic Left and Its Quarrels with Science Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore.Google Scholar
  12. Holland, J. H., and Miller, J. H. (1991). Artificial adaptive agents in economic theory. Am. Econ. Rev. 81 365–370.Google Scholar
  13. Holland, J. H., Holyoak, K. J., Nisbett, R. E., and Thagard, P. R. (1986). Induction: Processes of Inference, Learning and Discovery MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  14. Lakatos, I., and Musgrave, A. (eds.) (1970). Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge Cambridge University Press, London.Google Scholar
  15. Lorenz, E. (1963). Deterministic nonperiodic flow. J. Atmos. Sci. 20 130–141.Google Scholar
  16. Lyotard, J.-F. (1983). Answering the question: What is postmodernism? In Hassan, H., and Hassan, S. (eds.), Innovation/Renovation University of Wisconsin Press, Madison, pp. 71–82.Google Scholar
  17. McKelvey, B. (1997). Quasi-natural organization science. Org. Sci. 8 351–380.Google Scholar
  18. Mikulecky, D. C. (1998). A close look at a new science: Chaos as science or science in chaos, Working Paper, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond. [Available: http://views.vcu.edu/~mikuleck/chaos2.htm (Dec. 4, 1998).]Google Scholar
  19. Morecroft, J. D. W. (1985). Rationality in the analysis of behavioral simulation models. Manage. Sci. 31 900–916.Google Scholar
  20. Newell, A., and Simon, H. A. (1972). Human Problem Solving Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.Google Scholar
  21. Phelan, S. E. (1995). From chaos to complexity in strategic planning. Paper presented at the 55th Annual Meeting of the Academy of Management, Vancouver.Google Scholar
  22. Phelan, S. E. (1997). Using Artificial Adaptive Agents to Explore Strategic Landscapes Ph.D. dissertation, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Australia.Google Scholar
  23. Price, B. (1997). The myth of postmodern science. In Eve, R. A., Horsfall, S., and Lee, M. E. (eds.), Chaos, Complexity and Sociology: Myths, Models, and Theories Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA, pp. 3–14.Google Scholar
  24. Rocha, L. M. (1997). Evidence Sets and Contextual Genetic Algorithms: Exploring Uncertainty, Context, and Embodiment in Cognitive and Biological Systems Ph.D. dissertation, State University of New York.Google Scholar
  25. Sokal, A. D., and Bricmont, J. (1998). Fashionable Nonsense: Postmodern Intellectuals' Abuse of Science St. Martin's Press, New York.Google Scholar
  26. Stacey, R. D. (1991). The Chaos Frontier: Creative Strategic Control for Business Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford.Google Scholar
  27. Tsoukas, H. (1992). Panoptic reason and the search for totality: A critical assessment of the critical systems perspective. Hum. Relat. 45 637–657.Google Scholar
  28. von Foerster, H. (1984). On constructing a reality. In von Foerster, H. (ed.), Observing Systems Intersystems, Seaside, CA, pp. 288–309.Google Scholar
  29. von Glasersfeld, E. (1991). Knowing without metaphysics: Aspects of the radical constructivist position. In Steier, F. (ed.), Research and Reflexivity Sage, London.Google Scholar
  30. Vriend, N. J. (1994). Self-organized markets in a decentralized economy, Working Paper 94-03-013, Sante Fe Institute, Sante Fe, NM.Google Scholar
  31. Waldrop, M. M. (1992). Complexity: The Emerging Science at the Edge of Order and Chaos Penguin Books, London.Google Scholar
  32. Yates, F. E. (1978). Complexity and the limits to knowledge. Am. J. Physio. 4 201–204.Google Scholar
  33. Zwick, M. (1997). Complexity theory and systems theory. Paper presented at the International Institute for General Systems Studies, Second Workshop, San Marcos, TX.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1999

Authors and Affiliations

  • Steven E. Phelan
    • 1
  1. 1.School of ManagementUniversity of Texas at DallasRichardson

Personalised recommendations