Verisimilitude and the Dynamicsof Scientific Research Programmes
- 44 Downloads
Some peculiarities of the evaluation of theories within scientific research programmes (SRPs) and of the assessing of rival SRPs are described assuming that scientists try to maximise an ‘epistemic utility function’ under economic and institutional constraints. Special attention is given to Lakatos' concepts of ‘empirical progress’ and ‘theoretical progress’. A notion of ‘empirical verisimilitude’ is defended as an appropriate utility function. The neologism ‘methodonomics’ is applied to this kind of studies.
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Howson, C. and Urbach, P.: 1989, Scientific Reasoning. The Bayesian Approach, Open Court, La Salle (Ill.).Google Scholar
- Kitcher, P.: 1993, The Advancement of Science, Oxford University Press, New York.Google Scholar
- Kuhn, T. S.: 1962, The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar
- Kuipers, T. (ed.): 1987, What is closer-to-the-truth?, Rodopi, Amsterdam.Google Scholar
- Kuipers, T.: 1991, ‘Revisiting the Hypothetico-Deductive Method’, Acta Philosophica Groningana 3.Google Scholar
- Popper, K. R.: 1962, ‘Truth, Rationality and the Development of Knowledge’, in Conjectures and Refutations, Routledge, London.Google Scholar
- Zamora Bonilla, J. P.: 1996a, Mentiras a medias (in Spanish), Ediciones de la Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Madrid.Google Scholar
- Zamora Bonilla, J. P.: 1999, ‘The Elementary Economics of Scientific Consensus’, Theoria 14.3, 461–88.Google Scholar