Advertisement

Sex Roles

, Volume 48, Issue 3–4, pp 99–113 | Cite as

The Misunderstood Gender: A Model of Modern Femme Identity

  • Heidi M. Levitt
  • Elisabeth A. Gerrish
  • Katherine R. Hiestand
Article

Abstract

Femme identity remains a highly controversial topic. It has been maligned in both heterosexual and queer contexts, and is rarely represented in empirical literature. In this study we examined how femme women experience their own gender identity. Interviews were conducted with femme-identified lesbians; the focus was upon 4 content areas: identity development, experiences in the lesbian community, heterosexual society, and romantic relationships. The interviews were analyzed using Grounded Theory (B. J. Glaser & A. Strauss, 1967), an empirical method of generating models of subjective phenomena. The core category in this model “Maintaining integrity: Upholding beliefs about sexual desire and gender representation” reflects the need to uphold their sense of integrity across a variety of contexts by confronting stereotypes about both women and lesbians.

femme lesbian gender homosexual transgender queer identity 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Austin, P. (1992). Femme-inism. In J. Nestle (Ed.), The persistent desire: A femme–butch reader (pp. 362–366). Boston: Alyson.Google Scholar
  2. Bailey, J. M., Kim, P., Hills, A., & Linsenmeier, J. A.W. (1997). Butch, femme, or straight-acting? Partner preferences of gay men and lesbians. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 960–973.Google Scholar
  3. Burana, L., & Due, L. R. (Eds.). (1994). Dagger: On butch women. San Francisco: Cleis Press.Google Scholar
  4. Butler, J. (1990). Gender trouble: Feminism and the subversion of identity. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  5. Faderman, L. (1991). Odd girls and twilight lovers: A history of lesbian life in twentieth century America. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Feinberg, L. (1996). Transgender warriors: Making history from Joan of Arc to Dennis Rodman. Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
  7. Giorgi, A. (1970). Psychology as a human science: A phenomenological approach. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
  8. Glaser, B. J., & Strauss, A. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Chicago: Aldine.Google Scholar
  9. Halberstam, J. (1998). Female masculinity. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Hale, C. J. (1998). Consumering the living: Dis(re)membering the dead in the butch/FTM borderlands. Journal of Lesbian and Gay Studies, 4, 311–348.Google Scholar
  11. Harris, L., & Crocker, E. (1997). Femme: Feminists, lesbians, and bad girls. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  12. Kitzinger, C. (1987). The social construction of lesbianism. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  13. Laporte, R. (1992). The butch–femme question. In J. Nestle (Ed.), The persistent desire: A femme–butch reader (pp. 208–219). Boston: Alyson.Google Scholar
  14. Lapovsky-Kennedy, E., & Davis, M. D. (1993). Boots of leather, slippers of gold: The history of a lesbian community. New York: Penguin.Google Scholar
  15. Levitt, H. M., & Bigler, M. (2003). Facilitating lesbian gender exploration. In J. S. Whitman & C. J. Boyd (Eds.), The therapist's notebook for lesbian, gay, and bisexual clients. Bingham, NY: Haworth Press.Google Scholar
  16. Levitt, H., & Hiestand, K. (2002). A quest for authenticity: Contemporary butch gender. Manuscript under review.Google Scholar
  17. Levitt, H. M., & Horne, S. G. (2002). Explorations of lesbian–queer genders. Journal of Lesbian Studies, 6(2), 25–39.Google Scholar
  18. Munt, S. (1998). Butch/femme: Inside lesbian gender. Washington, DC: Cassell.Google Scholar
  19. Nestle, J. (1992). The persistent desire. Boston: Alyson.Google Scholar
  20. Nestle, J. (1993). Butch–femme relationships: Sexual Courage in the 1950's. In J. Penelope & S. Wolfe (Eds.), Lesbian culture: An anthology (pp. 107–111). Freedom, CA: The Crossing Press.Google Scholar
  21. Newman, L. (1995). The femme mystique. Boston: Alyson.Google Scholar
  22. Patton, M. Q. (1990). Evaluation and research methods (2nd ed.) Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  23. Pearcey, S. M., Docherty, K. J., & Dabbs, J. M., Jr. (1996). Testosterone and sex role identification in lesbian couples. Physiology and Behavior, 60, 1033–1035.Google Scholar
  24. Rennie, D. L., Phillips, J. R., & Quartaro, G. K. (1988). Grounded theory: A promising approach to conceptualization in psychology? Canadian Psychology, 29, 139–150.Google Scholar
  25. Ruby, J. (1993). A lesbian feminist fucks with gender. Off Our Backs, 28(8, pt.1) 4.Google Scholar
  26. Singh, D., Vidaurri, M., Zambarano, R. J., & Dabbs, J. M., Jr. (1999). Lesbian erotic role identification: Behavioral, morphological, and hormonal correlates. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76, 1035–1049.Google Scholar
  27. Smith, C. A., & Stillman, S. (2002). Butch/Femme in the personal advertisements of lesbians. Journal of Lesbian Studies, 6, 45–51.Google Scholar
  28. Vaisseau, R. (1995). I am not a straight girl. In L. Newman (Ed.), The femme mystique (pp. 30–32). Los Angeles: Alyson.Google Scholar
  29. Weber, J. C. (1996). Social class as a correlate of gender identity among lesbian women. Sex Roles, 35, 271–280.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  • Heidi M. Levitt
    • 1
  • Elisabeth A. Gerrish
    • 1
  • Katherine R. Hiestand
    • 1
  1. 1.University of MemphisMemphis

Personalised recommendations

Cite article

Buy options