Archives of Sexual Behavior

, Volume 32, Issue 2, pp 165–175 | Cite as

Men's Reports of Nonconsensual Sexual Interactions with Women: Prevalence and Impact

  • Barbara Krahé
  • Renate Scheinberger-Olwig
  • Steffen Bieneck
Article

Abstract

Two studies examined the prevalence and emotional impact of men's nonconsensual sexual interactions with women. The first study included a sample of 247 heterosexual men with a mean age of 18.3 years. The second study was a replication with a sample of 153 heterosexual men with a mean age of 22.3 years. All respondents completed a measure of nonconsensual sexual interactions including the use of three aggressive strategies (physical force, exploitation of the man's incapacitated state, and verbal pressure) and three forms of unwanted sexual contact (kissing/petting, sexual intercourse, and oral sex). In addition, the relationship to the female initiator was explored. For each type of nonconsensual sexual interaction, respondents indicated the affective impact of the experience. In Study 1, 25.1% of respondents reported at least one incident of nonconsensual sex with a woman and 23.9% reported attempts by women to make them engage in nonconsensual sexual activity. In Study 2, the overall prevalence rate for completed nonconsensual sexual interactions was 30.1%, and 23.5% of the men reported attempts at making them engage in nonconsensual sex. In both samples, exploiting the man's inability to offer resistance was the most frequently reported aggressive strategy. Kissing/petting was the most frequently reported unwanted sexual activity, followed by sexual intercourse and oral sex. Prevalence rates were higher for nonconsensual sex with an (ex-)partner or friend than for nonconsensual sex with an unknown women. Ratings of affective impact revealed that men rated their nonconsensual experiences as moderately upsetting. The findings are discussed in the light of previous studies on men's unwanted sexual experiences and the extant literature on women's nonconsensual sexual interactions with men.

sexual aggression men's nonconsensual sex prevalence impact 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

