Systemic Practice and Action Research

, Volume 12, Issue 4, pp 355–366 | Cite as

Innovation Versus Environmental Protection Presumptions

  • David L. Hawk

Abstract

The paper is about negotiating with issues that discourage innovation. The subject is environmental deterioration, with concern directed at the impediments that keep it from being innovatively resolved. The paper is organized around three issues. (1) The dominant model of environmental concern, called environmental protection, is managed predominantly via command and control approaches. (2) Command and control, by relying on analytical segmentation to subdivide the problem into digestible bits and using formal legislation to direct it, are not up to emerging challenges in the area. (3) More robust models are available but difficult to experiment with due to impediments that discourage change. These impediments are seen in ideals associated with protection, prevention, recycling, and sustainability that tend to do more to sustain harmful practices than to seek beneficial alternatives. Being able to appreciate the underlying restrictions of entropy could help stimulate a more innovative agenda. These issues are tested via a project funded by the EPA entitled ENERGY STAR Homes.

appreciation change environment entropy experimentation impediments innovation negotiation values 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

REFERENCES

  1. Ackoff, R. (1974). Redesigning the Future John Wiley & Sons, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.Google Scholar
  2. Angyal, A. (1941). Foundations for a Theory of Personality Viking Press, New York (especially Chap. 4).Google Scholar
  3. Davies, P. C. (1974). The Physics of Time Asymmetry Surrey University Press, London.Google Scholar
  4. Emery, F. E., and Trist, E. L. (1973). Towards a Social Ecology: Contextual Appreciations of the Future in the Present Plenum, London, p. vii.Google Scholar
  5. Hardin, G. (1968). The tragedy of the commons. Science 162 1244.Google Scholar
  6. Hardin, G. (1998). Extensions of “The Tragedy of the Commons.” Science 280 682.Google Scholar
  7. Hawk, D. L. (1977). Environmental Deterioration: Analytic Solutions in Search of Synthetic Problems Institute of International Business Series, Stockholm School of Economics, Stockholm, Sweden, Vols. 1–3.Google Scholar
  8. Hawk, D. L. (1979). Regulation of Environmental Deterioration Dissertation, Social Systems Sciences Program, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.Google Scholar
  9. Kaufmann, W. (1980). Discovering the Mind McGraw-Hill, New York, p. 25.Google Scholar
  10. Laszlo, E. (1972). The Relevance of General Systems Theory George Braziller, New York.Google Scholar
  11. MISTRA (1998). The Theory and Practice of Interdisciplinary Work, Conference of the Foundation for Strategic Environmental Research and the Council for Planning and Co-ordination of Research, Mistra, Stockholm, Sweden, pp. 3–4.Google Scholar
  12. New York Times (1998). Physical laws collide in a black hole bet, April 7, p.F1.Google Scholar
  13. Popper, K. (1958). The arrow of time. Nature 177 538.Google Scholar
  14. Science Now (1998). Science Magazine Web Site, 1070/1.Google Scholar
  15. Schimel, D. S. (1955). In Houghton, J. T., et al. (eds.), Climate Change 1994: Radiative Forcing of Climate Change Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 39–71.Google Scholar
  16. Thomson, W. (1852). On a universal tendency. In Proceedings of the Royal Society of Edinburgh, Vol. 3 p. 139. [In Price, H. (1996). Time's Arrow & Archimedes' Point Oxford University Press: New York.]Google Scholar
  17. Vitousek, P. (1999). Human domination of Earth's ecosystems. Science 1/26 5325.Google Scholar
  18. von Bertalanffy, L. (1968). General System Theory George Braziller, New York, p. 39.Google Scholar
  19. Watzlawick et al. (1974). Change: Principles of Problem Formation and Problem Resolution Norton, New York.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1999

Authors and Affiliations

  • David L. Hawk
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.School of ManagementNew Jersey Institute of TechnologyNewark
  2. 2.Department of Industrial ManagementHelsinki University of TechnologyFinland

Personalised recommendations