REFERENCES

  1. Anderson, P. B., & Aymami, R. (1993). Reports of female initiation of sexual contact: Male and female differences. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 22, 335–342.Google Scholar
  2. Anderson, P. B., & Struckman-Johnson, C. (Eds.). (1998). Sexually aggressive women. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  3. Baier, J., Rosenzweig, M., & Whipple, E. (1991). Patterns of sexual behavior, coercion, and victimization of university students. Journal of College Student Development, 32, 272–285.Google Scholar
  4. Black, C. A., & DeBlassie, R. R. (1993). Sexual abuse in male children and adolescents: Indicators, effects, and treatment. Adolescence, 28, 123–133.Google Scholar
  5. Briere, J. N., & Runtz, M. (1993). Childhood sexual abuse: Long-term sequelae and implications for psychological assessment. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 8, 312–330.Google Scholar
  6. Byers, E. S., & O'sullivan, L. F. (1998). Similar but different: Men's and women's experiences of sexual coercion. In P. B. Anderson & C. Struckman-Johnson (Eds.), Sexually aggressive women (pp. 144–168). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  7. Davies, M. (2002). Male sexual assault victims: A selective review of the literature and implications for support services. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 7, 203–214.Google Scholar
  8. Hickson, F. C. I., Davies, P. M., Hunt, A. J., Weatherburn, P., McManus, T. J., & Coxon, A. P. M. (1994). Gay men as victims of nonconsensual sex. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 23, 281–294.Google Scholar
  9. Hogben, M., Byrne, D., & Hamburger, M. E. (1996). Coercive hetero-sexual sexuality in dating relationships of college students: Implications of differential male–female experiences. In E. S. Byers & L. F. O'Sullivan (Eds.), Sexual coercion (pp. 69–78). Binghamton, NY: Haworth Press.Google Scholar
  10. King, M., Coxell, A., & Mezey, G. (2002). Sexual molestation of males: Associations with psychological disturbance. British Journal of Psychiatry, 181, 153–157.Google Scholar
  11. Koss, M. P., Gidycz, C. A., & Wisniewski, N. (1987). The scope of rape: Incidence and prevalence of sexual aggression and victimization in a national sample of higher education students. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 55, 162–170.Google Scholar
  12. Koss, M. P., & Oros, C. J. (1982). Sexual experiences survey: A research instrument investigating sexual aggression and victimization. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 50, 455–457.Google Scholar
  13. Krah´ e, B. (2001). The social psychology of aggression. Hove, England: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
  14. Krah´ e, B., Sch¨ utze, S., Fritsche, I., & Waizenh¨ ofer, E. (2000). The prevalence of sexual aggression and victimization among homosexual men. Journal of Sex Research, 37, 142–150.Google Scholar
  15. Landesschulamt Berlin. (2001). Schulabg¨ anger aus ¨ offentlichen und pri-vaten Schulen nach Schulart und Qualifikation. [School leavers of public and private schools by type of school and qualification]. Berlin, Germany: Landesschulamt.Google Scholar
  16. Lane, K., & Gwartney-Gibbs, P. (1985). Violence in the context of dating and sex. Journal of Family Issues, 6, 45–59.Google Scholar
  17. Larimer, M. E., Lydum, A. R., Anderson, B. K., & Turner, A. P. (1999). Male and female recipients of unwanted sexual contact in a college student sample: Prevalence rates, alcohol use, and depression symptoms. Sex Roles, 40, 295–308.Google Scholar
  18. Lott, B., Reilly, M., & Howard, D. (1982). Sexual assault and harassment: A campus community study. Signs, 8, 296–319.Google Scholar
  19. Muehlenhard, C. L., & Cook, S. W. (1988). Men's self-reports of un-wanted sexual activity. Journal of Sex Research, 24, 58–72.Google Scholar
  20. O'sullivan, L. F., Byers, E. S., & Finkelman, L. (1998). A comparison of male and female college students' experiences of sexual coercion. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 22, 177–195.Google Scholar
  21. Poppen, P. J., & Segal, N. J. (1988). The influence of sex and sex role orientation on sexual coercion. Sex Roles, 19, 689–701.Google Scholar
  22. Rind, B., & Tromovich, P. (1997). A meta-analytic review of findings from national samples on psychological correlates of child sexual abuse. Journal of Sex Research, 34, 237–255.Google Scholar
  23. Rind, B., Tromovich, P., & Bauserman, R. (1998). Ameta-analytic exam-inations of assumed properties of child sexual abuse using college samples. Psychological Bulletin, 124, 22–53.Google Scholar
  24. Sandberg, G., Jackson, T., & Petretic-Jackson, P. (1987). College students' attitudes regarding sexual coercion and aggression: De-veloping educational and preventive strategies. Journal of College Student Personnel, 28, 302–311.Google Scholar
  25. Sarrel, P. M., & Masters, W. H. (1982). Sexual molestation of men by women. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 11, 117–131.Google Scholar
  26. Sorenson, S. B., & Siegel, J. M. (1992). Gender, ethnicity, and sexual assault: Findings from a Los Angeles study. Journal of Social Issues, 48, 93–104.Google Scholar
  27. Spitzberg, B. H. (1998). Sexual coercion in dating relationships. In B. H. Spitzberg & W. R. Cupach (Eds.), The dark side of close relation-ships (pp. 179–232). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  28. Spitzberg, B. H. (1999). An analysis of empirical estimates of sexual aggression victimization and perpetration. Violence and Victims, 14, 241–260.Google Scholar
  29. Struckman-Johnson, C. (1988). Forced sex on dates: It happens to men, too. Journal of Sex Research, 24, 234–241.Google Scholar
  30. Struckman-Johnson, C., & Struckman-Johnson, D. (1998). The dynamics and impact of sexual coercion of men by women. In P. B. Anderson & C. Struckman-Johnson (Eds.), Sexually aggressive women (pp. 121–143). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  31. Waldner-Haugrud, L. K., & Magruder, B. (1995). Male and female sexual victimization in dating relationships: Gender differences in coercion techniques and outcomes. Violence and Victims, 10, 203–215.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  • Barbara Krahé
    • 1
  • Renate Scheinberger-Olwig
    • 1
  • Steffen Bieneck
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of PsychologyUniversity of PotsdamPotsdamGermany

Personalised recommendations